New EU Laws governing cookies; will Google Analytics still be usable after May 25th?
-
Hi, first time I've posted a question, New EU Laws governing cookies; will Google Analytics still be usable after May 25th? - apologies in advance if its already been covered, but I couldn't find any answers when I searched - google search showed someone else ask the question already, but no straight answers were given:-
From May 25th the Privacy and Electronic Communications Directive will come in to force which prohibits the use of cookies without informed, prior consent from web users. I've been trying to research to see whether or not this will affect Google Analytics.The Directive seems to be designed to prevent behavioural tracking, rather than web stats, but after reading the directive (with no law experience) I'm fairly confused by what will be prohibited. If anyone has any thoughts on the matter, I'd be very grateful!
-
Today's YouMoz is also about this subject. http://www.seomoz.org/ugc/not-freaking-out-about-the-eu-cookie-legislation
-
I’ve been keeping an eye on this topic myself, specifically trying to spot new & useful information from authoritative sources. The main area that’s of concern for all our customers is the grey area of Analytical cookies.
These two might be of interest:
1. It’s not about cookies, it’s about privacy – That’s from the Government Digital Service who look at websites like direct.gov.uk. It looks at the subject with some common sense and raises an interesting point that focussing on cookies may push sites into tracking users in other ways; using super cookie methods that the user cannot detect or control/disable as they can with standard cookies, which would be more intrusive.
Interestingly the GDS has taken a stance that analytical cookies are ‘minimally intrusive’ and (most importantly) ‘essential’ – which is a different line to the ICO. There’s a link to a PDF with guidelines at the end for government departments and other public sector bodies:
“Use of web-analytics/metrics: The use of metrics are integral are to departments’ being able to provide the best possible user experience in order to encourage citizens to use more cost-effective channels for accessing government services. They also allow departments to assess and demonstrate whether the digital services they offer provide “value-for-money” as demonstrated by the recent National Audit Office (NAO) report.
Consequently, collecting these metrics are essential to the effective operation of government websites, at present the setting of cookies is the most effective way of doing this. The ICO guidance supports this view as it states ’...it is highly unlikely that priority for any formal action would be given to focusing on uses of cookies where there is a low level of intrusiveness and risk of harm to individuals. Provided clear information is given about their activities we are unlikely to prioritise first-party cookies used only for analytical purposes in any consideration of regulatory action’”
2. EU cookie legislation – a look at some of the implementations – That’s new as of Friday, written by one of the Information Commissioner’s Office Technology Reference Panel:
_”+ First of all the 27th May deadline for implementing the legislation is more a marker for ICO – not a hard date. This means that from this time the ICO will start looking at the subject more closely.
- In the meantime in the run up to the end of May the ICO will publish information for individuals to allow them to raise concern via the ICO website. Note the ICO has not had much activity on the complaints front in last 12 months.
- They will also be making it clear that on an individual level it is unlikely that ICO will pursue 1 cookie on 1 web page
- The ICO can’t audit every UK website but can look at trends or patterns – eg if many issues raised about specific types of cookie
- ICO will also be issuing a clarification of its line on analytics cookies – these are not exempt from the law”_
It’s certainly a topic where the regulation and solution is still evolving. Personally I wonder if this might end up in the same situation as the DDA subject from a few years ago; the end result being that the worst offenders get a letter asking them to clean up their act, but for the rest of us who follow good practices there’s nothing to worry about.
-
As with many things in government, most of this is a "fix" to a problem that doesn't exist. If you don't want to be tracked, you can easily opt out. But the EU seems to think it knows better and declares that ALL cookies must be opt in only. This rule screams that it was written by people who want to push an ideology (i.e. government is going to save your privacy at all costs) and have no idea how the Internet works.
The largest problem with this rule is that there's no way to ascertain why a cookie was placed (most commonly called a session). In virtually all cases, cookies are pointers to something else. What's stupid is that you can still easily track people without cookies, you just pass your session ID in the URL. It's clunky but it works and there's no law against it. And there's always log parsing.
My bet is that there will be some sort of legal action taken against Google (the biggest fish in the pond) and we'll see where that goes. My bet is it stays in limbo until that trial is complete. I can't see anyone wasting the resources going after every violator.
-
Hi Ben
I've been looking into this a fair bit myself and have arrived at the following conclusions.
As already mentioned this whole legislation is up in the air to say the least, there is little guidance on how this will be practically implemented. From what i gather, general cookies that enhance usability by remembering information such as preferences etc are ok, however cookies that hold information that is deemed to be personal are more of an issue. Therefore i guess the case you make regarding Google analytics could be an interesting one.
We look after a number of medium weight websites that use cookies, some of which could be deemed to fall foul of this legislation, however so is just about every ecom site on the Internet. I am taking the view that i will see how the big boys tackle this, the likes of Amazon, Ebay, etc and follow their lead. For me this is one occasion not to be ahead of the game, especially as it will interfere with the purchase process and pretty much goes against every UX rule out there.
One other interesting point is that almost every site i have seen cover this story (BBC, Mashable, TechCrunch etc) all use cookies on the pages they are reporting this story on.
I suspect there will be a lot more debate and tweaking of this law before it is actually enforced as it seems impractical to implement as it stands
-
Hi Ben
welcome to the Q&A.
As (other) Ben says, there's no real clarity on this. Best practice would seem to dictate giving site visitors the option to opt-out the first time they visit after May 25th.
In reality, nobody is going to do this and kill their webstats, unless and until site owners are taken to court, and IMO that's most likely to happen to high-profile pubic service sites.
I'd suggest that good practice and as insurance, review your Privacy Policy to ensure it's clear what's being tracked and what's not using cookies, and ensure there's a reasonably prominent navigation link to the Policy.
-
Last time I checked (last month) no body knew. There is a definite case for them being allowed as part of the functionality of a website but it looks like this is going to be decide the first time the ICO takes someone ot court over it.
Sorry I couldn't give you a straight answer but I don't think there is one yet.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Deceptive site warning from Google: Java script and meta descriptions deployed.
Hi all, We received a deceptive site warning from Google recently. Seems like there is a deceptive content on some pages of the website. Some pages are removed from Google index. Meta descriptions have been deployed on the site few days ago. There is also java script on the website which we use for tracking visitors like GA. I wonder what's the reason for this alert? We believe its due to the Java script. Do you think meta descriptions will harm this bad? Any ideas? Thanks
Search Behavior | | vtmoz0 -
Subfolder on existing domain or new domain? Which would you choose?
I have been giving it a lot of thought lately. I manage five brand websites for well recognized national brands in the child care vertical. Our websites primarily serve as brochures and lead generators. While we have a blog on each site, I am leaning toward creating content separate from our "brochure style sales copy" that targets each of our individual personas. While it is our primary objective to drive lead volume up, I think people are at various stages in the decision process and even post decision, where we can do a better job nurturing them, engaging them, proving brand worth and all of the psychological reasons people choose and stay with a brand. With that, if it was your call to make, would you create a subfolder for each persona target, i.e. example.com/persona1/target-theme-1, or would you create a brand new experience on a new domain? Essentially, both options will provide interesting content, tips, advice, videos, downloads, etc. But, creating a new domain may help separate people from our sales copy, so they don't feel so pressured. I would build out linking for those who wish to engage at that level, but don't want to treat all visitors the same, like we currently do. I look forward to an interesting conversation about this. Also, if anyone has done this very well in the past or currently, I would love to see some example sites.
Search Behavior | | dsinger0 -
Recommendations for a Form Analytics software
Hello Mozzers! Currently using Adobe Analytics and Google Analytics, but looking for something dedicated to analyzing how effective our sign up pages are. What do you guys recommend? Here are some that I have found: http://revrise.com/ http://www.formisimo.com/ Perhaps there are add-ons available in GA that would offer similar data? Any help is appreciated! Thanks! Will
Search Behavior | | Newegg-NA0 -
How come this one google places listing is the only one to show up google maps?
Hi there, I found a really weird thing about google places. I'm working on a google places listing optimization for a locksmith company in Houston, TX. When I was searching google maps for "locksmith houston" only one listing came up. However, when searching for "locksmith near houston" 880 results came up. This changes from time to time, but most of the time this one competitor is the only listing that shows up which is really really weird. Anybody has an idea what this competitor did to get rid of the other 879 results and show up alone on google maps??
Search Behavior | | activechase1 -
How to setup google analytics snapshot
Hello all! I get these awesome emails from google about a specific site. But I am not sure how, and why. But I like the data it generates. I am uploading a screen shot. They are called Analytics' Snapshot. My question is basically: How to setup google analytics snapshot to report on a specific website in my account? Because I have several I track - Over 40 domains, but I am mostly concered with like 4 -5 of them, I would like to report on. Thanks Mozers!! GJF3iQX
Search Behavior | | smstv0 -
All pages were returning 404 for an hour. Will it impact the SERPS?
Hi, Due to a bug in my website system, all the pages were returning an 404 default page for a period of 1 hour. Can this event impact the SERPs of this site? (the site is heavily visited, more than 500k users coming from google every day, so I assume google crawls my pages every moment)
Search Behavior | | lucasms0 -
Google Places rankings go away, but organic rankings stay the same / get better?
Hello, I hope you all can help me out here with the information I could provide. Anyways, the past number of months I have had 1 of our clients rank extremely high organically and on Google places. For example: My client is a law firm so if you search “CLIENTS-TOWN Attorney” they would come up organically on the first page and if you were in that town and search “CLIENTS-TOWN Attorney” or even just “Attorney” they would also come up in the Google Places list. Now for some reason starting a week ago I noticed they have completely disappeared from Google Places. No changes have been done to their site and everything is the same as it was. Their organic searches are the same if not better than before. Do you guys have any clue as to why this happened and how I could possibly turn this around? Thanks for your help in advance!
Search Behavior | | WhiteHat120 -
Canadian ecommerce laws
So this is more of an ecommerce question than an SEO question, but I thought I would ask on here in case someone knew. We are concerned with the different rules and regulations concerning signing Canadians up for mailing lists. We know they must explicitly agree to be signed up for an email list, but is there a law regarding creating an account for them? For example, we currently offer an express checkout option where after they place their order, it emails them a username and password that they can use for future orders. We don't use this for any reason besides giving them the option to have information saved for future orders. They are not asking us to create an account for them, but we just feel as though it can potentially save them time down the road? Is this legally allowed, and if so would you recommend it? Thanks, Matt
Search Behavior | | ClaytonKendall0