Do user metrics really mean anything?
-
This is a serious question, I'd also like some advice on my experience so far with the Panda. One of my websites, http://goo.gl/tFBA4 was hit on January 19th, it wasn't a massive hit, but took us from 25,000 to 21,000 uniques per day. It survived Panda completely prior. The only thing that had changed, was an upgrade in the CMS, which caused a lot of duplicate content, i.e 56 copies of the homepage, under various URLs. These were all indexed in Google.
I've heard varying views, as to whether this could trigger Panda, I believe so, but i'd appreciate your thoughts on it.
There was also the above the fold update on the 19th, but we have 1 ad MAX on each page, most pages have none. I hate even having to have 1 ad. I think we can safely assume it was Panda that did the damage.
Jan 18th was the first Panda refresh, since we upgraded our CMS in mid-late December.
As it was nothing more than a refresh, I feel it's safe to assume, that the website was hit, due to something that had changed on the website, between the Jan 18th refresh and the one previous.
So, aside from fixing the bugs in the CMS, I felt now was a good time to put a massive focus on user metrics, I worked hard and continuing to spend a lot of time, improving them.
- Reduced bounce rate from 50% to 30% (extremely low in the niche)
- Average page views from 7 to 12
- Average time on site from 5 to almost 8 minutes
- Plus created a mobile optimised version of the site
- Page loading speeds slashed.
Not only did the above improvements have no positive effect, traffic continued to slide and we're now close to a massive 40% loss. Btw I realise neither mobile site nor page loading speeds are user metrics.
I fully appreciate that my website is image heavy and thin on text, but that is an industry wide 'issue'. It's not an issue to my users, so it shouldn't be an issue to Google.
Unlike our competitors, we actively encourage our users to add descriptions to their content and provide guidelines, to assit them in doing so.
We have a strong relationship with our artists, as we listen to their needs and develop the website accordingly. Most of the results in the SERPs, contain content taken from my website, without my permission or permission of the artist. Rarely do they give any credit.
If user metrics are so important, why on earth has my traffic continued to slide?
Do you have any advice for me, on how I can further improve my chances of recovering from this?
Fortunately, despite my artists download numbers being slashed in half, they've stuck by me and the website, which speaks volumes.
-
The duplicates that were created by the CMS are now all gone. Though didn't get 100% sorted until several days before the recent Panda refresh. There was a line in the code, that said any index.html, display the contents of the homepage. So Google had 56+ pages showing my homepage. Crazy.
It maybe that I've solved the issues, but waiting around for month is awful.
-
From a "pure" SEO standpoint, here's what I'd say we know about user metrics:
(1) Bing has confirmed using click-through rate (CTR) and "dwell time" as ranking factors. Dwell time is the time it take a visitor to return to search results from a site, so it's related to both bounce rate and time-on-site.
(2) Google has officially said that they do not use bounce rate as a ranking factor. Google historically defines things narrowly, so we don't know if they factor in dwell time. Reading between the lines, they seem to find it unreliable.
(3) I'm not sure if Google has confirmed this, but they very likely factor in CTR.
(4) We don't know for sure how user factors fit into Panda, although people have certainly suggested a connection. My gut reaction is that, if it's part of Panda, it's not a large part.
Of course, looking beyond SEO, reducing your bounce rate and increasing your page-views and time-on-site is great. You've improved your engagement and it will help you. This is in no way wasted effort, and even if it doesn't have a direct, immediate impact on SEO, it will have indirect effects.
You mentioned the CMS spun out a lot of duplicates. If you have text-thin pages AND a ton of duplicates, that certainly could cause some problems. Have you taken steps to control and de-index those duplicates? That would probably be the first place I'd look, from your description of the problem.
-
Hi Highland, I truly wish I was in a niche, where it was viable to use Adwords. So much more reliable and consistent.
As we give away content and don't sell anything, adwords is a no-go.
I only wish I were hit by Penguin, I feel that's a much easier mess to clean up. Panda to me, is the bigger evil.
I do feel ATM, I am looking for a needle in a haystack.
But that said, I must remain hopeful!
-
This is going to sound screwy (especially in an SEO forum) but I stopped worrying about the organics after we tanked in April (I think Panda 3.5 possibly but no one update fits the drop). We started Adwords immediately and got some of the lost traffic back but there's really nothing major we can do to fix it. It's not that I've given up, its that the drop is really hard to quantify as to the cause, so fixing it is nigh impossible. I cleaned up some links that looked bad and I have my fingers crossed that it will fix the problem as the index catches up but, beyond that, most of our efforts in general are in making our website better. We've pretty much defined our niche and I suspect we will bounce back eventually but, until Google stops disliking us, we're just going to keep on plugging away. We've made our site far better and nobody else even comes close to offering what we offer (although some people have stock items that are cheaper)
Incidentally our bounce rate has gone way down, conversion rates have crept up and I still have no earthly idea how to get us back to #1 (there's 15 cruise liners of people like us out there, tho). But Adwords have shown us some terms we've not pursued before. Small blessings in a hurricane, I suppose.
My advice to you: be the best at what you do. Make your website awesome and then call it crap and make it even more awesome (that's how artists do it I think). Be sure you're running social campaigns as well. Social has been a small bright spot as well. Sooner or later Google will sort it out but I have a hunch they're playing chicken with the spammers.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Does "google selected canonical" pass link juice the same as "user selected canonical"?
We are in a bit of a tricky situation since a key top-level page with lots of external links has been selected as a duplicate by Google. We do not have any canonical tag in place. Now this is fine if Google passes the link juice towards the page they have selected as canonical (an identical top-level page)- does anyone know the answer to this question? Due to various reasons, we can't put a canonical tag ourselves at this moment in time. So my question is, does a Google selected canonical work the same way and pass link juice as a user selected canonical? Thanks!
Technical SEO | | Lewald10 -
Does user engagement or content of pages requiring login help SEO?
Hi! Our company is trying to come up with a few pages with some manuals to teach our users how to use our products. However, these pages require username and password. My understanding is that user engagement will help a website's keyword rankings and Google will not be able to crawl or have access to pages requiring login as it doesn't have username and password. Based on that idea, does that mean all the content and user engagement on those pages requiring login won't help our overall SEO? Thanks in advance!
Technical SEO | | EverettChen0 -
Getting high priority issue for our xxx.com and xxx.com/home as duplicate pages and duplicate page titles can't seem to find anything that needs to be corrected, what might I be missing?
I am getting high priority issue for our xxx.com and xxx.com/home as reporting both duplicate pages and duplicate page titles on crawl results, I can't seem to find anything that needs to be corrected, what am I be missing? Has anyone else had a similar issue, how was it corrected?
Technical SEO | | tgwebmaster0 -
Duplicate content on user queries
Our website supports a unique business industry where our users will come to us to look for something very specific (a very specific product name) to find out where they can get it. The problem that we're facing is that the products are constantly changing due to the industry. So, for example, one month, one product might be found on our website, and the next, it might be removed completely... and then might come back again a couple months later. All things that are completely out of our control - and we have no way of receiving any sort of warning when these things might happen. Because of this, we're seeing a lot of duplicate content issues arise... For Example... Product A is not active today... so www.mysite.com/search/productA will return no results... Product B is also not active today... so www.mysite.com/search/productB will also return no results. As per Moz Analytics, these are showing up as duplicate content because both pages indicate "No results were found for {your searched term}." Unfortunately, it's a bit difficult to return a 204 in these situations (which I don't know if a 204 would help anyway) or a 404, because, for a faster user experience, we simultaneously render different sections of the page... so in the very beginning of the page load - we start rendering the faster content (template type of content) that says "returning 200 code, we got the query successfully & we're loading the page".. the unique content results finish loading last since they take the longest. I'm still very new to the SEO world, so would greatly appreciate any ideas or suggestions that might help with this... I'm stuck. 😛 Thanks in advance!
Technical SEO | | SFMoz0 -
Bringing a large news site back on line - anything to look out for?
Hi, I'm advising an online news site site that has been completely offline for almost 6 months, and is now looking to start back up again. The site seems to be completely gone from google's cache. This might mean moving to new hosting, but with the same URL. The archive has about 7000 original articles. Most of these are date specific news, although there are some longer investigative pieces that are more timeless. Is there any difference (from an SEO/digital marketing perspective) between putting the whole archive online at once, or gradually republishing the old articles? Is there anything I should be aware of, when restarting a website of this size? Thanks - Chris
Technical SEO | | AISFM0 -
How much impact does bad html coding really have on SEO?
My client has a site that we are trying to optimise. However the code is really pretty bad. There are 205 errors showing when W3C validating. The >title>, , <keywords> tags are appearing twice. There is truly excessive javascript. And everything has been put in tables.</keywords> How much do you think this is really impacting the opportunity to rank? There has been quite a bit of discussion recently along the lines of is on-page SEO impacting anymore. I just want to be sure before I recommend a whole heap of code changes that could cost her a lot - especially if the impact/return could be miniscule. Should it all be cleaned up? Many thanks
Technical SEO | | Chammy0 -
How to get user genreated reviews indexed properly?
We are currently working to improve the deployment of a review widget on our website. The widget was deployed about 18 months ago and all reviews are behind Java navigation. I have been working with our IT staff to get the reviews into an HTML page which will either live on the product page as a tab or will be a link from the product page. Our IT staff has suggested leaving the Java navigation for users and creating separate HTML pages specifically for search engines. Based on my experience, this sounds like a bad idea, basically creating pages just for search engines that will not be use by site visitors, although the visitors will have access to the same content via the Java navigation. Anyone care to comment on this? Is creating HTML pages specifically for search engines a bad idea? An acceptable idea?
Technical SEO | | seorunner0 -
Up-to-date list of search engine bot user agents
Does anyone know of an up-to-date-list of search engine bot user agents? Thanks.
Technical SEO | | JoeAmadon0