Homepage vs specific page Backlink
-
Hello,
I have a local business and have been working on getting backlinks for highly relevant keywords.
- I have keyword optimized pages (keyword in URL, title, H1, etc) but I have been sending backlinks to the homepage, as these keywords represent the core of what we offer.
See example below:
-
car repair
-
car repair london
-
auto repair
-
auto repair london
I have been sending backlinks (with the correct anchor text of course) to the homepage, am I better off sending them to the specific pages?
- One more thing: the SEOMOZ report talks about cannibalisation of keywords, where for example the page optimised for "car repair" links to "Car repair london".
I have links to the optimised pages in a footer at the bottom of every single page on the website, is this bad practice? (considering SEOMOZ talks about cannibalisation? Should I do something else instead (or eliminate the footer links altogether?)
I would appreciate your expert advice.
-
I'm suggesting that you should focus on inbound links rather than internal links at this point. You've got a strong base given that you're hovering in such high positions already for the home page. Building on this through inbound link and social media efforts would be the primary place to put your link building energy and resources. And again, even in that scenario, work on a mix of links pointing to both the home page and inner pages.
If you do this, over time, you'll find you may bounce back and forth for a while between the home page and inner pages showing up in ranking, yet ultimately you'll get both the home and inner pages showing up in the results.
If you then also seed in brand related anchor text from external sources and social media, you'll also achieve the ultimate results for your brand - having Google SiteLinks show up with your brand in the #1 position AND having other site pages show up in the mix further down.
-
Alan,
thank you for your reply.
I am happy for either the homepage or the specific page to be found, it does not really matter to me.
Ok maybe I should have made it clear that the keywords I am targeting are for the highest level topical focus/intent. Looking at the analogy I give above where I use the keywords "auto repair", "auto repair london", "car repair" and "car repair london", you can see these are very close topically and the overall website theme would be "car/auto repair in london".
While the topic is the same, the homepage focusses more on the brand of our business (domain is also www.brand.com) with title, h1 etc focussed on the brand, while the inner page focus more on the specific keyword www.brand.com/keyword, with title, h1 etc focussing on keywords.
I am hovering on position 2-3 for the london-specific keywords, this is for the homepage, I wonder if I should focus link-building more on the inner page to try push to no.1.
As far as the footer links, I see what you mean, but since these pages are very similar topically and really there for SEO, unless I link from the footer, I really dont see any other place where I could link from - unless you suggest I am better off without the links at all?
Thank you.
-
Eben is correct in his answer. It's unnatural to only link to a home page or to an individual page for a specific keyword phrase or any links at all.
In my experience, cannibalization is a false flag concern for the vast majority of sites and it's overplayed by some people in the industry when there are so many other things to be focused on that have a higher value. I say this because it's like this. If your site is really well designed and people can easily navigate to find what they are looking for, then you should be happy for either your home page OR an inner specific page to be found and clicked. And when you execute properly with a mix of targets (home and inner pages), you will ultimately get BOTH the home page AND the inner page to show up in the search results.
Having said that, burying links in the footer the way you describe is NOT an SEO best practice. First, because footer links are the lowest form of link you can have on a site. Second, it's a signal that you're potentially attempting to spam the search engines.
If you wish to continue to maintain links in footers it should not be a case of keyword stuffing attempts, but instead, links to highly important pages where the anchor text is not specifically a keyword phrase, but instead, a description of the link destination. And typically, it should be a mirror of the main site navigation, or alternately, to second tier corporate pages (such as customer service, privacy, disclaimers, etc.).
On a final note, I'll suggest that you can ultimately only truly optimize the home page for the site's highest level topical focus or intent, and secondarily, to whatever other keyword focus you have actually optimized the home page for. So while it's okay (and natural) to have links pointing to the home page that have anchors with other keyword phrases, the majority should not be so.
-
Eben,
thank you - you definitely have a point.
In terms of overall SEO, I guess I am trying to understand whether it is better practice to push SEO for a specific page, or to push SEO for the homepage/entire website... Does Google favour page SEO or domain SEO? Let's not forget we are talking focussed niche here...
Thank you and I will wait to hear from the gurus as well !
I love the community of SEO MOZ
-
In regard to question 1:
I think it's best to mix it up a little. In "real life" users would sometimes link to your homepage, and sometimes to your product/services pages, so a natural mix of anchor text to home and inner pages is probably best. You don't want your inbound links to appear overly organized.
I'll defer to one of our many gurus to shed some light on question 2.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Are Sidebar Backlinks worth for SEO?
Hello! Let's use the following example: I have a blog (let's call it Blog A) and I find another blog in the same niche (this will be Blog B) that has higher DA and PA than mine. Will Google penalize me if the Blog B puts a link to my blog in their sidebar? Remember, the Blog A and Blog B are from the same niche. I ask this because Google says that links on sidebars appears in every page and in some pages the link may be useless. But if both blogs are from the same niche, there won't be pages where the links will be from different themes and with less relevance. So, is my thought correct: we can use sidebar links without caring about penalization ONLY if the blogs are from the same niche? Thanks in advance!
Link Building | | btqkelvin0 -
Hidden Backlinks
Hi, I hope someone can help me with this. We have a competitor who appears to be ranking No1 for a competitive search term with a very lame site and above some authoritative sites. He has been here for some time as well. When we check out his back link profile through OSE, Majestic and Ahrefs they show as only 3 backlinks from no PR sites. However, someone pointed out that they could be using a link network that is blocking every crawler apart from Google, Yahoo and BIng. I would like to know if there is a way to confirm this. For instance I know that we can use screaming frog to mimic Googlebot, however, if there a way to reveal the real backlinks to a site like this using any tools. Thanks
Link Building | | kirstyseo0 -
Backlinks and Domain Authority
Hi there, I have a question on backlinks. I have seen conflicting stories about it, and hoping someone with a vast amount of experience will be able to help me (If you could please be so kind). Now I understand the difference between 'no-follow' links and 'follow' links. I have accumulated quite a few 'no-follow' links through things like Facebook, Youtube, Twitter etc. I understand that they won't feed my site authority or trust; or anything of that sort (I do work on content too, and have gotten a few follow links, don't worry). Now I have seen conflicting answers to the actual importance of them. Some things I have read are saying that SEs completely ignore them (NFL), and they don't even consider them a 'link', but rather a user tool to further the experience of the reader on your site. Which is fair enough, but then people are turning around and also saying that Google relies heavily on them, and they only make up 5% of the internet or something. I have even read something saying they are the only ones worth getting (I know that is bs, but they must have a reason behind this thought?). If someone could enlighten me as to a 'ideal' ratio, and also any little known authoritative sites I could look at submitting content to. I am in the plumbing business, and doing my own sites, so I'm no expert. Also, what are the importance of comment links? I don't go for them, but don't know if I should? Sorry for the mouthful, but I would really appreciate help on this matter. Kindest regards, Kyle The Plumber Bro's The Electrician Bro's
Link Building | | Kyle_James0 -
Backlink lag time or not indexed?
I've looked through a few questions relating to backlinks not showing up in Open Site Explorer and I've got the same problem. I want to understand whether my backlinks aren't showing in SEOmoz due to a lag time (some say 5 - 8weeks) or because google hasn't indexed them.
Link Building | | EdoubleD
For example: http://www.marquee-hire-directory.com/oxfordshire_marqueehire_2.html Or http://www.weddingdayangel.com/listings/katalystic-events/ My link is http://www.katalysticevents.com Am I doing something wrong here?0 -
Is it worth 301 redirecting an old backlink from a 404 to a landing page?
I was reviewing the 404 report in webmaster tools, when I found a 404 back link from a 10 year old forum topic on a very high DA site. It seems the poster did a direct hotlink to a pdf that was on our site a very long time ago, but is now gone so you get a standard "can not be found" page on our site. Is it now worth redirecting the url to an appropriate landing page, considering the age of the post/ link and the sites DA, or is it not worth it because of the age of the link, its a forum, and we are still getting some juice from it anyway despite it being a 404, and won't get much more out of it. Just want to know it good practice if I find many such links (very old links to now 404 pages) Thanks
Link Building | | PaddyDisplays0 -
Dodgy backlinks
I've got a new client who made the mistake of spending $5 on a sack load of dodgy links some time ago. I'm redoing his site, not set up analtics or WMT or anything yet, just starting on it but I had a look at his backlink profile and it's pretty shocking. Riddled with porn and money scams etc, but I'm concerned by the nature of one of the links....to the url is disturbing and I'm tempted to report them to the police. :(. If I use the disavow tool will it remove the links from my backlink profile altogether or just block the dodgy site? I want to disaccociate the site altogether.
Link Building | | littlesthobo0 -
Is it better to link back to the root domain, or the specific page you're optimizing for?
I'm working on a project our site - building links for iPhone Repair. For the term "iphone repair miami" - is it more ideal to link to the root domain (xxx.com) or to the subpage that is about iPhone Repair (xxx.com/iphone-repair)? I would imagine the latter - but obviously that page has less authority than the root. Thanks!
Link Building | | preemo0