Would Google Call These Pages Duplicate Content?
-
Our Web store, http://www.audiobooksonline.com/index.html, has struggled with duplicate content issues for some time. One aspect of duplicate content is a page like this: http://www.audiobooksonline.com/out-of-publication-audio-books-book-audiobook-audiobooks.html.
When an audio book title goes out-of-publication we keep the page at our store and display a http://www.audiobooksonline.com/out-of-publication-audio-books-book-audiobook-audiobooks.html whenever a visitor attempts to visit a specific title that is OOP. There are several thousand OOP pages.
Would Google consider these OOP pages duplicate content?
-
I'm confused. When a book goes out of print, does the URL change to this long OOP html page? Or does that book's URL then redirect to this page? Or *(shudders) do you make the OOP page re-titled to whatever the OOP book's page was?
If it were me I'd do the first scenario here. It's essentially the same concept as a 404.
-
Yes that is duplicate content, you should make these pages return a 404 instead. or leave the content in place with a sold out banner or something.
Something I don't like is your index.htm on your home page, people how link to you are likely to link to http://www.audiobooksonline.com/ you will then get a 301 redirect to http://www.audiobooksonline.com/index.html
this will leak link juice, as all 301's leak link juice just the same as a link does, 155 if we go by the original published Google algorithm. Also your internal pages link to http://www.audiobooksonline.com and are once again redirected to http://www.audiobooksonline.com/index.html
-
yes larry that is fine. so long as it is a single URL with a single HTML file on it, there is no duplicate issues. If you want to clarify I would suggest (if you aren't an SEOmoz pro member) to use a sitemap generator to ensure it isn't crawling multiple pages... But if that page is only listed once (and from what you are saying here that should be the case) then you have no duplicate content issues.
It's just the same as linking to one page from every page on your website. A redirect doesn't work much differently (although it does drop a small amount of linkjuice.)
You might consider no-crawling that OOP page anyway if you're still concerned. Not sure why you would need that one indexed in the first place.
Good luck to you!
-
We use only one URL for the OOP pages. It is 301 redirected from the each unique OOP title's page. Based on what you said, I am understanding that this is fine. Correct?
-
Hi Larry
Couple of questions - is that the only URL for the OOP pages, or are there other versions of the page and/or URL that exist?
If there are multiple pages, then that is definitely duplicate content. However, that can quite easily be fixed. If you add this code to the head tag of all those OOP pages, it will prevent Google from indexing the pages (thus not seeing them as duplicate):
That way you can keep the page for the user but not have to worry about duplicate content. I would do this anyway even if there is only one version of the page, as the page is thin on content as it is.
If you are displaying that image on other URLs that used to have products on them, but have gone OOP, then those multiple URLs and pages would be duplicate. Again, if you add the above code into the head text, it removes the problem. You could also 301 redirect the URL of the product page to the OOP page. For example, if you had a page for a product called: http://www.audiobooksonline.com/examplerecord.html that is now OOP, you could put in a 301 redirect to the http://www.audiobooksonline.com/out-of-publication-audio-books-book-audiobook-audiobooks.html. page and it wouldn't be duplicate. You can learn more about redirection here.
Hope this helps.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Duplicate content, although page has "noindex"
Hello, I had an issue with some pages being listed as duplicate content in my weekly Moz report. I've since discussed it with my web dev team and we decided to stop the pages from being crawled. The web dev team added this coding to the pages <meta name='robots' content='max-image-preview:large, noindex dofollow' />, but the Moz report is still reporting the pages as duplicate content. Note from the developer "So as far as I can see we've added robots to prevent the issue but maybe there is some subtle change that's needed here. You could check in Google Search Console to see how its seeing this content or you could ask Moz why they are still reporting this and see if we've missed something?" Any help much appreciated!
Technical SEO | | rj_dale0 -
404 Error Pages being picked up as duplicate content
Hi, I recently noticed an increase in duplicate content, but all of the pages are 404 error pages. For instance, Moz site crawl says this page: https://www.allconnect.com/sc-internet/internet.html has 43 duplicates and all the duplicates are also 404 pages (https://www.allconnect.com/Coxstatic.html for instance is a duplicate of this page). Looking for insight on how to fix this issue, do I add an rel=canonical tag to these 60 error pages that points to the original error page? Thanks!
Technical SEO | | kfallconnect0 -
Duplicate Content due to CMS
The biggest offender of our website's duplicate content is an event calendar generated by our CMS. It creates a page for every day of every year, up to the year 2100. I am considering some solutions: 1. Include code that stops search engines from indexing any of the calendar pages 2. Keep the calendar but re-route any search engines to a more popular workshops page that contains better info. (The workshop page isn't duplicate content with the calendar page). Are these solutions possible? If so, how do the above affect SEO? Are there other solutions I should consider?
Technical SEO | | ycheung0 -
Duplicate Content Issue
My issue with duplicate content is this. There are two versions of my website showing up http://www.example.com/ http://example.com/ What are the best practices for fixing this? Thanks!
Technical SEO | | OOMDODigital0 -
Localized domains and duplicate content
Hey guys, In my company we are launching a new website and there's an issue it's been bothering me for a while. I'm sure you guys can help me out. I already have a website, let's say ABC.com I'm preparing a localized version of that website for the uk so we'll launch ABC.co.uk Basically the websites are going to be exactly the same with the difference of the homepage. They have a slightly different proposition. Using GeoIP I will redirect the UK traffic to ABC.co.uk and the rest of the traffic will still visit .com website. May google penalize this? The site itself it will be almost the same but the homepage. This may count as duplicate content even if I'm geo-targeting different regions so they will never overlap. Thanks in advance for you advice
Technical SEO | | fabrizzio0 -
132 pages reported as having Duplicate Page Content but I'm not sure where to go to fix the problems?
I am seeing “Duplicate Page Content” coming up in our
Technical SEO | | danatanseo
reports on SEOMOZ.org Here’s an example: http://www.ccisolutions.com/StoreFront/product/williams-sound-ppa-r35-e http://www.ccisolutions.com/StoreFront/product/aphex-230-master-voice-channel-processor http://www.ccisolutions.com/StoreFront/product/AT-AE4100.prod These three pages are for completely unrelated products.
They are returning “200” status codes, but are being identified as having
duplicate page content. It appears these are all going to the home page, but it’s
an odd version of the home page because there’s no title. I would understand if these pages 301-redirected to the home page if they were obsolete products, but it's not a 301-redirect. The referring page is
listed as: http://www.ccisolutions.com/StoreFront/category/cd-duplicators None of the 3 links in question appear anywhere on that page. It's puzzling. We have 132 of these. Can anyone help me figure out
why this is happening and how best to fix it? Thanks!0 -
Our Development team is planning to make our website nearly 100% AJAX and JavaScript. My concern is crawlability or lack thereof. Their contention is that Google can read the pages using the new #! URL string. What do you recommend?
Discussion around AJAX implementations and if anybody has achieved high rankings with a full AJAX website or even a partial AJAX website.
Technical SEO | | DavidChase0