Is pointing multiple domains to a single website beneficial for SEO or not?
-
A client has purchased many domains with keywords in each. They want to have us point each domain to their site for better SEO. Is this a good or bad thing to do?
-
The information provided here has been helpful.
What is the best use for NEW DOMAIN EXTENSIONS? I have built a website around "####.online" and have now purchased many more domains with new extensions. Examples = "####.taxi", "####.services", "####.tours", "####.community", "####.restaurant", "####.villas", "####.business", "####.cafe", "####.energy", "####.solar", "####.cruises", "####.events", "####.fish", "####.news", etc etc etc...I have several more.
The "####" is a specific place, a touristic destination.
What is the best way to bring these domains together in a whitelist approach in order to improve ranking around searches related to "####"???
-
I also have a question regarding the practice of multiple domains pointed towards one site.
I have a relatively new domain (www.goodies.no) but the services provided through that site will be very varied (think web design, app development, marketing and SEO services etc)
So my theory was that in addition to creating www.goodies.no/webdesign folders for the webdesign service, I should also set up a www.goodies-webdesign.no domain pointing towards that same folder.
Does that make any sense at all, I though maybe having a vital keyword in the domain name would be beneficial to my SEO as long as the contents of the www.goodies.no/webdesign site it links to is highly relevant to the domain name
-
As you will have read in this thread, their is advice here that no benefit will come from purchasing a domain for sale which indicates it has (as in your case) a DA of 30 an ranking for many keywords.
This suggests to me that the domain you are looking to purchase is currently live and if that is the case then what you are considering is a feasible plan. But which way to go?
Do you make use of this domain you purchase and turn this site into becoming your primary site? Or, do you carefully redirect this newly purchased domain and all its related to pages to the website you have?
Certainly the 18 year old domain sounds like it has a lot of good back history and it is ranking for ( I am assuming) keywords in your niche. Longevity and being in possession of a live domain and it doing as well as you say it is - then I might be inclined to take your Old domain and redirect it and its associated pages to the 18 year old website.
If your 18 year old website has an ABOUT US Page then massage the content carefully here to say you company has inherited this website. 301 redirect your own current domain and have it point to this ABOUT US page, so that people who know you right now will identify that your business has taken over this other site.
In addition to this I would take the INSIDE URL pages of your own current site and redirect them also to any relevant pages in your acquired 18 year old site.
What not to do if you can avoid it, is for now make too many changes to the content on the HOME PAGE of this 18 year old site. Just carefully massage that for now, maybe just be adding where appropriate some content that again reflects you have inherited this site.
But my plan here is for two sites that are currently live. If you said the domain you have purchased is laying dormant somewhere and no pages having been attached to it for a long time and your decision is just going on some sales blurb telling you what the domain used to achieve - then you are not going to gain any real benefit from the domain then.
However, if it is per the scenario I think you are telling us all about then having a live site to inherit that is relevant to your business and with a DA30 which is higher than what you possess - well - this exercise could be worthwhile for you.
-
I have a question related to this and I hope it's ok to keep this conversation going with it.
I have a 5 year old site with DA of 25 (I only really started developing it a year ago). Today, an opportunity opened up to buy an old domain in my subject area with a DA of only 30 but ranking for many keywords. I'm wondering if it would be worth it to buy this old (18 years) domain and use it in some way to benefit my site. Either building it with content and monetizing it while adding a few links to my site on it.
Thanks for you input.
Jo-Ann
-
Issuetrak, I guess you may have found the answer to your question by now since this is now March 2016.
But I ended up here today just to seek reassurance in my thinking about pointing a domain name at an already established website. What I am looking at doing is using a domain that my client has purchased and simply had parked for a while and going to point that domain into the website. And the decision taken is to 301 redirect that domain so it points at a specific landing deeper page inside the website. Why do I want to do this. Well my client has currently quite a LONG domain name.
Currently when I am doing ADWORDS for this client I can just get his current site .co.uk domain to fit into the fixed URL box but only bvy chopping off the WWW DOT on the front of the domain, but I cannot add anything else onto the fixed domain which I know marketers tend to use (including myself) - for example I might want to use a fixed URL that is www.clientdomain.co.uk/treesurgeon should my Ad be focused around that topic.
But, Issuetrak, you talked about buying domains with a history and I was intrigued by that. My understanding is if the domain you were purchasing was already operating with a website attached to it right now, and through some acquisition you had taken over the company but absorbing everything into your business and so this purchased domain already very much in the face of the search engines who sees it has lots of pages associated with it, and there is some relevance towards you having it being redirected to further support, your already established brand site you are growing, then I am of the opinion this exercise might (and has been suggested by some authority voices in the industry) give a 'little' lift/boost to your current site.
However, if that domain you are purchasing was ONCE a well developed domain, but let's say it has been PARKED for some time and NOT ACTIVE for some time, no current flurry of activity around it. I would imagine that the domain then is already would be DYING or DEAD with no power behind it because it had been neglected for so long.
Your point 2 if I have interpreted your statement correctly is what my intention is for my clients new SHORT domain so I can use it more effectively purely for ADWORDS. So I create an AD, use this domain to help drive traffic to the main website by setting up a very specific campaign. I am taking guidance from this Google Article https://support.google.com/a/answer/4352075
For point 3 where would you stop? In the UK this is like having an obsession for private number plates and trying to own all that you think is relevant to you. But if you keep snapping up domains will you ever use them all? Highly unlikely. You could end up spending a small fortune in just trying to buy all the variations and for a small business this is just not practical. I remember a long time ago reading an article somewhere about HEWLETT PACKARD trying to manage all these different domains and in the end they simply got down to have just their PRIMARY and SECONDARY domains to support the brand from what I understand.
Domains and Domain management I find an interesting topic. Like, where should you host your domain. if I am in the UK targeting a UK audience, do I really want my domain to be hosted in Germany for example. I have sparked many a lively debate with this one, and everyone involved having very mixed views, especially when you bring into the equation Google's GEO Targeting tool. But I was once told this tool is fine if for example I am HOSTED in the UK and looking to take part of my website at www.mydomain.com/germany/ and using the GEO tool effectively that way, but not really to use it for the whole website being pointed from one country to the other. Appreciate anybody's view on that one.
Hope this helps keep this thread open.
-
I realize this an old post however a coworker who has a home-based business asked me about this practice. She heard about it at a recent workshop. The take, which is different than what I've read here, is that buying expired domains is a good strategy due to their age which is valued in search. I was intrigued which is what brought me here.
- Is there value in buying domains with a history
- Instead of redirecting, use the domain to generate traffic with fresh content and link back to your original domain
- And how much value is there in keeping domains out of competitors' hands if there isn't any value in owning the domains
Thanks,
-
Hi mszeer,
This resource might help: http://moz.com/blog/the-international-seo-checklist
-
Hi there...
excuse me for getting into this discussion... we are from brazil and we currently have .com and .com.br (brazil) tLD's. We currently have only Portuguese version but have plans to soon have english language as well.... so, .com we would use for english and .com.br for portuguese (brazil)... is this approach correct, then ? or would it be better to use only .com and forward the other variations to it ?
-
Some questions to ask:
Is there any reasonable expectation of traffic by redirecting the domains? i.e. do the domains receive traffic now? If so, a redirect may be in order.
Is there a chance you'll want to use the domains in the future, or do you want to keep the domains out of your competitor's hands? If so, you may want to hold onto them.
Otherwise, if you're redirecting unused domains simply for link equity, there's likely very little value in that strategy.
-
I just wanted to see if I could get an update on this tactic, post-Hummingbird. I'm assuming it's even less recommended to redirect URL traffic to another URL now? Do the exceptions Cyrus mentioned still hold?
If my client already owns other similar name domains, but never did anything with them (either building or 301 redirecting), should I recommend they continue to hold onto them, or just let the license expire?
-
Lots of good answers here.
Generally, there's not much benefit to doing this, especially if the domains are new as Streamline Metrics pointed out.
The risk however, is if the domains have a negative history associated with them. If bad links were pointed at the old domain, then those links will now point at your main site when you redirect them. If an algorithmic action like Penguin or an over-optimization filter was applied to the old site, your risk carrying that baggage to the new site.
Sometimes it makes sense to redirect domains.
- SEOmoz.com redirects to seomoz.org. Lots of folks type seomoz.com, so this makes sense.
- You migrate an old domain.
In general, however, there's virtually no SEO benefit to buying a previously unestablished keyword rich domain and redirecting it for traffic, rankings boost (unless on those rare occasions it's a very popular domain name to begin with)
-
I appreciate the response.
-
I might have said there would be no harm normally, but after a client came to me to find out why a .co.uk was appearing above the .com, which was his main site, I would say it can do harm. The .co.uk was simply being pointed to the .com. First time I have seen this happen so just tread carefully. Either way, it's a too grey hat for my liking - to try and get more search traffic by trying to mis-lead people from one domain to another is a no-no. Just tell them that with all of the algo changes going on, they are best scratching that idea and focusing their efforts on great content. If that got found out (and it can very easily if someone reports it) then all domains will be penalised.
-
Thank you for your response!
-
Thanks for your response!
-
There is no SEO benefit to doing this, there is also no harm
There can be other benefits, if there is a short URL that redirects that can be used on the phone to tell people to visit rather than the longer or hard to spell URL
I hope this helps
Sean
-
I get this question a lot from my clients. If the domains are brand new and they've never resolved to a site before, then there won't be any kind of impact for SEO, positive or negative. Just make sure the domain names 301 redirect to the primary URL instead of pointing them/setting them up as aliases.
The only time there could be a positive impact is if a domain name used to resolve to a website and that site ranked in the search engines and links were pointed to it. Then you could 301 redirect those domain names to a new URL to transfer at least some of the link juice.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Is there a tool out there to check any domain that might be pointing to my existing domain?
Is there a tool out there to check any domain that might be pointing to my existing domain?
Technical SEO | | adlev0 -
We switched the domain from www.blog.domain.com to domain.com/blog.
We switched the domain from www.blog.domain.com to domain.com/blog. This was done with the purpose of gaining backlinks to our main website as well along with to our blog. This set us very low in organic traffic and not to mention, lost the backlinks. For anything, they are being redirected to 301 code. Kindly suggest changes to bring back all the traffic.
Technical SEO | | arun.negi0 -
Negative SEO
I have got some idiot bombarding my site with spam links, most likely a negative SEO attempt. It started off very small and has ramped up to between five and 10 spam links per day. I think it may be having a slightly negative affect although difficult to tell. I can do a link cleanup, but I'm not sure that is a long term solution, I'm just going have to do it again in a few weeks time. Does anyone have any experience?
Technical SEO | | seoman100 -
Website SEO Product Pages - Condense Product Pages
We are managing a website that has seen consistently dropping rankings over the last 2 years (http://www.independence-bunting.com/). Our long term strategy has been purely content-based and is of high quality, but isn’t seeing the desired results. It is an ecommerce site that has a lot of pages, most of which are category or product pages. Many of the product pages have duplicate or thin content, which we currently see as one of the primary reasons for the ranking drops.The website has many individual products which have the same fabric and size options, but have different designs. So it is difficult to write valuable content that differs between several products that have similar designs. Right now each of the different designs has its own product page. We have a dilemma, because our options are:A.Combine similar designs of the product into one product page where the customer must choose a design, a fabric, and a size before checking out. This way we can have valuable content and don’t have to duplicate that content on other pages or try to find more to say about something that there really isn’t anything else to say about. However, this process will remove between 50% and 70% of the pages on the website. We know number of indexed pages is important to search engines and if they suddenly see that half of our pages are gone, we may cause more negative effects despite the fact that we are in fact aiming to provide more value to the user, rather than less.B.Leave the product pages alone and try to write more valuable content for each product page, which will be difficult because there really isn’t that much more to say, or more valuable ways to say it. This is the “safe” option as it means that our negative potential impact is reduced but we won’t necessarily see much positive trending either. C.Test solution A on a small percentage of the product categories to see any impact over the next several months before making sitewide updates to the product pages if we see positive impact, or revert to the old way if we see negative impact.Any sound advice would be of incredible value at this point, as the work we are doing isn’t having the desired effects and we are seeing consistent dropping rankings at this point.Any information would be greatly appreciated. Thank you,
Technical SEO | | Ed-iOVA0 -
Domain forwarding
Hi Is it ok or bad practice to domain forward shorter more memorable snappier domains used for promoting a website to a longer domain where the website actually lives, such as: Promoting in social media profiles, emails and offline literature a domain with forwarding set up like: www.brand.com To the main website: www.brandincludingprimaryproductrelatedkeyword.com And if ok (not bad practice), since its the forwarded domains that are being promoted they are hence the links most likely to be shared on social media and other websites so will they be treated like 301's and 'link building' for those will pretty much equate to link building for the main domain (or not) ? Many Thanks Dan
Technical SEO | | Dan-Lawrence0 -
What is cross domain?
what is cross domain? can any one explain in simple language ?
Technical SEO | | constructionhelpline0 -
Two companies merge: website A redirect 301 to website B. Problems?
Hi, last december the company I work for and another company merged. The website of company A was taken offline and the home page was 302 redirected to a page on website B. This page had information about the merger and the consequences for customers. The deeper pages of website A were 301 redirected to similar pages on website B. After a while, the traffic from the redirected home page decreased and we thought it was time to change the redirect from a 302 into a 301 redirect to the home page. Because there are still a lot of links to the home page of website A and we wanted to preserve the link juice. Two weeks ago we changed the 302 redirect from website A into a 301 redirect to the home page of website B. Last week the Google webmaster tools account of website B showed the links from the 301 redirected website A. The total amount of links doubled and the top anchor text is the name of company A instead of company B. This, off course, could trigger an alarm at Google. Because we got a lot of new links with a different anchor text. A tactic used by spammers/black-hats. I am a bit worried that our change will be penalized by Google. But our change is legit. It is to the advantage of our customers to find us if they search for the name of company A or click on a link to website A. We didn´t change the change of address of domain A in Google webmaster tools yet. Is it a good idea to change the change of address of domain A into domain B? Are there other precautions we can take?
Technical SEO | | NN-online0 -
SEO LINKS
New to S.E.O. so excuse my naivety. I have made lots of new links some of them paid for e.g. Best of the Web but I don’t see any change in the latest competitive link analysis. Some of the links we have been accepted for just do not show. Also the keywords we are trying to promote the most have disappeared off the radar for over 2 weeks now. I think we have followed the optimization suggestions correctly. Please could you enlighten me. Regards Paul www.curtainpolesemporium.co.uk
Technical SEO | | CPE0