Can a 100% bounce rate page hurt whole website?
-
Hello,
So with trying to figure out what I can do to better my website, I noticed a post on here that mentioned bounce rates.
So I went to my Google analytics pages and listed my bounce rates. My average is 44%
But I have a picture page that is 100% and a contact page that is 80%
Can pages like this cause an algo penalty that could hurt a whole site?
Thank you for your valuable insights
-
Another point I was considering...
If Google only counts click backs to the results as a bounce does that mean bounces caused by external link clicks are ignored in the ranking factor?
For instance, say you have an affiliate site where the bounce rate is high because people are clicking your affiliate links and leaving your site. This would be a good thing if you're an affiliate.
But you look at your analytics and see the bounce rate is high and start to panic thinking that google will demote you for having a high bounce rate.
But in actual fact Google is only looking at the rate at which users return back to the serps which might not be high at all, and ignoring those external link clicks which are causing a high bounce rate in analytics.
And therefore you needn't worry about your high analytics bounce rate.
I guess it's the type of bounce that counts when it comes to google rankings
-
Isn't analytics bounce rate ignored by Google with regards to rankings?
Isn't it the rate at which visitors return back to the search results that Google looks at?
No amount of analytics manipulation will change that. Only usability..
-
Just adding to this thought - it really is about context. I suspect that bounce rate is used very carefully and that Google tries to add context, given that a bounce on an informative article and a bounce on an opening hours page are very different. If you believe the pages should either attract further clicks, conversions or longer periods spent on page, then 60% is a worry.
I would never go as far as to say that you will ever be "penalised" for bounce rate - keep in mind that bounce rate should also be easy to fake, either for positive or negative consequences, for a website or a competitor. Google tends to weigh lightly factors that can be easily influenced. It would not be very hard to fake a high bounce rate from real-looking visitors on a competitor's website if you wanted to - you could do it with automated activity or use something like Mechanical Turk. As such, Google can't put too much weight in things that are too easy to manipulate. Hence why they put more weight in backlinks than in on-page mark-up, etc.
-
Hi Guy's
you referenced a 100% bounce rate on a few pages this will hurt your site.
If the pages are worthless to your visitors you should try to improve them and try to figure out exactly why your visitors are leaving 100% of the time. If there pages that are not full of content that is worth reading or something that is obviously junk I recommend you nofollow no index them.
A gallery page may load somewhat slower than a page with only text on it however that is no excuse you need to accelerate your site if that is the case.
If people find a page is running slowly then you must fix it.
You can take your photos that are not transparent on parts of them and make them into JPEG's then use a program called JPEGmini.com in order to shrink the size of the photograph down to something reasonable.
our recommend running your homepage and problem pages through the tool below.
http://developers.google.com/speed/pagespeed/insights/
This link also will give you a lot of insight on how to properly speed up your site.
I believe there more easily to digest format.
http://www.feedthebot.com/pagespeed/
Check your problem pages for issues with the crawler here also check your entire site for issues that will be highlighted when you run the tool's
four very general page speed issues check out using all three tools
if you find your photos/gallery page is loading extremely slow then you must take steps to fix it. If you find your contact us page is loading extremely slow you must take steps to fix that as well.
It sounds to me like your entire site possibly could be loading very slow I do not know.
However you can speed up most sites using Google page speed and a decent hosting company.
Something inexpensive and fast would be digital ocean or Linode
add google page speed via
https://developers.google.com/speed/pagespeed/
Who ever gave me the thumbs down I do not understand why. Maybe I should have been more clear on what proto sticking is.
http://moz.com/blog/solving-the-pogo-stick-problem-whiteboard-friday
Then this is a link to help make your site more user-friendly.
the UX of the site is going to make a difference and rather not you funnel people to the right pages may be the contact us page is almost never look that however it should be coming up in search for your address or phone number. I would recommend adding schema if it is not there. Here are some tips on how to make fix ux problems
http://moz.com/academy/on-page-content-ux
Travis makes a good point where people may not go to the contact us page because your phone number is displayed in the top right hand corner of the site however most people in my opinion still go to the contact us page regardless.
Having a bounce rate that you are talking about really needs to be solved because as shown in the whiteboard Friday video linked above it will drag down your site in the eyes of Google.
Berner
if you feel comfortable sharing your link I would be happy to take a look at it if you do not you are welcome to send it to me via private message and I agree again with Travis that the 60% bounce rate is extremely high. However, I do not know your industry is I do not know what your site does so honestly I cannot tell you without being able to see it.
It sounds to me like the site is not very user-friendly how many people do have going To your site?
could you tell me what are your top pages the ones people land on most?
Many times the contact us page is up there. If you want people to contact you on your website and that is the goal of the business obviously you should use multiple tactics in order to do this. However,
I would want to have a very low bounce rate my contact us page.
All the best,
Thomas
-
If you get much above 60% for a general page, you should start wondering what you're not doing so well. When it comes to a contact page, and you have given them phone numbers et al, there is very little need to be worried. When people find what they need, they stop clicking.
Conversely, when people don't find what they need they stop clicking as well.
All of this is based on context. I can only generally answer the question without a concrete example.
-
Thank you Travis
So would you say that I should be concerned then?
I am just at wits end trying to figure out what to do next. I figured maybe a bad bounce rate could be causing some of this issue.
A part of me says burn the site down, and start fresh, but I have branding and friends that know us. Some say they never recover, some say wait it out.
Its frustrating for sure.
Thank you again Travis for your insights
-
The picture page may load pretty slow, or the 'ranking' picture in Google image search may not be in the immediate view. The contact page is another thing, if there is a number to call, maybe they got it. That's not a bad thing.
If there are alternate means of communicating to the client in their industry, make sure to include that as well. It may not help your bounce rate on the contact page, but you have definitely helped your client.
-
Thank you Thomas
I had just noticed these pages that had high bounce rates and wondered if I deleted these pages if it would indeed help my page rankings if indeed a few 100% bounce rate pages can take down a whole site.
I am unsure if I have a panda or penguin penalty. I have disavowed bad links, and removed a bunch.
Yet now I am looking at page content. I have 2 pages posting bad bounce rates, yet I want every I to be dotted and T crossed.
So I truly appreciate your insight as you are the expert, and I greatly value your time.
-
If you are the site has pages which are pogo sticking and getting extremely high bounce rates as you have discussed.
Then yes it can hurt those pages most however if you affect the page you affect the site as well.
I am not saying that two pages are going to destroy your site however it is something you should look at having the bad pages re-created so that it is more end-user friendly.
I hope that helps,
Thomas
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Do Lot of Tracking via Tag manager Increase Bounce Rate?
Hello Expert, I am doing lots of tracking for my ecommerce site but I am not sure reason for increase in bounce rate as my traffic also increase but I want to make sure that my tracking not affecting my bounce rate. I do tracking via page views, events, custom html, etc so for all the applicable tags Non-Interaction Hit - I set "True" so I am right here? Thanks!
Reporting & Analytics | | dsouzac0 -
Anyone heard of or used Hadoop software for SEO/website analytics?
Hey Moz Community, We received an interesting email this morning from a client's marketing manager asking if we knew about or have ever used "Hadoop software" because "[Business owner name] says it’s supposed to help us see how people use our website and more." I've never heard of this software and upon looking around on the web, it says it can do a lot, but my client is a small law firm who average 800-1,000 visitors per month, mainly from their 2 local office cities/markets. Anyone have any thoughts on this or ever use this software? Thanks in advance. Patrick
Reporting & Analytics | | WhiteboardCreations0 -
Can assumptions be made for (not provided)?
With the (not provided) numbers growing to the inevitable 100%, can we make any assumptions about what the (not provided) visits includes without sifting through 5 software programs, Moz analytics, Google Analytics, Webmasters Tool, etc? It seems like a TON of time and work to "try" and get (not provided) data/keywords from all the articles and heads of the industries I've been reading. That amount of time and work are just not viable for a smaller SEO or single SEO working with smaller budgets, so my question, can we make an estimated guess based on visits for local businesses that most are branded keywords bringing traffic? Or am I way off here? Thanks in advance for sharing your thoughts or how you handle (not provided) with your clients.
Reporting & Analytics | | WhiteboardCreations0 -
Webmaster Tools Indexed pages vs. Sitemap?
Looking at Google Webmaster Tools and I'm noticing a few things, most sites I look at the number of indexed pages in the sitemaps report is usually less than 100% (i.e. something like 122 indexed out of 134 submitted or something) and the number of indexed pages in the indexed status report is usually higher. So for example, one site says over 1000 pages indexed in the indexed status report but the sitemap says something like 122 indexed. My question: Is the sitemap report always a subset of the URLs submitted in the sitemap? Will the number of pages indexed there always be lower than or equal to the URLs referenced in the sitemap? Also, if there is a big disparity between the sitemap submitted URLs and the indexed URLs (like 10x) is that concerning to anyone else?
Reporting & Analytics | | IrvCo_Interactive1 -
Why is Google Analytics showing index.php after every page URL?
Hi, My client's site has GA tracking code gathering correct data on the site, but the pages are listed in GA as having /index.php at the end of every URL, although this does not appear when you visit the site pages. Even if there is a redirect happening for site visitors, shouldn't GA be showing the pages as their redirect destination, i.e. the URL that visitors actually see? Could this discrepancy be adversely affecting my search performance? Example page: http://freshstarttax.com/innocent-spouse/ shows up in GA as http://freshstarttax.com/innocent-spouse/index.php thanks
Reporting & Analytics | | JMagary0 -
Nofollow page is being reported as a landing page for organic search in Google Analytics
One of my client's websites includes a series of pages for an enrollment process. All of these pages are blocked by robots.txt. In Google Analytics these pages are showing data as landing pages for organic search traffic, and have been for quite some time. There was recently a surge of organic search traffic landing on one of these pages, coming from multiple search engines. The pages appear to be blocked and I'm not finding any of them in the search results for the keywords that are being reported in GA or by searching for the url. Does anyone have any insights into why this might be happening?
Reporting & Analytics | | rgibson1000 -
Goal Conversion Rate increase AND Abandonment Increase
I wonder if someone can help me understand some data I'm seeing in Google Analytics. SetUp Goal with 3 step Funnel Date Comparison is 1st-8th September & 1st-8th June The Data (pics attached) Looking at the Goal Conversion Rate I can see: September - 11.58% vs June - 10.42% an increase which Google shows as (+11.18%) For same time period Abandonment Rate is showing September - 71.3% vs June - 61.5% - an increase which Google shows as (+16.5%) The Questions How can I bee seeing both an increase in conversion rate AND and increase in Abandonment rate on the funnel? And why doesnt "(Conversion Rate + Abandonment Rate) = 100%" ? Many thanks for any help! yqwFP.png cj5dn.png
Reporting & Analytics | | TobiasM0 -
Export all links on page with anchor text
As the question says really. Is there a tool that will export all the links on a page and anchor text related to those links into Excel? Thanks.
Reporting & Analytics | | RikkiD220