Local Google vs. default Google search
-
Hello Moz community,
I have a question: what is the difference between a local version of Google vs. the default Google in regards to search results?
I have a Mexican site that I'm trying to rank in www.google.com.mx, but my rankings are actually better if I check my keywords on www.google.com
The domain is a .mx site, so wouldn't it make more sense that this page would rank higher on google.com.mx instead of the default Google site, which in theory would mean a "broader" scope? Also, what determines whether a user gets automatically directed to a local Google version vs. staying on the default one?
Thanks for your valuable input!
-
So glad to be of help, Eduardo.
-
Wow thanks for this answer Miriam. This definitely helps me understand much better how this works as I was getting very confused why I was ranking better in "global" searches, now this makes more sense.
-
Hi Eduardo,
I just wanted to add a note to this good conversation. For local businesses, Google will show IP-based results if they believe the search query has a local intent. So, the factors governing actual local results (for things like restaurants, plumbers, hotels, etc.) are highly influenced by the searcher's location, or by him adding a geographic keyword to his query.
For example, searching from my location in the US, if I search for 'hotels alcapulco' Google is showing me their local carousel of hotel results for this city in Mexico, regardless of the fact that I'm not located in Mexico. Google 'gets' that I want to see hotels in Mexico. But, if I search for 'history of the Mexican flag', Google is showing me general, organic results including things like Wikipedia. So, whether one gets local results or organic ones appears to be based on the language of the searcher's query + Google's concept of the user's intent. Usually, they get this right, but there are some instances in which you may get local results when you didn't really want them. For example, I might search for something really generic like 'shoes', and then Google isn't totally secure about my intent, so they are showing me both local and national results.
-
its not that it is impossible but the results you see may not reflect what others see.
With cookies set on your computer and with IP and language playing such a strong role it will difficult to see accurate results without forcing it with things like gl=US or something like that.
Do you have a local listing for your address? That will help a lot as well as marking your site up with rich snippets like schema.org
-
Thank you Gary. What you've mentioned makes sense to me.
So, pretty much getting to google.com is almost impossible now, as Google will redirect users to their local Google sites based on their IP addresses. Therefore, it makes more sense to rank in local versions of Google, at least for this site, which is not intended to be global.
I'm thinking more links from .mx sites could be a possible solution.
Thanks a lot!
-
I have a question: what is the difference between a local version of Google vs. the default Google in regards to search results?
Many factors, the results in google.com can be a real mix of international listings as well as local. The location of backlinks to a website can force Google to rank a site in that region.
Lets say you have a .mx site but have lots of links from UK websites because it is about holidays in mexico then you could rank well in the google.co.uk it would be more likely however if the domain was a .com as Google gives more universal power to those types of TLD's
The domain is a .mx site, so wouldn't it make more sense that this page would rank higher on google.com.mx instead of the default Google site
Not if the above is true, also if you have a less of a local feel to your content you might rank better among a group of similar sites that are more broad in nature.
Also, what determines whether a user gets automatically directed to a local Google version vs. staying on the default one?
There are a lot of factors involved, IP address and Google's ability to determine where you are.
The language you use and even the spelling of words, for instance in the UK vs US it could be color vs colour
There are lots of answers to your questions but those are just a few to give you an idea of the 200+ algorithm factors for ranking in such circumstances.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Google Cache issue
Hi, We’ve got a really specific issue – we have an SEO team in-house, and have had numerous agencies look at this – but no one can get to the bottom of this. We’re a UK travel company with a number of great positions on the search engines – our brand is www.jet2holidays.com. If you try ‘Majorca holidays’, ‘tenerife holidays’, ‘gran canaria holidays’ etc you’ll see us in the top few positions on Google when searching from the UK. However, none of our destination pages (and it’s only the destination pages), show a ‘cached’ option next to them. Example: https://www.google.com/search?q=majorca+holidays&oq=majorca+holidays&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i60l3.2151j0j9&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 This isn’t affecting our rankings, but we’re fairly certain it is affecting our ability to be included in the Featured Snippets. Checked and there aren’t any noarchive tags on the pages, example: https://www.jet2holidays.com/destinations/balearics/majorca Anyone have any ideas?
Technical SEO | | fredgray0 -
My some pages are not showing cached in Google, WHY?
I have website http://www.vipcollisionlv.com/ and when i check the cache status with tags **site:http:vipcollisionlv.com, **some page has no cache status..
Technical SEO | | 1akalyou can see this in image. How to resolve this issue. please help me.
0 -
Homepage is deindexed in Google
Happened sometime on the 12th or 13th of Feb (is there a way to tell exactly besides referring to GA?).
Technical SEO | | Shinosky
I've been on the Google Webmasters Tools forums trying to nail this down - https://productforums.google.com/forum/?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer#!msg/webmasters/OgpmNCc3IFA/mmtgUilyXUUJ I can only think that Google is viewing this as duplicate content from an internal page for example: http://mudlifeled.com/shop Very frustrating because we were moving up on the first page for some good brand key words and traffic was climbing. Now I've got my hands up and am at a loss to what I can do.0 -
Quality Issues: My blog is blocked on Google Search Engine
Hi Webmasters, I got an email from google team. The email is included below. **Google Webmaster Tools: Quality Issues on http://abcdblogger.com/**August 8, 2012 Dear site owner or webmaster of http://abcdblogger.com/, We've detected that some of your site's pages may be using techniques that are outside Google's Webmaster Guidelines. If you have any questions about how to resolve this issue, please see ourWebmaster Help Forum for support. Sincerely, Google Search Quality Team My blog is completely blocked on Google Search engine. I removed all existing posts and reinstalled a fresh version of wordpress and wrote a good article. I redirected all broken links my homepage with a 301. After making those changes I submitted a reconsideration request to Google, But they declined it. I doubt that the reason for blocking could be due to the backlinks pointing to my domain. I think Google's Disavow Tool help me to remove low quality backlinks, But how can I sort low quality backlinks using Opensite Explorer? If possible can you create a text file with all possible low quality links, So that I could submit it using Google Disavow Tool. Thanks.
Technical SEO | | hafiskani0 -
Google Search memory
Hi we have had the following statement from a member of our Japan office with regards google displaying search results, would anyone be able to give us a definitive answer on this. Google remembers previous non-mobile related searches For example, we already know that we come up on the first page if you select “kaigai keitai” (mobile phone for use abroad) and “UK” where as we don’t for searches where you replace the UK with the US or other countries. This means that if a customer, for example, does a search just on the UK e.g. using words like UK travel, London, millennium dome, etc. and then does a separate search just using the words “kaigai keitai” that google could show us as a link on the first page. However, if an individual did a search on Paris, France, Eiffel Tower, and then did a search for “kaigai keitai”, our link might not appear on the page. I don’t know if we have tested this already, but Google seems to have a very long “memory” and I could see this kind of aspect of Google resulting in us missing significant business from people going to the US, France, Italy, etc. Any thoughts?
Technical SEO | | -Al-0 -
Google Places Question......
Hi Guys. I am working with a photographer they do not have a studio they shoot on location. However I noticed many photographers within their industry have their home address listed in their google places, and they too shoot on location. My client doesn't want their home address listed so I wondered what options there would be? Do you think renting mail forwarding address would suffice?
Technical SEO | | RankStealer0 -
Does Google Read Javascript?
I would like to include a list of links in a select type box which I would like google to follow. In order to do this, I will be styling it with the help of javascript, and in turn change the select box into a ul and the options into li's. The li's would each contain a link, but if javascript is disabled it will fallback to a normal css styled select box. My question is would google follow the links made by the javascript? Or would the bot just recognize the select box as a select box and not links. Thanks for any help!
Technical SEO | | BrianJenkins0 -
UK website ranking higher in Google.com than Google.co.uk
Hi, I have a UK website which was formerly ranked 1<sup>st</sup> in Google.co.uk and .com for my keyword phrase and has recently slipped to 6<sup>th</sup> in .co.uk but is higher in position 4 in Google.com. I have conducted a little research and can’t say for certain but I wonder if it is possible that too many of my backlinks are US based and therefore Google thinks my website is also US based. Checked Google WmT and we the geo-targeted to the UK. Our server is also UK based. Does anyone have an opinion on this? Thanks
Technical SEO | | tdsnet0