URL Structure & SEO - Should we be using sub-folders?
-
Hi all,
As part of our content marketing efforts we have run a number of initiatives in the past and created pages on the website to go along with them (also where the links for these particular projects point to).
However, the URL structure isn't actually a reflection of where the pages sit on the site. Unfortunately I'm unable to provide a URL for reasons I won't bore you with, but here's an example:
We recently ran a competition that was very successful in generating links. The URL for this is www.domain.co.uk/competition.
However, the page actually sits within the About Us section - which is where all of our news and content marketing pages go - and uses a URL override.
How much of an issue is this in regards to A) Our SEO in general?; and B) Ensuring we receive as much equity from the links we earn as possible? A brief explanation of what URL overrides actually are would also be useful! (We have a digital marketing agency who handle most of our SEO)
Thanks in advance guys!
John
-
Hi Jimmy,
Thanks very much for the reply!
John
-
Hi Tom,
Yes that's exactly right. The link from the About Us section goes directly to www.example.com/competition - it doesn't quickly redirect.
Thanks for putting my mind at ease!
John
-
Hi John
Just to make sure I'm reading this correctly.
You have your homepage. You can then click to the "about us" page. And from there, you can click to the "competition" page.
However, instead of it looking like: www.example.com/about-us/competition, it looks like: www.example.com/competition
Is that correct?
If it is, then I don't think there is anything to worry about. Here's why:
Think of your URL as merely a cosmetic thing. Your URL structure does not have to reflect how a search engine or a user reaches that page. The most important thing in terms of site structure and SEO is how a search engine crawler (and user) reaches that page - IE, how many clicks away from your root domain it is.
As a rule of thumb, you should try to keep all of your important pages no more than 3 clicks away from your homepage - and ideally as few as possible. How the URL is presented when the user/search engine reaches that point is not relevant**
**This isn't entirely the case - there is some correlation with including your keyword in the URL and higher rankings, albeit a very slight correlation. For example, some sites have links to their main pages from their homepage which then take you to a URL like: http://www.example.com/keyword/product-a - that doesn't mean that the search engine has to reach the page by going through that subfolder (which may not even exist), but the display URL contains the keyword and so it might be better for SEO (although I think if this does have an effect it is very, very slim). Conversely, if your main page URL was http://www.example.com/keyword, but it takes you four clicks to reach there, it would not be good for SEO as your page is so far away from the homepage.
The main guidelines here are to:
- Keep your main pages as close to the homepage as possible (via internal links)
- Try to include the keyword in your URL if possible (or at least use friendly, readable URLs)
Now, on the "about us" page, the link that goes to the "competition" page - does it go directly to www.example.com/competition, or is it linked to www.example.com/about-us/competition and then quickly redirects?
If it's the second scenario, that would be an unnecessary redirect and might involve some of the link equity being diluted. I'd get the agency to look at linking to the www.example.com/competition page directly if that is the case (although I doubt it will be).
I hope that helps to explain some things!
-
Hi John,
Your URL override sounds like a 301 redirect, you can test this by going to what the URL actually is in your system, e.g. www.domain.co.uk/about-us/pages/competition with a
'URL Redirect Checker'
If it reports as '301' then that is good (Moz has a section on redirects in their learn section).
If it reports as another type of redirect then that would not be as efficient as a 301.
Pages that come back as '200' are direct links (these are the best), 301 is 'Moved Permanently', they also prevent the page from being indexable via both URLs so as to remove any duplicate content possibilities.
301 redirects are 'meant' to carry all the equity across so nothing is being lost from an SEO perspectiveIn terms of SEO, having the easiest URLs possible is always a bonus, not only does Google prefer shorter URLs but is also encourages direct traffic and visitor referrals (you'd rather tell a friend to go to a particular if it easy enough to type).
Kind Regards
Jimmy
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Multiple CMS on one website / domain & SEO
For a client we would like to work with a content hub, but their website is build on a custom CMS so we are limited in our options and if we aks their web developers they ask crazy prices to help us. So now we have the idea to build the content hub with wordpress and implement it next to their current CMS. for example on www.website.com/contenthub/ . As far as i know this is technically possible and there are no negative effects regarding SEO as long as we link the two sitemaps together. Am i right or am i missing something here?
Technical SEO | | Siphoplait0 -
Canonical URL
Hi there Our website www.snowbusiness.com has a non www version and this one has 398 backlinks. What is the best way of transfering this link value if i establish the www. address as the canonical URL? Thanks, Ben
Technical SEO | | SnowFX0 -
Is 301 redirecting all old URLS after a new site redesign to the root domain bad for SEO?
After a new site redesign ...would it hinder our rankings if we 301 redirected all old URLS that are returning 404 error codes to the root domain (home page) ? Would this be a good temporary solution until we are able to redirect the pages to the appropriate corresponding page? Thanks so much!
Technical SEO | | DCochrane0 -
Mobile Site Domain/URL Structure
We are currently building a mobile optimised version of our main website and I had some questions with regard to SEO. 1. Is it best to structure the domain as: m.yourdomain.com yourdomain/m 2. It is correct to place rel="cannonical" on the mobile pages and to have only the main site indexed? Thanks in advance and links or books on mobile seo you can direct me to that would be greatly appreciated. Phil
Technical SEO | | Phily0 -
Best URL Structure for Product Pages?
I am happy with my URLs and my ecommerce site ranks well over all, but I have a question about product URL's. Specifically when the products have multiple attributes such as "color". I use a header URL in order to present the 'style' of products, www.americanmusical.com/Item--i-GIB-LPCCT-LIST and I allow each 'color' to have it's own URL so people can send or bookmark a specific item. www.americanmusical.com/Item--i-GIB-LPCCT-ANCH1 www.americanmusical.com/Item--i-GIB-LPCCT-WRCH1 I use a rel canonical to show that the header URL is the URL search engines should be indexing and to avoid duplicate content issues from having the exact same info, MP3's, PDF's, Video's accessories, etc on each specific item URL. I also have a 'noindex no follow' on the specific item URL. These header URLs rank well, but when using tools like SEOMoz, which I love, my header pages fail for using rel canonical and 'noindex no follow' I've considered only having the header URL, but I like the idea of shoppers being able to get to the specific product URL. Do I need the no index no follow? Do I even need the rel canonical? Any suggestions?
Technical SEO | | dianeb1520 -
Ajax #! URLs, Linking & Meta Refresh
Hi, We recently underwent a platform change and unfortunately our updated ecom site was coded using java script. The top navigation is uncrawlable, the pertinent product copy is undetectable and duplicated throughout the code, etc - it needs a lot of work to make it (even somewhat) seo-friendly. We're in the process of implementing ajax #! to our site and I've been tasked with creating a document of items that I will test to see if this solution will help our rankings, indexing, etc (on Google, I've read the issues w/ Bing). I have 2 questions: 1. Do I need to notify our content team who works on our linking strategy about the new urls? Would we use the #! url (for seo) or would we continue to use the clean url (without the #!) for inbound links? 2. When our site transferred over, we used meta refresh on all of the pages instead of 301s for some reason. Instead of going to a clean url, our meta refresh says this: . Would I update it to have the #! in the url? Should I try and clean up the meta refresh so it goes to an actual www. url and not this browsererrorview page? Or just push for the 301? I have read a ton of articles, including GWT docs, but I can't seem to find any solid information on these specific questions so any help I can get would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
Technical SEO | | Improvements0 -
Help with SEO
Hello, I am brand new to SEO and I'm learning on the go everyday. I am having issues with Google and getting any sort of ranking or analysis or even just traffic reports. I understand the site has never really been optimized so it might really not have any reports. So basically my real question is what helpful tricks or hints do you guys have that I can implement? Anything and everything helps. So far I have run the crawl diagnostics and I'm working on fixing the errors. Thanks fr your help.
Technical SEO | | Future130 -
Should Canonical URLs be used in Wordpress?
Wordpress offers Canonical URLs in the "All in one SEO" settings. I know that canonical tags for page content will cause the search engine to ignore the content, but I don't understand this setting in Wordpress. The Canonical URLs box for my blog had been checked until a couple weeks ago. I unchecked it (removing the canonical tag) and now I have about 300 duplicate content pages acccording to my SEOMoz reports. It appears that it's just the blog tag in the url now that is causing the confusion. Here's an example of the same url with two tags: http://www.rmtracking.com/blog/tag/aclu/ http://www.rmtracking.com/blog/tag/rfid/ Should I activate the canonical URL setting in Wordpress again. If not, how can I fix this? Your assistance is greatly appreciated. Regards, Brad
Technical SEO | | BradBorst0