Duplicate Content even when Canonical is used
-
Hi Everyone,
Our website uses the Magento platform which is notorious for creating duplicate content. I tried to make sure that all the duplicate content it creates should be "canonicalized" to the correct page.
While looking through the moz Page Diagnostics I see that I have 1003(!) pages of duplicate content. When I downloaded the csv I saw that over 95% of them had a canonical url.
Does that mean there is really no issue but moz analytics is still reading it as duplicate content and titles? Is there an issue with them being canonicals as opposed to being redirected?
Thanks!
-
We had a similar problem we thought with duplicates after placing canonical tags on all our pages. Moz took about a week as did Woorank to update and decide the canonicals were in place and showing no duplicate content.
We have a fairly small site with a little under 100 pages but this was a significant amount of work inserting the canonical tags and we were a little worried initially that they continued to show as duplicates for a short time.
Gary
-
I have the exactly same problems like you with Moz ereports. But after some research, I found out that the main problem here is that Moz is talking about the duplicate title tag and description (if you show on category and other pages).
-
Canonicals hint Google about what is the original page location and not really Moz crawler so Moz might still show the duplicate content (As far as I think). The better idea in my opinion is to search Google and see if they have still indexing the pages that you really didn’t want Google to crawl.
There are times (I am facing this one of my client) that Google does not get the canonical signal in that case I think we left with 3 options.
- Update the canonical tag once again and let the Google spider crawl the website again and hope this time it work! (very lame)
- Make the pages unique enough that we didn’t really want to use the canonical tag. (very difficult)
- Redirect 301 the pages to the original content (not possible in all cases)
Hope this clears the picture!
-
Your canonicals are good. You should not worry about that URL and those duplicate pages in specific.
For clarification: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2013/04/5-common-mistakes-with-relcanonical.html
Also you can try to search the caonicalized URL and see if its indexed, in this case it is not.'
For example search:http://www.plasticplace.com/business/trash-bags-for-rollaway-cans?gallon_capacity=368
And your original URL will apepar in SERPs.
-
Hi William,
Thanks for responding.
This is the url for the correct page: http://www.plasticplace.com/business/trash-bags-for-rollaway-cans
Here's a sample of a bunch of urls that are "canonicalized" to that page: (the minor differences on this page are based on the selection that you choose from the left hover, if a user going through the regular navigation chooses something, it doesn't affect the url.)
http://www.plasticplace.com/business/trash-bags-for-rollaway-cans?gallon_capacity=368
http://www.plasticplace.com/business/trash-bags-for-rollaway-cans?gallon_capacity=358
http://www.plasticplace.com/business/trash-bags-for-rollaway-cans?thickness_values=106
http://www.plasticplace.com/business/trash-bags-for-rollaway-cans?thickness_values=54
http://www.plasticplace.com/business/trash-bags-for-rollaway-cans?thickness_values=352
http://www.plasticplace.com/business/trash-bags-for-rollaway-cans?p=2
Thanks!
-
If you have duplicate content, the best practices are typically 301 redirects or canonicals. This would really depend what type of pages they are, whether they are campaigns, parameters, pagination(could use prev/next).
If you have an example we should be able to tell what you should do for that example.
-
Are you sure? I have some pages that have many other urls. Is it better if they are redirected?
-
I'm not 100% but perhaps Moz doesn't crawl duplicate pages and their code. It could be more about title tags, meta data etc.
As long as your canonical tags are in place and pointing to the original source, you should be fine.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Duplicate content - Product Categories
Dears, I've use "Site Crawl" tool to find any SEO warnings, and I found 991 duplicated content. The problem is that the pages are not duplicated its all products category pages, please check this exmaple: This page: https://www.jobedu.com/en/shop/category/prints/Postcards/na/all-colors/all-size and this page: https://www.jobedu.com/en/shop/category/Accessories/keychain/na/all-colors/all-size It said its duplicated, and it's 991 pages! How to fix this this? what I can do?
Moz Pro | | jobedu0 -
What user agent is used by SEOMOZ crawler?
We have a pretty tight robots.txt file in place to only allow the major search engines. I do not want to block SEOMOZ.ORG from being able to crawl the site so I want to make sure the user agent is open.
Moz Pro | | eseider0 -
Why does Crawl Diagnostics report this as duplicate content?
Hi guys, we've been addressing a duplicate content problem on our site over the past few weeks. Lately, we've implemented rel canonical tags in various parts of our ecommerce store, over time, and observing the effects by both tracking changes in SEOMoz and Websmater tools. Although our duplicate content errors are definitely decreasing, I can't help but wonder why some URLs are still being flagged with duplicate content by our SEOmoz crawler. Here's an example, taken directly from our Crawl Diagnostics Report: URL with 4 Duplicate Content errors:
Moz Pro | | yacpro13
/safety-lights.html Duplicate content URLs:
/safety-lights.html ?cat=78&price=-100
/safety-lights.html?cat=78&dir=desc&order=position /safety-lights.html?cat=78 /safety-lights.html?manufacturer=514 What I don't understand, is all of the URLS with URL parameters have a rel canonical tag pointing to the 'real' URL
/safety-lights.html So why is SEOMoz crawler still flagging this as duplicate content?0 -
How can I use my logo or company name at header left and footer section?
How can I use my logo or company name at header left and footer section in SEOmoz Analysis Report?
Moz Pro | | anu_bajpai0 -
Why does SEO moz show so many more duplicate page titles than webmaster
My SEO moz duplicate page titles are more than double the webmaster duplicate page titles. Plus, some of the items appearing in SEO moz are not really duplicates. Anyone else seeing this?
Moz Pro | | Stamats0 -
Duplicate Content and Titles in SEOMoz reports
I've had to rename some of the pages on my site and also move them to different locations. I placed a rel="canonical" on the old page pointing to the new one. The reports on my PRO Dashboard are telling me that I have Duplicate Content and Page Title errors. Do the SEOMoz automated reports take the rel="canonical" link into consideration or do I need to remove these pages and do a 301 redirect from the old to the new page?
Moz Pro | | TRICORSystems0 -
What Q&A Forum Platform Does SEOmoz Use?
Completely custom built, or a 3rd party offering that can be customized? One of the most usable forums I've seen!
Moz Pro | | SEOPA0 -
Rel-canonical tag confusion
I had our web development company implement the rel-canonical tag on all pages of our website to get rid of the duplicate content months ago. However, when I use the On Page optimizer tool (in previous version) it would tell me I'm not using the rel-canonical tag correctly on the page I was grading and when I untagged use rel-canonical tag in our CMS (which was pointing to the correct page) my grade would go to an A. Now with the new version it says I'm using it wrong either way, when I have the tag used in my CMS and everything else is good I have a B, but one I click to not use Rel-canonical tag I have a C. Both ways it shows up in On-page tool without a check in Apprpriate Use of Rel Canonical. I've attached pictures. In C version it says - Canonical URL "/info/solutions/" and "/info/solutions/" In B version: Canonical URL "/info/solutions/" What am I doing wrong and how do i fix this? Because ALL of my grades have dropped to Bs and Cs. Thanks! iklEHOjJLZE4966 [URL]]([URL=http://imgur.com/5BYcV][IMG]http://i.imgur.com/5BYcV.jpg[/IMG][/URL]) 5BYcV
Moz Pro | | aircyclemegan0