Where to host viral campaign content?
-
I'm about to launch a series of viral videos for a growing UK brand, in which the viewer will have control of the storyline (e.g. tippex bear http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ba1BqJ4S2M).
It will start with one theme (1 main 'landing page' video with a series of 'ending' videos).
If successful, there will be more themes added in the same format (on-going campaigns).
Each campaign will feature high volume niche keywords and will hopefully appear in the SERPs. The keywords will not compete directly with the main branded website but there will be some relevance.
My question is, where is the best place to host the content?
YouTube = max exposure, easier to get vid preview into SERPs but links to site are nofollow? must pay for customised page functionality - see this link http://www.quora.com/How-did-they-make-the-Tipp-ex-Interactive-YouTube-video
**Microsite **= keyword rich domain for each theme with links to main site? more difficult to rank with new domains?
Main website = (DA=44) easier to rank using existing domain, helps increase DA with new linkbait? Use video sitemap to appear in SERPs
Blog = as above (blog hosted on main domain), but keeps main site focussed on core keywords
I assume YouTube will achieve best reach/buzz, but would I miss out on any SEO benefits?
Thanks.
-
I recently helped my niece with her school project which involved a series of videos that give different outcomes depending on the decisions you make.
This is the video: http://youtu.be/2GpRPFhbZA0
I think it was easier to spread the message as it does involve a serious issue about underage drinking.
We managed to get 950 views just on the first video and almost 3500 channel views.I signed up for a Google alert for anything involving the term ' underage drinking ' . Once I had a list of sites I'd see if they suited the demographic of the video then left forum comments that were helpful about the article and left a link to the video. It may have been easier as the video isn't selling a product so people tend to be more likely to approve these kinds of comments.
I also made sure i added it to as many free bookmarking sites as possible
-
When we do the social media "buzz" campaigns you outlined above, we don't limit ourselves with just one site. Specifically with regard to video content it's a NO-BRAINER that you want to get that content on your site whenever possible. Again, the whole point of social media is to drive "buzz" in the form of social mentions, traffic, comments, and incoming links to your main site - all of which work to "push up" your entire site content by making your pages "stickier" and increasing your site visits. The best vehicle to do this is through a blog.
Take your YouTube video example, sure, you can submit that through a channel you control (YouTube), but you would then want to immediately embed that within a blog post on the client site that in turn is SEO optimized with bookmarking buttons (we like Digg Digg if you are on Wordpress). This will allow your blog audience and outside traffic to virally distribute the content for you directly from your blog.
Next, you take that blog post (containing the video) and you push-it-out through all your social media profiles (Twitter and Facebook specifically). The more established the account (power users are key) the better, but even new accounts will lead to dofollow links into the blog post which will help push the video virally. And don't be afraid to ask for comments, and RTs and likes. We do, and it works just fine.
And again, in a post-Panda world it's all about content. If you are doing a viral video campaign that is going to generate comments and trackbacks, then that is content you need to be including on your site. Why? Because this is the very definition of the type of User Generated Content (UGC) that Google is just EATING UP!
Finally, remember that YouTube is nofollow. Why waste any links the video may generate on YouTube when you could push the same content out on your own site and blogs and capture all that link equity for yourself? That's what we do and very effectively.
That's my two-cents. Good luck with your promotions.
-
If you self host the videos on your own site, its unlikely Google will actually display them in the SERPs for your keywords.
-
use youtube and other video sites (dailymotion, vimeo, metacafe etc) to host your teasers and then have your main content on your website.
It also wouldn't hurt to run an outreach campaign to relevant blogs encouraging them to embed the youtube clip.
Lastly post the video etc on your facebook page and try and promote that too
-
Hi Tim,
I'm sorry you didn't get much response to this question, as Q&A was just getting up to speed. For the archives, can you share with us what choice you made? If you have an interesting case study, you might consider submitting it to YOUmoz.
Thanks!
-
From an SEO perspective it would seem to be a shame to go with Youtube alone and miss out on the SEO opportunity. But then - you probably have a point there about the exposure. Maybe combine Youtube + main website? Have the full video content on your main website, while having a portion on Youtube?
BTW, the Tippex ads were brilliant Best online ad campaign I've seen in a long time.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Does duplicate content damage ranking in YouTube the same way it does on websites?
I'm asking this question due to the following scenario: When we have videos produced by Third Party video companies they upload the video to their YouTube account before us (the customer), has chance to upload it to ours. If this was an article that was uploaded to the web then the website uploading it first would be classed as the original piece and all other website uploading the article would be considered duplicates and not rank (As I believe). Hence my question, does YouTube work in the same way and hence our videos when searched in YouTube be secondary to our Third Party video companies as they are posting them first? Regards, Tom
Image & Video Optimization | | CoGri0 -
Where To Add New Content In Site URL?
I'm planning to add a new section to the website that will increase visitor traffic and social sharing by using regularly updated video content. I'm thinking of adding the videos to YouTube and Vimeo as their own channels and then host those videos on the site aswell using a cloud storage solution. Is this a good overall strategy? Where would I add it in the URL so it generates the most SEO benefit for the whole website? www.mysite.com/new-section www.new-section.mysite.com
Image & Video Optimization | | Ubique0 -
When I host my You Tube Videos on my website how do I get remove the ads that You Tube puts in them?
I am looking for some advice regarding You Tube and removing the adverts that are within the videos when I host them on my website. I 'Googled' the answer and all the information that I found was relevant before the latest You Tube update? Many thanks in advance for your help.
Image & Video Optimization | | mblsolutions0 -
How to build links with really good S3 hosted video using JW Player
I have a number of really good quality videos that are embedded on my own site. Many are "how to" or "what to do if" type video guides with questions answered by experts. They were professionally shot. So that I could reap the full SEO benefit from the videos, I have them hosted via Amazon S3 and am using an embedded JW Player. We have a video sitemap and, as a result, most of the videos have already been indexed by Google and are showing up in Google video search as residing on our webpage. Now the real problem is how to get some link benefit from them. They should be viable and valuable link bait. My initial thought was to do a PR Web type press release with the video embedded in it. The problem with that is that you are limited to Youtube and Vimeo embedded video which defeats that purpose entirely. PR Newswire has different issues but the end result is the same, I can't embed those videos with them either. As far as I can tell, all I could do with a press release would be to link to the videos. Moreover, I don't even know that press releases would be that valuable in the post penguin world but the hope was that people would share the videos naturally. So, I put it to the experts. Does anyone have any suggestions as to how to get some link benefit from these videos? Any ideas at all? I am stumped. Any advice would be appreciated.
Image & Video Optimization | | LawSEOSeeker0 -
Best way to host video?
Hi, We are planning to host videos on our site for the first time. It looks like YouTube is a bit too over focused on ads these days for commercial use, can anyone recommend any better video hosting services? I also realize that hosting somewhere like YouTube has little SEO benefit, am I better off hosting them on our site if possible? Please share your experiences with the various services and methods of hosting. Thanks
Image & Video Optimization | | Maximise1 -
Anybody knows of agencies who produce/optimize/market video content?
Hi everyone. Hope someone can help me hook up with a video content provider. Need one to produce optimized video content and market it, too. Did a Google search and found some. But I trust a crowd-sourced answer so I try here at SEOMoz. Anybody?
Image & Video Optimization | | macmallseo0 -
Hosting All Content Images On Flickr For Blog - What are SEO implications?
Hi, I am starting a travel blog and thought of the idea of hosting all the content images over at Flickr and just calling them into my blog content when needed. Benefits: push traffic over to my Flickr account pull traffic from Flickr to my blog However, I was just wondering about any SEO implications of having 3-4 links per post pointing to Flickr. Is this spammy? Will I lose my juice? Any thoughts would be appreciated. Thanks.
Image & Video Optimization | | DigitalLeaf0 -
Will hosted videos be indexed and pulled into search results if a video sitemap is submitted, but the video itself is in an iframe?
We're working with a client to create and submit a video site map. All of their videos are on separate pages, with unique copy, etc. The problem is that the videos may have to be within an iframe. Will this be an issue with regards to being included in video and universal search results? Or will the video site map take care of it? While we're on the topic of video site maps, does anyone know conclusively what the best thumbnail size is? Google has conflicting information, one resource says 160 x 120, and another says 120 x 90. Thanks in advance!
Image & Video Optimization | | RedDoor580