Page Over-optimized?
-
I read over this post on the blog tonight: http://www.seomoz.org/blog/lessons-learned-by-an-over-optimizer-14730 & it's got me concerned that I might be having a similar issue on our site?
Back in March & April of last year, we ranked fairly well for a number of long tail keywords, here is one in particular 'Mio Drink' for this page: http://www.discountqueens.com/free-mio-drink-from-kraft-facebook-offer
The page is still indexed, but appears back on page #3 for the search term.
During this time we had made a number of different updates to our site & I can't seem to put an exact finger on what might have caused the problem?
Can anyone see any issues that might have caused this to drop?
Thanks,
BJ
-
Awesome..thanks for the actionable items, I'll jump into them & see what I can find. Thanks!
-
On the html, I personally just checked your source. I also use a Firefox extension that auto-validates it while I look at it which is great for an eyeball. You can find it here http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/
On Panda, it's run on a regularish basis, often with a change to the algorithm, so it is possible your page was re-classified.
As for on-page ads, http://www.seomoz.org/blog/just-how-smart-are-search-robots, this article points out the the crawlers take into account above the fold content, and are rendering the page to determine this.
My greatest suspicion would still be that you lost some kind of freshness boost, especially as it's a page detailing an offer. Or alternatively lost a few very powerful links to the offer (knocked off the page of a list of offers e.t.c.)
Also on the ad, I'm with everyone else in surprise that putting up that ad didn't massively increase your bounce rate of the page and reduce the conversion rate of the page for the offer (as opposed to the e-book). There was an article recently pointing out that Google may (as in it's the subject of debate) be taking bounce rate into account, though that would only explain why it's not recovering as opposed to the initial drop if you ran the ad after the drop.
Generaly, you would expect your first time visitors to be leaving the site and never returning when you use such an ad, which could trigger such issue. One such article is here -> http://www.searchenginejournal.com/actual-bounce-rate-vs-bounce-rate-and-why-the-difference-matters-for-seo/31852/
I would try improving the pages html, fatten up the content somewhat and disable the ad for the page, then wait a couple months to see if there is any change. If not then it at the very least rules out the most likly culprits.
Other avenues you can explore are to investigate other sitewide changes, see if you can check historical link data for the page to check if you lost any powerful links, and to ensure your not just being legitimatly reduced in rankings by better competitor pages.
-
If you have done your homework, then so be it, but i am surprised.
-
Of course it does...we have people coming to the site looking for coupons. Our popup is a free eBook on how to save money using coupons. It doesn't popup every time, only for first time visitors.
Do we get 100% of the people submitting an email..of course not. Does anyone get annoyed, of course. Do we get higher conversion rates than without out..of course. That's why we use it!
If we judged everything by the cover, we'd never get anywhere. All the decision made on a site, need to be tested & measured. Hence what I was asking above in the article. If someone had data & ran some tests to suggest that a popup would have an effect on a popup, then that would be helpful information to have as I'm trying to address the drop in rankings.
-
I am suprised that it works, but then not everybody thinks like me.
-
K, thats a good opinion, but not the question at hand. I understand that it turns off some visitors, but we do it because it works
If it was in some way affecting our SEO, we would look into other alternatives.
-
I am not saying rankings or traffic will drop, but it will turn people off. it turns me off, people do not ask for a pop up, so it is a turn off when you get one.
but honestly, i thought it would be obvious to everone that blocking someones screen with a pop up is annoying, i didnt think you would need an article on it.
-
Actually I just pulled up my notes to find out when we added the popup to the site & it was on May 19th, which would have came after the traffic had dropped for these pages.
-
Hmm...you're the second person to question the popup promoting our eBook. Can you provide any articles that discuss how this would affect our Organic rankings? Could this really cause that much of an issue?
If I turned it off & waited to see how long it would take to get better search results, how long do you think I would need to wait to see results? I'd be fine running a test on this. At the moment, we do get a good amount of subscribers, so it would be a loss if we lost it.
-
This page http://onefrugalchick.com/2011/03/22/free-mio-drink-mix-sample-new-product/ ranks higher for the term & was posted around the same time as ours. So I'm not sure if it would just have been a freshness boost?
What tool are you using to crawl this page to find all the html errors? That would be helpful to find them & to start fixing them.
Do you have any resources/articles you could send about a page having an issue because a popup promoting the site? I'd be curious to look into this to see if there could be any issues.
Thin Content: This was my original impression, but after the Panda update we stuck around for at least 2 months, before anything happened. I wouldn't have suspected an update like that to take this long, so I'm suspicious about it being something else? Do you know if it could have delayed by two months?
-
Thanks for the response! I have tracked the backlinks & haven't seen any major drops overall? Is there any tools available that would show an overall link count for a particular site overtime? Also I wouldn't say this was a competitor move, as much as something happening on our site.
-
Your page is either otimised, or it is not, it may be at its optimum, but it cant be over the optimum.
unless you have keywords stuffed it and gone un-natural i would not worry.
I would be more worried about the delayed pop up you have, it would seem to me you are trying to show one thing to google and anouther to everyone else. It would also send users away. I would simply go to the next site in the search after seeing that.
-
Theres a few possable things here.
First the page might have recived a 'freshness' boost, as it is an offer. Which would explain an excellent ranking with few links.
The page also has a /lot/ of html errors which could cause serch engines to misintuprate the page if their bad enough.
The overlay ad might be seen as spammy, and the content could be seen as thin.
As for over optimisation, it seems within tollerance to me, but theres to meny on and off page issues to be sure.
-
Unfortunately, it's going to be difficult to tell what the problem is just by eye balling the site. Hopefully these questions will give you a starting point.
Have you checked your back links to make sure your site still has strong link juice coming in or any at all?
Was there any competitors who recently entered your target market that might have pushed you down?
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Canonical Page Question
Hi, I have a question relation to Canonical pages That i need clearing up. I am not sure that my bigcommere website is correctly configured and just wanted clarification from someone in the know. Take this page for example https://www.fishingtackleshop.com.au/barra-lures/ Canonical link is https://www.fishingtackleshop.com.au/barra-lures/ The Rel="next" link is https://www.fishingtackleshop.com.au/barra-lures/?sort=bestselling&page=2 and this page has a canonical tag as rel='canonical' href='https://www.fishingtackleshop.com.au/barra-lures/?page=2' /> Is this correct as above and working as it should or should the canonical tag for the second (pagination page) https://www.fishingtackleshop.com.au/barra-lures/?page=2 in our source code be saying rel='canonical' href='https://www.fishingtackleshop.com.au/barra-lures/' />
Technical SEO | | oceanstorm0 -
Could I optimize my homepage anymore ?
Hi everyone, My website is http://brownquarterhorse.com I was wondering if it would be possible to optimize my homepage anymore. I just feel like it's lacking SEO. The page grader has rated it an 'A', but im not sure if the page grader is a good reflection ?
Technical SEO | | BenDuncombe0 -
Optimize code
Hi Guy's, In Wordpress we've got the plugin "WP Rocket". It's possible to optimize CSS, JS, HTML and Google Fonts. If i optimize (minify) CSS and JS the website will load faster and the pagespeed will be reduced. So i guess that's always better for SEO results en SERPS... But what will happen if i optimize my HTML code? It will be much shorter but less organized. Will this also affect SEO results and rankings? I'm awear that less code will increase my text ratio, but don't know if Google will punish the website for having a code that's not very good organized. Thanks!
Technical SEO | | Happy-SEO1 -
Help! Pages not being indexed
Hi Mozzers, I need your help.
Technical SEO | | bshanahan
Our website (www.barnettcapitaladvisors.com) stopped being indexed in search engines following a round of major changes to URLs and content. There were a number of dead links for a few days before 301 redirects were properly put in place. And now, only 3 pages show up in bing when I do the search "site:barnettcapitaladvisors.com". A bunch of pages show up in Google for that search, but they're not any of the pages we want to show up. Our home page and most important services pages are nowhere in search results. What's going on here?
Our sitemap is at http://www.barnettcapitaladvisors.com/sites/default/files/users/AndrewCarrillo/sitemap/sitemap.xml
Robots.txt is at: http://www.barnettcapitaladvisors.com/robots.txt Thanks!0 -
Micro-sites for Landing Pages?
We are working with a site that is difficult at best to update. The client intends to re-do the site in 18 months or so but needs to start generating more traffic (and sales) now. What are thoughts on creating landing pages as micro-sites that point to the current site conversion page as a stop gap? Beyond not sharing authority is there any known penalty? By the way they don't have tremendous ranking right now - often bottom of page two - and the micro-site won't duplicate any content.
Technical SEO | | InformaticsInc0 -
Help with Places Pages
How can we get our Google Place page to rank higher, and how can we then keep it there instead of seeing it bounce around? We seem to have trouble getting a decent ranking for our places page even though out website ranks well on Google for geographical phrases?
Technical SEO | | onlinechester0 -
Does this page crawl well?
I just put up a page that uses an image map to illustrate a national currency note. http://www.antiquebanknotes.com/NationalCurrency/National-Bank-Note-Information.aspx My goal with this page is get results for National Bank Note. But I know image maps are wierd creatures and not good for linking. My question is, will Google index my tooltips and find this page useful and therefore worthy? I think the content is useful for my users but I just don't know if the implementation will work well. This screen will eventually have 5 or 6 notes on it and I don't want to do it the concensus is negative... Thanks for any advice.
Technical SEO | | Banknotes0 -
Home page penalty?
What does it mean when your home page has a penalty? I have a site that has good rankings for many pages, but my home page seems to be penalized by Google. I tried searching for my home page URL in Google, www.xxxxxx.com and my page doesn't show up, but sub pages do show up? What would cause this penalty and how do you correct this issue.
Technical SEO | | tadden0