Html and css errors - what do SE spiders do if they come across coding errors? Do they stop crawling the rest of the code below the error
-
I have a client who uses a template to build their websites (no problem with that) when I ran the site through w3c validator it threw up a number of errors, most of which where minor eg missing close tags and I suggested they fix them before I start their off site SEO campaigns.
When I spoke to their web designer about the issues I was told that some of the errors where "just how its done" So if that's the case, but the validator still registers the error, do the SE spiders ignore them and move on, or does it penalize the site in some way?
-
Ryan, thanks so much for taking the time to answer, and so comprehensively too, I really appreciate it.
My client came around after I suggested that Getting quality backlinks to a website full of coding errors was like hanging a crystal chandelier in a toilet!! and that they where tying one of my hands behind my back by not sorting it out. Perhaps not the most expert answer but they got the point.
Thanks for some great information and a great answer all round.
-
**When I spoke to their web designer about the issues I was told that some of the errors where "just how its done" **
Are you OK with that response? If your client asked you why you took a course of action on their site would you expect the client to accept "it's just how things are done"?
Generally speaking, sites should use valid code. The W3C is the international body which establishes coding standards. They are made up of a group of people including representatives from Microsoft (IE), Google (Chrome), Mozilla (FireFox), Apple (Safari), etc. Valid code should appear correctly in all browsers.
Generally speaking again, a developer who writes valid code is following best coding practices. The code can be more easily reviewed by other developers. When invalid code is used, it is often due to sloppy coding practices such as not closing tags, using deprecated tags, not being familiar with the particular encoding of the language in use, etc. When I ask a developer why the code is not valid and the response is "it's just how things are done" the translation often is "I lack the knowledge / training / experience to write valid code".
Ok, now that I angered many developers let me take the flip side of the coin. Google.com does not validate. What's up with that? Well, you know the development team at Google is among the best in the world. Their project leaders likely have their doctorate degrees or at least master degrees. Many of them are authors of books on best coding practices. These guys clearly understand all the rules and are able to go past them to achieve better results in a given area, such as speed optimization which Google treasures.
In summary, leading companies can often employee the upper echelon of employees who thoroughly understand the rules and can break them for their benefit. Unfortunately, that does not trickle down to every day developers. Most of them do not have the knowledge / training / experience to make those calls and are simply either using sloppy coding practices or they are not taking the time to research other alternatives. They have deadlines and they jump on whatever works.
what do SE spiders do if they come across coding errors? Do they stop crawling the rest of the code below the error
The results vary based on the Search Engine and the type of error. Here are some examples:
1. There are some errors due to the "&" being used instead of the binary operator "&". Sometimes there are issues with various code where the & character may have another purpose and the interpreter may try to perform an operation on the code such as concatenation rather then simply reading the & as a character.
2. In html,
is a perfectly valid tag. In XHTML, there is a rule that any tags which are not used in a pair should be end in />. In other words, the correct form of the
tag in XHTML is
. If you have an XHTML document which generates 20 errors, and all of those errors are due to the developer using
instead of
then a crawler should handle that issue very well. The crawler recognizes and understands the
tag even though it is technically invalid code.3. An open div tag can cause a variety of issues. It all depends on what operation the div is performing. It could be very minor or a major issue.
Google does a great job of handling invalid code. Bing seems less tolerant of coding errors and much more selective.
A video you will likely enjoy: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FPBACTS-tyg
Summary
You should strive for valid code with your site. Coding errors can cause a variety of issues including making it harder for other developers to work on the site, causing the site to appear incorrectly in various browsers or devices, negatively impacting page loading times, and impeding search engine crawlers. It is not possible to say without a review of the specific error. While I do not develop websites, I do project manage the development of many sites. When the site is complete, the goal is to not have any validation errors. If a handful of errors exist, I request for the developer to try to eliminate them. If they cannot, I request an error-by-error explanation of why the error exists and why it cannot be eliminated. The result is a site which appears correctly in all browsers, is correctly crawled and interpreted by search engines, and is easily maintained by various developers.
A final note: just because a page validates does not mean it is developed well, and the reverse is true also. I would say with the exception of the top 1% of sites which are developed by teams of very well trained and experienced web professionals, sites which validate are likely better designed and maintained then sites which do not validate.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Can the Lightboxes on My Site be Crawled?
I'm trying to optimize my site, but I have lightboxes and I don't know if they are visible to the search engines. If they aren't, could you suggest something that I could do? THANK YOU so much!!!!! My site is lymphexpo.com
On-Page Optimization | | bosleypalmer0 -
Single Page on my client's website is not crawling and indexing new changes. What could be the possible reason?
I made several changes on client's website on different pages, changed titles, add content on few pages, moved blog from subdomain to sub directory. Everything is crawled but there is one page on the website (not part of the blog) that isn't getting crawled in Google and picking up changes. The last crawl of the website is 2 days back whereas that page was last crawled on 30th sep. I just wanted to know the possible reasons and has anyone encountered this before?
On-Page Optimization | | MoosaHemani0 -
Moz Crawl Shows Duplicate Content Which Doesn't Seem To Appear In Google?
Morning All, First post, be gentle! So I had Moz crawl our website with 2500 high priority issues of duplicate content, not good. However if I just do a simple site:www.myurl.com in Google, I cannot see these duplicate pages....very odd. Here is an example....
On-Page Optimization | | scottiedog
http://goo.gl/GXTE0I
http://goo.gl/dcAqdU So the same page has a different URL, Moz brings this up as an issue, I would agree with that. However if I google both URL's in Google, they will both bring up the same page but with the original URL of http://goo.gl/zDzI7j ...in other words, two different URL's bring up the same indexed page in Google....weird I thought about using a wildcard in the robots.txt to disallow these duplicate pages with poor URL's....something like.... Disallow: /*display.php?product_id However, I read various posts that it might not help our issues? Don't want to make things worse. On another note, my colleague paid for a "SEO service" and they just dumped 1000's of back-links to our website, of course that's come back to bite us in the behind. Anyone have any recommendations for a good service to remove these back-links? Thanks in advance!!0 -
Would a free PDF download diminish SEO benefits of HTML content?
Dear readers, This post is a duplicate of one I just put up. Sorry about that. If you are interested in commenting or seeing other responses, please go to http://moz.com/community/q/would-a-free-pdf-download-diminish-seo-benefits-of-html-content. Thanks. Hello, I am doing SEO for a company that, as a sideline business, sells four books written by the principals; the content is directly relevant to the company's primary business focus. Book sales are a tiny fraction of our overall revenue, and we don't expect that to change, although we will continue to sell the books. In addition to selling them, we have decided to convert the books to HTML and post them for free on our website (laid out by chapter and section). The hope is that this will result in goodwill, links, traffic, and ultimately improved search rankings. My question: Would offering free PDF downloads of the books (in addition to posting the HTML content) diminish the SEO benefits of the HTML content? If we don't offer the PDF option, people would have to visit our site to read the content (unless they bought a hard copy). If visitors were able to download a free PDF, they wouldn't need to return to our site to read it. If our corporate clients (nearly all of our clients are corporations) could download a PDF, they could then post it on an intranet instead of posting a link to our site. In general, do you think a visitor would be less likely to link to our site if he or she were able to download the PDF? Or would the appeal of the PDF option make it more likely that people would visit and link to the site? Also, if we offer the PDF option, are there any SEO issues related to duplicate content? Finally, if we did offer the free PDF download, would you recommend that we ask for an email address before giving the PDF? Thank you very much!
On-Page Optimization | | nyc-seo0 -
301 redirected Duplicate Content, still showing up as duplicate after new crawl.
We launched a site where key landing pages were not showing up in google. After running the seomoz crawl it returned a lot of duplicate pages which may expalin this. The actual url of the page is /design and it was telling me the following were dupes: /design/family-garden-design
On-Page Optimization | | iterate
/design/small-garden-design
/design/large-rural-garden-design
/Design All of these URL's were in fact pointing to the /design landing page. I 301 redirected all of the pages so they all now resolve to /design After running another crawl the day after doing this it's still showing up as duplicate content on seomoz. Does seomoz evaluate the new changes right away?0 -
Website pages missing from seomoz crawl
Hi! I just added a website and the crawling result output has only 42 pages but my website has about 75 pages. What am i missing? Thanks!
On-Page Optimization | | ovieira0 -
CSS validation
After validating the CSS on my site the error "Parse Error title=" was shown with no explanation. What is this?
On-Page Optimization | | casper4340 -
External vs inline for CSS menu
Which is better for search engines: external or inline menus? And which language: CSS, Javascript, or both?
On-Page Optimization | | teatable0