Tracking SEO tests
-
Trying to get some best practices on testing SEO changes.
We are going to make a bunch of changes on subsets of pages. Say testing about 5 different on-page changes.
Originally we were going to submit separate Sitemaps to GWT and see if our test sets get indexed, how quickly, etc. But we noticed that GWT says some pages in our Sitemaps aren't indexed even though we know they are (what gives?).
So we thought, for each test, let's put a unique code on the page so we can see how many get indexed by Google.
But that doesn't solve the issue: how many people clicked on our test pages. So we are thinking of putting a tracking pixel on the test pages, specific for each test. But then I am thinking, why not just create a separate Google Analytics profile and place that code on the test pages (set up goals to track visits per test since we aren't going to change the actual URLs).
and on and on
This is where you come in. What kind of tracking do you implement when you set up tests?
Advice appreciated!
E
-
Google's Website Optimizer is ok and it's free. I also highly recommend https://www.optimizely.com/ it's paid tool but it's really great. For SEOmoz pro members there is 20% off.
-
setting up a 1x1 pixel is simple. Just create it, drop it on the page. In Google Analytics in the content section you can search for that pixel to get your numbers. I really think , without knowing your specifics, that you are over complicating this.
You can run multiple GA scripts, but they of course don't recommend it. Remember, if you are playing around with the main stats account, if you screw anything up, you cannot repair it.
I would at least set up a new profile before doing anything so that your main stats are untouched.
-
That's not really true, especially in the case of Google tools. There are many free tools out there that offer features and functionality far beyond the skill level of most mid-level IM's. Optimizly works well, but it costs. The experiements (new GWO) is more than enough for what most people need.
I have used Optimizly and it was decent, definitely makes testing easy, but I go back to GWO every time. Having the tests integrated into the stats is a godsend. Always be testing.
Your link is broken. I assume you meant http://monetate.com/products/testlab/#axzz1zl1r4yWU
-
You have a better chance of being indexed if you create decent content and have a couple links pointing at the page. Don't speculate about a way to improve your love from Google. Smarter people than us have spent a lot of time removing the predictability of Google.
Create good content, run a clean site, make people happy = get paid.
-
I have personally never seen GWO ever effect rankings or behave in any other way than it should. You can set up multivariate and a/b tests directly in Google Analytics now, much easier than GWO (which was easy) to set up, less code, and it uses your defined goals from Google Analytics.
If you want to see the testing in GA, its in experiments in the content section. Works like a charm. Are you testing if the changes you are making have any effect on the amount of time it takes to be indexed? Or is it about ranking.
Keep in mind, if you are testing very small elements on multiple pages, you are going to have to deal with duplicate content warnings, also if these pages are the same pages, you are going to be competing against yourself in the search engines. Typically, when testing pages, the test pages are blocked from search engines for this very reason.
Don't get too hung up in trying to figure out what you can do to a page to get indexed, getting indexed is the easiest part of the show.
-
The funny thing is that I got 6 thumbs down for that answer - but I think it's still true!
-
David,
I have heard this theory before. If you have adsense on a page, google must visit it in order to determine the content to set the ad properly. But as you said ther eis no evidence for this directly.
It sounds to me like you can just have GA on ALL pages and simply drill down to your subset for testing on what ever group you are interested in in the content view and compare accordingly. No need to get too tricky.
-
It seems to me that your test is a little different than how most people would consider SEO.
Most considering higher rankings and more traffic as a success. You are considering a higher percentage of pages as indexed as a success.
I think you should step back and rethink this test. With millions of pages the indexing of your site might get better and your rankings get worse with the same changes. That would probably turn out to be a net loss in benefits and actionable traffic.
I would use SEO and page content for higher rankings.
I would think of linking patterns (internally and externally), site structure, website coding and less redundant content as the way to increase percentage of pages indexed.
-
Interesting question:
I would set up with goals as you mentioned.
GWO can screw up your rankings and is not advised - speaking from personal experience.
Separately, with tens of millions of pages, maybe the basic problem is
-
getting more links
-
trimming the fat and seeing if you can consolidate certain pages together.
-
-
Though I've never personally tested this, technically, multiple tracking codes for different GA accounts should be able to run simultaneously.
http://www.webmasterworld.com/analytics/3781851.htm
http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Google%20Analytics/thread?tid=608cc854afe9629d&hl=en
I'm not sure if this is the most efficient or effective methodology for a multivariate test, or, rather, for measuring a multivariate test. I generally recommend Google Website Optimizer for most multivariate testing, and Omniture for folks with large, profitable sites.
-
Make life easier on yourself, spend some coin in a solid multivariate testing framework.
Free tools rarely offer the firepower of a commercial product.
This one seems decent: http://monetate.com/features/power-features-list/
-
Well - 6 thumbs down? I guess I was wrong!
I have no proof about what I am about to say, but using logic and a hunch, I would suggest that if one were to have direct links to Google, lets say via AdWords and/or AdSense, then your site has a better chance of getting more of your pages indexed.
In theory.
With no proof at all whatsoever behind this idea.
-
Have you looked into Google's Website Optimizer? It will serve two different versions of a page, roughly half and half, so you can compare which one converts better, which one ranks better, all that good stuff.
-
Hmm, ok.
I understand that linking to deep content will help that content, but we are trying to do discrete tests. My company was founded by a computer scientist, so everything must be scientific, even if my inclination is to simply do all the best practices and expect (hope) for the best. The test sets are too large and not in different directories, so going through logs would be . . . horrifying.
Here's the issue I am curious what peeps think:
What if I set up an additional GA profile and have two sets of GA code on each test page? Then I am getting credit for views in my main GA profile and can easily see if test sets are being viewed in the second profile.
Or, can someone give me info about how to set up a 1x1 pixel and see those stats in GA?
-
CRO = Conversion Rate Optimization.
I only asked as you were looking for link click metrics, which suggested you were looking to get users moving round your site more.
Users visiting specific pages doesn't mean that Google is going to index more of your pages. It's kind of 2 separate tests you want to run.
Your absolute best bet to see what pages Google is visiting is to check your server logs and see what Google is looking at. I appreciate it's confusing looking through them though and it still doesn't show what's being indexed.
I think I understand what you mean by the sitemaps now, treating a subfolder as a different site in WMT and seeing how many pages they index from the sitemap?
Could work...
Eh, normally when I want to see what pages are functionally indexed I would check in analytics to see what pages have actually brought a visitor through search. Anything that's not is effectively not indexed, though I appreciate that's not strictly true.
If a particular section has an increase in the number of landing pages bringing traffic then more pages are being indexed.
I appreciate it's onpage changes your testing but building links into pages further down the site structure should also prod search engines to crawl more pages.
It's not an easy task all in really. I guess sitemaps in WMT, functional indexing and long nights sifting through server logs is my best offer. Sorry it's not quite a solution but something to think about.
-
Basically we are looking to get more of our pages indexed. So rather than do everything to every page (we have tens of millions of pages) we are looking to test ideas on subsets. Whichever test gets indexed faster and more click throughs we will promote to all of the pages.
What is CRO?
-
Are you testing CRO or SEO?
The only reason I ask is that you can only present the search engines with one version at a time for them to index and rank, so the way to tell would be if the pages you've made changes on are getting more or less traffic which is easy enough through analytics.
CRO is an easy thing to test as well but if you could just clarify I'll have a think
-
We are making changes to a subset of our pages that are crawlable by google, but we aren't linking to them in a special way, so I am unsure how the URL builder will help us. But I may be missing something!
-
You could just use the Google Analytics URL Builder that will create some virtual tracking opportunities for you. Are you creating the test, running for a period and altering the test?
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Two Tracking for Banners - Internal Promotion & Event Tracking -Any Impact on Analytic Figure or Bounce Rate?
Hi All, I have implemented Internal Promotion - https://developers.google.com/tag-manager/enhanced-ecommerce#promo-clicks for my ecommerce site on homepage banners. Along with this I did event tracking for Banner click. So any negative impact of bounce rate or other reports? Thanks
Reporting & Analytics | | Arnold30 -
Tracking links and duplicate content
Hi all, I have a bit of a conundrum for you all pertaining to a tracking link issue I have run into on a clients site. They currently have over duplicate content. Currently, they have over 15,000 pages being crawled (using Screaming Frog) but only 7,000+ are legitimate pages in the sense of they are not duplicates of themselves. The client is using Omniture instead of Google Analytics and using an advanced tracking system on their site for internal and external links (ictids and ectids) in the URL parameters. This is creating thousands of duplicated pages being crawled by Google (as seen on their Search Console and on Screaming Frog). They also are in the middle of moving over from http to https and have thousands of pages currently set up for both, again, creating a duplicate content issue. What I have suggested for the tracking links is setting up a URL parameter in Search Console for these tracking links. I've also suggested they canonical all tracking links to point to the clean page so the pages that have already been indexed point to the correct clean url. Does this seam like the appropriate strategy? Additionally, I've told them before they submit a new sitemap to Google, they need to switch their website over to https to avoid worsening their duplicate content issue. They have not submitted a sitemap to Google Search Console since March 2015. Thank you for any help you can offer!
Reporting & Analytics | | Rydch410 -
Cross domain tracking Google Analytics
Hi there, Got a question on cross domain tracking: We have a couple of TLD's to serve localized content to our visitors, next to our main .com TLD where our app is running as well in a subdomain. Situation is this: Local sites:
Reporting & Analytics | | jorisbrabants
marketingsite.be
marketingsite.com.br
marketingsite.fr Main site: marketingsite.com
app.marketingsite.com Conversion gets triggered when somebody ends up in app.marketingsite.com/firstuse for example. People can sign up at the local site filling in their email but they end up in app.marketingsite.com/firstuse Reading this article on cross domain tracking I'm getting a bit confused on the setup of the tracking code itself. The sample code provided shows these two lines: ga('require', 'linker'); ga('linker:autoLink', ['maindomain.com','targetdomain.com']); Now the question 🙂 Is it correct when I think that maindomain should be replaced with our local TLD's on every one of those, and that targetdomain is where the conversion happens? In this case the .com site?0 -
Conversion Tracking Setup; Is there a decent guide?
Ok, I'm looking into how to set up conversion tracking for our website, and frankly, I'm totally confused. In looking at Google documentation, I'm not sure if I need to use Tag manager, throw some code into the site with jQuery, or sacrifice a goat. I'd like to implement a variety of tracking goals / events / things on several websites, so I'm really looking for a comprehensive guide. I couldn't find any in depth stuff on google. Help?
Reporting & Analytics | | MichaelGregory1 -
Google Analytics Not Tracking 100% of Visits?
Hi all, We're having an issue with Analytics where we are getting different figures from what Silver Pop are saying. For example email campaign A sent via Silver Pop, with Google Analytics tracking code show's 50 unique clicks in Silver Pop. Looking at Google Analytics there are only 10 visits from that campaign. So I thought it could be something with the tracking, but there wasn't a significant rise in web visits = either Google Analytics is not recording visits properly or Silver Pop figures are wrong. I'm more inclined to think that it's something to do with Google Analytics. Has anyone come across something similar? Where one system is showing you X amount of visits but the figures on Google Analytics don't add up? A few quick things already covered: Double checked the links have been tracked properly, but this doesn't explain the low increase in web visits generally We've double checked that Google Analytics tracking code is properly installed (and it is / was at the time of send). Any help would be much appreciated! Thanks guys.
Reporting & Analytics | | RKHStaff1 -
How to track and verify 301 redirects from 22 old websites to a new one?
Me and my team have just finished a website which will replace 22 old ones (6 main domains and 16 sub-domains, 19 in wordpress and 3 in Joomla). This means more than 20,000 links that we're trying to redirect with the most granularity possible. But we're experiencing a lot of conflicts because of the quantity and variety of links and the interference of Wordpress. And I'm having trouble finding which links are working and which aren't. I have a URL list in a plain .txt file for every website, is there a tool that can check these links for me? I've tested many wordpress plugins, but I didn't find a good one. Thanks!
Reporting & Analytics | | bernardovailati0 -
Question for SEO experts!
I am checking my competition with all the metrics available and I have no clue why we are not coming up higher in ranking on Google. It's been 3 months and we've been bouncing between 9 and 7 position. One competitor just came out of nowhere with almost 600 internal links and few external links and occupied 3rd spot. I've built pretty good portfolio of links with links even coming from Google for crying out loud. My on page optimization is very good, we've even passed W3C with no errors. At least 3 of our competitors above us have less Domain Authority, Page Authority, Back links for external domains, number of external domains, etc... Not sure what is going on. We are not really trying to be the top dog in Google all the time, but it is the principle of a thing. Keyword is Laser Marking. Our domain starts with cms. Don't want to type the whole URL because Google might crawl (maybe a bit of paranoid at this point LOL) Any suggestions?
Reporting & Analytics | | DmitryP0 -
Ranking Testing
At times when I change something on my site it effects my rankings. For my business I care mostly about my rankings in certain locations (not local). How can I see how I am ranking in various locations at a given time? I see several tools out there, but none of them seem to work. For example I recently I added a badge to my site and my ranking dropped a spot locally, but I do not think it did elsewhere. The value of the badge is worth that if it is just local, but if it made me drop a ranking in one of my major markets it would not be worth it.
Reporting & Analytics | | RobDalton0