Google Webmaster Tools notice of detected unnatural links ...
-
Hi,
We recently got "the message" from Google about unnatural links for two of our 50 sites. Ranking has dropped significantly since, we did not take any action to remove the links.
All our 50 sites were managed by the same SEO company but only two got this message.
We are in the process of understanding the best ways to deal with this situation, but currently there are two main approaches we can detect:
- Remove the links, resubmit for reconsideration
- Ignore the message and do not do anything, if you do something it is actually like admitting you did something wrong, and Google can not prove that you did...
Any insights on what approach we should adopt?
Thanks in advance.
-
David -
Thank you for explaining more clearly, it's really appreciated!
If all major keywords have dropped 5-10 spots, it seems that your traffic must be down quite a bit, not to mention brand exposure.
I would submit a reinclusion request. I would be totally transparent, tell them what you have done to try to get the links removed, but also tell them that you did not build these links. Show them what links you are responsible for.
Unfortunately there is no way to know how long it will take for your client to recover. It's possible that they will be sandboxed for a while. What I would recommend doing is moving forward to building really good links for them, trying to get good press coverage, and try to get in contact with someone on the spam team to review your case.
John
-
Hey John -
I'm really not convinced there was any negative seo in the sense that the term is being meant of late. I believe our past seo company built blog network links without consulting us. The foreign porn site links are more of a mystery. I'm reluctant to submit a reinclusion request in case they manually make rankings worse, what do you think about that idea? Our site has not tanked, but all major KWs have dropped 5-10 spots. A couple havent budged since getting the letter.
-
Hey David -
It all depends on how long it takes for the reinclusion request to process, if your rankings have indeed tanked. If you didn't build the links, be sure to talk about this prominently in your reinclusion request. Other than that, honestly, make a stink and get on Google's radar. If it's a case of negative SEO, then we need to make Google aware of it.
-
Any comments/suggestions? How long will this stupid penalty last? We never even created the bad links and cant get them removed.
-
Hi John,
Well naturally, my definition of a 'good website' will be biased. However there are no GWT reported onsite issues, no coding/browser issues, 100% original content, low bounce rate and a high % or returning visitors. We only received the GWT notice of unnatural links and 3 weeks later found quite a large drop in most but not all, rankings. Does this mean it's an algorithmic penalty and if so, how long will it last? We didnt publish any unnatural links on blog networks ourselves, but an seo company we paid money to did, and they have not responded to any of our requests for removal of those links. Ive been able to email some blogs and get a positive removal but the majority have not responded, and there are hundreds.
-
David -
What's your definition of a "good website"? If traffic has dropped 75%, Google has lost faith in your site and something has gone horribly wrong, thus your site is no longer considered "good" in their eyes. If you've done any unnatural linkbuilding (any comment spam or bought links), you need to get as many of these removed, or at least let Google know about it so that you can get back in the index.
There is no way, beyond being notified in GWT of unnatural links being detected and seeing a drop in traffic/rankings, to know for certain that a manual penalty has been applied. Usually you will receive a notice in GWT when this happens, though. Otherwise it's algorithmic.
-
Is there some certain way to know if youve got a penalty when rankings drop after getting this letter? Is it worth sending for reconsideration if youve got a good website?
-
Tried that waqid. Was expensive and still our rankings are terrible since 3 weeks after getting the letter. Maybe cause yahoo and botw for instance saw fit to place us on some regional pr0 page that gets cached once a decade. Seems awfully unfair to penalize a site for things they might not have caused, or be able to control.
-
Here is a suggestion. I had the same issue with one of my clients. We added the client to some human edited directories and after about 30 days we were back on our rankings. You are going to need to browse this site for a list of Human Edited Directories and sort through them. These sites are not cheap, you will spend anywhere from 20-300 per submission. Most being permanent listings.A few annual and very few monthly.
-
I was all prepared to shout down your answer as i just could not see how going on like nothing has happened will help.
But you make some very very valid points and as such we have decided to "try" get rid of 20-30 of the definitely crappy links that offer no value, tidy up the blog posts - delete the really rubbish blog posts and start building some better content and better links. But crucially we will not do a resubmit request.
-
Hello IM Rubbish,
You are in a unique situation (assuming that you are not an affiliate marketer). A large majority of people getting the message are seeing only minor changes in their rankings (Even after the 2-4 week lag time). Getting the notification does not mean that your are going to lose rankings or get a penalty. There are a lot of cases where webmasters (or their SEO's) never built a single link and are still getting the message. The majority of people who are loosing rankings are only loosing rankings on a few over-optimized keywords, and on a limited number of pages.
In the case where someone has lost a ton of their rankings because of massive low quality link building and over optimization (and in many cases low quality websites), I still do not suggest submitting a re-consideration request. Most of the rankings that were lost were because of devalued links not because of a penalty. And most trust penalties/filters are short lived. If your site has lost that many rankings, inviting Google to do a full manual review of your site is a very bold move, and you must be prepared to do a ton of work to get a positive answer (most people are not getting positive answers even after spending weeks and hundreds of man hours to "clean up" their links). And here is the kicker, getting a positive answer is not going to cause Google to revalue the unnatural links, so your rankings are not going to rebound as much as you might hope. They may shorten the length of the trust penalty, but the trust penalty is short lived anyways (It must be short lived else competitors could easily wack eachother). You don't need Google's written forgiveness to rebuilt trust, you can do that by building better content, being socially engaged etc.
Here are 2 scenarios to illustrate my point
-
Scenario 1 - You contact Google, they tell you that you have "Unnatural Links". You go about removing whatever links you can that you believe to be unnatural. You reply to Google and they respond telling you that you still have unnatural links.. Repeat multiple times and still not get a positive answer from Google. This is what is happening to most people.
- Result - You have removed a ton of links, some of which were likely still helping you, and Google still ignores your plea. But now you are marked as a admitted offender and have been manually reviewed, which only makes it tougher to recover. On top of that you have spent time that could have been spent improving your site, which would ultimately have a much longer term impact on your trust/rankings, and also reduce chances of future dips in rankings due to unnatural links.
-
Scenario 2 - You do the above steps, but instead you do finally get a positive response from Google. Your rankings are still not going to bounce back to where they were prior to the devaluation happening. Google is not going to revalue links its automated algorithms have devalued.
- Google may remove/shorten the trust penalty which will help slightly with your rankings, but it will not get you back you original rankings. and again, most trust penalties are 1-3 months long. And even that time can be reduced if positive trust signals are introduced.
-
-
I dont see how doing nothing will do any good at all, we have dropped massively for 75% of our keywords and Google is telling us they have detected unnatural links, i dont believe doing nothing will help.
Google is telling us to get our links in order and show them we have got it sorted by resubmitting, surely ignoring will just ensure you get penalized?
-
It is better to do nothing in almost all cases.
Submitting for reconsideration is not going to undue any devaluation that is done on links they found as unnatural. In extreme cases where all/most of your links appear to be unnatural, you may receive an additional trust penalty, but that only lasts a couple of months at the most.
Google has been devaluing links that appear unnatural for a long time, the only thing new is that they are now sending notifications.
Build quality content and links, expand your social reach etc.. you will rebound from any ranking losses over time. Use the notification as a wake up call that quality is better than quantity.
-
Just got this message on one of my sites as well. I thought we had been doing everything by the book but am finding a lot of directory submission websites the farther down I go. Most of our links are from solid sites with solid page ranks, but there are some directories like this: http://www.56resolutions.info/Business/Equipment/?s=H that I think may be giving us some problems.
I guess our next step is talking to everyone here to find out who submitted the site to these directories and then attempt to get them removed.
-
Have you questioned the SEO Company About their practices and how they gain your links?
This could REALLY help us here give you the best possible answer (even though right off the bat, #2 seems like a bad idea, just for the fact you need to see what is going on, so it can be stopped if necessary before other sites are penalized)
The Best Answer is #1 in my opinion
Since the most probable cause for your penalty is content farms and overuse of anchor texts, here is a nice post about a person who went through that
http://www.seomoz.org/blog/unnatural-link-warnings-blog-networks-advice
This is a little old, but it is a WBF on this issue
http://www.seomoz.org/blog/whiteboard-friday-oh-i-got-a-penalty
Here is also a post from Dr. Pete on cutting the bad links strategies
http://www.seomoz.org/blog/6-ways-to-recover-from-bad-links
IMHO
I would personally (since you know it is a penalty cause you were warned) use Dr. Pete's article to help you track down the bad links, attempt to remove them, fix any other issues you may have on your site that are "questionable" and submit a reconsideration letting them know you worked with an SEO firm, and you took matters into your own hands, cleaned them up, and it won't happen again.
And then you wait....
Hope this helps
Shane
-
I have posted the same question this morning regarding one of my sites, so il keep updated with comments here as well
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Should I Be Concerned About Unnatural Links Pointing to 404 Pages?
I bought an existing domain name on Sedo sometime ago and launched a new website on it in early June this year. I noticed there are about 5 or 6 spammy links from directories that were obviously bought by the previous domain owner but they're pointing to pages that never existed on the new website. Other than that, the link profile is 100% clean and it's quite good actually, lots of links from my content being shared on social networks. So should I be worried about these links? Like a lot of webmasters, I'd like to avoid using the disavow tool, I really don't trust that thing.
Link Building | | sbrault740 -
When do my links show up?
For the last two weeks I have been working on linkbuilding. I have downloaded competitors link reports and started contacting or submitting links. In the last two weeks I have gotten about 50-60 or so. In the newest report it shows I went up four c-blocks. Why is that? It is kind of discouraging.
Link Building | | EcommerceSite0 -
Total Links vs Google Webmaster Site Links
I am interested why the numbers between SEOmoz and Google are so different. In SEOmoz we only show 17,000ish links from 190ish domains. In Google, we show 200,000+ links from 370 domains. Why is there such a dramatic difference?
Link Building | | webspecdesign0 -
Why aren't links to my site from YouTube showing up in my link reports?
Our company is paying for a service to create hundreds of videos/month for us with links back to our primary domain. If I go to YouTube I see the videos with the links, but YouTube does not show in my link reports. Why not?
Link Building | | jtroia0 -
Link building
Hello all ! I would love some opinions about one Link Building technical aspect from SEOs, link builders ... How important is the number of outgoing links on the page you have the opportunity to place a link ? (from a scale of 1-10 / what about where dose this factor fits overall with your check list , as important to consider as far as link building) Would you place a link on a page with 200+ outgoing external links if the page is ok (not involved in selling links, all links are related with the subject, target page, anchor text etc) or you would go with a link on a 10-15 links per page but not that 'powerful' and not that related (not spammy but more general on the subject that can contain links to some other non related resources). Eg: Option 1: www.whatever-name.com/links.html the entire domain is about x. It has 250 links in that page (in the links.html) all links on the links.html pages are somehow related / resources with x. Your link can be placed with an anchor text related with x that will target a page on your site related with x. Domain page rank : 6 (as a general indicator), Page PR, the links.html one, PR: 2 Option 2: www.some-other-name.com/x-is-so-great the entire domain is NOT about x, just the page. It has 5..10 links in that page (external links more or less related with x - but not spammy) Your link can be placed with an anchor text related with x that will target a page on your site related with x. Domain page rank : 3 (as a general indicator), Page PR, the links.html one, PR: 1 What's your best option ? Thanks !
Link Building | | eyepaq1 -
Link building for rankings VS Link building for relationships
A Big Shout To Everyone -- Good Morning and What's Up 🙂 As I read today through seomoz professional guide to link building and the section why link building matters and in addition to this a newsletter I received today that changed my whole thinking towards link building for rankings vs for relationships. It is already happening on social networks if you are active there, but what about on your website. What are your thoughts on the following ? Google's job is provide the most relevant results to surfers online, and looking the link profile of a site & the page itself is the key to determining which page to serve on plate to the surfers link query ! Webmasters Site Objective:
Link Building | | helpwanted
I think that we as webmasters have to ask ourselves what do we want to achieve with link building. To get quick traffic or build slow authority links, high rankings, lead generation, sales & other things here I may be missing etcccc Other Objective Networking & Relationship Building Alliances : What I discovered today is that building links for 1st page rankings are great and will provide me with steady traffic, but not all of it is targeted traffic, but what else can I do to bring targeted traffic and at the same time try to build alliances with other related non competing business owners online. The idea... is to apply old school networking / relationship building alliances to get targeted traffic to my site that can actually benefit from my services. How Do We Achieve This I become a editor for approving resource links for me site, only the best will be placed on my site as a resource. Build a valuable tightly themed categorized resource section with related non competing resources that can help my sites visitors find what they are looking for, send visitors to non competing resources that may purchase their services which helps me build a relationship with them, and may can with rankings as well, provided I am selective with my qualification process. Questions & Concerns Below : What should I be thinking about when creating a resource categorized links page How many outgoing do follow links should I allow from this links partner page How will this links resource page affect my own SE 1st Page Rankings and is it worth it based on getting targeted traffic Any pros / cons I may be missing here0 -
Link to those that link to you? Worthwhile?
We have thousands and thousands of sites that link to a domain we are working on, many with low page authority and high domain (bloggers, forum posts, etc). Has anyone experimented with linking to the pages that link to you (not from your site) but from other means in an effort to boost their quality? I'm not sure what method we would use, maybe some relevant blog comments or social votes. But curious if this could be an effective method.
Link Building | | iAnalyst.com0 -
Should I unify my links?
Checking at opensiteexplorer.org I can see that: mydomain.com has has DA 26, linking root domains 1, total links 22 www.mydomain.com has DA 26, linking root domains 31, total links 89 The 22 links to the non-www domain come from the same site, which I would be able to convince to change to the www domain. Is it worth doing it? Will it add up to better DA? Thanks J PS: with only 32 root domains I think I have to do some serious link building...
Link Building | | TIBA0