Organic Search Problems?
-
Hey guys,
I am in need of a little help!
I am currently an aspiring SEO (trying to absorb as much information as I can and implement changes to help my site organically)... Most of my experience revolves around SEM.
That being said, I have a problem. My site is doing well through paid search... great quality scores, etc. However, the content on my site (and even my site as a whole) does not "appear" to rank well in Organic.
To explain further... My site is federalautoloan.com... and when I type in exact article names (or even federal auto loan) into Google, nothing shows up. And yes, my content is all original/unique content. I've even recently added a unique Calculator to my site.
site:federalautoloan.com in the search bar shows results for all of my pages... but it just seems as though Google does not like my site for some reason. At least in Organic. The odd thing is, none of my other sites have this problem.
Do you guys have any advice?
The only thing I can think of is that somehow my 301 redirect was performed improperly. Yes, I had a permanent redirect performed on my site about 4 months back. The URL we were using prior just wasn't performing as well in Paid Search. But seeing as how that is the preferred method by Google... I'm really at a loss...
Again, my site is FederalAutoLoan.com.
Any help would be GREATLY appreciated. Even generic SEO advice would be appreciated.
Edit: Two other things to note... I have plugged my site into the SEOmoz Pro tool... the tool is not showing any issues for my site. I am also making use of Google Webmaster Tools and the only error that shows up for my site is a Soft 404 for one of my pmcs... Not sure why it is even pulling one of my pmcs... but as far as I can tell, there really shouldn't be any problems.
Note on the 404 for anyone who might give a response on that issue... http://www.seoconsultants.com/tools/headers returns a 200 OK response.
Edit2: Question presented below.
-
Colt, many of your blog posts have multiple links to the home page and all are using the same anchor text. That on the surface looks a little spammy. That might be sending up a red flag to someone, because I know that if I were a customer reading them for the first time, and since they're all in red, I'd be thinking something along that line too.
Good luck finding the issue, Lowell
-
Thank you all for the responses so far.
Based off the responses thus far, it seems as though the site doesn't have any Google-related issues (I hope).
However, I am still concerned that specific article names do not show up. For example, when I type "count the costs before you get an auto loan" into the Google search bar... our article doesn't show up. At least not for a substantial number of pages.
I'm deeply worried that this is an issue related to our permanent redirect... as none of our other sites have this problem (sites that haven't been around for as long... counting the time before the redirect). The original URL was GetGreatAutoLoans.com if that helps at all.
Thanks!
-
Great!
Thank you very much Nux! Really appreciate the help.
-
I'm not sure if you can use htaccess with your hosting, but if so this will force www:
RewriteEngine on
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^www\. [NC]
RewriteRule .* http://www.%{HTTP_HOST}%{REQUEST_URI} [R=301,L]
and this should force no Default.aspx:
RewriteEngine on RewriteCond %{THE_REQUEST} ^[A-Z]{3,9}\ /([^/]+/)*Default\.aspx\ HTTP/ RewriteRule ^(([^/]+/)*)Default\.aspx$ http://%{HTTP_HOST}/$1 [R=301,L]
References:
-
Hey Kyle,
I guess my problem is that I am trying to "compare" SEO and SEM a little too closely at the moment. Right now our content, etc. is doing great for our SEM strategy... So obviously I'm wanting to see the same for Organic.
Everything I've read so far speaks to really focusing on quality/original content that are keyword specific. I assume I can't go wrong by building an extensive database of articles for specific (and long-tail) keywords.
Thanks for the Tool link! Glad you liked the site. We put a lot of effort into each of our sites.
Thanks for the response Kyle!
-
Hey Nux!
Great idea, thank you! Transitioning from FederalAutoLoan.com to Federal Auto Loan makes perfect sense.
http://www.federalautoloan.com
Both of these links point to http://www.federalautoloan.com. As far as I know, this is a pretty standard tactic for users that don't use www. when typing in a URL.
As for the /Default.aspx... I'll check into it. Our IT is using it for some reason. I'll have to get back to you on that.
Thank you very much for the response!
-
Hey Zsolt,
Thanks for the response!
I'll get on the H1 tag issue right away.
As for the code issue... is that really a significant problem? It's how my in-house IT department has coded all of our websites... and frankly, they are pretty good at what they do. Unless it is causing us major issues with Organic Search, I'm inclined to leave it as is. Let me know.
I have done a bunch of keyword research as of late - and read a lot about the importance of long-tail keywords - so this is good advice... and currently in progress. Obviously over-night results aren't to be expected. Is there a specific way I should be developing content for these keywords?
I'm working on our linking strategy as well. And will definitely avoid purchasing links.
Thanks Zsolt!
-
Two things I see when I did a quick look at it.
First, I suggest you change the title to "Federal Auto Loan: Fast and Easy Auto Loans" instead of "FederalAutoLoan.com: Fast and Easy Auto Loans". Right now your first keyword in the title is your domain name. Ranking for this keyword won't be an issue at all and will happen naturally. Federal Auto Loan would be a much more relevant keyword to push for. The keywords in the title are given importance from left to right.
Second, I would make sure your homepage is only accessible from one URL.
I see you can access the homepage with these different URLs right now:
http://www.federalautoloan.com/
http://www.federalautoloan.com/Default.aspx
Google may be able to differentiate between all of this, but links built in with one URL will quite possibly only benefit that one URL and not the other two.
-
Hello Colt,
First and most important thing is that organic SEO differs from paid search. One thing is that you have multiple instances of h1 tag and that is spamming. Just leave the most important as h1 modify all other to h2.
I think you have quite a long code for this short page. I would try to shrinken the code somehow. One other problem with the code is that your page is built using tables: that is not up to date anymore. You should use divisions and format them via css.
The hugest matter of all is that you have only got 2 inbound links: all two from the same site. If you want to rank in organic search with compatitive terms like loan and credit you should have tonns of inbound links. Read more somewhere on linkbuilding what is possible and what is forbidden. Do not purchase links.
Do some keyword research or get some from your paid campaigns: optimize for long tail words, loan and credit are so compatitive words, that with really hard work you need at least a whole year to get to first page, and i am not sure that is even enough.
Why you are not ranking for federal auto loan is that it contains loan as a compatitive words, federal that is another nice word used mostly on governmenr sites, and auto that can be a lot of things. So your brand name is composed of three really compatitive and hard words, you need patience and lot of hard work to rank for that.
-
I just did a quick analysis and it looks like your domain strength is low (DA 17) and you are trying to rank for moderately competitive keywords 30-40%
The only way you can rank for the keywords mentioned with that low of a domain strength is by AWESOME on-page-optimizations. Use the Term Target Tool tool to help with the process. Shoot for an "A" on each page and definitely have an exact match in your title tag. Currently your home page only has a grade of "C" for the term "federal auto loan" so there is room for improvement.
Keep focusing with your on-page, you have a sharp looking site so once you get traffic there you should be all set!
Good luck - Kyle
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Organic real estate shrinking year on year against adwords?
Hi Guys, Has anyone seen proof or studies which show that organic real estate is shrinking year on year, resulting in fewer clicks to organic results and more to paid search? Cheers.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | marieh0 -
301 redirect to search results page?
Hi - we just launched our redesigned website. On the previous site, we had multiple .html pages that contained links to supporting pdf documentation. On this new site, we no longer have those .html landing pages containing the links. The question came up, should we do a search on our site to gather a single link that contains all pdf links from the previous site, and set up a redirect? It's my understanding that you wouldn't want google to index a search results page on your website. Example: old site had the link http://www.oldsite.com/technical-documents.html new site, to see those same links would be like: http://www.newsite.com/resources/search?View+Results=&f[]=categories%3A196
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Jenny10 -
On-site Search - Revisited (again, *zZz*)
Howdy Moz fans! Okay so there's a mountain of information out there on the webernet about internal search results... but i'm finding some contradiction and a lot of pre-2014 stuff. Id like to hear some 2016 opinion and specifically around a couple of thoughts of my own, as well as some i've deduced from other sources. For clarity, I work on a large retail site with over 4 million products (product pages), and my predicament is thus - I want Google to be able to find and rank my product pages. Yes, I can link to a number of the best ones by creating well planned links via categorisation, silos, efficient menus etc (done), but can I utilise site search for this purpose? It was my understanding that Google bots don't/can't/won't use a search function... how could it? It's like expeciting it to find your members only area, it can't login! How can it find and index the millions of combinations of search results without typing in "XXXXL underpants" and all the other search combinations? Do I really need to robots.txt my search query parameter? How/why/when would googlebot generate that query parameter? Site Search is B.A.D - I read this everywhere I go, but is it really? I've read - "It eats up all your search quota", "search results have no content and are classed as spam", "results pages have no value" I want to find a positive SEO output to having a search function on my website, not just try and stifle Mr Googlebot. What I am trying to learn here is what the options are, and what are their outcomes? So far I have - _Robots.txt - _Remove the search pages from Google _No Index - _Allow the crawl but don't index the search pages. _No Follow - _I'm not sure this is even a valid idea, but I picked it up somewhere out there. _Just leave it alone - _Some of your search results might get ranked and bring traffic in. It appears that each and every option has it's positive and negative connotations. It'd be great to hear from this here community on their experiences in this practice.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Mark_Elton0 -
Noindex search pages?
Is it best to noindex search results pages, exclude them using robots.txt, or both?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | YairSpolter0 -
Having problems resolving duplicate meta descriptions
Recently, I’ve recommended to the team running one of our websites that we remove duplicate meta descriptions. The site currently has a large number of these and we’d like to conform to SEO best practice. I’ve seen Matt Cutt’s recent video entitled, ‘Is it necessary for every page to have a meta description’, where he suggests that webmasters use meta descriptions for their most tactically important pages, but that it is better to have no meta description than duplicates. The website currently has one meta description that is duplicated across the entire site. This seemed like a relatively straight forward suggestion but it is proving much more challenging to implement over a large website. The site’s developer has tried to resolve the meta descriptions, but says that the current meta description is a site wide value. It is possible to create 18 distinct replacements for 18 ‘template’ pages, but any sub-pages of these will inherit the value and create more duplicates. Would it be better to: Have no meta descriptions at all across the site? Stick with the status quo and have one meta description site-wide? Make 18 separate meta descriptions for the 18 most important pages, but still have 18 sets of duplicates across the sub-pages of the site. Or…is there a solution to this problem which would allow us to follow the best practice in Matt’s video? Any help would be much appreciated!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | RG_SEO0 -
How do i get over my alt tage problems at a cateogry level?
At present at a category level, our site does not incorporate images specific to the category you are in and therefore we do not have appropriate alt tags to suffice SEO requirements.It only covers categories you are navigating too. e.g. http://www.towelsrus.co.uk/towels/catlist_fnct561.htm (no image placement available on page for that category, it only shows sub categories Does anyone have any suggestions how we get over this? How big a deal is it to not have image with appropriate keyword driven alt tag? Can you put more than 1 keyword phrase in a alt tag?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Towelsrus0 -
Local Keyword Searches With Broad Terms.
I am able to do keyword research for any term that I want,. However, I want to see results for broad keywords in local areas.... For example.. Hair cut Miami may get 100 searches a month. How can I find the number (x) of search volume for "Hair Cut" searched within Miami, FL.? If I add the 100 and the other number (x) it may be worth the while to build.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | SEODinosaur0 -
Search Engine Pingler
Hello everyone, it's me again 😉 I've just got a Pro membership on SeoMoz and I am full of questions. A few days ago I found very interesting tool called: Search Engine Pingler And description of it was like this: Your website or your page was published a long time, but you can not find it on google. Because google has not index your site. Tool Search engine pingler will assist for you. It will ping the URL of your Page up more than 80 servers of google and other search engines. Inform to the search engine come to index your site. So my question is that tool really helps to increase the indexation of the link by search engine like Google, if not, please explain what is a real purpose of it. Thank you to future guru who can give a right answer 🙂
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | smokin_ace0