Sub-domains and keyword rich domains
-
Hello All
I'm hoping for some opinions as i am confused as to the best action for me to take.
The problem:
Although i say the below, we have never been penalised by Google, not taken part in any bad link building and don't do too bad with SERP. but i worry Google may not like what i do these days.We have one main site that is broken down into areas/cities (i,e London, Manchester, etc) so the domain looks like www.domain.co.uk/London
But in addition to this we also use Sub-domains to target popular areas (i,e. http://London.domain.co.uk).
These sub-domains take the content from the main site but of course only display results relevant to London and are optimised for "London + Keyword"
Any page that gets duplicated (i.e London.domain.co.uk/profile123 and www.domain.co.uk/profile123 are ALMOST the same content) we add a rel="canonical" link that points to the main domain+page on www.
All these sites have a large amount of links back to www.domain.co.uk/?Page so the user can also search in other areas other then London, etc.This method has worked well for us and is popular with both users and Google search results. All sites/sub-domains are added to GWT under the same account and all sites have unique sitemaps.
I do however worry that Google may class this as link manipulation owing to the amount of links pointing back to the main domain and its pages (this is not the reason we use the sub-domains though)
In addition to the above sub-domains we have a few domain names (5/6) that are keyword rich that we also place the same content on (i,e www.manchester-keyword.co.uk would show only content relevant to Manchester), and again these sites have links back to the main domain, so users can navigate other areas of the UK.
I worry that these additional domains may also not be liked by Google
What do people think?
I have started to reduce/replace some of the additional keyword rich domains with sub-domains from the main site and then 301 the keyword rich domain (i.e. www.manchester-Keyword.co.uk now goes to http://Manchester.domain.co.uk) as i feel sub-domains may not be penalised as much as unique domains are.
There are domains that i dont really want to 301 as they bring in good amounts of traffic and users have bookmarked them, etc.Any opinions or what you think i should do would be great, as i really worry that if Google stops giving us good results, i'm in real trouble. Although im not sure if what we do is wrong with Google or not.
-
Thanks and yes that's what i have now done with the microsites. So thank you very much for your advice.
The subdomains rank too well for me to bite the bullet on these too, or at least for the moment.
A slightly different and better suited analogy would be
"my main site advertises Hotels and each sub-domain advertises Hotels in London, etc, although my main site also advertises the same Hotels"FYI my site has an Adult Theme (although not porn) which is why i am not posting URL's.
Thanks again!!
Jon -
Let's say your main site focus on Ford cars. On the main site you have content related to Mustangs, Pickups, Vans, etc.
If you have a microsite focused on Mustangs, redirect each page from the microsite to the same (or similar) page on the main site. If the page does not exist on the main site, move the content from the microsite to the main site.
-
well i have bitten the bullet and 301'ed all but 2 of my micro sites.
I have kept unique tracking code on the sub-domains they all go to, so i can keep an eye on the traffic.
If it would be of help to others i will repost what happens to the traffic (if anything), so to help others make similar derisions.I note Ryan said :
_"For your subdomains, as long as you are redirecting users to similar content on your main site, you should be absolutely fine. If the content does not exist on your main site, move the page from the subdomain to the main site. You should not experience any significant traffic loss. The future advantages of consolidation outweigh any minor loss which may occur. " _My subdomains are all fully functional sites, but for specific areas, so the user only needs to go to the main site in order to search different areas or to contact us, etc.
Any page that gets duplicated (i,e. all profiles are on the main site, and profile for the specific area are duplicated on the subdomains ) is added with rel="canonical" to the page on the main site.
Is this what is meant by "as long as you are redirecting users to similar content on your main site" ?All content also exists on the main site, so would this mean there is no consolidation to do? or do you think it would be better to 301 all subdomain to the main domain still?
sorry for all the questions and i am very grateful for all the advice
Best Regards
Jon -
"Serves you right for not sharing with us!"
I will try to email you a glass later....
301 redirects are something im not sure if i know the best way to do them for SEO.
From a technical point all works fine, but im not sure if google will see this as every page 301'ed (although all redirect)I use this code (or similar) in .htaccess
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^keyword-domain.co.uk$ [OR] RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www.keyword-domain.co.uk$ RewriteRule (.*)$ http://subdomain.MainSite.co.uk/$1 [R=301,L]All pages now redirect to the main domain + whatever page they were trying to get to
(i.e www.keyword-domain.co.uk/whateverpage.php redirects to subdomain.MainSite.co.uk/whateverpage.php)Does anyone know if this is correct or not. Ideally i don't want to have to redirect every page individually as there are 100's of pages and several domains and my .htaccess is large enough as it is.....
Or is there a better "wildcard" way of redirecting all pages?Best Regards
Jon -
will teach me to reply after drinking some of 'Scotland's Best'
Serves you right for not sharing with us!
For the doorway sites, 301'ing them to the main site is perfectly fine and desired. Be sure to 301 the entire site if they have more then one page. Also be sure to set the redirect to the appropriate page rather then simply dumping users on your home page.
For your subdomains, as long as you are redirecting users to similar content on your main site, you should be absolutely fine. If the content does not exist on your main site, move the page from the subdomain to the main site. You should not experience any significant traffic loss. The future advantages of consolidation outweigh any minor loss which may occur.
-
Hello Francisco
Thank you for your opinions, they are much appreciated!
Best Regards
Jon -
Hello Ryan
Thanks for your advice and sorry for calling you Jonny in my previous reply.
(Doh, that's my name....., will teach me to reply after drinking some of 'Scotland's Best').Although it is not the news i wanted to hear, but i also know it to be true. You are of course right, in that it's only a matter of time before the doorway pages/micro sites come to bite me.
Do you think it would be OK for me to remove these micro sites and 301 them to the main domain (or relevant sub-domains if i am to keep some of the sub-domains)?
Or would it be better just to remove them and make no connection to our main site with them?I will also try your test of 301 a couple of sub-domains for a month to see if this works too.
My only worry with this is, that the main site does not rank at all for i,e Manchester + Keywords, where as the sub-domains do.
(FYI the sub-domains are not just a few pages each of them can be around 100 pages and all pages within are optimised for Area + Keyword + Page Keyword, etc.)I do hope i'm one of the good guys (white hat), and have always taken the attitude that SEO is 90% about good content and 10% about optimisation.
Thanks again
Jon -
if i removed these sub-domains i would loose 40%-50% of my overall traffic which is around 6,000+ a day
If you 301 redirect your subdomain to the main domain properly, you should not lose traffic. You specifically mentioned having subdomain pages that were nearly identical to the pages on the main domain. Redirect each subdomain page to the equivalent page on the main domain.
If you are concerned about traffic loss, try with just one domain first. Wait 30 days so you can fully see the results of the change, then proceed from that point.
Regarding the Doorway pages, they will likely continue to work until you are caught, at which time you will be penalized. You may not even realized your are penalized at first, then when you discover the issue, you may not be clear on whether the issue is the Doorway page, the subdomain issue, or one of the 50 algorithm changes Google makes each month. It is up to you as to what type of site owner you wish to be: white hat or black hat.
-
I agree with Ryan "Your approach is highly likely to be considered as Doorway Pages. "
-
Hello Jonny
yes i think you understand me and thanks for the link to the doorway pages/micro sites.
I have used this method very effectively for many years, but it now look like Google disapprove, so i need to think very carefully about what i do with them.
(i dont think i fit totally in with the doorway description Google give, as their intent is not to funnel users, but they are intended to rank. But i do worry Google will not see it this way, so i hear what you say!)The problem i have with "eliminating" the sub-domains is that we take a good amount of traffic from these and Google gives them good ranking for their respective keywords and better rankings than the main domain for their respective keywords. (+ the user seems to like them)
If they are not going to cause issues with Google, do you think it will be ok to leave them as is? or do you think this will cause problems in the future and I'm best of changing them now?
(if i removed these sub-domains i would loose 40%-50% of my overall traffic which is around 6,000+ a day, this would hurt my prideand probably my bank balance!)
Thanks for your opinions, they are greatly welcomed!!!
best Regards
Eddy -
Hi Jonny,
If I am understanding your question correctly, you have two concerns:
1. Linking from your subdomains to your main domain
2. Creating micro sites which link back to your main domain
Regarding linking from your subdomain site to your main domain (i.e. from london.site.co.uk to www.site.co.uk/london) I am not aware of any issue Google may have with that process. Even though technically a subdomain is a different site, Google is clearly aware you own and operate both sites and would not provide external linking value to such links. In other words, I would not expect that type of link to be used to manipulative search rankings.
With the above understood, I would suggest the process is inefficient. It is likely your best course of action would be to eliminate the subdomains and simply use the content on your main site.
Regarding the micro sites, that is a concern. Your approach is highly likely to be considered as Doorway Pages. Based on your description, it seems like a textbook case. http://support.google.com/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=2721311
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
How serious is Google about internal linking report? Considers the links from sub-directories too?
Hi community members, It's been clearly said by Google to interlink the important pages across the website and they give top interlinked pages in "Links report". They do consider the links from the sub-directories like example.com/blog, etc. to sum up the internal linking . But we do employ multiple sub directories and link to various pages which may not be that important to rank, example "terms of use" page at footer section. So, obviously these non-important pages might be over linked as per the search console "internal links report". Will this make Google to consider the highest linked pages as most important and they try to give ranking importance to them? How about links from sub directories? Please clarify and share your opinions.
Algorithm Updates | | vtmoz0 -
New .TLD domains - SEO Value?
Hi all, I see that a new wave of domains are to be released soon. We are not talking or 1 or 2 new extensions, but more like 700 new extensions on a TLD level. What's your views on their SEO value? thanks!
Algorithm Updates | | bjs20100 -
301 a purchased domain
I've purchased a competitor. They rank well organically for keywords that I target, and I want to optimize the way I get value from their current rankings and traffic (and customers -- we will obviously market to their email/customer list). Which is better: (1) use a 301 redirect for any access to their domain and point it to my home page. I think this would force Google to de-index all of their pages, right? (2) put up a stub page as their homepage that announces the site has been bought, and have a do-follow link to my home page (which maybe is auto-redirected after 10 seconds or something)? Maybe this is better to keep their home page in Google's index for a while? As for option (1), I thought I read somewhere recently that 301'ing a domain to the home page of another domain would no longer pass link juice (?). Maybe I should 301 the newly purchased domain to a sub-page on my site that explains the acquisition and asks them to sign up on my site? Both sites are legit. No spamming happening here; just industry consolidation as one competitor acquires another. Thanks in advance...!
Algorithm Updates | | scanlin0 -
Rich Snippets stopped showing up in SERPS
Up until a few weeks ago my testimonial review ratings (5 star rating system) were showing up in search results but they no longer do. Went to the google rich snippet testing tool and they still do there just not on the real search results. Any thoughts on why? Perhaps an algorithm change?
Algorithm Updates | | casper4340 -
Which is the better option in 2012, sub-domains or sub-directories?
Pinnion offers online software for surveys and trivia games. Information about our product is at www.pinnion.com and then interested users create their accounts at secure.pinnion.com. The surveys that they create link back to secure.pinnion.com, so we would obviously like to gain whatever SEO benefits we can from that structure. We've been advised that moving from secure.pinnion.com to www.pinnion.com/secure would be the best way to accomplish this. A 2009 post by Rand seems to support that POV, but then a 2011 post over SEObook claims that everything has changed 100% since then. There was a little conversation here and here in Q&A last Fall that touched on this subject, but nothing really definitive. Would love to get thoughts on this subject based on the collective wisdom today. Thanks.
Algorithm Updates | | yahuie0 -
Title of home page is changed to domain name in SERPs
Hi, We have a unique problem, we are getting a totally different title in Google serps for a large site. When we search with domain name with space in google.com. We are getting title as domain name with space. We don't have any Open Directory listing. We don't have any cannonical issues and other pages with title as domain name. Can you please tell us what we have to do get our original title back in SERP ? Thanks, With Regards,
Algorithm Updates | | semshah1430 -
Keyword rich domains sliding fast
I decided not to worry too much about the statements from google indicating that they were going to consider key word rich domains as a negative for ranking since any of the sites I work on that have them are totally relevant to the content on the sites. However, since recent Google algorithm updates I see these domains have suddenly slid from top 3 positions to page 4 or beyond in Google SERP's. Nothing has changed on these sites in the intervening time and no change is evident in Bing or Yahoo SERP's. Is it just my imagination, or are others seeing the same thing for keyword rich domains? and has anyone yet determined the best way to deal with this problem?
Algorithm Updates | | ShaMenz0 -
.Co Domains - Any thoughts?
Hi Guys I'm not sure which section this one belongs in as I didn't see a section for domains/tlds. I wanted an opinion on the future of .co domains. We own a gift company (www.xperiencedays.com), as well as a gift recommendation site (www.uniquegifts.net), and invested in a few gift occasion .co domains (www.birthdaygifts.co, christmasgifts.co etc). This was partly because they were cheap and easy to come by, but also with a hope that they soon gain some public recognition. My question therefore is whether anyone within SEOMOZ has an opinion on whether .co will be widely accepted, whether they will (as google claims) be treated as a non-country specific url, and early success stories you know of, and finally whether the recent news from Overstock to rebrand as O.co (http://www.overstock.com/guides/faqs-about-o-co) is the kick start that .co need. I realize that is more than one question
Algorithm Updates | | bigtimeseo2