Should we fire our SEO Vendor?
-
Dear SeoMozers,
We are working on ranking towards some hyper competitive keywords (each query has millions of searches a month) and working with an external SEO Vendor. We were not satisfied with the progress, therefore we asked them to send a revised SEO Plan.
Here's what they proposed:
1. On Page Optimization (standard techniques)
Off Page Optimization
1. Directory Submissions (100)
2. Article Marketing (Two unique 300 word articles to be submitted to 300 directories)
3. Press Release (Two Press Releases to 100 PR Sites)
4. Classified Ads Submissions
5. Business Listings
6. Link Reinforcement (Create wheel to circulate traffic)
7. Blog Submissions, Commenting, Forum Posting
8. Web 2.0 Link Building (Squidoo Lens, Hub Page, Link Wheel etc)
9. One Way Links (Not Specified how many)
Our concern is that this sounds like low quality link building. We've given them 19 top keywords to achieve rankings for and will be paying $20-25K to achieve Top 3-5 rankings for the targeted terms.
Do you think this strategy would work or should we change the SEO Vendor?
-
This made me smile! HA
-
Is that one of Distilled's link building packages?
-
The "plan" doesn't look much like a plan... more like a list of (as already mentioned, low value) seo tactics to me.
Has anyone suggested tackling some less competitive, but related keyword terms first? It's easier to climb the tree from the bottom than to try and jump onto the top of it and you get to pick some low-hanging fruit on the way up.
What is important to the business - ranking for these highly competitive terms or more traffic/conversions now. Don't lose site of the business goals.
If you look at the sites that are currently ranking for your competitive search terms, can you honestly say that your site, your content delivers better value to the potential visitors and deservers to rank up there?
-
I think that's a great clarification. Paying $20-25K for someone to build authoritative, trustworthy links and content to drive you to the top on competitive keywords could be a bargain. Paying that for someone to create junk is worse than a rip-off - it could kill your rankings. Off-page (1)-(8) all look low-value to me, and (9) is ambiguous.
-
Also feel free to create a private question and ask for a second opinion from the Moz staff and associates. Those questions aren't indexed, and they're not viewable to anyone who is not Moz staff or associate, and you can share your URL and other details there if you would like.
-
Yep ... it is a public secret that once u rank first for some keywords and people get to know you you start ranking automatically for others too because people spread the word. And optimizing the next 5 is easier and thus less costly.
-
I totally agree with him here.
-
I completely agree. For that budget I would expect a select amount quality links rather than a large quantity of spammy ones, but who knows... maybe the company is working on relationships to get some really good quality links and is just doing the run of the mill directories in the mean time (playing devils advocate here a little because I don't believe that is the case).
I think the on page SEO is just as vital too. If the website in question is the one in the OP profile then I would question that a little too.
The homepage seems to be targeting 3 key phrases plus the brand name which isn’t ideal, especially not with very competitive key terms.
I could go onto the categories too - you have the category which is targeting the key phrase for men, women and children when there are separate sections for each which could target the male, female and child’s keywords while the main category page targets the general term.
I think in 6 weeks it can be difficult to judge the link building strategy but taking the on page SEO into account I would say you might be better changing...
-
Can you throw one of your keywords your targeting into the mix, this will allow others to give you an indication on what type of link building worked for competitors and thus an idea what kind of link building you should be doing.
-
You should definitely find another vendor that does not use spam techniques because the recent google panda update really hits them very hard.
-
One thing I will say is targeting that many keywords in one go is way to much, take 5 of the keywords, work on ranking them first, then once they are ranked, start on the next 5 and at the same time keep maintaining the first.
-
I am not saying the budget is over the top ... I am saying that if they are spending it for the services they listed it is not well spent.
-
We are working on ranking towards some hyper competitive keywords...
I do not believe that the work that they propose will be effective for your "hyper competitive" keywords.
-
Hello, First and foremost - thanks for the great responses. The reason why we posted this question here was because when we received the report, we were very unhappy with the quality of links that were being built. We have not been with this vendor for long (about a month and a half), but overall - for over 77% of the keywords, rankings have declined (though we are aware that its too early to judge). What concerns us the most is those spammy .edu links, blog commenting, thin articles, bad directories and so forth. The budget that we have set is to achieve the Top 3-5rankings, from thereon - we do have a maintenance budget to retain the top positions.
-
Not sure if I agree that the budget is way over the top for what you are trying to achieve if the keywords really are 'hyper' competitive. It depends how it has been structured - is it $25k when they achieve the rankings or $25k for the time period (3m, 6m, 1y) regardless of results?
In terms of their plan I agree with the others that sounds of the link building does sound a little low quality but even today those links can still get people ranked highly if done correctly (high quality directories, relevant one way links etc) and the on page stuff is good.
I don't like the way they state how many of each link you will get, that does sounds spammy and automated but there is know way of knowing if the 'one way links' are going to be high quality or not because there is no detail.
To me it all comes down to results - how long have you been with the company and how far have you progressed?
-
The price you are paying is GIGANTIC .... You can get what they are offering for like 250$ per keyword. and you are paying 100 times more.
And as the other guy said most of it is rubbish ... what they are offering is a lot of low quality links and what you need is not so much high quality links.
Regarding your content :
Google and people and "our world" basically favors quality over quantity. For the price you are paying you can get someone to "rework" your content so that it is professionally made like apple's content for the users and also keyword targeted for your searches. In other words REAL on page optimization.
Regarding your social networks status :
Also you will get professionally made profiles in all the social networks (VERY high quality backinks from them too) As Gillian (The president of seomoz ) told me when i last met her ... "it is all about gathering and nourishing your community". You will start gathering the community of your real fans... the real people that like you and will really spread the word about you.
Regarding links :
You can get links to relevant sites to yours and high quality ones. For example the 1 link you get from YouTube which has Page Rank 9 is worth 10 000 of the links you are buying for 100 000 times lower price ... Also the open directory and so on. I am from Bulgaria and I always do quality work here ... it is amazing how great it works on the low markets ... I get a clients website to top 1 on all keywords for 2-3 weeks just including them to like 20-40 websites like youtube, dmoz , facebook , linkedin , and websites from their area. The days of "automatic seo" are over man it has SO LOW value that it is not worth it.
Advice : You should be paying someone to research your busyness and figure out link bait techniques, find high quality relevant websites you can make link partnerships with, understand your busyness and advise you on how to spread the word and go social, work on your content and do some usability work and so on.
Regarding your vendor :
The services you listed are the lowest quality possible and are being almost surely done with automation software which sooner or later gets "caught" by Google.
Advide : Totally YES ... change the vendor. You can find lots of great people that can do that for you here in the seomoz community ... including my company ( a bit of shameless self promotion here for the time i spent answering )
-
Personally (and many may disagree) but:
1. On Page Optimization (standard techniques)
Off Page Optimization
1. Directory Submissions (100) (could do this yourself)
2. Article Marketing (Two unique 300 word articles to be submitted to 300 directories) (rubbish)
3. Press Release (Two Press Releases to 100 PR Sites) (ok'ish)
4. Classified Ads Submissions (rubbish)
5. Business Listings (ok if its yahoo directory and some of the big ones)
6. Link Reinforcement (Create wheel to circulate traffic) (not worth the effort)
7. Blog Submissions, Commenting, Forum Posting (spammy)
8. Web 2.0 Link Building (Squidoo Lens, Hub Page, Link Wheel etc) (this works for me)
9. One Way Links (Not Specified how many) (?)
Basically you got $1000 to spend on each keyword, id use the other $5000 for onesite SEO and a tidy up (if needed)
I would then take the 1k and spend most of it on having content generated targeting the keyword and throw it out on, your own site, guest blogging, squidoo, hub pages and a few other things.
Thats me though and im not a wizard at SEO (yet)
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
We're looking at providing SEO for a website that has the majority of its incoming links from websites created solely to provide links. Few have bad spam rankings. How worried should I be about those links?
The majority of incoming links to a prospect's website are from website pages apparently created solely to provide links to the website. Few have high spam scores. The sites linking to the main site have versions of blogs with linked text. They seem to be providing positive SEO value now, but I'm concerned they might get noticed and hurt the main site in the future.
Link Building | | PKI_Niles1 -
Recommendations on SEO Tools, Strategies and References
Hello all, I have been doing SEO/SEM work on some sites I own for a few years but now I am in a position where I need to handle these tasks for a significant numbers of clients on a freelance basis. Obviously, this requires much more work and organization as well as some additional tools to help. I was wondering if the experts on here could help me with the following: Does anyone know of any online step-by-step guides or checklists that highlight a comprehensive SEO and digital marketing strategy? This could be helpful while trying to juggle multiple projects at once and provide a blueprint that I can follow and alter as I go. What free project management tools do you recommend? I was thinking of using Wunderlist, Trello or Evernote to keep track of projects, but there may be other suggestions I am not aware of. I have it in my budget to spend about $200/month worth of paid tools. Which tools are best for keyword research, backlink analysis, search rankings etc.? I am currently testing out Moz and SEM Rush, but would like a wide variety of information that helps me efficiently execute a plan but without too much white noise. What are the best paid (or free) tools to accomplish this? What are the best references for Q&As and reference materials on strategies, etc. for when I need to deep dive and do some learning on the fly? Besides this website of course. Thanks for any help!!
Link Building | | ccdispoto2 -
My current SEO plan
Hello, I am new to SEO. I had this plan and understanding that I thought was a good one but seems to not be working as well as I thought. Basically I thought that showing for a keyword was based on how close you had a page on your site with a title tag to the search and how many quality links you had to your sites. Also the content had to be original. So I had two plans. The first was to make specifically high value pages on my site (what to do when you are stopped by the police) and then try to seek out links for those pages. My second plan was to make keyword specific pages for things in different cities. IE Car Accident Lawyer Brampton, Real Estate Lawyer Brampton, Find a lawyer Brampton. I hired some law students to re-write the same page basically with different language for every city, thinking that this would solve the duplicate content issue. This worked very well at first but for some reason yesterday all of my car accident city pages were de-indexed and I'm not sure why. http://www.lawyerconnection.ca/practice-areas/car-accident-injury-lawyers/ Very few other pages were de-indexed but I know that one of the find a lawyer pages was de-indexed. Also the page I linked above was not de-indexed, just the city pages linked from that page. I am not sure why the car accident pages were de-indexed. Too Similar to each other? Too similar to the slip and fall pages? (Any help on that much appreciated) Anyway I'm freaking out and now questioning the whole plan! Any thoughts on my whole general SEO plan would be much appreciate. Is this a good one? Am I doing something wrong?
Link Building | | RafeTLouis0 -
★Does syndication of a news features from high Profile site like TechCrunch have a negative SEO impact?
As a co-founder of a startup that is weekly featured on high page rank news sites such as TechCrunch, The Next Web, TreeHugger , Yahoo News etc. These types of write ups are "SEO Gold" as they are high page rank sites with high relevancy to our sector and with unique good quality anchor text and copy. However... Within hours of each post going live the content and links are syndicated either via RSS or scraped and appear as duplicate content on in some cases 100's of very low quality and low relevancy content aggregation sites. To give you an example here are just two of the sites that are now appearing as linking domains due to this syndicated content and the links included in the article. Examples : Eco Market, The “Etsy For Eco,” Rebrands, Revamps, Raises & Prepares A U.S. Launch Sarah Perez | Technology | Page 4 The above are just a couple of examples amongst 100's that result from each feature. I would like to hear you opinion on if these links would be considered natural and you feel I should not take action or if you think these need removing by contacting the webmasters or disavowing the links? I am sure I cant be alone in having this problem and look forward to hearing you advice and tips
Link Building | | LiamPatterson0 -
Shopping comparison sites for ecommerce Seo
Does anyone use shopping comparison sites to drive traffic to an ecommerce site? If so does that improve your organic ranking or result in the first page being dominated by comparison sites?
Link Building | | DavidLenehan0 -
Links built by previous SEO company are mostly 'dead' - will this affect me?
Hi, This is my first post/question in the forum - so apologies if this topic has already been covered - or if the question seems daft! Here's the issue: I have started working on two websites, and have been doing a lot of on-site work, increasing valuable content, etc... I'm now slowly moving onto more off-site stuff and have noticed that a lot of the backlinks to both websites (built by SEO companies before I got here) are 'dead' and simply return 404 errors (yet they still show up in site explorer). I'll be honest, the links aren't great; the SEO companies have taken the word 'relevant' and completely re-defined it in their books! Will these links - from sites that aren't relevant... but are dead - have any impact on my SEO efforts from now on? Or should I treat these sites as a kind of 'clean slate' and work on building the brand naturally through social media and user experience, etc? Also - I'm re-structuring the internal pages of the site... would it be worth re-directing the old URLs (with all the dead in-bound links - that may have suffered a -50 penalty) to the new ones, or just start fresh with the new pages? Any advice, tips or stories to share (relevant ones, of course!) will be greatly appreciated! Thanks, Nick
Link Building | | Danapollo1 -
SEO Triage - What matters most?
If you only had 8 hours to work on an SEO project... How would you spend your time to get the fastest results? On-page optimization, or link-building? Context: On-Page Optimization: "A" grade (SEOMOZ On-Page Report Card) Keywords: "moderately competitive" (SEOMOZ Keyword Difficulty Tool) Domain Authority: 33 (SEOMOZ Competitive Link Analysis)
Link Building | | JessicaCox0