Crawl Diagnostic Errors
-
Hi there,
Seeing a large number of errors in the SEOMOZ Pro crawl results. The 404 errors are for pages that look like this:
http://www.example.com/2010/07/blogpost/http:%2F%2Fwww.example.com%2F2010%2F07%2Fblogpost%2F
I know that t%2F represents the two slashes, but I'm not sure why these addresses are being crawled. The site is a wordpress site. Anyone seen anything like this?
-
Yep, i think you nailed it. I crawled another 2 sites I manage, one has sexy bookmarks, one doesn't. The one with had 404 errors. A quick search for sexy bookmarks causes 404 had some results as well.
You're right about the issue with the other plugin, commentluv. Will definitely take that suggestion to the developer.
And a hat trick, you're right about the block of latest from the blog on the footer. Been meaning to take that out for ages.
Very grateful for your attention and wisdom! Thank you!
-
Ross, it seems you have a plugin for comments which adds a link to the last post of the person who made the comment. This is an interesting plugin which i have not seen before. There are two problems I see with the plugin. First, it identifies links to your own site as external, when they should be tagged as internal. Secondly, it probably shouldn't be used to link to the current page. Debbi's comment is a link asking readers to view her latest article, which is the current page.
There is also a link to the current article under Recent Posts. It would be a great advancement for the plugin if it could identify the current URL and not include it in the list.
There is also a footer section "Latest from blog" which offers a link to the post. In my opinion offering the same links in the Recent Posts side bar and the "Latest from blog" footer is excessive, and since footer links aren't used very much I would recommend removing the footer block.
The fourth link to the article I located on the page is from a plugin which is referred to as "Shareaholic TopSharingBar SexyBookmarks". The link is contained within javascript.
All of the above 4 links are valid links and should not be the source of the 404 error.
And finally I believe I just now discovered the root cause of this issue. It seems to be your "Shareaholic" plugin. Try disabling it and then crawling your site again. The 404 error should disappear.
The URL you shared, in the exact format you shared it, is present in your site's HTML code in a line which begins with the following code:
-
will do and thank you for your insight!
-
I just started a SEOmoz crawl for your site. It will take some time to complete. Once the report is available I'll take a look.
Since you removed a plug in, the results may not be the same. You may have resolved the issue. Please refrain from making further changes until the crawl is complete.
-
Okay sure. Embarassingly enough, it's my own site at bayareaseo.net.
http://www.bayareaseo.net/2011/11/things-that-can-mess-up-your-google-places-rankings/
is referring to in SEOMOZ crawler
and in GWT the original url refers to
http://www.bayareaseo.net/2011/11/things-that-can-mess-up-your-google-places-rankings/<a< p=""></a<>
Just removed a "related posts" style plug in, not sure if that's the culprit.
-
It doesn't make sense to me that the referrer is the page itself. If you are willing to share your site's URL and the specific URL which is having an issue I can perform a crawl and offer more details.
-
The referrer is the page itself. Examined the code and I'm not seeing any links that match, with or without the funky markup, i.e. searching for
http://www.example.com/2010/07/blogpost/http:%2F%2Fwww.example.com%2F2010%2F07%2Fblogpost%2F
as well as
http://www.example.com/2010/07/blogpost/http://www.example.com/2010/07/blogpost/
I'm thinking it's down to one of two WP plugins causing the error. Found similar results in GWT, with many 404s referring from themselves as
http://www.example.com/page<a< p=""></a<>
Will disable the plugins and report back after the next crawl
-
The crawler normally will start on your site's home page and move through all the html code on the home page, then crawl each and every link on the home page following it throughout your site. If you are seeing these errors on your crawl report then the links are on your site.
Examine your crawl report and look for the REFERRER field. This field indicates the page which contains the link. If you can't see the link on the page itself, right-click on the page and choose View Page Source, then do a search of the html code (CTRL+F) for the link.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Can someone kindly explain what 'Crawl Issue Found: No rel="canonical" Tags' means? Is this a critical error and how can it be rectified?
Can someone kindly explain what 'Crawl Issue Found: No rel="canonical" Tags' means? Is this a critical error and how can it be rectified?
Moz Pro | | JoshMcLean0 -
Moz & Xenu Link Sleuth unable to crawl a website (403 error)
It could be that I am missing something really obvious however we are getting the following error when we try to use the Moz tool on a client website. (I have read through a few posts on 403 errors but none that appear to be the same problem as this) Moz Result Title 403 : Error Meta Description 403 Forbidden Meta Robots_Not present/empty_ Meta Refresh_Not present/empty_ Xenu Link Sleuth Result Broken links, ordered by link: error code: 403 (forbidden request), linked from page(s): Thanks in advance!
Moz Pro | | ZaddleMarketing0 -
Crawl results on keyword rankings differ from actual search rankings
For the second week in a row, the weekly keyword rankings in my MOZ account show "not in top 50" for most keywords. However, when I check some of my rankings I still broadly have the rankings that I used to have. It seems that the MOZ crawl is experiencing some difficulties. Does anyone have suggestions how to find out what's going on? If I can't rely on the crawl outcomes, then the tool is not very useful anymore!
Moz Pro | | matteis0 -
Why does SEOMoz only crawl 1 page of my site?
My site is: www.thetravelingdutchman.com. It has quite a few pages, but for some reason SEOMoz only crawls one. Please advise. Thanks, Jasper
Moz Pro | | Japking0 -
Why won't scheduled crawl of my site begin?
I currently have a campaign running on SEOMoz for over a month. It has been showing that a crawl was scheduled to start on 12/21. Now it's 12/23 and there has not been a new crawl, and it still says scheduled for 12/21.. Anyone know why this is happening or how to fix it? Thanks
Moz Pro | | Prime850 -
404 errors
I have a few 404 errors found using seomoz tool. It also shows the url, but I am not sure where in the site is it linking from. Is there a way to find out the origin of the 404 error. Thanks
Moz Pro | | Accounts0 -
How long should the weekly crawl take
Mine started yesterday afternoon and it's now almost 11pm on Sunday. 30+ hours and still not finished (and no progress indicator). 438 pages quoted as being crawled. That's not normal - right? I have made a bunch of changes based on last weeks crawl so I have been eagerly waiting for this to finish But 30 hours?.... Thanks. Mark
Moz Pro | | MarkWill0 -
Canonical tags and SEOmoz crawls
Hi there. Recently, we've made some changes to http://www.gear-zone.co.uk/ to implement canonical tags to some dynamically generated pages to stop duplicate content issues. Previously, these were blocked with robots.txt. In Webmaster Tools, everything looks great - pages crawled has shot up, and overall traffic and sales has seen a positive increase. However the SEOmoz crawl report is now showing a huge increase in duplicate content issues. What I'd like to know is whether SEOmoz registers a canonical tag as preventing a piece of duplicate content, or just adds to it the notices report. That is, if I have 10 pages of duplicate content all with correct canonical tags, will I still see 10 errors in the crawl, but also 10 notices showing a canonical has been found? Or, should it be 0 duplicate content errors, but 10 notices of canonicals? I know it's a small point, but it could potentially have a big difference. Thanks!
Moz Pro | | neooptic0