Do parameters in a URL make a difference from an SEO point of view
-
We us a number of different parameters in a number of our URLs to track how the user has navigated to the page. So for example we will have a page www.example.com/product/?banner to show that the user has navigated to the page from the banner as opposed to www.example.com/product/?footer to show that the user has navigated to the page from the footer. Do search engines treat these pages as the same page or different pages? Thanks
-
Thanks
-
Yes,if you flag it in webmaster tools Google will consider ignoring it, but I would also flag it in Bing as well.
You might also want to consider if you could make it easier on yourself by doing something like nav=banner1, nave=banner2, and nav=footer1 and then you only have to put in nav into the parameter handling tool. As appose to using banner=1, banner=2 and footer=1 and then having to put both banner and footer into the your parameter handling tools. There are reasons to use the different parameters, but as a general rule I try to keep the number of parameters as small as possible. I find it easier to scale my site and tracking that way. Good Luck!
-
Hi Chad
Thanks for the info. I should have been more specific with my example. The parameter that we use is something along the lines of www.example.com/product/?banner=1 so if I have picked up what you have said correctly I should be able to flag "banner" through webmaster tools and the search engines will ignore the value. Is that correct?
-
Remember that a parameter should have two parts: a parameter and a value.
ex. www.example.com/product/?nav=banner
in this example nav would be the parameter and banner would be the value. This is important when using the Google webmasters parameter handling tool. With your current method you are only using a value and so you will need to declare every single value as a parameter. But if you use a parameter correctly, then you would just need to declare the parameter (in this example nav) and the search engines would then automatically ignore the value. The cost of not using a parameter correctly can compound really quick in an organization that is trying to track a lot of different things.
Also note that most analytics packages already utilize pre-determined parameters for tracking. If you are using Google analytic then I would suggest justinvestigating using there URL builder (https://support.google.com/analytics/answer/1033867?hl=en) for off site tracking. Then to track internal traffic Google Analytic wants you to use Goals and Events. With Omniture you actually can set what your parameters will be during set up. I would suggest setting one up for internal campaign tracking and one for external campaign tracking. Anyways, all this just to say you might what to double check your options on tracking. Hope this helps!
-
Thanks very much Jean-Francois
-
Yes they are treated as two different pages. To inform the search engines that they are the same page, you need to use the canonical URL tag. Here's Moz.com's info about it : http://moz.com/learn/seo/canonicalization
You can also declare it to Google in Webmaster tools: https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/1235687?hl=en
Bing also offers this functionnality: http://www.bing.com/blogs/site_blogs/b/webmaster/archive/2012/04/27/better-than-canonical-url-normalization.aspx
I hope this helps !
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Numerous duplicate destination URLs from within one menu - potential impact for on-page SEO?
Hello all What is your evaluation in regards to a number of links (different anchors) targeting the same destination URL from within one and the same menu (on the same website)? Keeping it brief: Think of a top menu drop down entry, that needs to feature the alphabet (each letter has it's own sub-entries). However, the actual letter itself is not represented by a page (it has no URL either). So far so good. However, when testing the menu on a mobile device, the letter entries are still treated, as if they were non-existent pages - thus throwing a 404 when clicked. In order to avoid people getting a 404 when clicking on any letter, it would be ideal, if they were directed to any main page (the same destination URL though). However, that would mean 26 times the same destination URL from within that menu. Is this approach potentially bad for SEO, hence there would be numerous duplicate destination URLs in place? Please mind, I am not inquiring for help on how to arrange the actual menu. I am concerned about the impact, identical destination URLs could have on the on-page SEO. Many thanks in advance for your help and input!
On-Page Optimization | | Hermski0 -
Latest SEO Factors
What is the most recent report you have for "factors" that impact SEO --- you guys had one a few years ago and I don't see a recent report. This was based on a panel of experts I believe.
On-Page Optimization | | mommybu0 -
Youtube Videos For SEO
Besides enhancing the page and time on page, can youtube videos do anything for seo? Can we save the videos and rename them with keywords? Ty
On-Page Optimization | | TP_Marketing0 -
Geo-targeted content and SEO?
I am wondering, what effect does geo-targeted "cookie cutter" content have on SEO. For example, one might have a list of "Top US Comedians", which appears as "Top UK Comedians" for users from the United Kingdom. The data would be populated with information from a database in both cases, but would be completely different for each region, with the exception of a few words. Is this essentially giving Google's (US-based) crawler different content to users? I know that plenty of sites do it, but is it legitimate? Would it be better to redirect to a unique page, based on location, rather than change the content of one static page? I know what the logical SEO answer is here, but even some of the big players use the "wrong" tactic. I am very interested to hear your thoughts.
On-Page Optimization | | HalogenDigital0 -
How do you fix on page SEO ?
I have been trying to push my foundation website in organic search results for competitive keywords , i have been not been so consistent in raking our website in top search results of Google. can some one recommend the guidelines and activities which can really push my websites to Google first page. More Info: about our foundation We are the worlds largest school meal run ngo in the world feeding over 1.3 million school children in India Wesite url www.akshayapatra.org
On-Page Optimization | | AkshayaPatra0 -
Dynamic parameters
Our site has numerous filters and on each results page, we have the rel canonical tag. So, I'm not sure if we should concern ourselves or not about the crawl stats reporting that we have a bunch of pages that have more than two parameters. If so, do you have any suggestions? This url is an example: http://www.colemanfurniture.com/accent-occasional-furniture/accent-chairs.htm?color=20&furniture_type=213&price=16,10 Thanks!
On-Page Optimization | | thappe0 -
Best SEO structure for blog
What is the best SEO page/link structure for a blog with, say 100 posts that grows at a rate of 4 per month? Each post is 500+ words with charts/graphics; they're not simple one paragraph postings. Rather than use a CMS I have a hand crafted HTML/CSS blog (for tighter integration with the parent site, some dynamic data effects, and in general to have total control). I have a sidebar with headlines from all prior posts, and my blog home page is a 1 line summary of each article. I feel that after 100 articles the sidebar and home page have too many links on them. What is the optimal way to split them up? They are all covering the same niche topic that my site is about. I thought of making the side bar and home page only have the most recent 25 postings, and then create an archive directory for older posts. But categorizing by time doesn't really help someone looking for a specific topic. I could tag each entry with 2-3 keywords and then make the sidebar a sorted list of tags. Clicking on a tag would then show an intermediate index of all articles that have that tag, and then you could click on an article title to read the whole article. Or is there some other strategy that is optimal for SEO and the indexing robots? Is it bad to have a blog that is too heirarchical (where articles are 3 levels down from the root domain) or too flat (if there are 100s of entries)? Thanks for any thoughts or pointers.
On-Page Optimization | | scanlin0