Website Redesign and Migration to Squarespace killed my Ranking
-
My old website was dated, ugly, impossible to update and a mess between hard-coded pages and WP, but we were ranking #1 in the organic searches for our key words.
I just redesigned my website using Squarespace. I kept most of the same text on the pages (for key words) and kept the same Meta-Tags and Title Tags for each page as much as possible.
Once I was satisfied that I had done as much on-page optimization as I could, I changed the IP in our Domain Name Registry so that it would point to our new website on the Squarespace host. And our new website was live!
...Then I watched in dismay as our ranking fell into oblivion.
I think this might have something to do with not doing any 301 redirects from the old website and losing all of my link juice.
Is this the case? And, if so, how do I fix it?
Our website url is www.kanataskinclinic.ca
Thanks
-
Really sorry to hear the new site is still struggling, Nicolas. In some quick indexing tests, it certainly appears that your blog posts are being indexed, and I'm seeing them in the search results for the specific post titles. [See screenshot attached] It's possible this may have picked up in the 10 days since you posted this.
I'm assuming you submitted your site's xml sitemap to the correct www version of your Google Search Console? What does the sitemaps report indicate as far as the number of pages indexed compared the number submitted?
Certainly one of the tradeoffs of a site tool like Squarespace is that you have far less control of the code to implement technical SEO, but it shouldn't be so problematic that you lose rankings completely.
If you're interested, I'd be happy to share a short Skype chat to try to narrow down the issues. You can send me a private message through my account here at Moz.
Paul
-
Why thank you! Did some of that info help you out as well?
p.
-
Hi Paul,
Thanks for your detailed response. And sorry for the delay in my reply. I am currently focused on updating my knowledge on SEO as much as possible so that I can figure out what happened to our website ranking.
I have re-directed all the major pages on my website, and continue to redirect pages as I come across them, but there are fewer and fewer and I don't think they're very important.
I did discover some other troubling problems, though: I tried using the "view as text" feature of Google Cache to see how Google sees our site....And it looks terrible!
- There is a lot of duplicate content, including page titles, which is horrifying.
- Duplicate and even triplicate content arises where I used their carousels and sliders,
- The images do not have their original filenames, just some generic SquareSpace "static" name.
- There is little, if any alt text, and I'm not always sure where it comes from, as I didn't put it there.
To make matters worse, even though our website has been live for over a month, and I have submitted it to Google for indexing several times already, my blog posts still do not show up on Google. Even the ones that are featured on our home page. Even if you type their titles right into Google's search bar.
Ugh! It took me several months to build our new website, and I was very proud of the result. It looks beautiful. But, if it's that ugly to Google, I'm going to have to look for other options.
-
Paul, you rock!
-
Most welcome - happy to see another Canuck hereabouts My mom's just down the road from you in Arnprior.
If you were able to get the initial broken links review corrected within two weeks, that's great - not much of the authority should have dissipated.
However to note - the 404s in Search Console aren't the only ones that need to be fixed - they're just the ones Google has noticed and alerted you to so far. The problem with relying on GSC to tell you what to fix is that, by the time it has shown up in the Console, Google has already hit a 404 and been told it's a missing page. It's totally reactive, instead of proactive.
I'd strongly recommend you also use the other methods I mentioned to get more of the old URLs found & redirected as well before Google notices they're borked. It's also ideal if you can try to get the owners of the most valuable sites that linked to you in the past to update their links to point directly to the new pages. It's a bit of a battle, but even just a few updated can make a difference.
As far as how long until "link juice starts flowing" by which I assume you mean "rankings and traffic start to return" - the only real answer is "it depends", I'm afraid. You'll want to submit your new sitemap to GSC so that you can track the progress of the indexing of your new site's pages (on Squarespace, the URL to submit is www.kanataskinclinic.ca/sitemap.xml). You should also do this for Bing's Webmaster Tools.
Since URLs and content have changed, it's going to take some time for your site to fully re-index and for Google to understand the value of the new content. Could be from a few weeks to a month. It would also help to submit a few of the main section pages using the Fetch as Google tool in GSC and to get some new, strong incoming links to the site's pages. Good social links, and at least one or two new ones from relevant sites.
Lemme know if you have further ??s
Paul
-
Just to clarify, our new website was just launched two weeks ago. Hopefully, I haven't lost too much power from the old links?
-
Hi P.
Thank you so much for your informative reply.
I took your advice and went into my Google Search Console and checked for 404 errors. Google made it easy by listing all of the broken URLs. They even thoughtfully allowed me to download the list into a Google Doc so that I could keep track of my work as I fixed them.
I then went into my SquareSpace control panel and added 301 redirects for the broken pages. It was surprisingly easy to do, and they provided very clear, step-by-step instructions to help.
After doing this, I checked my Google Search Console to see if anything had changed. I was pleasantly surprised to see that the redirects were working immediately. Wow, fast!
Now that this problem is resolved, how soon does the link juice start flowing? In other words, how soon do you think it will affect our ranking?
-
And just to add - there is a shelf life on recovering all that page and link equity. The longer those old URLs 404, the more of the power of the old pages will erode away.
Two month is a long time - don't dally on getting those redirects started immediately.
P.
-
Regardless of the possible issues with the new design, yes, if you changed to new URLs on the new site and didn't implement correct 301-redirects from all the old URLs, you have essentially thrown away all the ranking authority and inbound links contributed by all of your old pages except the home page.
Since most homepages only rank for a small portion of the total number of terms for an established website, that's the primary cause of your immediate problem.
To fix it, you have some hard work ahead of you to capture as many of the old URLs as possible and write redirects to the new URLs. These old pages can be captured in a number of ways. The easiest initial method is to look up all the 404 errors in you Google Search Console, sort them by date, then start fixing all the ones after the date of the site change.
You can also use your Analytics data - create a report of all the page URLs of your site that received traffic in the year before the change, then sort them by highest traffic to prioritise where to start creating rewrites. You can also capture the current 404 errors in your Analytics data for high-priority pages to get redirected.
For a final more high tech solution, you can use Screaming Frog SEO Crawler to crawl the archive.org WayBack Machine version of your site to capture as many old URLs as possible.
Hope all that makes sense?
Paul
-
Not using 301s could be a big part of the problem. Do your old backlinks all point to existing pages on the new domain?
-
Hello,
According to Wayback machine, you've migrated your website after April,13.
https://web.archive.org/web/20160413071802/http://www.kanataskinclinic.ca/
We can see clearly that you have changed everything ! Design, photos... So you've changed the UX ! Text is important but Google takes user engagement into account, and if users are not reassured by your new design, you will never get back your positions ! In old design buttons are clearly identifiable, it's more simple to navigate, some menus are youseful like "Why choose us ?"... I think you'd better improve old design and navigation and forget the new one !
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Lost Rankings Late April Even Though We Have A Mobile Site
I have noticed a significant drop in rankings since late April. It is about a 30% drop in organic from Google. This is despite the fact that we launched a mobile site before the update. What gives? Any thoughts or suggestions would be appreciated.
Web Design | | inhouseseo0 -
Best Approach to Rank For Multiple Locations With Similar Targeted Keywords
I'm trying to determine the best way to set up a website to rank for a similar set of keyword phrases in three different cities. The keyword phrases I want to rank for are all pretty much the same with the only difference being the city associated with the keyword phrase. For example, "Austin water restoration" vs "San Antonio water restoration" vs "Houston water restoration". Each city needs about 7 or 8 pages of unique content to accurately target the group of keywords I'm trying to rank for. My initial thought was to write up unique content for each city and have each city act a site within the main site. For example, the main navigation for xyz.com/austin would be Austin specific, so when you land on xyz.com/austin and go to Services - Water Restoration, it would be all Austin specific content. The same would be true for San Antonio and Houston. The only problem with this approach is that I have to build up the page authority for a lot of different pages. It would be much easier to build up the page authority for one Water Restoration page and just insert a little "Areas we serve" on the page that includes "Austin, San Antonio, and Houston" and maybe work the coverage area in again at the bottom of the page somewhere. However, it would be much more difficult to work "Austin, San Antonio, and Houston" into the title tags and H1s though, and I couldn't logically work the cities into the content as much either. That would be a downside to this approach. Any thoughts on this? Wondering how large companies with hundreds of locations typically approach this? I'd really appreciate your input.
Web Design | | shaycw0 -
Link juice passing from a .org.uk link to a .org/uk websites
Hi all, A client I am working on had a CMS built in recently which has resulted in all their canonicals tags being taken off the website, and as such the same page with both a .org/uk and .org.uk/uk domain have appeared in the search results and I am wondering what your guys take is on the best cause of action. For further background: Historically they have always used .org.uk/uk (not sure why) for their UK website and used .org/xxx for other countries (they also have a .org splashpage FYI). Having seen the .org/uk pages, and knowing they have to choose one to avoid duplication, they would like to move their uk website to the .org/uk domain to fit in with the rest of the divisions. However due to the historical use of .org.uk/uk their backlink profile contains links to both the .org.uk and .org domains. My question then: would a canonical tag on all the .org.uk/uk pages pointing to the .org/uk pages be strong enough to pass on link juice to the .org/uk pages (from all links pointing to .org.uk) or would a 301 redirect be required in this instance, or indeed would it be best to stay with the .org.uk/uk domain? Thanks, Diana
Web Design | | Diana.varbanescu0 -
Website Redesign SEO Checklist
I am looking for a comprehensive Website Redesign SEO Checklist. One of my customers is changing its website design (including URL structure) and I need all kinds of suggestions for a smooth SEO operation. Thanks in advance!
Web Design | | stradiji0 -
Does stock art photo attribution negatively impact SEO by leaking Google Page Rank?
Greetings: Companies such as Shutterstock often require that buyers place credit attribution on their web pages when photos you buy from them appear on these pages.. Shutterstock requests that credit attribution links such as these be added: Songquan Deng / Shutterstock.com Do these links negatively impact SEO? Or do search engines view them as a positive? Thanks,
Web Design | | Kingalan1
Alan0 -
Getting a highly ranked site a better result for 1 search term
I have a highly ranked website for a niche category. My site ranks higher in SEOMOZ than all of my competitors, but I can't get any higher than 4th on a page for one specific search term. What can I do to help my site increase its ranking on a specific search term?
Web Design | | tadden0 -
How do I learn how to build custom wordpress websites?
Is wordpress a good platform to build websites with? If so, what are some good resources to learn how to build custom websites using wordpress?
Web Design | | Lael0 -
Website redesign testing environment
An external company is redesigning our website. They have a draft version active in a folder on their website to enable us to view it (example: www.externalcompanywebsite.com/ourwebsite/). There is no permission required to view the website, anyone with the url could just go there. I am not sure if they're using the robots.txt to block crawlers, or if they're blocking specific ip addresses. If the engines are allowed to crawl their website and they index pages of our draft website, does that affect our website negatively in the future once we host it on our domain?
Web Design | | jdossetti0