Google Panda and Penguin "Recovery"
-
We're working with a client who had been hit by Google Panda (duplicate content, copyright infringement) and Google Penguin (poor backlinks).
While this has taken a lot of time, effort and patience to eradicate these issues, it's still been more than 6 months without any improvement.
Have you experienced longer recovery periods?
I've seen sites perform every black hat technique under the sun and still nearly 2 years later..no recovery! In addition many companies I've spoken to advised their clients to begin right from the very beginning with a new domain, site etc.
-
Thank you to you all for your valued feedback. Marie, please do let me know when this article becomes available. I'd be vary interested to read.
We use Moz to analyse and correct the general health of a website to eradicate errors accordingly.
Panda - I'm aware Panda updates have happened more frequently. All duplicates and the quality of content has been implemented for our client.
Penguin - I have disavowed "all" poor quality backlinks, ensuring good quality links remain. We did this manually checking each link and the referring websites for quality assurance.
**But how do we know when the Panda penalty has been lifted, when it's obvious we have a Penguin penalty in place? **
**Does a business who are desperate to advertise online simply begin creating new "valuable" **content, reach out to industry influencers etc, to achieve backlinks with authority - meaning waiting maybe months before the penalty is removed, if removed?
Or, create a new site, "completely" separate from the old, and implement our marketing strategy knowing that the spammy practices conducted in the past will not affect my clients new site?
-
If you disavowed six months ago then you still haven't seen a Penguin refresh as the last one was October 4, 2013. So, if you have done the work required to escape Penguin, you may see an improvement once Google finally refreshes Penguin. No one knows when the refresh will happen but hopefully it will be soon!
I actually have an article coming out on Search Engine Watch this week that lists 5 reasons why people don't see recovery on Penguin hit sites. To summarize:
1. Not a thorough enough disavow
2. Errors in your disavow file
3. Still waiting for a refresh (probably the case for you).
4. Not enough good links there to support the site naturally.
5. Other issues such as Panda or technical issues.
-
"My client is reluctant to spend money on developing links with relevance and authority until we see some evidence that the penalty has been removed."
Part of bringing a site any traffic after being penalized is developing a white hat strategy to get visitors via authoritative relative links pointing at your site.
It is like a fighter who has been knocked out. They are down and all the sudden everything changed they no longer are able to stay in contention.
Would you tell some guy who just got knocked out by Mike Tyson get back in there and fight them once he was pushed to his feet?
No you got to train and get yourself feeling better in order to get back to the same level you are at before if you can do that.
If the knockout was too hard you may have to swap out your current expectations with new ones.
How valuable is this domain to the client?
If it is not brought up to snuff there is no need to worry about whether or not will work because no one's will even try it.
Even with a new domain your client is starting at a disadvantage just because of who they are whois and numerous other methods will tell Google to a very small or very large extent exactly who they are.
Maybe they 301 redirect and it is the same deal for new domain
Maybe they start fresh realizing that without putting amazing content out there for end-users that they are just in it sit and complain it is not even worth thinking about unless they are going to do it.
You need to explain to your client that your site is equivalent to worse then a new domain right now most likely or depending on your circumstances possibly better I do not know.
But put yourself in either place you start a site with a new domain would you do?
You get penalized by Google for what occurred you have to really step it up top quality all the way.
You have to show Google that not only are you very trustworthy now and you are essentially sorry that you did what you did but that you are actually a site that is worth something to them and to end users. With the fact that you have had this penalty on your domain means your going to have to work even harder to make up for everything you lost.
If you did a link disavowal I think you took the right measures obviously you had no choice right?
The client has to start looking at search from a different perspective not one that states you can do a couple cool things that might get you a higher ranking but one that looks at their end users and how they can actually serve the visitors to that site the best they possibly can.
That is a pretty tall order and the web is huge so there is outstanding content, including video, text photograph, infotographs I could go on your client not only needs to have a top tier website.
They need very fast load times
An easy to navigate beautiful site.
Links that are being generated by users that like what they see.
Just those three things are not inexpensive in any way.
You want to start get into technical seo it only gets more time-consuming and a lot more expensive.
I do not know the circumstances of their penalty however a new domain might be something that will get your client to actually work on the things that they need to do to make the site a quality website.
I hope that helps,
Thomas
-
The disavow tool has of course been used. Some links still appear in webmaster tools. We've also asked the webmaster of each site to kindly remove the links, which some have been kind enough and removed.
I know once a link has been "disavowed" Google adds an invisible nofollow tag to the link. Similar to your no-followed links in WMT.
My client is reluctant to spend money on developing links with relevance and authority until we see some evidence that the penalty has been removed.
It seems we've exhausted all avenues by cleaning up the website. Plus disavowing links should also be used with caution!
Having seen no recovery for such a long time - my question is, will the site every recover if it has seriously abused Google's guidelines in the past?
-
If your trying to promote a brand it's hard to start from the beginning. Im wmt I'm sure you know about "links to your site" tab, go in there and see who is linking to you, if it looks spammy, disavow or email them to take the link off.
-
you can create quality links not quantity and create new fresh content , use Google disavow tool.
-
Have you just gotten rid of all the duplicate content, poor backlinks, etc? Or have you done that and also added quality content and obtained quality links?
- Ruben
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Significant "Average Position" dips in Search Console each time I post on Google My Business
Hi everyone, Several weeks ago I noticed that each Wednesday my site's Average Position in Search Console dipped significantly. Immediately I identified that this was the day my colleague published and back-linked a blog post, and so we spent the next few weeks testing and monitoring everything we did. We discovered that it was ONLY when we created a Google My Business post that the Average Position dipped, and on the 1st July we tested it one more time. The results were the same (please see attached image). I am 100% confident that Google My Business is the cause of the issue, but can't identify why. The image I upload belongs to me, the text isn't spammy or stuffed with keywords, the Learn More links to my own website, and I never receive any warnings from Google about the content. I would love to hear the community's thoughts on this and how I can stop the issue from continuing. I should note, that my Google My Business insights are generally positive i.e. no dips in search results etc. My URL is https://www.photographybymatthewjames.com/ Thanks in advance Matthew C0000OTrpfmNWx8g
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | PhotoMattJames0 -
How does Google handle product detail page links hiden in a <noscript>tag?</noscript>
Hello, During my research of our website I uncovered that our visible links to our product detail pages (PDP) from grid/list view category-nav/search pages are <nofollowed>and being sent through a click tracking redirect with the (PDP) appended as a URL query string. But included with each PDP link is a <noscript>tag containing the actual PDP link. When I confronted our 3rd party e-commerce category-nav/search provider about this approach here is the response I recieved:</p> <p style="padding-left: 30px;">The purpose of these links is to firstly allow us to reliably log the click and then secondly redirect the visitor to the target PDP.<br /> In addition to the visible links there is also an "invisible link" inside the no script tag. The noscript tag prevents showing of the a tag by normal browsers but is found and executed by bots during crawling of the page.<br /> Here a link to a blog post where an SEO proved this year that the noscript tag is not ignored by bots: <a href="http://www.theseotailor.com.au/blog/hiding-keywords-noscript-seo-experiment/" target="_blank">http://www.theseotailor.com.au/blog/hiding-keywords-noscript-seo-experiment/<br /> </a> <br /> So the visible links are not obfuscating the PDP URL they have it encoded as it otherwise cannot be passed along as a URL query string. The plain PDP URL is part of the noscript tag ensuring discover-ability of PDPs by bots.</p> <p>Does anyone have anything in addition to this one blog post, to substantiate the claim that hiding our links in a <noscript> tag are in fact within the SEO Best Practice standards set by Google, Bing, etc...? </p> <p>Do you think that this method skirts the fine line of grey hat tactics? Will google/bing eventually penalize us for this?</p> <p>Does anyone have a better suggestion on how our 3rd party provider could track those clicks without using a URL redirect & hiding the actual PDP link?</p> <p>All insights are welcome...Thanks!</p> <p>Jordan K.</p></noscript></nofollowed>
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | eImprovement-SEO0 -
Dump Penguin Hit Domain
Just wanting to get some feedback from others dealing with Penguin hits on client's websites. We've got one particularly client that has been hit badly because of a high proportion of link toxicity. After running the Cemper Detox Tool we found that only about 25 links are healthy. We're actually thinking of dumping the domain and moving the website to a new domain and starting again with link building (manually grabbing as many of the existing healthy links as possible on the way). Has anyone out there used this strategy? What do you think of the potential of the Sandbox of the new site vs. the Penguin hit on the old site. Do you think the 'drag' of Penguin is higher than the 'drag' of the Sandbox on rankings? Thanks guys, look forward to your insight!
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | mavster0 -
Have just submitted Disavow file to Google: Shall I wait until after they have removed bad links to start new content lead SEO campaign?
Hi guys, I am currently conducting some SEO work for a client. Their previous SEO company had built a lot of low quality/spam links to their site and as a result their rankings and traffic have dropped dramatically. I have analysed their current link profile, and have submitted the spammiest domains to Google via the Disavow tool. The question I had was.. Do I wait until Google removes the spam links that I have submitted, and then start the new content based SEO campaign. Or would it be okay to start the content based SEO campaign now, even though the current spam links havent been removed yet.. Look forward to your replies on this...
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | sanj50500 -
Has google done well with these search results?
I am struggling to grasp the new logic behind google, my understanding was that they wanted to return more related searches so that the search matched the results giving people exactly what they are looking for from trusted suppliers. However I work in the vacation rental niche and I have found that the individual long tail searches have started to become less valuable as they are no longer giving the exact property. Here is a screenshot of the top 10 results for the key phrase "10 bedroom villas in quinta do lago" Position 1 & 2 are good results and would be expected however the next 7 positions are completely not related to the search, yes it is quinta do lago. But I am looking specifically for a 10 bedroom villa, none of these pages offer 10 bedroom villas. I actually found my listing outside the top 20 and mine is a 10 bedroom villa in quinta do lago. Does anyone have anything that can enlighten me on this? Thanks Andy 0bqdRJi
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | iprosoftware0 -
How to idesntify "inorganic" links
I am intending to remove spammy link of my website http://cellspyexpert.com/ which has been ranking well but I noticed a sudden drop in its ranking. I took a lot of care while building links, I tried to get links from relevant high authority websites with high page rank. I used profiling and guest blogging method only and never participated in any link scheme but received following message in google webmaster tools " Google Webmaster Tools notice of detected unnatural links to http://www.cellspyexpert.com/" I got this message on 19<sup>th</sup> Sep and ranking dropped on 6<sup>th</sup> Oct 1- Is this EMD issue?? I am pretty sure it is not because of EMD (Exact match domain) as I have been using phrase match, brand name+phrase and other anchor texts. I used exact match also but only 2%. 2- If it is bad quality, inorganic link issue?? Then I am intending to remove inorganic links so that I could send reconsideration request but facing problem in detecting inorganic links. Please advise!!
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | shaz_lhr0 -
Competitors have local "mirror" sites
I have noticed that some of my competitors have set up "mirror" homepages set up for different counties, towns, or suburbs. In one case the mirror homepages are virtually identical escept for the title and in the other case about half of the content id duplicate and the other half is different. both of these competors have excellent rankings and traffic. I am surprised about these results, does anyone care to comment about it and is this a grey hat technique that is likely to be penalized eventually. thx Diogenes
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | diogenes0 -
Google Bombing For A Specific URL
The term "Beruk" which means "Ape or Monkey" in english brings up this page of wikipedia amongst the first page result: URL: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khairy_Jamaluddin The page does not contain the word "Beruk". External links to the page do not contact the anchor-text "Beruk" Given the above scenario, how is the page still ranking on first page for this keyword?
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | rajeevbala0