Do links count if they have no href parameter?
-
A SEOmoz report indicates that we have a large number of links on our pages, mainly due to an embedded mega-drop down and lots of product display options that are user activated, but otherwise hidden.
Most of the links have the paramter href="#", because the links are used in combination with jQuery to trigger actions.
It is still possible to trigger the actions without the href parameter, so the question is:
- Do links without href parameters count towards the total amount of links on the page, since a link without a href parameter is actually an internal page link?
Our site (this version of the site has not had empty tags removed):
-
Taken from http://pro.seomoz.org/tools/on-page-keyword-optimization
Avoid Excessive External Links
<dl>
<dt>Explanation</dt>
<dd>Linking externally is generally a good thing, but as with many optimization tactics in SEO, moderation is the best path. Employing a high number of followed external links may prevent the engines from passing much value through any given link and can also trigger potential issues of spam/manipulation (particularly if those links are not pointing to high quality/trustworthy sites).</dd>
<dd>
Avoid Excessive Internal Links
<dl>
<dt>Explanation</dt>
<dd>Employing an excessive quantity of internal-pointing links may not directly harm the value of a page, but it can influence the quanity of link juice sent through those links and dilute it's ability to help get link targets crawled, indexed and ranked.</dd>
<dt>Recommendation</dt>
<dd>Scale down the number of internal links to fewer than 100 (preferrably), and, at a minimum, fewer than 300</dd>
</dl>
</dd>
</dl>
-
Thanks for the feedback and the link to the analyser. I ran our production site through the analyser and got:
This tag contains 229 urls. Some Search Engines have problems with more than 100 urls on a page.
However, when I ran the same page on our development site (without empty hrefs) I got:
This tag contains 143 urls. Some Search Engines have problems with more than 100 urls on a page.
Which seems to indicate that removing empty hrefs will decrease the total number of links.
Did I understand correctly that 100 links on a page is not a problem if they are outbound, but it could be an issue if they are inner links, because some might not be picked up?
-
I ran your URL through http://www.submitexpress.com/analyzer/ and it picked up 221 links on page/URL's so to answer your question I'd say yes they do. Although as far as I'm aware having more than 100 links on your page is not a problem, provided that it's 100 or less outbound links and not inner links.
Another thing to comtemplate is that if I turn javascript off I can't navigate your site at all, this might be worth looking into
http://code.google.com/web/ajaxcrawling/docs/learn-more.html
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Broken canonical link errors
Hello, Several tools I'm using are returning errors due to "broken canonical links". However, I'm not too sure why is that. Eg.
Technical SEO | | GhillC
Page URL: domain.com/page.html?xxxx
Canonical link URL: domain.com/page.html
Returns an error. Any idea why? Am I doing it wrong? Thanks,
G1 -
Is this an OK back link profile?
Hi Guys I have worked throug this SEOMoz article to examine our back link profile http://www.seomoz.org/blog/how-to-check-which-links-can-harm-your-sites-rankings This is an image of the chart I ended up with. http://bit.ly/Z7Pp1G Does this look like an OK back link profile? Should I be doing something about the high number of 0 and -1/NA rank links? Thanks Paul backlinkprofile.gif
Technical SEO | | TheUniqueSEO0 -
Internal Link Analysis Tool
I want to get a better handle on what internal link text (and co-occurance if possible) my site currently has. We have a lot of old blog articles that provide link juice back to the main site, but with thousands of pages, we never kept track of when we internally link to a page. Are there any tools that will provide an analysis of this? OpenSiteExplorer seems like a very tedious way to do it and it didn't appear to be 100% accurate. Also, are there any tools that will provide analysis and recommendations based on keywords targeted?
Technical SEO | | TheDude0 -
Number of links you should have on a taxonomy term??
According to SeoMoz, my taxonomy terms contain more than 100 links (links to articles in my case) and it tells me that I should reduce it. I have seen a video by Matt Cutts, the google software engineer, and in that video he said that Google's engine has dramatically improved ever since and 100 is not the limit anymore. What do you guys think is the best practice here? To clarify the subject even more: I want to learn this from link juice perspective, does it effect how link juice is distributed? Let's say I have 5 taxonomy terms and all of them have 200 articles and these 5 terms are listed on the home page of a PR7 website. In this case some of the PR will be passed to these 5 taxonomy terms. However, if I increase taxonomy terms to 10, then i will reduce links to 100, but the PR will be distributed even more. This means each taxonomy term will have even less PR value. Am I wrong? Any ideas?
Technical SEO | | mertsevinc0 -
Should I no follow all external links?
I have worked with a few different SEO firms lately and a lot of them have recommended on the sites I was working on to "no-follow" all external links on the site. On one hand this traps all the link equity/Pagerank. On the other I would think this practice is frowned upon by Google. What are some opinions on this?
Technical SEO | | MarloSchneider0 -
Too many on page links
Yes this question again. I know it get's asked a lot and I know of a few fixes, but this one I'm having a problem with. So we have a fan gallery on our site which is not only causing duplicate page titles, which I'm thinking we can fix with a canonical, but also too many on page links. The issue is this is on drupal which I have very little experience with and it seems to just be located within the fan galleries section of the site. After looking at a few things I know that no-follow wont be an option since from what I read it wont really work anyway so I was wondering if anyone else has an asnwer. I just read through a million articles trying to find a simular situation and can't seem to find anyone with the same thing. It might have something to do with the plugins the programmers used, but my inexperience with drupal is making this difficult. Thanks guys.
Technical SEO | | KateGMaker0 -
Removing links from another site
Hello, Some site that I have never been able to access as it is always down has over 3,000 links to my website. They disappeared the other week and our search queries dramatically improved but now they are back again in Google Webmaster and we have dropped again.I have contacted the site owner and got no response and I have also put in a removal form (though I am not sure this fits for that) and asked Google to remove as they have been duplicating our content also. It was in my pending section but has now disappeared.This links are really damaging our search and the site isnt even there. Do I have to list all 3,000 links in the link removal to Google or is there another way I can go about telling them the issue.Appreciate any help on this
Technical SEO | | luwhosjack0 -
Value of Twitter Links
Let's ignore the "social metric" value of Twitter links and mentions and look at it from the pure link juice point of view. Twitter accounts such as http://twitter.com/randfish used to have their own PageRank and were treated as separate URLs. Twitter changed that to http://twitter.com/#!/randfish consolidating all their content to a single URL. When I search for "randfish" in Google, however, the result is the first URL version. Some clarification on this matter would be much appreciated.
Technical SEO | | Dan-Petrovic0