Why is OSE showing no data for this URL?
-
Hi all,
Does anyone have any ideas as to why OSE might not have any data for this URL:
http://www.ccisolutions.com/StoreFront/product/shure-slx24-sm58-wireless-microphone-system-j3
It is not a new page at all. It's been on the site for years.
Is OSE being quirky? Or is there an underlying problem with this page?
Thanks in advance for any light you can shed on this,
Dana
-
Hi Paul,
We discovered that the problem was being caused by a trailing "comma" at the end of the keyword string that we once used to populate the Meta keywords tag. Unfortunately, the keyword information in those fields is still being parsed. The parser did not know what to do when it encountered a comma followed by nothing.
We did run a query and found that this problem was affecting 128 of our product pages and had been for a long time. We haven't been populating the keywords for almost a year now, so the problem is at least that old.
The commas are now gone.
Thanks again to you and Andrew!
-
Glad I could help, Dana.
And yes, "borked" is a technical term. It's defined as existing in a badly broken state as a result of an inexperienced/inattentive user making unauthorised/incorrect changes to a website's code or content
Can also be used as a verb: "he borked the database so badly the whole site went 503".
Not that it's ever been applied to me or anything.
And yea - sometimes our tools can mislead us, even though the info they provided was "technically" correct.
Suggestion for a fast way to test the rest of the site for this kind of error: Use the paid version of Screaming Frog to program a search for a snippet of code that should be in the content area of every product page. Limit the crawl to the product pages category. (Or whatever sections of the site you're worried about.)
You could search for something as simple as class="productExtendedDescription" which would at least ensure the content container was there. Still wouldn't prove there was any content it it, but if you wanted to get fancy with regex, you could even do that too. You could also search for the tag, which would indicate that the rest of the pages' code likely exists.
Just an idea to speed up the testing process.
Paul
-
Thanks so much Paul,
Yes, when I ran a "Fetch as Googlebot" it returned a "Success" message, but when I looked at what Google is seeing there is no content on the page.
"borked" - great term...I am definitely going to have to file that one away for future use!
If the problem is isolated to this page, that's one thing. I am more concerned that this problem is effecting a larger number of pages.
Once I figure it out, I'll come back here and post what we found/fixed.
I really appreciate the comments from you and Andrew very much!
-
Dana, there's no content on that page.
The massive head section with all it's JavaScript is there, making it look like there's lots of code, but the actual body content has somehow been deleted.
This is all I see in the actual body of the page:
|
<form name="headerForm" action="IAFDispatcher" onsubmit="return submitQuery()" method="post">
That's it. There's no actual content, no footer, no closing or tag, which makes me think someone's actually deleted the content part of the code by accident.
Good luck figuring out who borked it
Paul
</form>
|
-
I just ran the source code for this page through the validator at: http://validator.w3.org/
There are a multitude of problems that need to be addressed. Thanks very much Andrew. I do have enough HTML knowledge to provide guidance to our IT manager on how to fix the problems. I don't have access to much of the source code, so it will certainly be a "project" to fix the issues.
I am sure these problems are everywhere all over the site, as many people with very little experience in coding and design have had their hands in the pot (so to speak) over the years.
At least this will allow me to prove to our CEO that our underlying code is indeed presenting a problem for indexing and crawling.
-
I did some comparisons with other pages and it doesn't seem that the drop-down frequency selector is the culprit. This page also has one: www.ccisolutions.com/StoreFront/product/shure-slx24-sm58-wireless-microphone-system-h5
but the cache in Google seems to be fine for this page and OSE displays data for it just fine.
-
Could the coding issue be related to the drop down box that's located just above the pricing on the right hand side? That is one thing that makes this product page different from others on our site.
Thoughts?
-
I also see what you mean that there is a problem with Google's cache. The cache date is really old (April 11) and there is no preview of the page.
Anyone who can point me in the right direction?
-
Thanks so much for responding Andrew. I have suspected problems with our code for a long time, but I am not a coder, sp it's been a challenge to attempt to identify the specific problem.
I believe this is not just a problem with this page, but could be a problem across many pages on our site.
Can you are any of my fellow Mozzers point to what you are seeing in the source code that leads you to believe it is corrupted?
Many thanks for any help. I truly appreciate it!
Dana
-
Hi Dana,
I think your page is corrupted, I have copied a link to the sourcecode I am seeing http://pastebin.com/BRfFT4RR
It looks like Google Cache is also having problems with this page. Perhaps OSE had trouble too and so skipped the page?
- Andrew
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Opensiteexlorer - Download CSV show different links
Making backlink report, got results -> Download csv Open downloaded csv in excel, it is different links set inside - copied some urls from the web interface and could not find them in excel using Ctrl+F... wtf?
Moz Pro | | Liston810 -
Why does mozbar show pagerank sometimes and not opensiteexplorer?
Hello Internet People! I have been using Opensiteexplorer and Mozbar side by side for 2 months now, running comparisons while link building. I have noticed a small problem, in that sometimes, Mozbar will display page rank information while Opensiteexplorer does not. Eventually Opensiteexplorer updated after several days or weeks, showing the same values as Mozbar. Can someone help me understand why this is happening and if it is a problem to trust the tool over the website? Thanks!
Moz Pro | | CGalownia0 -
Why is OSE so infuriatingly annoying
Damn thing tells me the www.domain im researching has 599 links internal and external. I download an advanced report for the whole root domain of external links....and its come up with 64 in a csv file.....wtf is that about? The data about root domain says i have External Followed Links 408 and
Moz Pro | | xtopher66
55,736 total links...........which is BS. this site hasnt enough internal or external to shoot from the low figure up to 55,0000 By the way, im a 79 tall but ive never meaured my height.. Sounds like SEO data!0 -
OSE Domains & Subdomains
Is there a compelling reason that OSE treats subdomains as part of a parent domain, rather than as a separate site? Or is this just a technical limitation? I ask because it's my understanding that Google treats subdomains more like separate domains than like parts of the parent domain. OSE treating them more like folders creates some frustrating situations when researching niches that are heavily filled with blospot and wordpress.com blogs. First of all, the domain authority in these situations is not at all indicative of the strength of the site. It also makes it hard to evaluate linking root domains at a glance, since all blogspot blogs count as one domain. So to see all blogspot sites linking you have to go to the full link list -- where each site may be listed hundreds of times -- and you can't group them because they're all considered the same domain. To be sure you when researching these niches you can just throw out domain authority as a metric, and export every report to excel where you can sort things in a way to make it easier to separate sites. But if there isn't a compelling SEO reason to have OSE function this way, I'd love to see those subdomains treated as separate sites so I can have access to all the easy to use SEOmoz metrics and layouts without the extra work. And of course if there is a compelling SEO reason for subdomains to be treated as domains, I'd love to be educated! : )
Moz Pro | | Ecreativeworks0 -
Difference between Seomoz Competitive Domain Analysis and OSE link data?
Any reason these numbers are so much different? SeoMoz Competitive Domain Analysis:
Moz Pro | | fibers
Followed Linking Root Romains: 288
Total Linking Root Domains: 338 Open Site Explorer
Linking ROot Romains: 1270 -
Why not having on SEOmoz pro dashboard the table shows by rand fishkin in his whiteboard friday (see below)
I have seen this video, very interesting. Why not building this keyword dashboard in SEOmoz as all data can be taken from Google Analytics ? http://www.seomoz.org/blog/keyword-metrics-for-seo-and-driving-actions-from-data-whiteboard-friday
Moz Pro | | betadvisor0 -
Anyone having issues with OSE?
Everytime i try to access the tool i get the following error: "Error 310 (net::ERR_TOO_MANY_REDIRECTS): There were too many redirects."
Moz Pro | | Anest0