How many websites in Google Serps
-
Let say you are an electrician. You have a website in Google Serps
After much deliberation you realise that the current domain name is giving the wrong signals to your potential customers. So you decide to rebrand to a new domain name. The new domain will have fresh content (no duplication).
Question
Can you have both instances live in Google Serps and eventually retire the current website via a 301 redirect to the new domain.Thanks Mark
-
Hi Mark,
If there is zero relationship of data between the old site and the new one (such as you've described) you should likely be okay. Regarding blocking bots from crawling the new site until it is ready, this falls a bit outside my area. I expect you could set up the robots.txt file for this, but I recommend starting a new question on this topic to get expert advice from our technical SEO experts. You have to be sure to do this correctly to avoid problems. Hope this helps.
-
Hi Miriam,
Thank you for the advice.
I understand the consequences of Google seeing both live sites and same NAP information. I have a few additional question.
Additional Questions Is there a way to stop Google crawling the new work in development site?
If I do not associate the new work in development site with any NAP information, i.e, info on website, directories, Google Places, etc. will this still effect me?
Thanks Mark
-
Hi Mark,
It sounds like you've determined that re-branding is essential for your business. As we're talking about a local business, I'm going to recommend against having 2 live websites at the same time. Here's why. You local rankings depend on the consistency of your NAP+ W (name, address, phone + website). Should Google begin to see 2 URLs associated with your any part of your business data, they may lose trust in what they've gathered about your business and you may lose rankings because of this.
If you're going to re-brand, I recommend rolling it all out at once and then undertaking the major work of citation cleanup. If this isn't something you've previously handled, I strongly recommend that you consider hiring a professional outfit for this task to ensure that all possible mentions of your NAP have been brought into compliance with the new information. WhiteSpark is a good company for such work and I believe Moz members may get a discount for signing up with Whitespark's citation services.
Hope this opinion is helpful to you.
-
Hi Andy,
Thanks again for all you help. I agree more user input here is needed.
I welcome additional community users to contribute.
-
You are correct Mark, and this is where link networks come from.
However, I can't see any area of what you are trying to do as being a major issue but perhaps someone else who has been in just this situation would like to chip in? I personally would just go ahead and launch the new site, but as I can see a few differences in your situation and my own, perhaps a few precautions would be a good bet.
-Andy
-
Hi Andy,
My new site will be the daddy of all sites. It will provide feature rich content, an A-Z of information, and all things relevant.
My plans are to work towards being an authority and reference point in addition to provide a service.I would like to run both site together for about 6 months. My current old site will be my bread & butter.
Why 6 **Months?**Initially, like all new sites there will be no seo value. When customers send quote requests and ring, I would like to give them an opportunity to see the new site. This will be my way to see how effectively they are able to navigate, add or tweak relevant information, etc.
During the 6 months, customer experience will be key towards perfecting the site based on user site experience and human conversations.
Additionally, with social engagement via the new site, I will be able to gain backlinks from users sharing valuable feature rich content. Upon such time in the 6 month windows, should the new site overtake the old in SERPS then i will make the switch.
Make the Switch: 301 redirect my old site to the new site. Pass all things goods from the old to new.
Concerns I had read a while ago that having more than 1 site in SERPS within the same trading area is a violation of Google policy.
Put simply, anyone with seo knowledge or deep pockets can create untold websites to manipulate SERPS.Thanks Mark
-
I could have sworn I replied to this Mark. My apologies.
From what you say, this sounds like an ideal candidate for a rebrand and there is no problem with having both domains live. Neither is going to be duplicating the other so there will be no problem. As I said, I have 8 currently and Google pretty much loves them all. Unique content throughout.
How long are you thinking before retiring the old site? Will you be relying on that in the SERPs for the time being? You could always noindex the whole site if you wanted Google to stop using it but still be there for people when they land?
-Andy
-
Hi All,
I welcome more information on this subject.
Thanks Mark
-
Hi Andy,
No issues with content.
Current domain name does not represent size of company, portfolio of services or potential market. Rebranding would simply provide greater opportunities and customers.Thanks Mark
-
Hi Mark,
Can I ask if it is the domain name that is causing problems, or the content? Unless there is a real need to rebrand, I would look to explore other possibilities before jumping into a new domain - unless a rebrand is what you really want.
Edit- I forgot to add that there is no problem having a second site in Google either. I have 8 in total, because I use a single page design, and have no issues at all.
-Andy
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Location based IP Redirect cuasing Google Search Issue
Hi there, My client has a .com.au site (www.example.com.au) for Australian visitors and a .com site for US visitors (www.example.shopify.com). The .com.au site has a lot of content while the .com site has little content, due to only recently starting business in the US and due to seasonal offerings. The client does not want US visitors to see the .com.au site. Se we set up an IP redirect, so users with a US IP address are directed to the .com site. This negatively and significantly effected our Google organic search rankings on https://www.google.com.au My question is what is best practice solution in this situation? thanks
Local SEO | | Paul170 -
Indexed by Google but only ranking in Bing and Yahoo
I have a website nativeamericanpalmhut.com that has been up and running for months. The sitemap was created and submitted in GWMT and the site was indexed pretty quickly. Here's where I'm lost all of the pages are indexed but only the homepage ranks and only for the exact match domain query "Native American Palm Huts". What's even more confusing is that Google Analytics and HotJar Analytics are both showing hundreds Google organic search traffic coming to the site on multiple pages (not just the homepage). This on top of the fact the that website is ranking well for several different terms in Bing and Yahoo lead me to believe this is a Google search specific problem. I have checked the backlinks to see if maybe there was a penalty on the domain but couldn't find any record of it. I've searched the Moz Q&As, Countless Google forums, etc with no luck. I'm scratching my head at the moment so if anyone has any ideas on what could be causing the problem that would be great.
Local SEO | | White_Shark_Media1 -
Google Business Details on the SERP
Good morning, We've recently launched Pea Soup Digital, a new UK-based digital agency. However, when you search 'pea soup digital' in Google, the business info doesn't appear on the right-hand-side of the SERP. But when you search 'peasoup digital' it appears? Our Google+ and business account have the name registered as separate words - Pea Soup Digital - so why is Google doing this? It's not the end of the world, but slightly annoying. Is there anything we can do? There's also an issue of our privacy policy page ranking above the home page. I know it's early days (1 week), so Google might be sorting itself out, but I guess we could add this page to the robots.txt file? Cheers, Lewis
Local SEO | | PeaSoupDigital0 -
Dynamic websites & SEO
Hello Mozzers, I would love some advise from some seasoned SEO people PLEASE. The company I work for are replacing their static website for a new dynamic website which affectedly serves blocks of generic content based on the users activity. Currently we rank really well, especially for local long tail terms - however I am very unsure and apprehensive as to how this new approach will affect our rankings. Can Google index content pulled together on the "fly"? Can anyone recommend an article, website, white paper - explaining how to limit the change to SEO? Kind regards Ben
Local SEO | | Bendall0 -
Any Notable Change in Google's Location Based Results?
I've noticed with many of our clients that when searching for general terms, with obvious local intent, that Google assumes you are in the nearest metro area rather than the specific locality. Anyone else noticed this? Example: I have an HVAC client who has ranked a solid #1 for "HVAC Repairs" since January - if the user was in the small town we were targeting (Wake Forest) since January. However, now Google assumes users in this town are in the nearby metro area (Raleigh), and displays local and organic results for Raleigh instead of Wake Forest. I first noticed this change in mid-May. From what I've read about the Nov Hummingbird update, I don't see that playing a direct role. Any insight?
Local SEO | | Rusty_Shackleford0 -
Google+ for Business Links Section - Not Available
I haven't found any documentation on this - curious if anyone's noticed that Google+ Local Listings (i.e. brick-n-mortar shops) don't have access to a Links section like a "brand" page might? Seems strange not to let them link out to their social media assets while Coke and Ford have that privilege. I wonder why? Thanks!
Local SEO | | PerfectPitchConcepts0 -
Does having /search/ in your URLs for searches within your site hamper these URLs from coming up on Google SERP's?
We are an aggregate site for a particular category and have our own internal search wherein visitors can search for local references to services that they are looking for. We use SOLR search and our results page for the "Tag123" search would look like www.mywebsite.com/city/search/tag123 For some reason, we see that these pages are all indexed on Google but they do not come up on SERPs appropriately! The content is unique and we also have appropriate title and description tags on these pages.
Local SEO | | mycity4kids0 -
Content Across International Websites
I am wondering if anyone could clear up some questions I have regarding international SEO and how to treat the content placed on there. I have recently launched several websites for a product internationally, each with the correct country domain name etc and I have also followed the guidelines provided by webmaster tools on internationalisation. All the websites are targeted towards English speaking countries and I have rewritten most of the of the content on there to suite the English style of the targeted country. This is being said however I am finding mixed bags of information on what to do in treating large chunks of potential duplicate content. For example my main .com website which has been running several years (and is targeted to the UK) has a lot of well written articles on there which are popular with the visitors. I am needing to find out if duplicating these articles onto the international versions of the websites, without rewriting them, would have a detrimental effect on SEO between all the sites. I have done a site search for each domain name to see if they are cropping up in other local Google versions (e.g .ca site in Google.com.au etc) and they are not. Does this mean Google is localised to its results regarding duplicate content or is it treated at the root level? Any information to point me in the right direction would be a big help.
Local SEO | | Rj-Media0