Buffer Link and Google Impressions
-
Afternoon,
I noticed a spike in impressions over a couple of days in April, so I investigated Analytics to see where these were coming from. It appears these impressions were split between two URLs; one was a blog post, the other was the Buffer link to the blog post that we used on Twitter and Facebook. According to Analytics, this Buffer URL received 1000 impressions over two days, with an average SERP position of 16. This surely can't be right, can it? Is this just another Analytics quirk? After two days of a decent amount of impressions to this Buffer link, the amount of impressions dropped to pretty much zero.
I know Tweets are now starting to rank, but this would be the Twitter URL, not the Buffer link to our blog post?
Any ideas,
Cheers,
Lewis
-
Thanks for the response, guys. The Buffer URL that is driving organic traffic is:
It looks like you're right; it's the Google+ Buffer link that's ranking. There's no canonical on the blog post as we're using BlogEngine and they don't automatically add one. I'll have to check with the developers to see if we can manually insert one.
Cheers,
Lewis
-
Greetings Lewis
So yes URL shortners can and will get indexed if there are enough links to them, there are 71.8 million bit.ly links currently indexed in Google... I did a check of my travel site and noticed this Buffer UTM link in GWT Top Pages report http://travel-network.co/review/aggelika?utm_content=bufferebb76&utm_medium=social&utm_source=plus.google.com&utm_campaign=TravelNetwork.net.au it was indexed and getting impressions but it was only a small amount last month and I checked and now only the canonical version remains indexed.
But it was only the Google+ version being indexed as Buffer creates a unique URL for each share on a social network, so the only question is did you manually share the Buffer link on Facebook & Twitter so it was actually the same link? Also did you check to confirm your page has the correct canonical tag in place so it reduces the chances Google will get confused and indexed the Buffer link instead of the actual blog post link.
But I couldn't find any other examples of Buffer links being indexed, if you are worried about the situation would could use the Buffer settings and select "No Shortnening" option.
Hope that helps a little.
David
-
I had a whole answer and lost it due to a cookie faux pas.
It looks like there are about 2 million buff.ly URLs in the Google index, so as long as you are seeing the buff.ly URL as a referral and not a page on your site, this looks possible. It is weird indeed and I don't know if it's intentional on the part of Bufferly, but it is happening for sure.
The URLs could be being indexed and then dropped from the index after a few days. And it's a social URL, so the drop makes sense there as well.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Search and Replace filter on Google Analytics?
Hello! On our GA account for one of our clients, we'd like to add a search and replace filter to the Views section of the account. The URL is www.askergoworks.com (it redirects to askergoworks.com), and Google has flagged us to have redundant hostnames. This is why we'd like to add the filter. Would the regular expression be askergoworks.com|www.askergoworks.com ? Any help would be great - I'm not a regex expert, so I really don't how to go about this. Thanks!
Reporting & Analytics | | AGILITY0 -
Ecommerce, Product Content & Google Metrics
Hi I know Google has many different variations of what they consider to be thin content. I wondered if anyone has an idea of the best metric to determine what content you need to improve on your site? I work on a large e-commerce site so there are a thousands of product pages - all with product descriptions similar [but not duplicate] to competitors. I guess in terms of quantity, these pages don't have huge amounts of written content, so I'm wondering what Google classes as 'thin' on a product page: 1. Does Google just expect a conversion to deem that product page useful? And if not, what's the best metric to identify what works vs. what doesn't on product pages in Google's eyes. 2. If adding lots of product pages on mass is bad and will decrease overall authority? The content isn't duplicate, but may be fairly similar to other sites selling the same thing. I'm trying to get our reviews added directly to product pages rather than in a pop up to improve the unique content and I'm starting to write guides, FAQ's and I'll work towards getting video started - however, I'm the only SEO & we don't have much resource so this all takes time. If anyone else has any advice on steps to take that would be great 🙂
Reporting & Analytics | | BeckyKey0 -
Google News Bug
During today and yesterday we are getting a lot of visits (Over 400) from http://news.google.com the visits are all at the same time and to different pages, the visits are very brief so much so that it pushes our bounce rate up to 69% in GA. Is there anything we can do to stop this? Thank you in advance?
Reporting & Analytics | | Palmbourne0 -
Cannonical Links?
Hi guys, I recently started using Moz Analytics's for my site and it has told me that the vast majority (perhaps all) of my pages have duplicate content because Google will be indexing the version both with and without www. in front of it as seperate domains. I've done some research and have come across a few suggestions of what to do, but i'm not sure which to go with or how to actually implement it. Any help, advice or suggestions would be greatly appreciated! Thanks
Reporting & Analytics | | Sandicliffe0 -
Google analytcics sub domain dot or not?
Buongiorno from 16 degrees C wetherby UK famous for the Wetherby Whaler Chippy 😉 OK... on this site http://www.philpotts.co.uk/ I've set up sub domain tracking as so:
Reporting & Analytics | | Nightwing
Parent site:
http://www.philpotts.co.uk/ Sub domain
http://shop.philpotts.co.uk/ So my question is please: should a dot be placed in the sub domain line as in : _gaq.push(['_setDomainName', '.philpotts.co.uk']); Some advice places a dot in setDomainName other advice doesnt 😞
Any insights welcome, Grazie,David0 -
Link value when with parameter ?
Hi all, I added some links to my website, but because I want to track traffic and other things, all links were created with Google URL Builder and slightly customized. So the end result looks like this: http://www.example.com/example_home.asp?acs=986lfqa&utm_source=keyword.fr&utm_medium=RP&utm_content=example_Link&utm_campaign=General All links are containing keyword as anchor text. And the question is if Google is smart enough to figure out that the anchor text is for http://www.example.com and not for the whole /example_home.asp............ I'm afraid that it will see it as entirely different page and don't pass link value.
Reporting & Analytics | | VasilTasev0 -
No Internal Followed Links on My Site?
I just ran the Site Explorer on my site (myeyedr.com) and it reported that there are no internal links on www.myeyedr.com or myeyedr.com. However, there were 20 internal followed links on www.myeyedr.com/index.aspx. I'm guessing this is hurting my SEO. Any suggestions?
Reporting & Analytics | | lance-1744490 -
Tracking Effects of Internal Linking
Can anyone suggest the best way to track the effectiveness of internal linking on a website? Thanks!
Reporting & Analytics | | RishadShaikh590