Should I block google indexing "search.php"
-
My question is I have a search page on our website , you can search by date, number of people staying and so on, I am just wondering should block this in the robots.txt ? Because we have pretty URL'S already for searching by county and searching by towns. I cannot see any benefit of having e.g
"search/search.php?sp_dateFrom=16%2F12%2F2015&sp_dateTo=23%2F12%2F2015&sec_drop%5B%5D=727&spesh_town_id=764&q=&occupants=5&bedrooms=3&submit=SEARCH#search" indexed. Would I be correct in doing this ?
-
Second confirmation ;-), he's right. It's one of the things that for bigger sites really could get you in trouble.
-
That is the answer I was looking for, I was thinking along those lines. The problem was that Seo software was coming up with duplicate content because of different variations of the search parameters. Thanks very much for a clear and precise answer and taking time to explain this.
-
You want to block Google from any URL that produces a search result that is essentially a resorting or refiltering of a master list of search results that they have already crawled/indexed.
If you already have a set of pages that lets Google crawl all the pages in your site (could be all the products in your store, all the articles in your blog, etc), having Google crawl through variants of that same page causes a couple of problems. 1) You are wasting Google's time in spidering pages that it has already seen, vs having Google crawl your more important pages. Depending on how you have these setup, you may end up sending Google into an endless loop of non-important pages to crawl 2) You are creating pages that are generally low quality, have nothing truly original on them, they will not rank for anything anyway and may give the impression that your site consists of primarily low quality pages.
What I show Google is a single simple path to browse my content. For a blog this would be a chronological listing of articles that is paginated so that Google and the user can browse from my most recent to my oldest articles. For an ecommerce page, I might setup basic category pages, make sure the category pages have great content on them and then allow Google to crawl back through all the products based on those main category pages. If I have some products in 2 or 3 categories I do not sweat it. If on either of these examples, I show the user options to resort, filter, etc the results, I block Google with a nofollow or with robots.txt.
In your example, you already have "pretty" URLs by country and town, keep those, that will let Google and your users find your content and also provide context around that content. The crazy a$$ search URL you show is handy for your PHP code to give a search result, but would just waste Google's time. Unless you think it would be useful for a user to save the search URL results, I would see if there is a way to simply hide all the parameters from the user (submit the parameters using a POST vs a GET request for example) so that all they see in the URL result is /search/search.php
Good luck!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Virtual URL Google not indexing?
Dear all, We have two URLs: The main URL which is crawled both by GSC and where Moz assigns our keywords is: https://andipaeditions.com/banksy/ The second one is called a virtual url by our developpers: https://andipaeditions.com/banksy/signedandunsignedprintsforsale/ This is currently not indexed by Google. We have been linking to the second URL and I am unable to see if this is passing juice/anything on to the main one /banksy/ Is it a canonical? The /banksy/ is the one that is being picked up in serps/by Moz and worry that the two similar URLs are splitting the signal. Should I redirect from the second to the first? Thank you
On-Page Optimization | | TAT1000 -
Blocking internal search results
Hello Everyone, Does anyone know how I can block Google from indexing internal search results? Thanks. Ryan
On-Page Optimization | | RyanUK0 -
Google changing my Title
I noticed today that Google is showing a different Title in searches for the homepage. It is showing a title which I believe was active as of late last year or early January. The new title is in the title tag, in Google cache and in MOZ crawls as well. Not sure why it would still be showing a different title in the search and wanted to see if anyone can explain the reason. Thanks
On-Page Optimization | | campaigneast0 -
My website is not indexing the image.
Our website's images are not indexed. Will anyone help me? How will all images in my website be indexed? This is my website address: https://www.expertclipping.com/
On-Page Optimization | | jacky_risham0 -
Google is indexing urls with parameters despite canonical
Hello Moz, Google is indexing lots of urls despite the canonical in my site. Those urls are linked all over the site with parameters like ?, and looks like Google is indexing them despite de canonical. Is Google deciding to index those urls because they are linked all over the site? The canonical tag is well implemented.
On-Page Optimization | | Red_educativa0 -
"Heading 1" vs. "Title" Style for SEO
In Word, you can specify "Heading 1" text which Google presumably treats the same as an HTML tag. Is there any benefit in using the "Title" style? Is it the equivalent of a web page's title?
On-Page Optimization | | BlueLinkERP0 -
Does Archive pages help in indexation of the site?
Hello, we have an argue internally regarding if we should keep the archive pages on a news site or not. Pro Archive pages help indexation of the news. although not all of us are sure about this. Con archive pages receive from none to little traffic archive pages are source of duplicate content, duplicate titles - which we can manage some how but does it worth? What is your opinion on this topic, should we keep it or not? thanks, Irina
On-Page Optimization | | InformMedia0 -
Does link text "more information" have more weight than a normal link?
Does the anchor text "more information" hold any additional weight than any other anchor text? My suspicion is no, but just wanted to confirm.
On-Page Optimization | | nicole.healthline0