301 redirect on yahoo hosting
-
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone could lend some advice to getting a 301 redirect on yahoo web hosting;
I spoke with someone in SEO and they referred me to a site that had step by step instruction, the only problem is that was for the yahoo store, my business is not e commerce rather a service website.
I was wondering if anyone had the same problem, some say that Yahoo does not offer "301 redirects" on their hosting, however, they say there are methods to cirumvent that, my site is html.
Any suggestions would be great - thanks
best regards,
James C
-
Hi Paul,
Hope all is good for you in the new year. I just wanted to thank you for your great and articulate response regarding the use of 301's.
I have implemented your suggestion and - it works! Thanks again.
Happy New Year
-Jimmy
-
I think Paul's got you on the right track, although I'll just add a couple of things:
(1) META Refresh can be a bit unpredictable, in terms of passing inbound linking power and SEO benefits. Google has generally recommended against using it the last couple of years.
(2) 301-redirects would be the preferred solution, but you could use rel=canonical in a pinch. It will generally help consolidate any duplicates and pass any inbound link "juice":
http://support.google.com/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=139394
The disadvantage is what Paul discussed - canonical tags won't send the visitors to the canonical URL - they're only seen by search engines. The advantage is that you could create them within the HTML itself and don't need the Yahoo platform to support it.
I tend to agree with Paul, though - there are plenty of inexpensive hosting options that do support redirects. If it's important, it's worth considering a switch.
-
Your question makes good sense, Jimmy, and happy to assist. The short answer is - yup, the kind of redirect you're talking about would help your site's ability to rank better.
The 301-redirect will definitely harness nearly all the value of the secondary version's links and transfer that value to the main URL once you've done the redirect - that's the primary purpose of the process! Do note that without the redirect, it's not just the home page that has a duplicate, it's every page on your site! You essentially have two site competing against each other and diluting each other's authority.
How much immediate help you'd see would depend on how many incoming links the "alternate" page currently has (i.e. the URL you're going to redirect to the new "main" one) If it's an established site, it's best to find out which URL already has the greatest number of incoming links, and make that the main, while redirecting the lesser-linked version of the URL.
The other benefit of doing this is that visitors will now see only one version of the URL in their address bar, regardless of how they arrived at the site. That means it's much more likely that they'll use the correct URL if they choose to link to your site - meaning almost all future links will be to the correct URLs. This again helps avoid splitting future authority between two versions of your site.
Is that clearer?
Paul
P.S. Once the redirect is in place, you can also go into Google Webmaster Tools and use its tool to tell Google which version of the site (with www. or without) it should consider the primary address. This should be done in addition to the redirect, not just by itself. (Because it's only considered a hint by Google and it doesn't help solve the problem for the other search engines)
-
Hi Paul,
Thanks so much for your response and for being so articulate. I do have one question, because I know that transferring from one host to another one can be less than daunting, but more than easy (lol). Does the DNS redirect provide any SEO benefit? In other words, my site shows up better in SE results as: http://domain.com/ vs. http://www.domain/com/ ; I guess my questions is with the DNS redirect would I be able to harnessthe links that link to the www.domain/ if I chose to redirect all www.domain.com/ to http://domain.com/ ?
Hope that makes sense to you. And thanks again for all of your help!
Jimmy
-
What kind of redirect are you trying to do, Jimmy?
There is no facility for handling any kind of sophisticated SEO-friendly redirects on Yahoo's basic hosting that I'm aware of. It is a significant problem and would be more than enough to push me to move off their hosting if it were me.
That said - if it's something like canonicalisation redirecting (e.g. redirecting sitename.com to www.sitename.com), most DNS hosts - usually the company that hosts your domain name (not your website) - allow that kind of redirect to be created from within their admin panel.
If you're just trying to redirect a page so that users will get to the correct one (and don't care about the lost SEO) you can use what's called a meta-refresh to push the viewer to the new page.
You would add that line in your page's < head > section, where the content=5 means redirect the viewer after 5 seconds, and the url= part is the new page to which you want to send the viewer. This process is definitely NOT SEO-friendly and should be used sparingly.
Honestly, if you're taking your website seriously enough to be putting effort into optimising it for search engines, basic Yahoo hosting is unlikely to be satisfactory. There are plenty of other quality options at the same price point or even lower. It is a bit of effort to transfer to a new host, but it's not daunting and often your new host will help you migrate form the old one.
Paul
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Buy domain, redirect, get all the good links (+link juice) and disavow the spammy ones?
There is a domain for sale that has a quite nice profile and a lot of good backlinks, but also quite a few spammy ones. This domain has a Spam Score of 14% acc. to Moz Link explorer, ours has only 2%. My questions: 1. The domain and the good backlinks are related to or close to our content/keywords. But we are worried whether the "spammy" ones will hurt us. Does anyone has experience with this? 2. Would it help if we disavow the spammy backlinks afterwards? And if so, how do we do that? Add new domain to search console, disavow the bad links and then redirect the entire domain to our domain or redirect the domain first and then disavow from our property? Many thanks for your help!
Link Building | | pissuptours0 -
33k links from Yahoo?
Google WMT says I have over 33,000 backlinks from Yahoo.net, linking to 4 different pages on my site. I am not sure if these are nofollow or not, but I would assume they are. It also says I have almost 4,000 links from feedblitz. Should I be concerned or do something about either of these two things? I am pretty unfamiliar with RSS feeds.
Link Building | | redfishking0 -
Is it worth 301 redirecting an old backlink from a 404 to a landing page?
I was reviewing the 404 report in webmaster tools, when I found a 404 back link from a 10 year old forum topic on a very high DA site. It seems the poster did a direct hotlink to a pdf that was on our site a very long time ago, but is now gone so you get a standard "can not be found" page on our site. Is it now worth redirecting the url to an appropriate landing page, considering the age of the post/ link and the sites DA, or is it not worth it because of the age of the link, its a forum, and we are still getting some juice from it anyway despite it being a 404, and won't get much more out of it. Just want to know it good practice if I find many such links (very old links to now 404 pages) Thanks
Link Building | | PaddyDisplays0 -
How to build links for a domain name that is redirected to another url?
I'm helping a friend build links to his site because he recently moved across country. His primary domain isn't very SEO friendly (shef1.com) so he registered another domain (stephenshefrinphotography.com). Shef1.com has been around for awhile and has at least been crawled with a page rank of 1 so we decided to keep shef1.com as the main website and redirect stephenshefrinphotography.com to it. So for SEO sake I know it's best to at least have a keyword in your URL so I have been using the url stephenshefrinphotography.com in my link building efforts for local directories and blog comments. Is this the right way to go about this or should I be using the main url shef1.com? He had virtually no backlinks until I started helping him but the ones I have created over the last month are not showing up on the link analysis in my campaigns. I just want to make sure my efforts aren't in vain. Advice please. Thanks!
Link Building | | mrsmelmitch0 -
Does registering with the paid Yahoo directory have any effect on your google rankings?
I am trying to get quality back-links and I know Yahoo is one adn as it is a directory is still ok post penguin but can anyone tell me whether it is worth it or does Google ignore the Yahoo links? Thanks
Link Building | | ebowdublin0 -
How to Get Links as A Web Host
As a web hosting provider how would you get links other than people writing reviews about you? How would I find people with actual websites/blogs to ask to write reviews about us? Current customers will usually write reviews on webhostingtalk.com a popular forum for web hosting. We already have plenty of links from forums in the industry. Giving out prizes will only result in more links from webhostingtalk.com presumably, what do you think?
Link Building | | coreymanshack0 -
Backllinks to our site but via redirect (still SEO helpful?)
Hi, A large website may link to us but via their internal redirect mechanism. So it would be somthing like this: [If you select the link, it eventually goes to our site but not from the original page. These links would be placed on lots of pages, but since they would all "pass through" the "redirect" page, it seems not as beneficial from an SEO perspective. Is this reasoning correct? Would google still follow the link and see where it ends up, even though it is via multiple pages? Ideally I'd prefer direct link but how much better is it than the redirect as listed above?](/redirect/rd?site=www.oursite.com/page&trackingparam=111111)
Link Building | | NicB10