URL paths and keywords
-
I'm recommending some on-page optimization for a home builder building in several new home communities. The site has been through some changes in the past few months and we're almost starting over.
The current URL structure is
http://homebuilder.com/oakwood/features
where
homebuilder = builder name
Oakwood Estates= name of community
features = one of several sub-paths including site plan, elevations, floor plans, etc.
The most attainable keyword phrases include the word 'home' and 'townname'
I want to change the URL path to:
http://homebuilder.com/oakwood-estates-townname-homes/features
Is there any problem with doing this? It just seems to make a lot of sense. Any input would be appreciated.
-
I had a feeling that there was something inherently wrong with my approach which is why I asked the question. Good to know that there's folks willing to help out - thanks for the clarification(s). And the separate town pages is a good solution. Thanks.
-
Perhaps this video would be more helpful: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gRzMhlFZz9I
The URL is a ranking factor, but it should not be focused to this level of detail. It is one of over 200 ranking factors, most of the weight goes to the domain name and the keywords deeper in the URL have very very very little effect on ranking. Where it matters more is for users to be able to read the URL prior to clicking through. If you make your URL too long, then it will get cut off and the most important terms at the end wont be viewed.
If you feel "Oakwood estates" is not helpful and you also feel the town name is very important, then you could make your URLs homebuilder.com/town/floor-plans.
The effect of keywords in your URLs comes more into play when sites link to you using the URL. If sites do not link to you, it's not really going to matter. If sites do link to you but use anchor text, it wont matter either. Even if sites link to you using a keyword stuffed URL, there will be so many terms in it the weight given to each term will be so low it wont make any meaningful difference.
-
I would start with the major cities, surrounding the area, and create zip coded directories.
I found the more directories, I create and submit, and coinciding names & keeping then relative to what the search reports are.
This is after the a close look at your GA Reports.I hope it helps.
-
This is a really good answer by Ryan, covers both Usability and SEO.
I'd suggest going with this recommendation, sticking with the shorter style URL structure to benefit user experience and to focus on the main primary keywords for SEO.
It would also make it easy to clearly target other towns/cities at a high level, e.g. http://homebuilder.com/townname/
-
Thanks. That makes sense.
Consider this though. I should have been clearer.
The keyword phrase that I would be targeting in almost every case would be 'townname homes for sale' and/or 'townname homes'.
'Oakwood Estates' and the other community names don't really generate much traffic, and while I need them for the small amount of traffic they produce, I'm more interested in penetrating the broader area names.
Your take?
-
There is not any problem with taking that approach in and of itself. I would suggest there is not any need nor a substantial benefit to sticking those extra keywords in the URL. If it was my site, I would think "oakwood" is probably enough instead of "oakwood-estates", and the town name should not be needed in the URL at all. I would think Oakwood is associated with only one town.
The URL would then be http://homebuilder.com/oakwood/floor-plans for example.
As a general rule for most of SEO, the more terms you add the more you dilute your other keywords. People have a tendency to want to stuff in extra terms to gain relevancy. The process is not user friendly nor does it help with SEO.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
How Shold I Structure URLs for a Portfolio?
Hi Moz Community, My web design agency has a lot of different projects we showcase in the portfolio of our site, but I'm having trouble finding information on the best practices for how to structure the URLs for all of those portfolio pages. We have tons of projects that we've done in the same service category and even multiple projects we've done for the same company within that category. For example, right now things look like: www.rootdomain.com/portfolio/web-design/clientname which tends to get long, bulky and awkward, considering we do lots of projects in the web design category and might do a second project for the same company. How should we differentiate the projects from a URL standpoint to avoid having all of the pages compete for the same keyword? Does it even matter, given that these portfolio showcases are primarily image-based anyways?
Technical SEO | | formandfunctionagency0 -
URL has caps, but canonical does not. Now what?
Hi, Just started working with a site that has the occasional url with a capital, but then the url in the canonical as lower case. Neither, when entered in a browser, resolves to the other. It's a Shopify site. What do you think I should do?
Technical SEO | | 945010 -
URL Structure for Product Pages
Hi Moz Community. I'm in need of some URL structure advice for product pages. We currently have ~4,000+ products and I'm trying to determine whether I need a new URL structure from the previous site owners. There are two current product URL structures that exist in our website: 1.http://www.example.com/bracelets/gold-bracelets/1-1-10-ct-diamond-tw-slip-on-bangle-14k-pink-gold-gh-i1-i2/ (old URL structure)
Technical SEO | | IceIcebaby
2. http://www.example.com/gemstone-bracelet-prd-bcy-121189/ (new URL structure) The problem is that half of our products are still in the old structure (no one moved them forward), but at the same time I'm not sure if the new structure is optimized as much as possible. Every single gemstone bracelet, or whatever product will have the same url structure, only being unique with the product number at the end. Would it be better to change everything over to more product specific URLS. I.e. example.com/topaz-gemstone-dangle-bracelet. Thanks for your help!
-Reed0 -
Keyword Difficulty Tool
Hi, When can we expect the keyword difficulty tool to be operational again? Thanks
Technical SEO | | dt18072 -
301 on certain url string
I have a few thousand old urls with the string /content/ in them and are looking for a way to 301 batch redirect them. So for all the urls that contain the word 'content' I would like to redirect to 1 specific page. I have tried the methods below without success. Regular 301's are working fine but this particular method is not working for me. I am running a Joomla site but I don't imagine that would have any impact. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Redirect 301 ^content/.*$ http://www.mysite.com Redirect 301 ^content/ http://www.mysite.com
Technical SEO | | omega0 -
What if my brand name is my keyword?
Referencing the new 'over optimization' penalties.. What if your company name was "Buy a Burrito" and your website website was buyaburrito.com (not a real site), and your main keyphrase was "buy a burrito". Will Google treat all Branded Terms as exact or phrase match keywords and penalize you?
Technical SEO | | daviddischler0 -
Canonical URLs and screen scraping
So a little question here. I was looking into a module to help implement canonical URLs on a certain CMS and I came a cross a snarky comment about relative vs. absolute URLs being used. This person was insistent that relative URLs are fine and absolute URLs are only for people who don't know what they are doing. My question is, if using relative URLs, doesn't it make it easier to have your content scraped? After all, if you do get your content scraped at least it would point back to your site if using absolute URLs, right? Am I missing something or is my thinking OK on this? Any feedback is much appreciated!
Technical SEO | | friendlymachine0 -
Canonical for non-exist URL ?
Hi I have a website what has parameter URL. For example www.example.com/index.php?page_id=1&no=2 I want that search engine see my page URL as; www.example.com/toys/cars But this URL is not exist in my website. And when i externally enter this page it goes to 404 page. If i add canonical url as www.example.com/toys/cars to the page www.example.com/index.php?page_id=1&no=2, what happened ? Is the url at the serp change as www.example.com/toys/cars ?
Technical SEO | | SEMTurkey0