Why are my paid vendors not showing on our links?
-
We pay a hefty amount to site that claim to bring in leads. ie... Cars.com, Edmunds.com, Cargurus, and I also have my dCard (digital business cards) with links to our URL. Why aren't they showing on our PA or DA? Could it be our web host? We have on;y 2 options for web hosts per Acura (a compliance thing) Please help with any thoughts or answers to this. I see many other dealers with strong links who use the same companies. Our site is http://findlayacura.com and thank you for any help. We appreciate it greatly.
-
The main reason I personally don't like these sites is there claims to get impressions. I caught them advertising of Facebook with my cars!! When I asked if this was part of there 94k impression my store got last month they couldn't come up with a straight answer. You can definitely monetize your site as long as you properly address what makes your site different then these big corp sites that are charging you a huge sum then turn to your competitor and get them to pay more to put banner ads across my cars. I am always open to trying out a pilot program if you're interested.
-
Cody has a good answer here. We don't have the server farms (or server barges?) that Google has, so we can't crawl as much of the web as they do, and can't always crawl all of the links. Do also check in Google and Bing webmaster tools to see if the links are showing there.
-
I don't have access to the webmaster tools we pay a company as I'm sure you know to do this for us. I only can submit a ticket to our support team and see what the come up with. With the help of MOZ I am able to uncover a lot of things that our SEO and website team don't pick up on or even look at. This is why I posted the question to begin with. you are absolutely right when I ask me Rep if they can provide links back to our site I get let me check with tech support then about a month goes by and next visit I get oh yeah they weren't able to figure out what I asked them.
It's the normal automotive rep bs.
Thanks again for responding I am going to now open a ticket at the next window lol while forwarding this over to my internet team. -
I know what you mean. I work with pretty much all the vendors, and I can say that you should just be happy you don't have a Ford Direct site, which requires you to pay a "SEO Fee" to just change title tags.
Anyway, if you install the "Redirect Path" plugin on Chrome, which shows when you get redirected on a site, and what kind of redirect it is, you will see that the link to your dealership page from one of your VDPs on Cars.com is actually a 301 redirect. Basically, they are doing their best to keep any authority from going to that page that would help the link back to your site. They also link to the www. version of your website, which then gets 301'd to the non www. version of your website. If, and how much, authority is lost with redirects is highly debated, but I usually go with a 10% loss of authority. Basically, any authority that the link might provide is greatly decreased by these redirects.
This is just Cars.com, but I would guess the others are similar. Do these links register in your Webmaster tools?
-
Cody Jerry
I really appreciate you taking the time to respond to this question. I am a Sales Manager here who also is running our internet department. I am trying to think outside the box in the auto biz. As you know most of the SEO and website host are cookie cutter to put it blunt. I can't stand the fact that we pay companies like cars .com or autotrader, it's our inventory, it's our product, without us they wouldn't be here. You're right on the fact that they would never give up any info on analytics so no sense working that angle. Why if there PA is so high and I compared us to another dealer who uses them am I not getting any results in the link Analysis? Thanks for the help.
-
I actually specialize in automotive seo, but haven't really thought about it. Anyway, I took a look at your cars.com link, and it registers as a PA of 1, which means it has very little authority being passed into it. The reason why you aren't seeing these links is because the pages in which they reside have such little authority that the Moz spider does not locate them. I've also never seen one of these links in Google Webmaster tools, so I would guess that they don't consider them very authoritative links either.
Consider this, though. You are paying for that service, so those links are Paid Links. It's also possible that search engines ignore them because they know this fact, and don't bother indexing them. The only way to really get an idea of how important search engines feel those pages are would be to look at server level crawl stats. Unfortunately, Cars.com would never share that data with you, and your rep would probably just give you a blank look if you asked.
If you have any questions about your dealerships SEO you can PM me.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Data that shows people who click on paid vs organic listings
Hey Everyone, I've been searching for data on the percentage of people who click on paid vs organic. My last stats which are now outdated show 60% of the people click on organic on average and 40% click on paid. Any help/links would be greatly appreciated.
Competitive Research | | JohnSammon0 -
Ad url compare link metrix
Hi, I want to add another url to compare link metric, but it does not work. I still see the waiting signal for about 4 hours now. is there something wrong with it?
Competitive Research | | JoostBruining0 -
Decent domain authority score with no links other than their own linking back to them. How is that possible?
Hello everyone I just spotted the following 'abnormality' while doing a little link analysis with Open Search Explorer. I checked out a site that has a domain authority score of 35, when the only domain linking back to them is ''the site itself'. They happen to have a domain authority of 35 themselves, but no other links pointing back to them apart from their own and yet they have the same authority as other sites with twice the amount of content and an actual backlink profile. How is that possible? 🙂 Links and authority scores, stills baffles me...
Competitive Research | | Hermski0 -
Competitive Link building
Hi Folks According to Site Explorer this link ... www.quotationspage.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=12032&p=98500 .... has a page Authority of 42 and a domain Authority of 87. Looking at this it seems to be 3 links embedded in a forum comment. What I would love to understand is... how valuable is this link? (Especially with Panda and Penguin?) ... How do i decide if I should also peruse a similar link for my site? Thank you in advance
Competitive Research | | PHD0 -
Certainty or Uncertainty of SEO / Link Building
Hey there I'm new to both SEO and Seomoz. I have this personal site I've been working on SEO wise (slowly since I started learning from 0) and I have reached a point where the only missing thing for me to do is build links. However, the competitors for my site have thousands of links. From all I've read on the web regarding SEO&LinkBuilding, including articles in this site...the old method of spamming links wherever/whenever possible is now being penalized while the practice of manual/hand-built links of higher quality and lesser quantity is rewarded. So I went ahead and approached several linkbuilding companies and one thing that struck me was the level of uncertainty regarding the chances of getting a site to get to the first page. I understand there's factors you cannot predict or control, such as what your competitors are doing on the SEO front...but ultimately, I'm curious as to how do you effectively gauge the possibility of getting to the top page of any keyword combination? Especially when dealing with clients... since apparently whoever 'guarantees' you anything is a fraud or uses blackhat techniques...how do you pitch the 'uncertainty' to the client? Likewise...how do you know if you can make it to the top page or viceversa? Cheers
Competitive Research | | Sotkra0 -
My competition is using 1px images and links without anchor text. Good or bad idea?
I've been scoping out some of my competition and I noticed the number 1 ranking site is doing a lot of "interesting" stuff. I saw a bunch of 1px blank images that they must be using for the alt tag keywords. I also noticed several links to internal pages with different keywords without anchor text so they don't actually appear on the page. Is this considered black hat? Should I be doing something similar? It feels like the work I'm doing to try to rank #1 with a clean/professional looking site are wasted when the #1 sites are doing things like this.
Competitive Research | | technota0 -
Does SEOMoz (or anyone) offer a measurement of "overlapping" links between 2+ domains?
I'm trying to judge how much incremental value we'd see from 301'ing an old domain vs. revitalizing the old domain's content. My gut feeling is that most of the links to the two sites are from the same set of websites so it wouldn't add much value to 301 the old domain. I've seen the opposite of this done with Competitive Link Analysis (e.g show links that you don't have that your competitor does have). Is there a tool available that can take 2 or more sites and tell me for instance - 72% of the inbound links or linking root domains are the same?
Competitive Research | | Jeff_DomainTools0 -
Competitor with over 100,000 links to duplicate copy ranks well, anyone know why?
One of our competitors has over 100,000 links on Yahoo site explorer, most of them are from pages on their site with duplicate content and they don't seem to have a focus on gaining backlinks, but the site still ranks really well. Can anyone think of a reason why this duplicate content hasn't been penalised by Google?
Competitive Research | | RobertHill0