No longer showing for 'money' phrases but long tail combinations rank high?
-
I hope someone can shed some light on this as I've been pulling my hair out so much there's hardly any left!
Background: 12 year old website that for about 10 years had Top 3 rankings for 100's of phrases but rankings first dropped off August 2011. Panda seemed to be the cause but finding the exact issue is hard. We are an online travel agent and every hotel page has duplicate content copied from other websites. This has not been changed although lots of sections in the site still rank well, so do the hotel pages themselves. Lots of internal duplicate issues have been resolved but with no effect.
Our old style link, link, link all day long with our 2-word main key phrase as anchor text has given us an unnatural backlink profile but no message has been left by G about this in WMT (yet).
Internal link structure is poor with all pages linking back to the homepage with our 'money' 2-word phrase in 3 places.
Penguin wiped two thirds of all our backlinks back in May 2012.
Why then, do we still rank for our 'money' phrase on the homepage when it has some extra words included and becomes long tail?
e.g.
CityName Apartments (money phrase) - Now ranks page 2-3
CityName Apartments to rent for the night - Ranks #2 on Google in all countries
To make things more confusing other pages rank really well for similar money phrase
e.g.
CityName Apartments Offers - Ranks 2nd on 185,000,000 results (not homepage)
It seems only the homepage is effected (where 95% of inbound links point) but if the site wide duplicates or unnatural link profile was flagged it would effect more than one page of the site. Wouldn't it?
-
For whatever it's worth, have a site which was also mauled by Panda & Penquin in April, 2012. Probably lost around 30% to Panda and Penguin knocked it down to around 25% of the pre-mauling traffic. The Penguin mauling is algo based and is probably caused by anchor text in manually written comments on relevant blogs or pages. Without doing anything (as in taking an extended vacation from blogging, linking, etc.) traffic is now at 50% of pre-mauling (probably half of the Penguin effect is gone). Seems to benefit from each Penguin update by 10% - 20% per month. I am curious how this compares to "link removal" efforts.
-
Hi Marcus
Thanks for confirming my suspicions.
It's time to bite the bullet and start re-writing all the content!
Simon -
Hey Simon
It's fairly easy to diagnose a panda issue and start by checking the dates you lost traffic. Lets assume you have a panda issue and that has pulled down lots of the rankings for various pages and sections of the site.
Now, that does not mean, that subsequently, you have not picked up a penguin problem as well and looking at your link profile, it would certainly not be surprising:
- No URLs in the top 5 anchors
- Links from low quality sources (http://zurichhotelsweb.com/links/links13.html)
- Links from topically irrelevant sources
- High percentage of keyword anchors
- low percentage of URL anchors
So, if you can check the date you first lost organic traffic in analytics you can pretty much determine if it is a panda problem.
You can read up on the types of thin content here:
http://www.seomoz.org/blog/fat-pandas-and-thin-contentThen, you need to identify all the thin content pages and either update them or remove them. If you can't remove them or they have a purpose then you can noindex them and ideally nofollow the links to them from the rest of the site.
Once you have done that, and you need to be thorough, then you should see a bounce back from those issues but I am fairly sure you will have accrued some penguin issues as well so I would also then check the penguin dates for further drops.
I have one client that got hit by Panda on the 19th of April and lost around 25% of organic search volume from Google and then by Penguin on the 24th and lost around another 50% of the remaining volume. We have solved a lot of the penguin problems but are now looking at the panda problems which can be larger in scale to diagnose and resolve.
Fact of the matter is, you have to be fastidious in your approach and remove anything that is duplicated or thin and then go after the Penguin problems.
Good luck and keep us posted!
Marcus -
Hi Marcus
I know this sounds like Penguin but this issue kicked in nearly a year before Penguin was announced which is why I'm thinking Panda.
Thanks for taking a look Simon
-
Hi Simon,
Can you drop a link? A quick look at the backlink profile would really help here as it certainly looks like a penguin problem for the 'money keyword' from the description but without checking, it's hard to tell.
My thinking would be that the longer search keywords are not competitive so you still rank for these terms. That said, if you have internal / external duplicate pages that are not ranking, if you can't or won't change the content, then maybe they could be worth noindexing as a test at least.
Re the links, I have been working with various sites with a bad link profile and subsequently done a bit of research about what constitutes a safe and natural (or super natural) link profile and the basics seem to be:
- 50% of links should be from topically relevant sites
- keep keyword anchors below 50% and ideally around 30%
- aim to have at least two of the top 5 anchors as branded URLs
- aim for around 70% of the link profile as branded url links
- link to a wide variety of documents with a wide variety of terms
- keyword anchors for product pages should be below 45% of total anchors
- keyword anchors to category pages should be below 25% of total anchors
More details here:
http://www.bowlerhat.co.uk/blog/seo/anchor-text-ratios-and-link-building/This is possibly a little conservative but is the approach we are using to repair link profiles and for future link building efforts.
Hope this helps
Marcus
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Co-occuring Phrases
How do you find co occurring phrases to include in your content when you as a human has access or looks at the top 10 to 30 results on google when google has access to 30 million results in its database ? Is there a trick to that or is the only available solution that google left is called luck 🙂
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | seoanalytics0 -
How to rank a transactional query
I have a webpage about bike tours in France with a list of bike tours in France. I imagaine people don't want a big paragraph about what a bike tour in France is because this is a transactional query and not an informational query. How do I go about ranking this page ? Would a good title tag and good description be enough to rank that page ? Thank you,
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | seoanalytics0 -
My landing pages don't show up in the SERPs, only my frontpage does.
I am having some trouble with getting the landing pages for a clients website to show up in the SERPs.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | InmediaDK
As far as I can see, the pages are optimized well, and they also get indexed by Google. The website is a danish webshop that sells wine, www.vindanmark.com Take for an instance this landing page, http://www.vindanmark.com/vinhandel/
It is optimzied for the keywords "Vinhandel Århus". Vinhandel means "Winestore" and "Århus" is a danish city. As you can see, I manage to get them at page 1 (#10), but it's the frontpage that ranks for the keyword. And this goes for alle the other landing pages as well. But I can't figure out, why the frontpage keep outranking the landingpages on every keyword.
What am I doing wrong here?1 -
Site's disappearnce in web rankings
I'm currently doing some work on a website: http://www.abetterdriveway.com.au. Upon starting, I detected a lot of spammy links going to this website and sort to remove them before submitting a disavow report. A few months later, this site completely disappeared in the rankings, with all keywords suddenly not ranked. I realised that the test website (which was put up to view before the new site went live) was still up on another URL and Google was suddenly ranking that site instead. Hence, I ensured that test site was completely removed. 3 weeks later however, the site (www.abetterdriveway.com.au) still remains unranked for its keywords. Upon checking Web Master Tools, I cannot see anything that stands out. There is no manual action or crawling issues that I can detect. Would anyone know the reason for this persistent disappearance? Is it something I will just have to wait out until ranking results come back, or is there something I am missing? Help here would be much appreciated.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Gavo0 -
.GOV Link - same impact on my site's rankings whether link to home or Gov related category?
I own a job site and I am about to get a link from a .GOV. My site has a category called "State Jobs". Should I ask the ".Gov" to link to my homepage or to the state job page and use the anchor text "State Jobs". I understand "State Jobs" page would get a big kick by that being the anchor text and linking to that specific page, but the question I have is this: for my site as a whole (homepage and various categories) would they get around the same "push up" whether the linking is to 1) my homepage with anchor text being my site's name or 2) to the state job specific page and in this case the anchor text would be "State Jobs"? thank you
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | knielsen0 -
Is my other domain making me not rank?
Hi there, We have a .co.uk website which was ranking well for a number of highly competitive keywords, however in February 2012 those rankings for those keywords suddenly dropped off Google all together and have never came back. A few possibilties to why this has happened: We launched a .ie website which has exactly the same content, could this be the reason for the drop? I have put in all the necessary steps in making sure Google ranks these geographically correct by using hreflang and making sure everything is setup properly in webmaster tools. Why I think it could be this: If I copy and paste the first few paragraphs of text from the pages in the .co.uk website that were ranked highly in Google.co.uk it's the .ie version that appears not the .co.uk version. Here is the webpages in question: http://www.avogel.co.uk/health/menopause/ http://www.avogel.ie/health/menopause/ Forgot to mention, the reason we have these two websites is due to different currency and legalities. Hope someone can help me out with this.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Paul780 -
My Google title isn't showing what is entered
Help! On Yahoo and Bing, if you search "Chant Real Estate" the full title that I've entered appears in the search listings: Chant PA Real Estate | Real Estate PA | Pennsylvania: Find PA Homes for Sale But in Google it only shows "Chant PA Real Estate". This title was what the original developer used for their site and it's been almost a year now that it's been under our control. Any suggestions? The URL is www.chantre.com.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | gXe0 -
.com ranking over other ccTLD's that were created
We had a ecommerce website that used to function as the website for every other locale we had around the world. For example the French version was Domain.com/fr_FR/ or a German version in English would be Domain.com/en_DE/. Recently we moved all of our larger international locales to their corresponding ccTLD so no we have Domain.fr and Domain.de.(This happened about two months ago) The problem with this is that we are getting hardly any organic traffic and sales on these new TLD's. I am thinking this is because they are new but I am not positive. If you compare the traffic we used to see on the old domain versus the traffic we see on the new domain it is a lot less. I am currently going through to make sure that all of the old pages are not up and the next thing I want to know is for the old pages would it be better to use a 301 re-direct or a rel=canonical to the new ccTLD to avoid duplicate content and those old pages from out ranking our new pages? Also what are some other causes for our traffic being down so much? It just seems that there is a much bigger problem but I don't know what it could be.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | DRSearchEngOpt0