Using Premium SEO Pack – Wordpress Plugin
-
Hello
Im Using Premium SEO Pack – Wordpress Plugin and the plugin in a way tell me what i need to fix so my website get better ranking in SEO, but here in moz im getting an F when i rate my website
Moz ask me to fix things that i already fix with the plugin
http://imgur.com/1sP0Jm0,bKdHhWL,0XvEPyY#2
what im doing wrong?
-
so you're aware the permalink link is a WordPress term for URL or link
however it does have its unique abilities to WordPress it is a WordPress URL.
http://codex.wordpress.org/Using_Permalinks
Regarding your plug-in settings and doing what it tells you.
create your own titles based on information found in Moz SEO by the sea, distilled and many other authoritative places which will actually give you the ability to write your own titles regardless of what your plug-in tells you
a must-read is right here
http://www.seobythesea.com/2014/12/direct-answers-taken-authority-websites/
care about what tools like deep crawl and screaming frog have to say
you can use screaming frog to check if they're the right size. of any title or pretty much anything on the page. Same thing with deep crawl
http://www.screamingfrog.co.uk/page-title-meta-description-lengths-by-pixel-width/
I do not think that plug-ins have come that far in all honesty all of them talk about keyword density almost every single one of them.
Never take a plug-in's information as more important than what you might read here in the Moz guides http://moz.com/learn/seo or in http://distilled.net/u & http://www.feedthebot.com/
they are suggestions based on what the plug-in can detect about your site.
do not get me wrong I think plug-ins are extremely important for the ability to put in titles and canonical's other important elements that must be installed for the site to work properly. But there are very few plug-ins I would listen to describe content is good but is expensive and they are right there is no magic keyword percentage however you can always have too many or too few but it should be written for the end-user.
Titles should be created for the end user as well. Think about what would drive you to the site if you were to read it. Never use keywords in the title or URL unless they serve a purpose That benefits the end-user not what people think Google will want.
With all that said obviously if you do not put keywords or key phrases that are relevant to what you're speaking about and quality content on your site you will not rank for it.
when it comes to creating titles for your site I strongly recommend reading this prior
http://moz.com/learn/seo/title-tag
for a guide to content excellence
check out distilled.net/content-guide/
hope this helps,
Tom
-
It is widely agreed that direct-match keywords are declining in importance compared to user experience-based forms of communication in terms of ranking in SERP's.
In other words, it is generally accepted that having all keywords you are targeting in a sentence is best practice, although it is not required that they be together exactly as the phrase you are targeting. In your case, "luxury car rental miami" would be represented better on your site as:
"Use the best luxury car rental service in Miami."
than it would by
"Use the best luxury car rental Miami service."
Even though the second option is a direct match, it would probably rank lower than the first option.
Hope this helps!
-
thank you for your response,i will read all thsi articles
by the way this is my website www.arowautorental.com on the frontpage im using Luxury car rental miami as the keyword and the the reason the person put this kind of keyword in my website but my big question is for example on this text the one that you put before "Offers every client far more than a luxury car rental experience in the Miami area" is necessary fro the key word to be together? or i can put some word in the middle of my keywords?
-
If you are a brick and mortar business located only in the Miami area, localization is always a great way to go. In this case, the first option is probably your best bet.
There are so many resources out there to help you with an up-to-date SEO campaign:
General information:
http://moz.com/blog/how-to-have-a-successful-local-seo-campaign-in-2015
Using Moz Analytics to improve your marketing:
http://moz.com/blog/local-rankings-in-moz-analytics
Conducting an audit on your website:
http://moz.com/blog/ultimate-local-seo-audit
Local SEO Tools (Free and Paid):
http://moz.com/blog/free-local-seo-tools
semrush.com
brightlocal.comRemember that keywords are a factor in ranking, but a good site experience for users, quality content and accessibility for crawlers are all huge factors as well. Don't limit your approach to a single facet - really open up to multiple subjects and your marketing will take off.
All the best,
Rob
-
i got one question, my business is in miami what kind of keyword i should use?
Luxury Car Rental Miami
or
Luxury car Rental
-
Hello Julio,
The plugin you are using is horrifically outdated. There are a few things you should know ahead of time:
-
Many of the ranking factors (technical SEO factors) shown in your screen shots are irrelevant by today's standards. "Keyword density" and meta description do not carry weight in ranking terms.
-
Exact Term Match (keyword in the permalink or url) is also on its way out and is being replaced by user intent metrics by learning machines (algorithms).
-
Your content contains use of your keywords that sounds unnatural: "...offers every client far more than just a luxury car rental miami,..." - Google picks up on this and will rank it negatively. It is far better to use content that sounds grammatically correct and includes the keywords (Such as "...offers every client far more than a luxury car rental experience in the Miami area,..." would do better). If I had to guess, I would bet that you got this content from iwriter.com or an equivalent freelance writing site for extremely cheap and the resulting lack of quality is unlikely to do your rankings in SERP's any favors.
-
If Moz is ranking this site as an F, I would fix it according to their guidelines rather than your plugins. Create content that is likely to engage users and encourage them to share. Avoid "over-optimizing" and focus on user experience more.
It's better to solve the root of the problem rather than perform poor technical SEO and cost yourself time and money.
Cheers and the best of luck!
Rob
-
-
is the home page and when i set this page to the hope it change the permalink
-
Hello,
What's the permalink to your post?
The software is holding you that you're not using your target keyword on the link to your post. Just it.
To fix that, change the permalink to have your target keyword.
Hope I've been helpful
See you
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
What Moz reports would you suggest running when pitching SEO services to a client?
What do you think the best Moz reports are when presenting SEO services to a client? I need to share reports that show where the opportunity is and where we will be prioritizing our effort. I'd like to hear what you would suggest given your experience presenting SEO to clients. Thanks in advance for your help!
Moz Pro | | mrupert1 -
Which backlinks sites to use for full competitive research
Hello, Doing competitive research for really gentle basic link building campaign. Which sites do I need to get a backlink list from besides open site explorer to be most successful? Thanks.
Moz Pro | | BobGW0 -
Are tags in blogs worth anything in SEO value these days and can i remove duplicate title tags?
I have around 12 duplicate tags in the blog and the general consensus is to noindex./nofollow the tag pages which is not an awful way to do things. Should I just arrange my tags better or remove them all together? I believe it's the fact that the same page can be accessed by 3 different url's because of the tags it's under and that in the tag urls, only teaser descriptions of the posts are being display, not the full post, but the seomoz tools still consider it as duplicated content.
Moz Pro | | SEM_at_Lees0 -
The Pros & Cons of Free SEO Reports
Are the numerous Free SEO reports that are available around the internet, where I simply put a website address in and wait for the results actually any good? I tend to stick with Moz & Semrush which takes a little time pulling all the information I need together, but many of our clients are being approached by SEO's waving these free reports at them. Should I see these reports as valid, or ignore them and only concentrate on Moz. Any views will be greatly appreciated. -Christina
Moz Pro | | ChristinaRadisic1 -
I have a new website and would like to use the keywords my competitors are using and was wondering the best way to take a look using Moz Pro?
The website is www.fapwrap.com - it's a new adult wall decals website. [editor's note: may not be safe for some workplaces] The wall decals we have are obviously a bit more niche than the bigger competitors, but I want to get into the first page to see how it helps us. I'm slowly taking over some kws like "xbox wraps" and "ps4 wraps" but those have low search volume and I feel like "wall decals" will help - though it's highly competitive. Suggestions? I just kinda want to plug in my competition and pick from their list of existing kws..... Ha.
Moz Pro | | JohnnyRoq0 -
Web Site Migration Testing and SEO-QA Automation?
Hey Mozzers, Are there any good Migration-SEO-QA Tools out there? Given a prioritized list of URLs and prioritized list of Keywords, is there a tool that can compare basic SEO factors, old URL vs. new URL, and identify all the specific gaps that need to be fixed? Here is a basic SEO-QA acceptance checklist, for porting any website. . . . Until the porting work is completed we cannot accept the new website. Givens: 1. A list of the Top 100 URLs from the old site, prioritized by conversion rates, landing page traffic, and inbound links. 2. A list of the planned 404 - mapped URLs, old to new site, from the porting team. 3. A list of the current Top 200 Keywords, prioritized. 4. A good amount of SEO work has already been done, by several professionals, for the current (old) site. **How to evaluate if the new site will be acceptable to Google? Check ON-PAGE SEO Factors... ** **. . . that is, the NEW site must be AS GOOD AS (or better than) the current (old) site,
Moz Pro | | George.Fanucci
in the eyes of Google, to preserve the On-Page SEO work already done. ** Criteria: URLs ok? :: Is the URL mapping ok, old to new, best web page? LINKS ok :: Are all internal LINKS and keyword Anchor Text ported? TEXT ok :: On-page content, TEXT and keywords ok? TITLE ok :: HTML Title and title keywords ok? DESCRIPTION ok :: HTML Meta Description ok? H1, H2 ok :: HTML H1, H2 and keywords ok? IMG kwds :: HTML IMG and ALT keywords ok? URL kwds :: URL - keywords in new URLs ok? Potential porting defects: Keywords in URL missing: Keywords in HTML Title missing: Keywords in Meta Description missing: Any internal LINKS or Link anchor text missing: Keywords in Page TEXT missing: H1, H2 missing keywords: HTML IMG alt-text, IMG file URLs, any missing keywords: Notes: Until the porting work is completed we cannot accept the new site, or set a target date for potential cutover. There are eight (8) data items per URL, and about one hundred (100) URLs to be considered for SEO-QA before going live. We were expecting to cutover before the end of February, at the latest. There is no point in doing full QA acceptance-tests until the porting work is completed. QA spot-checks have found far too many defects. About 60% of the landing-page traffic comes via the top 40 URLs. With over 100 URLs to look at, it can take more than a week or two just to do SEO-QA in detail, manually, item-by-item, page-by-page, side-by-side, old vs. new. Spot-checks indicate a business disaster would occur unless the porting defects are fixed before going live. _Any Migration-QA Tools?_Given a prioritized list of URLs and prioritized list of Keywords, is there a tool that can compare basic On-Page SEO factors, old URL vs. new URL, and identify most of the specific gaps that need to be fixed before going live with the new site? _ *** Edit: Any comments on the SEO criteria, tools, or methods will be appreciated!_0 -
Number of Linking Root Domains using EXACT match anchor text
Recently, I read an article a post here in SEOmoz blog talking about competitive backlink analysis. (http://www.seomoz.org/blog/guide-to-competitive-backlink-analysis). Could anyone please indicate me the way to retrieve the next two metrics from the SEOmoz account? Number of Linking Root Domains using EXACT matct anchor text. Percentage of anchors with EXACT match anchor. Thank you in advance!
Moz Pro | | KostasKostalampros0 -
Which tools do not use backlinking and/or tagging?
I am new to SEOmoz and was wondering if any, which tools on SEOmoz does not use or require backlinking and/or tagging?
Moz Pro | | aschraegle0