Google Update?
-
We have a website that for the past several weeks has been very consistent at between 13,500 and 14,200 daily visits and this site received 15,600 last Thursday.
THIS week, Monday is at 22,200, Tuesday is at 26,200, and at mid-day today (at about our traffic halfway point in the day) we're already at 14,000 today.
This was a site that was bringing about 14,000 visits as of May 16th last year and dropped to 11,000 the following week. The traffic to this site this week is so far beyond statistical analysis that there must have been something that happened.
-
Is it possible that this direct traffic is coming from email? I've seen big direct traffic spikes when a link has "gone viral" over email. The other thing I would check for is multiple Google analytics tags on the home page (double counting your traffic), but you would probably see a crazy low bounce rate if that were the case.
-
Possible tracking issues are not checking out. 3rd party advertisers are showing higher impressions and clicks.
Traffic by specific service providers... Comcast, Roadrunner, Cox, etc.. are all consistently higher at the pace of traffic growth. Traffic from all of these sources have a graph that looks identical; Showing the same increase at the same time.
Further, the non-U.S. traffic is down by percentage so the spike is coming from domestic traffic originating in the United States.
Average time on site for the last 30 days is: 1:20... minute twenty seconds. Month of January was 1:24. The past two days is 1:02. With traffic being up 70% if they were all brief hits - then the past two days' visitor duration should be cut in half.
The home page traffic which is where the spike in visitors are landing on the site has a visitor duration of about 22 seconds lower than usual, which is 55 seconds.
The visitor duration difference looks more like the traffic isn't targeted, although not 100% uninterested either.
We have done a lot of work on this site since losing some traffic to Panda last summer. I just wouldn't expect such a dramatic increase without an update in Google but regardless the increase is in "direct" visits and not from search.
-
Has time spent on page changed at all? If the bounce rate is higher I would figure it would have dropped. Also is it just visits that are up? Did pageviews stay roughly the same?
When something like this happens I try to look for any indicator that analytics is having tracking issues.
For example if a user came to the site, then went to a page that is somehow killing my cookie information or ending my session somehow then that would cause the visits to spike while pageviews stayed the same. This would also drive my bounce rate up.
This happens often if you have a third party tool like a booking engine or chat tool that uses a different URL, and you aren't using the linker functionality where you need to.
Another suggestion would be to do a comparison to recent history of location and service provider dimensions to see if any specific location or service provider is spiking compared to recent slower times.
If all of that looks legit it may just be that other marketing efforts are paying off, and people are coming back to your site...
-
Yeah, revenue is up. We have several ad programs running and affiliate systems that are outside of our tracking software - so it seems that 3rd parties are seeing it too.
Now, revenue isn't up in a straight line with the traffic increase because we are not as aggressive on our home page with ads and affiliates. Bounce rate is higher on that page than before but time spent on page isn't? Bounce rate went from 48% to 79% which scares me. Seems the traffic coming in is less targeted now than our typical sources.
-
Interesting stuff - is revenue up as well then? Could there be an issue with analytics code counting people twice, or not counting people in the past?
-
Carson thanks for your response.
Here's how strange it is. There's an overall boost in traffic on most of the pages but they are trickling out from the home page. The home page traffic is up tremendously. Our direct visits: Not driven by Google, Yahoo or any other significant referrer - the spike seems to be from direct visits. No spike in keywords, nothing. Last Tuesday/Wednesday's home page PV= 1,435. This Tuesday/Wednesday's home page PV = 22,594.
I was wondering if there was an algorithm change with Google maybe temporarily from a URL where the SSL system they are using is giving referring the visitor as a no-follow. Google I ask, because I don't know of another traffic source that could produce these numbers. I wish that I knew so I could duplicate it!!
Affiliate impressions and revenue are up in reflection of the traffic change, the average time spent on the home page is almost identical to historic #s (55 seconds).
Not to toot my horn but we are good at this stuff and we can't figure it out. There's no referrer for this new traffic - it is all registering as direct - and still seems to be increasing.
No significant blog, forum or social media mentions either. The thought was that maybe the site was mentioned on TV or something but even that would have spiked inside a 2-3 hour window and then go back down. Not keep gaining.
The site is samplewords.com and typically gets about 365k visits per month and 825k PV. I would love to hear someone's theory on this.
Maybe it's something simple I'm missing while I look for something more technical?
-
We are not aware of any significant changes since last Thursday, but I'm glad to hear that your results are doing well! It might be interesting to go into analytics and see where the users are coming from. Are they coming through Google-organic, or did you perhaps pick up some coverage that is sending you referring traffic?
If it is organic traffic, you can then look at organic keywords, compare it to the past, and see which keywords have increased the most. It's always good to know what's going right and how you can duplicate it It's also worth looking at your content report to see which organic landing pages are doing well.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Is there any way to prevent Google from using structured data on specific pages?
I've noticed that Google is now serving what looks like host-specific video cards on mobile for our site. Is there any way to control which videos are included in these lists without removing the structured data on those clip pages or user pages? We don't want to noindex those pages but we don't want content from those pages to appear as video cards. 1kzPW
Algorithm Updates | | Garrett570 -
Increase in impressions reported by Google Analytics
Because Universal Analytics (and Google Webmaster) only stores SEO data for 3 months, I've been downloading SEO data (from the Acquisition tab of Analytics) to get a record of how impressions, clicks, CTR etc are changing in the long term (our business is seasonal, so these long-term patterns are important). Today, I downloaded data for September, and found a very large increase in the number of impressions compared to previous months. I looked back at the data for August, which I've already downloaded, and found that Analytics is now reporting much higher numbers of impressions than I have in my downloaded data. The total number of impressions has roughly doubled, and the increase for individual URLs varies, with some increasing by a factor of 10. The number of clicks has also increased, by about 15% in total. Because of the 3 month cut-off, I could only look back as far as the 11th of July, but the impressions for the end of July are also much higher than in my downloaded data. I've noticed that Analytics has changed some other details in its reporting of SEO data. For example, the impressions and clicks data is no longer rounded. Could this increase in impressions be a result of those changes? Has anyone else experienced something similar? We can go ahead and use the new data but it will throw our analysis off for past months (which have the lower numbers). If others have experienced something similar it would be good to know, so that we can adjust our historical numbers accordingly.
Algorithm Updates | | MargotLoco20 -
Fetch as Google - removes start words from Meta Title ?? Help!
Hi all, I'm experiencing some strange behaviour with Google Webmaster Tools. I noticed that some of our pages from our ecom site were missing start keywords - I created a template for meta titles that uses Manufacturer - Ref Number - Product Name - Online Shop; all trimmed under 65 chars just in case. To give you an idea, an example meta title looks like:
Algorithm Updates | | bjs2010
Weber 522053 - Electric Barbecue Q 140 Grey - Online Shop The strange behaviour is if I do a "Fetch as Google" in GWT, no problem - I can see it pulls the variables and it's ok. So I click submit to index. Then I do a google site:URL search, to see what it has indexed, and I see the meta description has changed (so I know it's working), but the meta title has been cut so it looks like this:
Electric Barbecue Q 140 Grey - Online Shop So I am confused - why would Google cut off some words at start of meta title? Even after the Fetch as Googlebot looks perfectly ok? I should point out that this method works perfect on our other pages, which are many hundreds - but it's not working on some pages for some weird reason.... Any ideas?0 -
Could Retail Price Be A Google Ranking Factor???
I have not done any detailed studies on this but it seems that Google might be using low retail prices for specific items as a ranking factor in their organic SERPs. Does anyone else suspect this? Just askin' to hear your thoughts. Thanks!
Algorithm Updates | | EGOL0 -
Google Unable to Access Robots.txt
We haven't made any changes to the robots.txt file and suddenly Google claims they can no longer access the file. The site has been up and active for well over a year now. What are my next steps? I have included a screenshot of the top half of the file. See anything wrong? D3H5tgE.png
Algorithm Updates | | rhoadesjohn0 -
Google Algorithm Update .. Author-rank finally kicking in ?
These few days I've been seeing great movement of my sites growing by 70-100% in traffic spikes. Some how I think this has something to do with AuthorRank maybe kicking in now as more of a factor in rankings? Anyone have an idea whats going on ?
Algorithm Updates | | NikolasNikolaou0 -
Implications of removing all google products from site
Is there any data on the implications of removing everything google from a site; analytics, adsense, webmaster tools, sitemaps, etc. Obviously they still have their search data and they say they dont use these other sources of data for ranking information but has anyone actually tried this or is there any existing data on this?
Algorithm Updates | | jessefriedman0 -
Can AJAX implementation affect the rankings in Google Panda?
Hi there, I have the following situation with one of our job sites. We migrate the site to a new application, which is better from design point of view and also usability. For this we use a lot AJAX especially in searches. So every time a user is filtering down their search new results will be shown on the page, at the same url and with no page load. But, having this implementation. affected Bounce rate - which increased from 38% to nearly 60%, PI/visits - which are now half, at 3 and also Avg Time on Site is half that is used to be coming to 2,5 min from nearly 6 min. From Rand post, it is clearly that the content is very important in Google Panda, and all of these parameters we should consider, as it is telling the quality of the content. So, my question will be, can this site be hit by Panda updates (maybe later on) because Bounce Rate, PI/Visits and Avg Time on site, decreased in such way? At the moment we don't measure the Ajax impresion, but as I understood that we can do that though virtual pages in GA, does anyone of you have the experience how to handle this? Won't be this an artificial increase? Thanks, Irina
Algorithm Updates | | InformMedia0