Google appending keyword to local search result(s)?
-
I noticed an interesting change today in how one of my clients appears in the SERPs. Google seems to be appending a keyword to his listing title.
Client website: www.mycalgarydentist.com
Keyword: Calgary dentist
Rank: #2 or #1 lately
Title tag: Calgary Dentist | Ambiance Dental
Google+ Local listing title: Ambiance Dental
Link title in SERP: Ambiance Dental: Calgary Dentist
That last point is what's interesting, and new. As of a couple weeks ago (before I went on holidays) his link would simply show "Ambiance Dental", which makes sense because that's the title of his Google+ Local listing.
Given the above information, I can't see why his link in Google's SERP is "Ambiance Dental: Calgary Dentist" when doing a search for that keyword. When I do a search for "Calgary dentists" or other similar searches, he simply shows as "Ambiance Dental", not "Ambiance Dental: Calgary Dentists"
To test yourself, use the Google AdWords Preview Tool (https://adwords.google.com/d/AdPreview/), change locality to "Calgary, AB, Canada" and search.
I suspect this doesn't mean he's violating Google's guidelines for business listings (i.e. businesses aren't supposed to add keywords to their business title). I'm certainly curious why this is happening though.
Can anyone provide any insight? Has anyone seen anything similar?
-
Hi guys, I see this as well for a client we have in a competitive space.
It's a little difficult to understand, because it tends to apply to only particular pages of a domain (please check by using site:yourdomain.com and view all titles)
There seems to be no correlation at all.
It could be a conversion / click through test for Google.
-
Hi Paul,
Thanks for the thorough response. Just what I was looking for, and that has opened my eyes to the discussion a bit more, and helped to explain it.
As for "Calgary dentist" being the term that Google is re-writing, maybe it has to do with the extensive focus on that keyword on the home page, and in link building? It could be more evident as the site's name than "Ambiance Dental", which is the actual business. Just a thought.
I guess I'll keep my eye on this. If there's anything particularly interesting, I may post a response here as well.
PS - Canmore, awesome.
-
Quite a few people have been noticing this over the last several weeks, KC.
It was mentioned a week ago on Search Engine Roundtable and I was discussing it with another Calgary SEO who had noticed it over 3 weeks ago.
There have been a number of suggestions about when Google's doing this kind of title tag re-writing, but no sooner does someone come up with a theory, but somebody else shows proof that contradicts it. E.g. for a while it was thought the re-writing was occurring for brand searches, especially where the brand name was split off at the end of the title by a separator like a hyphen or a pipe pipe. But your example shows for a keyword search, rather than brand.
It really looks to me that Google is experimenting with this. I've seen it come and go, and it is in no way consistent at this point, which is why nobody seems to have been able to nail down a specific set of circumstances in which it occurs.
Sorry this doesn't really give you any actionable info. Just wanted you to know that others have been seeing it recently as well.
Paul
P.S. And hi from just down the highway in Canmore!
-
Thanks for the input, Dave.
I have never seen this for any of my other clients, nor any competitors in the local space. And I find it interesting that...
(a) my client's listing didn't appear this way before and...
(b) the way the link is shown doesn't actually match the title tag. In the title tag I have the keyword first. Do you still think the new link test is related to the title tag, or could it be something else?
Has anyone else seen similar behaviour with their listings, or competitors?
If it's understood WHY this might happen, I could make changes to encourage it for my other clients. And others could learn and do the same.
-
I see this all the time. Usually when a pipe "|" or a comma is used in the Title tag. I can't say I know why it's happening though.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Drupal, http/https, canonicals and Google Search Console
I’m fairly new in an in-house role and am currently rooting around our Drupal website to improve it as a whole. Right now on my radar is our use of http / https, canonicals, and our use of Google Search Console. Initial issues noticed: We serve http and https versions of all our pages Our canonical tags just refer back to the URL it sits on (apparently a default Drupal thing, which is not much use) We don’t actually have https properties added in Search Console/GA I’ve spoken with our IT agency who migrated our old site to the current site, who have recommended forcing all pages to https and setting canonicals to all https pages, which is fine in theory, but I don’t think it’s as simple as this, right? An old Moz post I found talked about running into issues with images/CSS/javascript referencing http – is there anything else to consider, especially from an SEO perspective? I’m assuming that the appropriate certificates are in place, as the secure version of the site works perfectly well. And on the last point – am I safe to assume we have just never tracked any traffic for the secure version of the site? 😞 Thanks John
Technical SEO | | joberts0 -
Google + and Google Knoladge Graph
I am trying to get things to match up for the company brand websearch and the Google + page and we have had it for years now The knowledge graph on Google is showing the map, address and name (shown in attached image), but is not linked to a G+ page, as when i click the "Are you the business owner?" its is trying to make me create a new G+ business page. Anyone have any ideas on this? Also does the wiki name have to be exact for it to show? As for phone number would that be coming from the DNS record as that is nowhere in the markup rich snippet or normal markup Thanks in advance LC9cWdG
Technical SEO | | David-McGawn0 -
301 Redirect to add juice from Keyword A to Keyword B
Here's our situation: Our company sells Employee HANDBOOKS (the book that explains to employees how the company itself is run, more or less). That's the technically correct term for them. However, many people use this term interchangeably with Employee MANUALS. Employee MANUALS are actually slightly different. (they're more specific, usually a list of common office policies and procedures and how to do them) When doing Keyword research, we learned that many, many people search for Employee MANUALS when they actually are interested in an employee HANDBOOK. We've got our page optimized for the Keyword Employee HANDBOOKS, because in our copy we always refer to it as such. Here's my question: Would it be "cloacking" or some other blackhat nonsense if we did this: #1. Take a copy of the current page, and make a second page for it with a slightly different URL, but optimize the SEO-relevant parts for the phrase Employee MANUAL. #2. That page will also include a 301-redirect towards the original page, which is identical except the SEO bits are optimized for Employee HANDBOOKS. My understanding here is that we'd get the SEO juice from the phrase Employee Manual, without actually having to do the upkeep on two different pages. We also avoid having to have a random page SEO optimized for an improper term just because of the general confusion about what the product is called. Are we on the right track here? Or is this going to annoy Google, or not have the result I'm predicting? Any insight is appreciated!
Technical SEO | | CEDRSolutions0 -
What's Moz's Strategy behind their blog main categories?
I've only just noticed that the Moz' blog categories have been moved within a pull down menu. See it underneath : 'Explore Posts by Category' on any blog page. This means that the whole list of categories under that pull-down is not crawlable by bots, and therefore no link-juice flows down onto those category pages. I imagine that the main drive behind that move is to sculpt page rank so that the business/money pages or areas of the website get greater link equity as opposed to just wasting it all throwing it down to the many categories ? it'd be good to hear about more from Rand or anyone in his team as to how they came onto engineering this and why. One of the things I wonder is: with the sheer amount of content that Moz produces, is it possible to contemplate an effective technical architecture such as that? I know they do a great job at interlinking content from one post onto another, so effectively one can argue that that kind of supersedes the need for hierarchical page rank distribution via categories... but I wonder : "is it working better this way vs having crawlable blog category links on the blog section? have they performed tests" some insights or further info on this from Moz would be very welcome. thanks in advance
Technical SEO | | carralon
David0 -
How to: Sub headings appears in google results
I notice that many sites have sub headings appearing below their google results. http://i.imgur.com/A5JxMKD.png
Technical SEO | | kevinbp
See image for example. Q: what are these called? and how do we get them? A5JxMKD.png1 -
Google instant results different to results shown when press enter
A client's site, www.duorol.co.uk is top (or second if a youtube video makes an appearance) for the term duorol if you press enter after typing it in to google UK. Before you press enter though, their site is not listed in the results bought back for instant search. It's the same behaviour in incognito mode too. Very weird I thought. Does anyone have any ideas please? Their site's only been live about a month. Could that be anything to do with it?
Technical SEO | | OffSightIT0 -
Why is a site search query being returned in SE results
Hello One of my top targeted keywords is now linking to the results page of an internal site search query (the search query is for my site url). Oddly, this page does not contain the targeted keywords. My site url used to be the highest ranking page for my targeted keywords. Can anybody advise why this is happening and how I can change it? Thanks Nick
Technical SEO | | PP_user0