Are these good backlinks?
-
I am trying to understand how to build good backlinks. I've read or been told that anchor text is bad (understood), websites with unrelated subjects is bad (understood), paid-for links are bad (?), "submitted" and article to get the link is bad (?), or it is a link/farm directory are bad (?). This is actually really confusing to me! Please bear with my silly questions, I am an engineer with an MBA, stay-at-home/homeschooling mom that helps run my husbands business. My brain gets full fast! Ha!
I thought maybe if I post some of the links we have built, someone could look at them and tell me if they are good or bad. This way I can go forward understanding better.
Articles... I thought that writing articles was a GOOD thing! Now I see that submitting articles isn't? So what about these two articles where my husband, as an expert in his field, wrote an article for a popular mag/blog.
http://coastalanglermag.com/red-snapper-season/ (they did the hyperlink wrong and I am trying to get the publisher to fix it)
http://www.bdoutdoors.com/article/shark-encounter-capt.-gregg-rapp/ (this is a pretty funny story if you read it)
Blog stories... what about when someone copies your blog post as a story on their website? Or someone scrapes your content?
http://jeremyrymill.tumblr.com/
http://www.bdoutdoors.com/article/heart-pressure/
http://www.sportfishermen.com/board/showthread.php?t=2627767&p=3294972 (we post fishing reports and they get copied)
Un-related Directories...
http://www.mobileresources.net/mobi/Glowing_Deep_Sea_Fish/ (I didn't create this!!! I guess they just crawl and link?)
Related "farm" Directories
http://www.sportsmansresource.com/ffishtarpon.htm
Other directories/citations such as yellow pages, city search, etc. These are okay right?
Local hotels and what not... concierge's link to me, I don't even ask them to
http://laquintacocoabeach.com/things-to-do/index.cfm
Paid - I pay for MOZ Local! Isn't that paying??? AND, I paid for a whois listing on enom... is that bad too?
NOW FOR THE BAD.... these are bad right?
http://darman.niniyoo.com/Sea-Leveler-Sport-Fishing-Charters-Inc-FL.html (I have no idea how this got there)
http://teensnow.comwww.whoisbusinesslistings.com/Other/10/23490/Sea-Leveler-Sport-Fishing-Charters.html (what the heck is this??? how can they even append a website on a website?)
http://forums.gq.com.au/member.php?u=1813973 (I think this was created on my behalf by my part-time SEO)
If you have read all the way down to here, my sincerest thanks! Thank you for your time!
-
Thank you, all! Your answers are what I thought was okay to begin with. When I started reading Penguin articles, it was seeming that many things I thought were okay were not and it was really confusing. I did read that Point Blank article several months back and made a strategy to employ many of the concepts in there.
I have around 14% anchor text that isn't just my company name and is some kind of keyword phrase. Is that okay? The rest is some form of my website or company name.
-
The most important thing about a good link building strategy is making sure the links look natural and relevant. Keep your link building consistent and moderate. Find the best quality linking sources over the higher quantity link sources (like link farms). Build a strong social strategy and make sure you are sending valuable social signals. That means engaging your audience.
Link farms and other "paid for links" are the sources that do nothing but build quantities and quantities of link regardless of the root domains or the DA of the sources. This is bad because you don't know what or where these links will be. any kind of link building strategy that involves too much of one thing will look unnatural.
When you work on your strategy you have to make the decision of what kind of website you want Google to think of you as. Your link profile is the path that connects you to other sources and tells Google what kind of crowd you belong too. When you think of it like that, you can make the decision that points you to a better strategy. You don't want Google to think you are fast and loose, because then you aren't trustworthy. If you build high quality links, to related, reputable websites you will look like an authoritative member of your industry that can be trusted. Write good content that will make others want to link to you, send valuable social signals and strive for the best quality links, not the highest quantity of links.
-
I have to agree with Justian. You seem to have a few things so confused that it may not make sense for us to try to unravel all of them in a short Q&A but start with this:
Not all anchor text is bad, just way spammy & overdone anchor text. If you check a tool like Ahrefs and you're over say 20%, you're in a danger zone. Over 50% you may as well forget it. THAT is bad anchor text.
Not all paid for links are bad - if you can get traffic off a link, pay for it. If you want to be super-SEO friendly, no follow the link. But it's not bad to have the link if the traffic is good.
Unrelated directories - yes, I would stay away from non-niche pages. But "link directory" isn't bad if you're in the right ones. For instance, Trip Advisor at some level is a directory with links. I'd still put every single travel client ever on there.
Writing articles can be a great source of links - just don't overdo any one tactic. I had a client who wrote maybe 100 guest blogs in 4 months. THAT is bad. (Thanks for telling me, by the way! #disavow)
Anyways, just a few thoughts. Make sure you read http://pointblankseo.com/link-building-strategies and http://pointblankseo.com/prioritize-link-opportunities
And if you really want to learn more, Paddy Moogan's Link Building Book.
-
I don't know where you got all this information (where you read it or who told you) but IMO you have been mislead or only been told half of the story
Anchor text isn't bad.. its actually a good thing.. BUT if all the links pointing to you site have exact match anchor text, that might look pretty suspicious.
websites with unrelated subjects isn't a bad thing.. If the link is relevant in the context it has been written.
about submitted articles or guest blogging.. in general links that you influences/have control over in one way or another won't help you all that mush.. but the links that you have no control over will help you.. in other words; if someone refers to your site in some way that's a link that you have "no control" over - so to speak
Instead of thinking of building links, you should think of making outreach to people that might have an interest in your product or brand.
make content that people would want to link to or share.. that's a mush better approach.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Backlink "class=X-hidden-focus"
Is anyone familiar with class=X-hidden-focus? Do these links still contain link juice or are they similar to no follow?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Colemckeon0 -
Link Type Distribution - Any Good Studies?
Hi guys, Recently Neil Patel did an analysis on the link type % for his blog. Link: https://www.quicksprout.com/2016/03/28/the-blueprints-the-exact-links-your-blog-needs-to-rank-like-quick-sprout/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=email I was wondering if anyone knows of any other good studies on this topic? Cheers.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | jayoliverwright0 -
Irrelevant backlinks - will 301 redirect cleanse the relationship?
My client has thousands of clients for whom they provided websites that used to reside in a subdirectory of their own domain. They moved them to their own domains but there are tens of thousands of backlinks on those sites pointing back to the original domain. Those backlinks are completely irrelevant and are probably hurting them by sending the wrong signals to Google on what this site really is about. My question is will the 301 redirect be enough to cleanse the relationship between my client and all their clients' sites or should I ask the client to clean up all those backlinks on their clients' sites and remove their domain from the target urls? That's a huge job, obviously.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | katandmouse0 -
Uncontrollable Spammy Backlinks - Disavow or Not?
Hey Mozzers, I have ran a few different backlink reports, and I noticed that one of my sites has an incredible amount of spammy backlinks. These were not done by a prior SEO, they are simmply spammy links that were scraped and inserted on terrible sites, forums, directories, etc. 100% uncontrollable. The anchor text includes anything from the domain to "live sex" and "victoria's secret coupons". There are probably close to 700 or so of these backlinks from around 150-200 domains. I have read that one should contact the webmaster, and use disavow as a last resort, but I am not sure if that advice is for spammy link building techniques, which we have no history of doing. Is this normal? What is the best way to handle this? Is it likely that these are affecting this site's ranking at the moment? The number of spammy links drastically affects the ratio of quality backlinks to spammy backlinks. This is so frustrating...
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | evan890 -
How are you supposed to manage your backlink profile?
If you have a site that has 200k+ backlinks, and you are receiving anywhere from 1-4k new links daily (according to majestic), how are you supposed to manage your link profile? We don't do any black hat tactics or any link building, and at the rate of new links coming in, we are afraid that Penguin might hit us one day. We have never used the disavow tool yet either. What are we supposed to do exactly?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | WebServiceConsulting.com0 -
What is a good, structured link building campaign?
I feel like I've tried everything up to this point. I also survived all of the recent Google updates, including the recent EMD update (my site is an EMD). Also I am in the financial sector. I blog every day, I've made some great infographics. I have a very nice website (much better than the competition's), I've done my on-page SEO. I've done the basic link building too. I've hit good business directories, good blog directories (like Technorati), and infographic directories. I've done a bit of comment linkbuilding but I don't see that being very fruitful. I also have a large twitter following + a twitter tribe that shares all of my blog posts. I can't say I've managed to build any sort of community however. My traffic has grown from 0 to anywhere from 80 to 160 visitors every day in just 3 months, and I am happy with that progress but it seems like I have plateaued. Sure I will continue creating content, but what can I do about link building? That's where the results are probably going to come from. I've read all the articles about it, took advice from LinkBuildingSchool.com... but at this point, I'm not sure how to continue. I dont want to continue going after blog comment links, I want quality. Any advice?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | MangoMan160 -
How else to find backlinks for training site
Hello, How would you recommend finding and gaining backlinks for nlpca(dot)com other than looking at the top 10 competitors? Also, we could do an infographic but the owners don't have time to produce a lot of additional articles. Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | BobGW0 -
Interesting 302 redirect situation - could they be a good idea??
Just started with a new SEO client. The site is built on Sharepoint Server 2007 running Windows Server 2003 R2 on IIS 6.5 (I know, fun times for me). Being a standard crappy Windows setup, URLs and canonicalization is a huge issue: first and foremost, we get a 302 redirect from the root www.example.com to www.example.com/Pages/default.aspx Now standard SEO best practices dictate that we rewrite and redirect these pages so they're clean URLs. However that may or may not be possible in the current environment - so is the next best thing to change those to 301s so at least link authority is passed better between pages? Here's the tricky thing - the 302s seem to be preventing Google from indexing the /Pages/default.aspx part of the URL, but the primary URL is being indexed, with the page content accurately cached, etc. So, www.example.com 302 redirects to www.example.com/Pages/default.aspx but the indexed page in Google is www.example.com www.example.com/sample-page/ 302 redirects www.example.com/sample-page/Pages/default.aspx but the indexed page in Google is www.example.com/sample-page/ I know Matt Cutts has said that in this case Google will most likely index the shorter version of the URL, so I could leave it, but I just want to make sure that link authority is being appropriately consolidated. Perhaps a rel=canonical on each page of the source URL? i.e. the www.example.com/sample-page/ - however is rel=canonical to a 302 really acceptable? Same goes for sitemaps? I know they always say end-state URLs only, but as the source URLs are being indexed, I don't really want Google getting all the /Pages/default.aspx crap. Looking for thoughts/ideas/experiences in similar situations?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | OddDog0