Exact Keyword is Used in Page Title & Exact Keyword Used in Document Text at Least Once
-
Hi Folks,
I have a page https://purplegriffon.com/courses/itil-training/itil-foundation-training/itil-foundation that grades with the 'On-Page Grader' as a B grade for the keyword 'itil foundation' but reports that there is no 'Exact Keyword is Used in Page Title' and 'Exact Keyword Used in Document Text at Least Once'.
The thing is, it actually is but because of IP (intellectual property) rights we have to include a '
' (
) symbol when we mention the course title 'ITIL
Foundation'.
Now I believe Google is smart enough to recognise that this symbol should not be included but it seems that for the specific criteria mentioned above, the MOZ bot isn't smart enough to recognise this, even though it recognises the keyword usage elsewhere.
So my question is this. Would this constitute an issue in terms of ranking?
Another question I have, is how significant are the gains with shorter URL's? For example, the URL to the page in question is:
https://purplegriffon.com/courses/itil-training/itil-foundation-training/itil-foundation
Would a URL such as below have a significant effect on SEO?:
https://purplegriffon.com/courses/itil-foundation
Thanks for your feedback.
-
On question 1, I'm surprised it's that specific that you can't include a space. I'm inclined to think Google knows the difference, but there isn't much out there. I did find this, but it's not definitive: http://www.searchenginejournal.com/registered-trademarks-and-other-symbols-in-the-title-tag/20463/. I may just try testing the impact of a mark (TM or R) next to the keyword. That would be useful to know.
On question 2, I did a little more research and found this question answered quite nicely a couple years ago by Moz member Edward R. Jenkins: http://moz.com/community/q/maximum-length-of-the-url-for-seo-75-115
-
Hi Joey,
Thanks for your feedback.
In terms of question 1, yes the registration mark must immediately precede the brand. For question 2, is there significant SEO benefit in doing so, forgetting for the time being user experience?
Thanks
Gareth
-
Question 1: What would it hurt if you separate it yourself by putting a space between the word and the mark, like this? 'ITIL
' I have long done this to make sure keywords stand alone, particularly in titles. Is there a rule that the
has to be right next to the keyword?
Question 2: The longer URL looks very spammy to me. I'd go with quality of quantity on this one, with quality being a better user experience with a shorter URL.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Pages with Duplicate Page Content Nov
Moz is showing all many of URL's as duplicate URLs. I put canonical for all the pages but still it showing all as duplicate page. These are URL's https://www.crystalizeonline.com/brands/ravenscroft-crystal/material/non-lead/page/2.html https://www.crystalizeonline.com/brands/ravenscroft-crystal/material/non-lead/page/2/sort-by/price/sort-direction/desc.html https://www.crystalizeonline.com/brands/ravenscroft-crystal/material/non-lead/page/2/sort-by/price/sort-direction/asc.html Their is a lot of pages like this. How can I get rid from all this issues.
Moz Pro | | crystalize0 -
Duplicate pages coming from links from the login page - what should we do about them?
This is a follow on to an earlier question which was well answered by Dirk Ceuppens regarding abnormal crawl issues. We are seeing that the issues relating to Duplicate Pages are coming from links from the login page which shows information about where the user was redirected from. For example, if the visitor is not logged on and wishes to wish-list an item, they will be redirected to the login page, with the item code and intended action in the url; which can then continue on to the desired page once logged on. The MOZ crawler is seeing these pages as having Duplicated Content whilst they are all the same apart from a piece of information in the URL. Should we be blocking these duplications? Are they a risk to us? What should we be doing? Many thanks, Sarah
Moz Pro | | Mutatio_Digital0 -
Problem with On-page
I have an issue. I have added 5 keywords but when i go to the "on page" tab. They are not there... So i press on "Add keyword" and it takes me to another page where i can see all my keywords. So i go back to the "on page" and no keyword shows up. I wanna have a summary of the weekly crawl for the on page of these keywords and it's not showing up 😞 Anybody knows why?
Moz Pro | | theseolab0 -
Duplicate Page Title - although there are differences
Hello, I get duplicate page titles errors on pages in which there are little differences. For example: C++ Online Test for Seniors C# Online Test for Seniors I assume that from some reason the ++ and the # are removed when SEOMoz crawler checks for duplicate page titles. As you may know C# and C++ means two different programming languages. Should I do something about it or is it a bug in the crawler?
Moz Pro | | ulukach0 -
On-Page Report Card B grade because its a PPC landing page
I have a PPC landing page with I'm getting a B grade on the On-Page Report Card. Can I just ignore that, it says its a "Critical Factor" Thanks Mike Crawl status <dd>Status Code: 200
Moz Pro | | mjrinvent
meta-robots: noindex,nofollowall
meta-refresh: None
X-Robots: None</dd> <dt>Explanation</dt> <dd>Pages that can't be crawled or indexed have no opportunity to rank in the results. Before tweaking keyword targeting or leveraging other optimization techniques, it's essential to make sure this page is accessible.</dd> <dt>Recommendation</dt> <dd>Ensure the URL returns the HTTP code 200 and is not blocked with robots.txt, meta robots or x-robots protocol (and does not meta refresh to another URL)</dd>0 -
Title Element too Long - Counts ampersand as &
I was wondering if Google counts the ampersand written as '&' as 5 characters or a single one? It seems that Google counts it as a single character and SEOmoz PRO counts it as 5 characters.
Moz Pro | | DPSSeomonkey0 -
On Page missing keywords
I setup my keywords on SEOMoz properly but the On Page result just shows me 2 keywords instead of the 7 that I set for my campaign. I was expecting the application to score the other keywords on wednesday but it did not add the missing keywords. Is this a bug?
Moz Pro | | netbuilder0 -
"Issue: Duplicate Page Content " in Crawl Diagnostics - but these pages are noindex
Hello guys, our site is nearly perfect - according to SEOmoz campaign overview. But, it shows me 5200 Errors, more then 2500 Pages with Duplicate Content plus more then 2500 Duplicated Page Titles. All these pages are sites to edit profiles. So I set them "noindex, follow" with meta robots. It works pretty good, these pages aren't indexed in the search engines. But why the SEOmoz tools list them as errors? Is there a good reason for it? Or is this just a little bug with the toolset? The URLs which are listet as duplicated are http://www.rimondo.com/horse-edit/?id=1007 (edit the IDs to see more...) http://www.rimondo.com/movie-edit/?id=10653 (edit the IDs to see more...) The crawling picture is still running, so maybe the errors will be gone away in some time...? Kind regards
Moz Pro | | mdoegel0