Freedom from Google
-
I was looking at a blog site and the owner is claiming a very high number of hits per day, I forget maybe it was 200,000 a month or something like that. His site is about "self improvement" so it is a general interest site, so I understand traffic is high for this type of site.
The interesting thing is that he claims that he gets only 1.5% of his traffic from Google. The rest is mostly referred traffic that he gets from other blogs and sites where they have posted his link and people actually click on it. NOw while a lawyer site is unlikely to ever be popular like that, ithe idea of having an internet marketing strategy that is not subject to the vagaries of Google , the Panda and other algorithm changes, etc is quite interesting. This guy said that he has totally emphasized having great content and not SEO tactics or marketing tactics.
Would this concept make sense on a lawyer site? Does anyone have any thoughts?
thx
Paul
-
Hi Paul,
Great answers from Ryan and EGOL.
The other thing to keep in mind is that traffic doesn't automatically equal business.
While it may seem attractive to be "free from Google" and other search engines, there is an important consideration that must not be forgotten.
If the Lion's share of your traffic is perhaps from RSS subscribers or referrals from more general sites, how many of those visits are actually delivering you people who need a lawyer?
When I need a lawyer for myself or a family member (when my need is immediate and I am ready to contact the one that seems best able to help me), what am I going to do?
Will I:
- Look for a blog to subscribe to?
- Surf around and read other websites looking for links to lawyers that might help me?
- Go to my favorite search engine and search on a term that will take me straight to a list of local law firms in that practice area?
While diversity of traffic sources is important, the reality is that if they were not the most useful means of finding what you want on the web, search engines would not still hold the place they do.
I have a number of clients who are lawyers and would agree that the approach Ryan has described for you is the best way to go. In addition to that I would say that the key in developing content for them has always been remembering the mindset of the client. A person who needs a lawyer is a person who needs help. The practice area and seriousness of the situation will dictate what type of help.
Hope that helps,
Sha
-
Lots of people who have kickass traffic from sources outside of Google are getting that traffic from subscriptions. If you have a blog that has, say 20,000 email and RSS subscribers and you post every day, then you could easily get x00,000 visitors per month from your subscribers.
You could also get a lot of traffic by having your blog feed posted out to your facebook and twitter accounts. If you have a lot of friends and followers it will get passed along.
The key to getting big traffic outside of search is developing an Audience.
-
This guy said that he has totally emphasized having great content and not SEO tactics or marketing tactics.
For the most part, great content is the cornerstone of solid white hat SEO and marketing.
Work such as optimizing meta tags, robots.txt files and similar search engine specific activities are an extremely small percentage of a SEO's time. A much better use of time is spent on content related activities. A few examples:
-
determine which topics are most popular. You can write a fantastic legal article on the insanity defense, but how many people are interested in that topic? You may find a "how to beat a speeding ticket" article will be a LOT more popular.
-
ensure the topics are relevant to your services. Perhaps you are a one attorney office and you specialize in the insanity defense. In that case, even if your main topic is unpopular, you can only handle one client at a time so the insanity article would be the best topic.
-
the basic English and marketing strategies you have learned in school are all relevant to great content. Grabbing the reader's attention with a title such as "How I beat my last 7 speeding tickets" is often very successful. Writing articles in a wikipedia like fashion is not done for search engines, but for readers. See how they do it: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speeding_ticket
-
proper "link building" shouldn't be about grabbing links for search engine purposes, but instead earning links for direct traffic.
Try this approach. Pretend Google and search engines did not exist. Now write your articles and try to popularize them. What would you do differently? For my part, nothing would change with respect to the content itself.
Some suggestions: write the best article you can, let everyone know about it via social networking (twitter, facebook, etc), publicize the article anywhere you can think of where readers can find it. These tactics will be great for direct traffic, but they will also be great for search engines as well. Realistically speaking, if you provide great content and present it properly, you can promote your web pages "normally" without adjusting for search engines and the pages should do very well in search results.
PS. Please forgive my judgment, and I humbly admit I could be wrong, but I call bullsh*t on the guy who claims 200k visitors a day with 1.5% being from Google. It is entirely possible, but would be a very poor business strategy. The site is likely either in Russia or another country where Google is not a factor, or it is highly probable the statements are severely inaccurate or misleading.
-
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Hi. One of our competitors is ranking ahead of us on Google. Our site has a much stronger authority and much more quality links than this competitor. Would anyone have any explanations for this? Thanks
Hi Guys - I've noticed recently that one of our competitors is ranking extremely well on Google, while we seem to be fluctuating, along with other competitors, for our main keywords. Our site has a much stronger authority and much more quality links than this competitor and traffic is continuously increasing each month. Would anyone have any explanations as to why we may be seeing this? Any help would be greatly appreciated, thanks.
Link Building | | barryhq0 -
Does google flag bad back links
where would we go identify the links that are bad is there a way to get a list of each individual link not just the site and number from the site
Link Building | | CostumeD0 -
Penguin,No warning message from Google
I'm losing traffic & I have been since April. I'm pretty sure it's Penguin but I have not received any messages from Google. Should I proceed with the disavowal tool to remove some of the spammy directory links? PS Submit Edge is owned by the Devil
Link Building | | KrisPhoto0 -
Total Links vs Google Webmaster Site Links
I am interested why the numbers between SEOmoz and Google are so different. In SEOmoz we only show 17,000ish links from 190ish domains. In Google, we show 200,000+ links from 370 domains. Why is there such a dramatic difference?
Link Building | | webspecdesign0 -
Which is the best link building method after Google penguin update & why?
We are currently offering our client pre penguin these activities for link building: Local listing Directory submission bookmarking article submission blog comment guest post business review squidoo lens Forum posting infograhics My questions is which is the best link building method and is there any activity that is redundant now. thanks
Link Building | | conversiontactics0 -
Links in google+ profile
THe links people can add in the about part of a google+ profile - do they have any effect on rankings? is this worth doing for link building?
Link Building | | pauledwards0 -
Has Anyone Heard from Google?
After submit RR last week, we got the following from Google: "We've received a request from a site owner to reconsider how we index the following site: http://www.butterflycraze.com/ We'll review the site. If we find that it's no longer in violation of our Webmaster Guidelines, we'll reconsider our indexing of the site. Please allow several weeks for the reconsideration request. We do review all requests, but unfortunately we can't reply individually to each request." We got discouraged that Goodle said that it'd reconsider if we are no longer in violation. However, we have about 4500 unatural links created by SEO co, who has proceed with some, but, we aren't seen reduction of such links. In fact, it went up. I need advise as how to remove the following (they are the few site with bulk links): fantake.com: have their webmaster info, however, since last request, we still have 1200 links from it. blogspot.com - is there any way to remove links from such site? onlineunionmall.com: don't see any contact info on their site Some suggest us move on by building good links, but, to dilute the power of 4500 unnatural links, it would take forever.
Link Building | | ypl0 -
Google sending warnings about Artificial or Unnatural links in Google Webmaster Central
Has anyone seen warnings about Artificial or Unnatural links notice show up in their Google Webmaster central yet? I just looked at each of our clients and had not but after reading the Search Engine Land article at http://searchengineland.com/google-warning-more-about-bad-link-networks-117079 I was wondering what your thoughts were regarding this topic? We are not purchasing links for our clients sites but definitely going out their and building links. Article concerned me that I may run into issues for my link building clients. Thoughts?
Link Building | | jfeitlinger0