Backlinks in client website footers - best strategy?
-
I work for a web design & development agency. We are looking to rank for 'web design' and 'web development'. Typically we have a credit in the footer of every site we build (below). We have a lot of backlinks (>60,000) this way.
We link 'web design and development' and '<our name="">' separately.
Does this strategy sound ok and can anyone suggest improvements?</our>Thanks
-
My only response would be this. Sometimes it can work especially in the short run, but is often penalized. I would wait until the next penguin update comes out and take a look at the competitors site again. Again, not linking site wide from the footer is not a hard-and-fast rule but more of a general best practice.
The problem is that these are not editorial links per se. As such they are at constant risk are being devalued or penalized by Google.
You can roll the dice and sometimes see a short-term victory. But more often than not you risk getting burned.
-
I'd like to revisit this issue.
Why? Recently a competitor who was brand spankin new, propped their site up with this tactic, they had their parent company place a backlink to their site in the footer, so they get 160 some backlinks.
I saw this as one of the most boneheaded moves since what I read constantly says don't do this, google will throat check you.
However they aren't being penalized like I thought and read. In fact, they've surpassed my client's site in rankings. It's a bit perplexing to experience really.
So even though others have said :
Don't link externally in the footer
A couple of other rules that I see people violate all the time that Google has made painfully clear in the past few months: Don't link externally in the footer. Just don't. I'm not going to go into the reasons. Just don't do that.
What will happen to sites that link to other sites from their footer?
-
SEO's are wary and for good reason - it wasn't long ago that 'footer' links was an over-used tactic that was quashed, resulting in the start of the 'blogroll' type links. Like I said, opinions are going to differ wildly for different SEO's on this one. For us, when we work a client, we know and control their link profile so we know that their site(s) are very clean. As such, we feel that having a footer link to our business (just as web design companies do) that we are not at risk.
Like you, we see this everywhere in our competitor link profiles and in fact, we see large variations in local ranking when there are links added or removed from their or our local clients.
So it's going to be your call in the end - opinions will differ, and even I might change my mind within the next few months depending on what happens in the SE Algo world. But for now this is a practice we are actively using.
-
Wish I could give you a definite answer, but because it's algorithmic, over-optimization is a shifting target.
"Over-optimization is the amount of optimization that makes your rankings go down."
-
Thanks Cyrus.
This makes sense, but my main issues are:- All our high ranking competitors use this strategy. A lot.
- We've adjusted some of the inbound footer links to include service terms in the anchors and our rankings have noticeably improved.
So I think I will continue with this plan, but mixing up the anchor text.
BTW - I've read a few articles on 'over optimisation' and there seems to be a mixed consensus on what it actually means. Are there any definitie article on this?
-
Hi Matt,
I fall in the camp of SEOs that would avoid this strategy.
We've seen lots of cases of this backfiring, especially in the past year. For a specific example of site-wide footers devastating a business, see Ross Hudgen's piece on WPMU, and how they recovered....
http://www.seomoz.org/blog/how-wpmuorg-recovered-from-the-penguin-update
Here's the problem. Google tends to devalue:
- Site-wide, boilerplate anchors
- Anchors in the footer
- Over-optimized anchors
Since Penguin, these three have been pounded especially hard.
I'd much rather have a single link from a single page - preferably in the body text - from each website built than a sitewide footer. I'd also vary the anchor text from link to link. This could be offered as an incentive, such as $100 off if the client includes a link (although this technically violates Google's guidelines on paid links. Gasp!)
If you do build footer links, I'd try NOT to build them to your homepage. If you ever incur a penalty and need to "cut" the links, it's very hard to return a 404 from your homepage.
Also, generic, branded or complete URLs are "safest" for sitewide links, because they aren't over-optimized.
Hope this helps! Best of luck with your SEO.
-
Thanks Jared. Though why would most SEOs say this is a bad idea?
-
Honestly, at first glance most SEO's would probably say this is a bad idea, particularly with Penguin - the problem is, it seems to work. I know as an SEO when i do competitive analysis, some of our competitors have thousands of links that read:
SEO by
And they certainly rank for their respective terms. Opinions may differ with some SEO professionals here, but I would argue that unless you have seen a significant decline in positioning for the anchored text, I wouldn't be concerned about it and would venture to say that it's probably a positive strategy. The best part about links like these (we do this as well) is that for the most part, the links are usually very clean.
Hope that helps.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Strategy for Local Site
Hi everyone I am working in a Media Agency in Los Angeles and we have to locally rank this site to get leads. Arts by Yaseen https://artsbyyaseen.agency/ We are strictly going for whitehat SEO. Can experts here give me an strategy to rank this site on top results? Thank You
Link Building | | jack4920 -
Tracking Backlinks
Hi there, I'm looking for a tool/ service whereby I can track backlinks & be alerted when:
Link Building | | jasongmcmahon
a) They've moved
b) They've been removed & 404 is generated Is anyone aware of any such service?0 -
Backlinks 101, one or multiple?
Analyzing a competitor backlink profile I noticed they have the habit of adding multiple links to the guest post/advertorial they get, one link to their site, plus some links to authority site like wikipedia and institutional websites. Is there anyone with some data, testing, and so on, supporting this? I can see their SERP positioning is very good, but they spent a lot of money on quite expensive links, so I don't know if it's the DA of the linking domains or the multiple links making the difference. Anyone has an idea?
Link Building | | max.favilli0 -
How Useful is this website for Linkbuilding
I've been looking at A to Z of materials trying to determine how much time it is worth spending on building a company profile and adding additional information http://www.azom.com/suppliers.aspx?SupplierID=2343 DA is 50+ and PA for a new listing seems to be 17 of so. My site currently has a DA of about 20. Once of my competitors seems to have put a lot of time into it Other than a profile you can also write articles and post news. It's worth pointing out that as a whole the sector has no useful blogs and most linkbuilding is done via directory listings. And Most companies have back links from less than 20 other root domains. Thoughts would be gratefully received
Link Building | | Zippy-Bungle0 -
What is the best backlink? Homepage or specific post?
I am working hard to get backlinks from other blogs by submitting deal tips. I am a deal blog so I am wondering - is it better to get a backlink to a specific post that will expire because it is a time sensitive deal or sale? Or is it better to get a backlink to my homepage? I focus on the best blog with PR of 7 and DA of 72 as well as others that are high up there. In case I am not being clear, which backlink is better? A. www.mysite.com B. www.mysite.com/awesome-sale-of-the-day Sometimes I won't have a choice but just wondering what I should focus on or if it even matters. Thanks!
Link Building | | dealblogger0 -
How long for backlinks to kick in?
Lets say you do a guest post, Google indexes the article which must mean it has found the link back. Would you expect to see movement straight away? Some of my latest guest posts (in the last week) have been indexed but have shown no movement at all, but when I check WMT for links coming in they are not in the list so im guessing they have not taken full effect?
Link Building | | activitysuper0 -
How best to link multiple related websites.
I have a handful of e-commerce websites that overlap each other some in the same niche. I have already heard that it would have been best to make just one website, but this is not practical for me. Our business model goes back to a time before the internet. We have relationships with manufacturers where they refer business to us because we brand web sites which will not switch customers to competing brands. Our agreements make it ok to link to other websites so long as we have branded websites that focus on the specific manufacturers. For SEO, what is the best way to link these sites? Site wide links in footers.? Single links at on homepages? One way links from the most powerful site? Some other method? We have been wrestling with this question for some time.
Link Building | | EugeneF0