Estimating the number of LRD I need to outrank competitor
-
I just ran a SERP/keyword diffculty report for a keyword I want one of my pages to rank
Also, I just conducted the on-the-page-optimization and now I am going to start buidling links.
=> I would like to estimate how many linking root domains I need to overrank one of my competitor. These are the MOZ data:
1. My page:
Page Linking Root domains: 0
Root Domain Linking Root Domains: 1512. Competitor:
Page linking root domains: 1
Root Domain Linking Root Domains: 5,786I don't really know on which metric (Page or domain LRD) to rely on in order to make an estimation and I would be glad for some help!
To simplyfy the problem, assume that all toher factors (code, on-the-page keyword use., social etc.) are equal for both sites. Can I just get 2LRD to that page in order to likely outrank my competitor or do I need around 5000 more links poiting to my site?
I think an answer to this question could help a lot of users here, since I saw similar questions/difficulties regarding the use of page LRD vs. root domain LRD
P.S. Non of the pages of my website do currently rank in the top 100 for that keyword.
-
**I am trying to get an rough estimation anyway.... **
That's good. Lots of people are selling the $1000/month package to people who need $5000/month to be effective and don't know it. You are trying to figure it out and that is very important.
Economists call this "ceteris paribus" analysis.
There's an awful lot of variables here. That's what makes it interesting.
-
Thanks EGOL for the detailed answer and sorry for my late reply- just coming back from vacation
It is clear to me that the question cannot just be easily answered by a number. I understand this and I wish my clients/supervisors would do that too - but that's a different story...
I am trying to get an rough estimation anyway, assuming that all other factors (on-the-page factors, words on page, quality of the content, social signals, age of the domian etc.) of the competitor's page/site are exactly the same as on my page/site and these factors would not move. Economists call this "ceteris paribus" analysis.
P.S. I've been in the business now for a while, but just starting to use SEOMoz (we used other tools before) - the ressources on this website and especially this question section is just simply awesome!!
-
Thank you Robert. I put a little extra effort into it because I figured that you would like it.
-
Ayup - and to accomplish that means being willing/able to do some business analysis, not just site analysis. Which moves into the realm of web marketing optimization, not just SEO. Which is where the real value in this whole process lies IMO
-
EGOL
This may be the best answer I have seen to any question. The beauty of it goes on and on in that anyone in SEO dealing with clients must always ask themselves: Can the client handle the truth and/or understand the explanation?
The explanation is what you just gave and the truth is that no one knows for sure and it will often cost you a lot to get there. The other difficulty for SEO clients is that we live in a world of instant gratification. I have clients who spend a lot with me and regularly ask what they are getting (yes, they get reports, etc.). Interestingly, these same clients will mention they have just authorized a $250,000 TV ad campaign. (Trust me we are a bit cheaper.)
They understand the tv ad no matter what the results; even with excellent results (more and more customers) they have a hard time understanding the SEO.
Egol,
Thanks a bunch for a truly excellent, thought provoking answer.
Robert
-
We compete against pages on about.com and amazon.com that are thin content and have zero off-page assets. About.com has skimpy information about our topic and nothing to sell. Amazon has a couple things to sell an zero informative information.
They outrank us for the short tail.
We have the best and deepest informative content on the web in our niche, informative video, youtube channel, lots of articles, printable resources, one of the best selections of products on the web, an email address that answers questions almost 24/7/365 and a phone where you can talk to someone who uses and tests most of the products regularly and has handled, inspected, photographed, described, every product that we sell.
This is one of the problems with google giving huge authority to the brands. Mom and pop know an awful lot more and give immediate, helpful, informative, caring service... but they get no respect in the SERPs.
I understand our position in the rankings. Praise be that I don't have to explain it to a client!
-
Or to determine whether the costs of attempting success are just too high to be worth it.
I would really respect an SEO who told me something like this.
-
Egol's explained the true scope of what you're asking, but to give a specific response to your specific question:
No, just having one more incoming link to your page than your competitor has to his will never guarantee you'll outrank him.
Search engine algorithms use hundreds of signals when ranking a page, and the number of incoming links to that page is only one measure.(And it's more than just wht else is on the page, like code, keyword use etc)
Even if we just restrict ourselves to considering the links to a single page, additional issues like the authority of the sources of the incoming links plays a huge part. Not all links are of equal value.
But more importantly, things like the authority of the whole domain have huge impact as well. That's why SEOMoz goes out of it's way to compute scores for domain authority as well as page authority. A weak page on a strong site will frequently outrank a strong page on a weaker site. That's one of the big frustrations/challenges of nearly all small site owners.
Bottom line, neither Page nor Domain LRD metrics are sufficient in themselves for assessing the work ahead of you.
Make sense?
Paul
-
What Egol has just described is why SEO is only part science and the rest - a significant portion - is still an art. It's also why automated implementation tools have never been successful.
It takes juggling a wide range of constantly changing factors, many with very subjective values, to deliver success. Or to determine whether the costs of attempting success are just too high to be worth it.
Website owners always HATE to hear the accurate response, but the honest response to so many (most?) SEO questions is:
It Depends.
And the good, ethical SEOs will tell you that right up front, as Egol has done. It would be so much easier if SEO, Conversion Rate Optimization etc were linear pursuits - do X and the result will be Y. But they're not, which is why good SEOs will beat those who simply follow (and promise results from ) formulas.
Frustrating huh?
Paul
-
Anyone who gives you a number for this question is full of beans.
This is one of the most difficult questions in SEO and most of the people who are charging clients for SEO can not answer it.
Lots of SEOs have clients on a $500/month plan when the target that they are attacking needs many times that much to become competitive.
Let me give just a couple reasons why this question is so difficult and why nobody here can give you an answer with the information that you provided.
====================
Your question is making a straight comparison.... it assumes that you are racing a stationary target. The target is not stationary. This question is really like this...
Two cars are driving on a road.... Car B leaves when Car A is already 100 miles down the road and traveling at a rate of 50 miles per hour. How fast will Car B have to drive to overtake Car A?
The answer is a velocity AND a time. And the question as I stated it assumes no acceleration.
If Car B drives 51 miles per hour... will you have the patience and budget for that long of a wait? Do you have the resources needed to drive 70 and not be stopped by Google?
=====================
Another example...
George Pickett was a southern general at the Battle of Gettysburg who was ordered by Robert E. Lee to run the Union Army off of Cemetery Ridge. To do that Pickett's troops would need to cross a mile-wide open field in broad daylight under an absolute hail of enemy fire.
The field was one mile wide, it was up a slight incline - if they were slow in crossing they would be mowed down...
The Union had hundreds of troops dug in and positioned on the ridge and ready to open fire - if Pickett had only a few troops they would be mowed down....
So Pickett needed to order an enormous number of troops across that field and order them to run their asses off to engage the Union Army quickly - or die in the middle of the field.
If they failed in getting a enough troops... if they failed in getting enough speed... if they failed in getting enough determination and courage... then they would be mowed down.
Your job is similar to Pickett's... you must get an enormous number of links... you must get them quickly... and you must get them before your budget runs out... and you better hope that your budget is big enough.
Pickett knew that his field was a mile wide.. he knew how many troops that he had. He could see Union troops on the other side of the field at the top of the ridge.
Pickett's generals complained when they were told the battle plan... but Pickett pointed at the Ridge.
This battle was lost on bad math.
But your problem is even more difficult... the field is getting wider as you cross it because the target is moving away from you.
==================
And your problem is also more difficult because links have different values. One link from the Pope's site is worth a thousand from pedestrian sites.
Furthermore... different pages compete with different amounts of vigor. I might have a fifty word page but my competitor might have 2000 words, ten images, a video, and tables of data. Big difference.
===================
So, how is an SEO to know what is needed?
-
You run the keyword difficulty tool and get a feel for the numbers (which contain much confusion).
-
You go out to those SERPs and visit the sites and get a feel for their authority and content quality.
-
Then you use open site explorer to see if the Pope is on their side.
-
Then you decide if you are up to beating their content, beating their numbers, beating their quality.... and if you can do that quickly enough before the conditions of engagement change or your budget runs out.
After all of that you decide on taking the gamble or not.
-
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Need advise/strategy for cleaning up backlinks to my site
I recently redesigned my website (studio35design.com), and with that, I'm finally paying attention to SEO. I used a few different tools to find the amount of backlinking domains I've built up through the 7 or so years. The numbers are the following: 52 Total Backlinking Domains (800+ links):
Moz Pro | | rubennunez
• 17 of those are from blog commenting - they are pretty much all NF
• 20 of those are from sitewide footer credits on websites I've built. They are all old, as I stopped adding sitewide links to my client sites over a year ago.
• 7 of those are from spam. My site was hacked last year which contributed to alot of it. I've since then completely scrapped my old site and built this one on webflow (Not self-hosted like my old WP site).
• The other 10 or so are from forums, and the odd photo credit. As you can tell, almost none of these backlinks links are really any good. I'm surprised that my DA is 27 really. So moving forward, I need to know the best strategy dealing with these "bad" links. For the spam, I'm going to disavow in google webmasters. As for the rest, here are my questions... QUESTION 1:
As for the sitewide links, would the best thing be to remove the link altogether from the footer of each one of those sites? Some I can't because they are really old, and I don't have access to them (I'll probably disavow), but the rest I can still go in and update. QUESTION 2:
Will removing a ton of links at once hurt my DA and my google ranking? I can probably eliminate 500-600 links within a few days just by removing the sitewide links. How quickly can I expect those links to drop off? A few months? QUESTIONS 3:
Should I disavow blog commenting links even though they are NF? Does it matter at all? QUESTION 4:
I noticed 5 or so of the domains I have links one aren't working domains anymore. How quickly can I expect those links to drop off? Thanks in advance for your help.0 -
Our main competitor is/was doing some Black Hat tactics....
Our main competitor Royal Cases, a custom case manufacturer and designer, has some really shady links and some dummy domains with duplicate content, yet they are ranking #1 organically for some of the industry's top search terms. Let me give you some examples. First off, they have multiple dummy domains with the same exact same content as their main website. One of these is casescasescases.net. They have a couple more that are just as bad. Secondly, their link profile is so shockingly black hat, I can't figure out why/how they haven't been deindexed or hit with a filter. I'll give you some examples. I ran a link analysis through Moz, and found multiple links from many websites that have absolutely NOTHING to do with custom cases. Here are a few of the linking domains: http://moneysourceonline.com/ ; www.lemons2lemonade.com/ ; http://jenaesboutique.com/ ; These are just a few. Now here is what I don't understand, when I go to explore the individual inbound links, I can't find the links to Royal anywhere on the pages. They have dozens from different pages on these obviously completely unrelated websites, but when you go to those pages, the links themselves are nowhere to be found. Yet, they are showing up as inbound links....I am lost. Does anyone have any idea what in the world is going on here? Is there a way to report this to Google? Normally I wouldn't resort to this sort of "tattle-tailing" but this company has a history of scheming and just horrendous business practices, and they recently had to pay a large settlement for pirating software for their company.
Moz Pro | | Sean_Gutermuth0 -
Competitor Ranks Highly Despite LOTS of Duplication
One of my Moz campaigns tracks my main competitor. I can't get over the fact that this competitor continues to rank well despite having thousands of duplication issues while I currently have less than 10. Our websites are similar both structurally and product-wise. The two images attached include OSE comparisons for the keyword "kraft envelopes". My competitor ranks #2 for the term, while I rank #9. I don't get why! And again, looking from a top-level perspective, MOZ shows that my competitor's website is full of duplication issues and other problems while my site is healthy as a horse. All responses are greatly appreciated. QmSlfET.jpg 9CDny60.jpg
Moz Pro | | jampaper0 -
Why do the competitive link analysis numbers not match the domain analysis?
There is only one area that our competitor out ranks us and that is in the total links on the root domain. But when i go to competitive link analysis we have more links then they do. Any ideas?
Moz Pro | | d_friess0 -
Competitors traffic
How can i find the top keywords generating traffic, Both paid and organic, for my competitors? Are there specific tools out there I can use if I dont have access to their Google Analytics account?
Moz Pro | | richm010 -
External Followed Links History, number of links go down
I was reviewing Historical Domain Analysis and found that in last 2 month we lost almost 10000 external followed links. What this could be? is this real or just question seomoz crawling? 30voy1g.jpg
Moz Pro | | ctam0 -
Issue in number of pages crawled
i wanted to figure out how our friend Roger Bot works. On the first crawl of one of my large sites, the number of pages crawled stopped at 10000 (due to the restriction on the pro account). However after a few weeks, the number of pages crawled went down to about 5500. This number seemed to be a more accurate count of the pages on our site. Today, it seems that Roger Bot has completed another crawl and the number is up to 10000 again. I know there has been no downtime on our site, and the items that we fixed on our site did not reduce or increase the number of pages we had. Just making sure there are no known issues with Roger Bot before I look deeper into our site to see if there is an issue. Thanks!
Moz Pro | | cchhita0 -
What Anchor text is being used by my competitors and how many times?
Is it possible to check out my competitors and see how many times there back link is using the anchor text "buy widgets here" for example?
Moz Pro | | dynamic080