Severe Health issue on my site through Webmaster tools
-
I use Go Daddy Website Tonight. I keep getting a severe health message in Google Webmaster tools stating that my robots.txt file is blocking some important page. When I try to get more details the blocked file will not open. When I asked the Go Daddy peeps they told me that it was just image and backup files that do not need to be crawled. But if Google spiders keep thinking an important page is blocked will this hurt my SERPS?
-
I would just like to add: If you're considering signing up for something (SEV), you may as well get a real hosting package.
-
Thanks for letting us know, and glad you found a work-around. A 0-second META REFRESH sometimes acts like a 301 - it's not ideal, as you said, but it's something.
-
For anyone else with Website Tonight, I have finally found a work around if not a fix. Being that Website Tonight will not allow you to do a 301 Redirect of an old page, I have figured out that if you re-create the deleted page (just the URL not the content) and use the Meta Tag to do a REFRESH to the new page, anytime the old page is clicked on it will bring them to the new page. Not ideal, of course, for SEO purposes but at least they are no longer going to a 404 and HOPEFULLY your old link juice will pass on.
-
While creating the copy of the home-page isn't ideal, if Google hasn't indexed it, it's very likely not creating duplicate content problems. Either they're filtering it out or haven't indexed it at all (since it probably has no links/paths).
I don't think that this alone is the cause of your ranking drop, but you've got a few things going on, so it's tough to say. Unfortunately, most of the ideal solutions seem to be impossible in the Godaddy system, and that's going to continue to cause you some problems.
-
No I have not made any changes yet. Google has never preferred the /shakeology.html page. I don't think it's ever been indexed. My only problem is that since I tried to CHANGE the root url not CREAT ANOTHER VERSION my serps have seemed to tank and I am trying to avoid the duplicate content issues that I believe the /shakeology.html is causing.
-
No I have not made any changes yet. Google has never preferred the /shakeology.html page. I don't think it's ever been indexed. My only problem is that since I tried to CHANGE the root url not CREAT ANOTHER VERSION my serps have seemed to tank and I am trying to avoid the duplicate content issues that I believe the /shakeology.html is causing.
-
It's a bit dangerous to simply block "shakeology.html", if Google has preferred it for a reason - you could end up getting your root page back in the rankings, or you could end up just falling out completely. I think you'd be better off leaving it and having the "wrong" page rank, if that's the only viable option.
I'm actually still showing your root home-page ranking, though, and now the "shakeology.html" page isn't even appearing in the index. Did you already make a change?
-
My original wanted homepage is www .hompage .com
My duplicate is www. hompage .com/shakeology.html
Would it be possible and/or advisable to use a Parameter in Web Master tools to ignore the /shakeology.html?
-
Unfortunately, there just comes a point where sometimes these very narrow CMS systems hit their limits, and it can start to harm you. I don't know Website Tonight well enough to help on that (hopefully someone else does), but there may come a point where you want to consider to a more advanced platform. These days, there are a lot of options that aren't budget-breakers, although switching is always a bit tough.
-
Unfortunately no. The edit page section of Website Tonight only shows the newer homepage.com/shakeology.html version and not the original homepage.com
I am afraid to delete the homepage.com/shakeology.html in fear that I will be left with neither one.
You probably aren't seeing the preview of the .com/shakeology.html because it is not the indexed homepage. It shows for the homepage.com version. The canonical tag was me trying to redirect search engines from the new (unwanted) homepage to the original because Website tonight won't allow me to 301 it.
-
Sounds like SEO Executive has got you covered on the Godaddy front - just wanted to point out a couple of things:
(1) I'm not seeing a preview for your home-page, and I had trouble connecting to it the first time. It seems to be cahced, so this could be a fluke.
(2) Not sure if this is part of the Godaddy code, but there's a really weird tag on the home-page:
name="canonical tag" content=""/>
That might just be a reference, but it doesn't do anything. If it's supposed to actually be a canonical, then something is broken.
-
Yes I saw that but unfortunately the organize your site page on website tonight only shows the new page. I'm afraid to delete it and lose both.
-
I found some great info here that I believe explains it: http://support.godaddy.com/help/2986/organizing-your-website-using-the-organize-site-page
-
I really do appreciate all of your help. Here's the issue I'm having with this though... After I renamed the homepage file to add /shakeology.html to it (because I thought it would be beneficial to have a main keyword in the url) Website Tonight only shows me the homepage.com/shakeology.html and not the homepage.com. I'm afraid that if I delete /shakeology.html I will show neither one and in essence, according to Website Tonight just be deleting my homepage. I'm not sure how to properly accomplish what I'm looking to do without screwing myself any further??
-
Personally, that's what I would do is delete it. Unless, there is a reason you need that page.
-
Since I can't 301 it, would it be bad to delete the dupe page?
-
Yes thanks. I foolishly renamed my home page and caused a duplicate page. Website tonight will not allow me to do a 301 redirect. I put a canonical tag on the /shakeology. Should this do the trick?
-
Your welcome! I'm also sending the other side of the story not to confuse you but to allow you to make a decision based on both sides: http://groups.google.com/a/googleproductforums.com/forum/#!category-topic/webmasters/crawling-indexing--ranking/8nyxCtv9RHM
-
Oh OK great. Thanks so much for your help. I just got nervous because Google puts up the Severe Health Issue warning everytime I get crawled.
-
This is a javascript file and I don't see it being an issue unless Google thinks your hiding it to be spammy . Also, there are some that say it's a benefit to block js files from the search for SEO purposes. Here is an example of that situation: http://www.seomofo.com/advanced/do-not-let-google-crawl-javascript.html I think since this is out of your control and goes by the standard of how Godaddy sets up there sites, then it shouldn't be an issue.
-
It was just crawled. And it was after robots.txt was uploaded. This is the page it lists: siteUtil.js
-
Also, the following are duplicates: http://www.shakes4life.com/shakeology.html & http://www.shakes4life.com
-
When did Google last index your site? You can check this through webmaster tools. When did you instal the robots.txt file. The reason I ask: If Google's last crawl was before you uploaded your robots file then that could be the issue. Please look at these statistics and verify this before we move further.
-
Is Google webmaster tools giving you the specific name of the files that are being blocked?
-
Is there something on it that would be detrimental to my SERPS?
-
Yes. When I type www.shakes4life.com/robots.txt the same list shows.
-
Can you place the following in your browser and replace website with your domain name and www or non www in front. website.com/robots.txt
Let me know if you see the same stuff you sent me in your last response
-
Below is the robots.txt Website Tonight Creates when I tell it to allow all pages:
User-agent: *
Allow: /
User-agent: *
Disallow: /cache/
Disallow: /_backup/
Disallow: /_mygallery/
Disallow: /_temp/
Disallow: /_tempalbums/
Disallow: /_tmpfileop/
Disallow: /dbboon/
Disallow: /Flash/
Disallow: /images/
Disallow: /plugins/
Disallow: /scripts/
Disallow: /stats/
Disallow: /statshistory/
Disallow: /WstxSearchResults.html
Disallow: /WstxSearchResults.php
Disallow: /QSC/ -
Yes you are correct. I forgot to mention (sorry) that I do use S.E.V. It allows you to create a robots.txt and lets you choose pages to block. However, even when you choose allow all, by default it blocks certain files. Go Daddy tells me they are only system files but Google tells me an important page is blocked.
-
From what I know, Godaddy Website Tonight does not offer you the opportunity to create a custom robots.txt. I believe you have to sign up for there Search Engine Visibility services. Here is some more information: http://support.godaddy.com/help/article/5321
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Do I need to verify my site on webmaster both with and without the "www." at the start?
As per title, is it necessary to verify a site on webmaster twice, with and without the "www"? I only ask as I'm about to submit a disavow request, and have just read this: NB: Make sure you verify both the http:website.com and http://www.website.com versions of your site and submit the links disavow file for each. Google has said that they view these as completely different sites so it’s important not to forget this step. (here) Is there anything in this? It strikes me as more than a bit odd that you need to submit a site twice.
Technical SEO | | mgane0 -
Webmaster Tools Manual Actions - Should I Disavow Spammy Links??
My website has a manual action against it in webmaster tools stating; Unnatural links to your site—impacts links Google has detected a pattern of unnatural artificial, deceptive, or manipulative links pointing to pages on this site. Some links may be outside of the webmaster’s control, so for this incident we are taking targeted action on the unnatural links instead of on the site’s ranking as a whole I have checked the link profile of my site and there are over 4,000 spammy links from one particular website which I am guessing this manual action refers to. There is no way that I will be able to get these links removed so should I be using Google's Disavow Tool or is there no need? Any ideas would be appreciated!!
Technical SEO | | Pete40 -
Best practice for eCommerce site migration, should I 301 redirect or match URLs on new site
Hi Guys, I have been struggling with this one for quite some time. I am no SEO expert like many of you, rather just a small business owner trying to do the right thing, so forgive me if I say something that makes no sense 🙂 I am moving our eCommerce store from one platform to another, in the process the store is getting a massive face lift. The part I am struggling with is whether I should keep my existing URL structure in place or use 301 redirects to create a cleaner looking URLs. Currently the URLs are a little long and I would love to move to a /category/product_name type format. Of course the goal is not to lose ranking in the process, I rank pretty well for several competitive phrases and do not want to create a negative impact. How would you guys handle this? Thanks, Dinesh
Technical SEO | | MyFairyTaleBooks0 -
Use webmaster tools "change of address" when doing rel=canonical
We are doing a "soft migration" of a website. (Actually it is a merger of two websites). We are doing cross site rel=canonical tags instead of 301's for the first 60-90 days. These have been done on a page by page basis for an entire site. Google states that a "change of address" should be done in webmaster tools for a site migration with 301's. Should this also be done when we are doing this soft move?
Technical SEO | | EugeneF0 -
Webmaster Tools Site Map Question
I have TLD that has authority and a number of micro-sites built off of the primary domain. All sites relate to the same topic, as I am promoting a destination. The primary site and each micro-site have their own CMS installation, but the domains are mapped accordingly. www.regionalsite.com/ <- primary
Technical SEO | | VERBInteractive
www.regioanlsite.com/theme1/ <- theme 1
www.regioanlsite.com/theme2/ <- theme 2
www.regionalsite.com/theme3/ <- theme 3 Question: Should my XML site map for Webmaster Tools feed all sites off of the primary domain site map or are there penalties for this? Thanks.0 -
Site maps, Is there any benefit?
I have a relatively simple and small site (60 pages). All of it is crawlable and there is nothing I want non follow. So, is there any real benefit to a sitemap since Google can get to all the site anyway? Do they give the site more credence or something because it's there? I guess as an aside, are there any favorite sites that will generate a site map? Thanks!
Technical SEO | | Banknotes0 -
RSS Hacking Issue
Hi Checked our original rss feed - added it to Google reader and all the links go to the correct pages, but I have also set up the RSS feed in Feedburner. However, when I click on the links in Feedburner (which should go to my own website's pages) , they are all going to spam sites, even though the title of the link and excerpt are correct. This isn't a Wordpress blog rss feed either, and we are on a very secure server. Any ideas whatsoever? There is no info online anywhere and our developers haven't seen this before. Thanks
Technical SEO | | Kerry220 -
Crawl Errors In Webmaster Tools
Hi Guys, Searched the web in an answer to the importance of crawl errors in Webmaster tools but keep coming up with different answers. I have been working on a clients site for the last two months and (just completed one months of link bulding), however seems I have inherited issues I wasn't aware of from the previous guy that did the site. The site is currently at page 6 for the keyphrase 'boiler spares' with a keyword rich domain and a good onpage plan. Over the last couple of weeks he has been as high as page 4, only to be pushed back to page 8 and now settled at page 6. The only issue I can seem to find with the site in webmaster tools is crawl errors here are the stats:- In sitemaps : 123 Not Found : 2,079 Restricted by robots.txt 1 Unreachable: 2 I have read that ecommerce sites can often give off false negatives in terms of crawl errors from Google, however, these not found crawl errors are being linked from pages within the site. How have others solved the issue of crawl errors on ecommerce sites? could this be the reason for the bouncing round in the rankings or is it just a competitive niche and I need to be patient? Kind Regards Neil
Technical SEO | | optimiz10