Does it make sense to go after broad search with less competition vs. narrow search with very high competition?
-
We are in the process of analyzing our current site structure, on-page optimization and keywords to form a new strategy around our site. What we are finding with the keyword research we’ve done thus far is keywords that are shorter-tail have less competition, but far more searches than some of the long-tail keywords. For purposes of illustration I will give an example. Let's say we sell Wedding Cakes and the keyword string “Garden Wedding” has approximately 246,000 monthly local searches and medium competition, but “Garden Wedding Cakes” only has 880 searches and very high competition.
We believe that if we create a very effective landing page for "Garden Wedding" with all kinds of great content surrounding "Garden Wedding" that we have a much better chance of ranking on page 1 than if we were to go after the term "Garden Wedding Cakes". Furthermore, the volume of search far exceeds the "Garden Wedding Cakes" and hopefully will reach a much larger audience. However, because "Garden Wedding" is such a broad term, we are concerned that we don't necessarily understand what folks are searching for vs, when someone types in "Garden Wedding Cakes" we know they are looking for a cake.
Here are the questions we have:
- Targeting broader terms with higher search, has anyone implemented this type of strategy? We think in the long run, this will help us with exposure, but also with help our targeted page of "Garden Wedding Cakes" rank higher (if we can earn a great PR for the page "Garden Wedding".
- Would we run the risk of creating a higher bounce rate with this strategy for people who are looking specifically for Garden Wedding items/supplies, etc.. Is this a major concern?
- Could we monetize the effort put into new, rich content surrounding Garden Weddings, when we are in the business to sell Wedding Cakes?
Any insight that one can provide would be greatly appreciated.
-
our short tail search has a lot less competition that our long tail
Yes, that makes this sound extra good!
Good luck! Let us know how it works!
-
Andrea,
Thanks so much for your response. If I understand you correctly, this is something that you employ and that you have seen success with. Do your competitors do the same? One interesting thing that we are seeing is that our competitors don't play within this space---meaning they don't rank for (or don't appear to try to rank for) our short tail keywords. We see that as an opportunity. Would you agree?
-
Thank you so much for your incredibly fast response. I think your answer helps us to affirm that we would not be shooting ourselves in the foot and is in fact, a good strategy to try. I did want to clear up that our short tail search has a lot less competition that our long tail. I would assume that this would suggest that we are definitely on the right track. Thanks again for your insight.
-
I think EGOL makes some great points, especially about content vs product/sales. And, given that I work on an incredibly complex site that often poses many SEO challenges, here's how I happen to look at it:
- Low volume words that are highly competitive you hope would mean a more targeted audience. (So, not throwing everything against the wall to see what sticks.) One issue: if it's, let's say 100 searches a month, then the best you can hope for is a percentage of that.
- Fact is, not everyone who may be looking for a "lockout tagout custom procedure" may search for that long tail. They may just search for "LOTO" - so, I have selected to build a keyword/SEO strategy that build long tail into short tail/broad terms.
- Also, what I have noticed is that even with the short tail, our bounce rates haven't taken a hit, perhaps because the meta descriptions give enough info away so people can tell before the click if we may be right for them.
- And, our rankings for a section where we did a much better pyramid build with keywords/content/like subjects has steadily improved in visibility - giving me hope that if you can manage the technical with understanding what Google wants (good, relevant content), it works.
Good luck!
Andrea
-
First, I agree that the traffic for "garden wedding" is going to be very different from the traffic for "garden wedding cakes".
If I owned a cake site I would want at least two special pages dedicated to "garden wedding cakes". One would be my sales page... and another would be an informative page that has a lot of content about that topic. How these cakes are different from others, why a person would want this type of cake, lots of sample photos, lots more sample photos. I might even have a third page that explains how to make them. These two informative pages would be built to be best-on-the-web content for their topic. The hope would be that they would attract links, likes tweets, and traffic. Each of these informative pages would have "house ads" with the goal of luring visitors into the sales page. If you have these three pages and they are successful you might get ranked #1, #2, and #3 in the "garden wedding cake" SERPs.
I would also build pages for "garden wedding". The goal would be to produce awesome content that will attract generic traffic. These would be very long content pages with tons of words, lots of photos, maybe video. I'd want substantive content because I think that it ranks better, gets shared more and attracts lots of long tail traffic.
As you mention, the "garden wedding" SERPs have a lot more competition and probably are more difficult to get rankings. However, my philosophy is... "Do not fear competition" because where there is competition there is also lots of traffic and there is often some money changing hads. My garden wedding page would have adsense on it to generate a bit of income and it would also have house ads that attempt to lure visitors to my cakes sales page.
Depending upon the topic and the amount of traffic and potential money I would not hesitate to create more than one page for the "garden wedding" theme. As long as you are producing more diverse content that is high quality you can keep pulling in still more long tail traffic that is different from your other garden weddings page.
Lots of people would say... you are committing the huge sin of keyword cannibalization. Yes, that is true - for the short tail terms but not for the long tail terms. It is the opposite side of the "archers dialog" from Braveheart that was horrifying in the film but applies perfectly here.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Are large property portals going to continue to dominate Google's search results?
We are having a discussion (potential argument) in our office around whether large portals (namely property portals) have longevity in Google's search. Argument 1:
Industry News | | NeilPursey
Google's rise in local search and rewarding strong brand names rather than keyword driven domain names will devalue property portals with keyword rich domain names. Property portals are essentially duplicating content on smaller individually owned property websites, therefore in time Google will devalue property portals. **Argument 2: **
Property portals have more property stock listed on their websites so therefore Google will reward them by ranking these websites higher than the smaller real estate agencies with niche stock in their areas that they operate in. The property portals that already are already in a dominate position already carry authority and their own sense of branding, therefore it's difficult for Google to ignore them. If we assume that Google is looking into user behaviour as a ranking factor, then this will help portals as they have more stock which means higher engagement on the website. I'd love to read the moz community thoughts and opinions on this. I reckon it's a worthy debate..0 -
We noticed that goods offered in our email newsletters used to disappeared from first google search results page!?
We noticed that goods offered in our email newsletters used to disappeared from fisrt google search results page. Goods where in top 5 positions or even higher, but after email newsletters we didn't find them even in top 100. We suspect service provider of email sending is in blacklist? Could it be reason? If yes, how could we check that?
Industry News | | Patogupirkti0 -
URL Search removal tool.
Hi All! I have tried to request a URL removal from Google search for an old testing site they still have listed. Ive tried requesting removal of the domain and of individual pages, all requests are getting rejected. Any help would be gratefully appreciated 😄 Many Thanks Anthony
Industry News | | Anthonykal-group0 -
Google Search Quality Team - Commission Based Reviews
I have been busy this past week writing articles for various sources about the recent update on Google. A number of people contacted me about the analysis I was doing and the report. Some were members of the Google Search Quality Team. I knew manual reports were done before - but after the documents they showed me regarding the reports they do and the compensation for doing the reports - I am left in a state of being pretty shocked. May be I have been naive for all these years but I didn't realize that; Google outsourced the review and reconsideration requests to individual reviewers for a compensation Google's position in terms of checking qualification and experience of these "reviewers" was very insufficient at best, The three contacts I spoke to who had done reports had very little training or experience. I went through the GSQT REVIEWERS PDF (a very long and thorough document) that I was sent - with them. We went together through some sites I wanted them to review and their comments that came back were quite astounding to say the least and would have made many of you Mozzers laugh. Obviously I don't want to post said document online here.... BUT, I wanted to know if: a) any Mozzers had ever been part of such a group - the GSQT b) had any dealings with them - in terms of having your website reviewed and known about it. I knew about this group way back - like in 2005 or 2006 or sometime around then - I was told at time it was stopped and Google had stopped paying these sub contractor reviewers. Please don't get me wrong here... totally on board with manual reviews... I would just prefer them done by a trained team that possibly worked for either a professional company that maintain high quality review testing and standards - or for that matter GOOGLE employees that were trained. I just am a little unsure of them being done by individual subbies that get paid for the amount they do. What if that subbie has got some skin in the game for a particular keyword? What if their knowledge about certain aspects isn't up to par or not tested on a regular basis. This space is always changing and as you guys ./ girls on this forum know - it can change pretty quick. I just would want all websites to be judged fairly and equally by a group trained EQUALLY and to the same standards. I don't care if this is a G team or not - I just want it to be a team that is trained equally and trained continuously as opposed to paying outside people based on numbers of reviews done. When the livelihood of a small business is the balance I don't want a commission hungry toe rag with one years experience being the gate keeper for me or any of our clients. Carlos
Industry News | | CarlosFernandes0 -
Will Search Engines implement timestamps?
We continuously receive comments on our partners' websites which are obviously spam from a third world country trying to build backlinks that some SEO firm outsourced. Out of curiosity, and what I've added to my prayers at night is for the search engines to apply an algorithm update to discredit comments posted under a certain time frame to help identify spam, and these garbage practices. Do you think something like this would happen? My most important thought is...how can we compete with companies that are doing these practices trying to get that quick buck? Look, we want to play the game with the highest ethics and morals and not "cheat" the system because we know a "work around". Thoughts...
Industry News | | cyberlicious0 -
Who is going to Searchlove London? Will you stop and say hi?
A massive part of the conference is meeting people. I went last year and would like to make sure I meet as much of the moz community as I can this year. If you are going to be there please let me know and we can all make a point to say hi I'm debating whether to go back to the mohawk hairstyle for the conference, for ease of recognition 😉 Cheers and hope to see you there Stephen
Industry News | | firstconversion0 -
Is Bing actually using Yahoo's search engine now?
All my Bing rankings are now the same as Yahoo's ranking were, but I expected the opposite. Meanwhile, my Yahoo rankings are exactly the same as they were last week.
Industry News | | agawrvagreaas0