Previous keyword overuse on past blog posts: looking for a plan to proceed with new posts
-
My client has multiple office locations around the US. Each location has it's own subdomain for maximum local visibility. For example: "cityname.maindomainname.com"
Each subdomain has it's own blog, and has, up until now, all posts have been key-worded:
"product + city" followed by the blog title
For example: "Life Insurance San Fransisco | 5 Facts to Know"So on each subdomain (location), there are many blog posts done on the same product, in the same city. So they have a series of blog posts with the pattern below (hypothetical examples):
"Life Insurance San Fransisco | Insurance Myths"
"Life Insurance San Fransisco | Which One is for You?"
"Life Insurance San Fransisco | Getting Your Policy Reviewed"
"Life Insurance San Fransisco | Buying From a Reputable Agent"
"Life Insurance San Fransisco | Cancelling Your Policy"The issue I am running into is how do I properly keyword/key-phrase all future blog posts for each location. The same keyword has been used so many times that it seems almost meaningless to continue to use it ("life insurance") even though it's the target product and location the client is trying to rank for. I don't plan on using the formula "product+city," but it would be nice to use the term "life insurance" somewhere in a key phrase or two.
The client's goal, to rank high for their product in each, individual location. I am looking for guidance and advice on what would be the best course of action to achieve the client's desire for increased visibility in their target areas.
An added challenge is the number of cities. Following their current blog posting needs/schedule, they want to do 60 posts a month, one for each city each week (14 cities), so I'll be on the hunt for how to write this many posts without writing duplicate content, but that's for a different question.
So considering the above, if this were your client, how would you proceed?
-
I've just started re-evaluating MozPro again now but from what I recall, there's no way to see a specific scorecard for blog posts.
Blog posts and landing pages have quite different purposes and so keyword targeting does work quite differently as well. Rather than targeting a specific product or serviced based term like "leather shoes seattle", they'll target a particular intent related to it. For example, "best leather dress shoes in seattle" or even broader, perhaps offer advice - "10 tips to having your old leather shoes looking like new".
Clearly terrible titles but you get the picture!
Rand did a Whiteboard Friday some time ago on a relevant topic that you might find helpful. Essentially what he's saying there is that getting the targetted terms into the title and through the content is kind of important, but not more important than the user experience.
Also, don't worry too much about what Yoast has to say either. It can be a handy guide sometimes but just because it's highlighting something doesn't necessarily mean you have to do it. It's a confusing industry huh? I suppose if it was easy, everyone would be doing it!
-
Thank you very much for your answer. Yes, this is exactly what I needed to hear. One question, I am fairly new to the industry and am a little confused as to how the Moz keyword ranking fits into the 'don't write for a particular keyword' idea. When you write:
"Blog posts should absolutely have a target audience and perhaps a common search phrase in mind, but they shouldn't really have a keyword focus like other pages on your site - there should never be a post that's built around the phrase Insurance San Francisco for example."
Are you saying we should not choose a specific keyword (or keyphrase) to build the post around (even if we barely use the keyword in the post and focus on the message around that keyword)? When I have Moz evaluate a blog post, there is a long list of keyword optimization advice. I am using WordPress with Yoast to post the blogs, and there is also heavy focus on keyword optimization. How does the lack of keyword focus and the Moz/Yoast optimization advice fit together?
-
Yes, that is what I would do.
-
Thank you very much for your response. You touch on several points I was actually thinking but had not put it into concrete terms like that. You are right, I doubt if anyone is going to share or discuss the current posts. I am tempted to suggest they remove all the previously published posts and start fresh, especially since they are not ranking for anything at this time. Do you think this would be a good idea?
-
Hi there!
If this were my client, I'd be having a very serious and educational chat about the direction the campaign is headed and strip it back to basics. The below suggestions assume the site doesn't currently rank anywhere that's going to bring them any real volume of traffic.
Remove the Subdomains Subdomains are treated as separate websites so sanfrancisco.website.com is viewed as a completely different website to seattle.website.com. While that may be ok for the end user, what this means for optimisation is 2 different link building campaigns, two sets of content (both of which need to be unique and still genuinely valuable) and 2 sets of ranking signals.
You mentioned they have 14 locations set out like this so what you've actually got is 14x the work needed. Honestly, this is not a good use of your time or their budget.
Remove the Spammy Blog Posts The reality is, nobody is likely to actually read a series of blog posts that are so blatantly keyword heavy. The most probable outcome is that users will be given a very low quality vibe and steer clear of the brand in the future.
Also, having that much keyword spam on your site is playing with fire. It doesn't provide a good user experience and search engines these days are easily capable of understanding exactly the aim.
Blog Posts Don't Target Keywords
Blog posts should absolutely have a target audience and perhaps a common search phrase in mind, but they shouldn't really have a keyword focus like other pages on your site - there should never be a post that's built around the phrase Insurance San Francisco for example.
Focus Your Time; Work on the Primary Domain
As I touched on above, splitting your time across 14 subdomains is not a great use of your time or their budget at all. Rather than trying to churn out 60 low quality blog posts from questionable sources to meet this arbitrary requirement, spend that same time writing 1 or 2 high quality, uniquely valuable posts each week then promoting them through various channels like social media, influencer outreach etc. It's going to give you far better quality signals than huge amounts of rubbish across 14 subdomains.
More importantly, this approach gives users a reason to stay on your site and build that crucial rapport. in the insurance industry, people tend to shop around and do their research for a bit before they commit to the purchase and swamping them in keyword spam is not a way to build that relationship.
Go Back to Basics
From my experience, any site that's in this bad shape is probably going to have a lot of other fundamental issues (thin, keyword heavy content, a terrible backlink profile, poorly structured and keyword heavy navigation etc) that really should be addressed before even thinking about blog posts.
If this were my client I'd be treating it like a brand new website and going from the top. Ignore the domains and plan to take them offline, plan the site architecture and nav then get to work on improving the site one element at a time with a heavy focus on the user experience and the real end goal (traffic that converts) rather than keywords and SERP position.
You can rank #1 all day long but if your site is heavily spammy, it isn't going to convert!
That's probably not what you wanted to hear and perhaps not the sort of info that you're looking for here but to be honest, I think any further time that gets tipped into forging ahead with those spammy subdomains is time very poorly spent. I hope you find it helpful either way!
It may be that the client is very reluctant to such a drastic change so it would take a very strong educational approach and, if they're financially driven, focus on the fact that optimising a single site, they need to pay you to do less work for more return; "more for less".
-
they want to do 60 posts a month, one for each city each week (14 cities), so I'll be on the hunt for how to write this many posts without writing duplicate content, but that's for a different question.
If this gig was offered to me, my first goal would be to see if someone should upset the apple cart. My hunch is that they are wasting their time.
It sounds like they have a ton of light weight content on this website. If they want 60 blog posts per month a person could not generate anything but mindless prattle. So, I would get into the analytics to see just how much traffic all of that past content is pulling in from Google. Then, how much of that is from client's target market. I bet people there will be really disappointed.
I bet it will look like this..... "During the past 12 months the entire mass of these blogs pulled in just six visitors from search and all of them bounced. They probably are not getting any sales or traction out of this content. Nobody is sharing it. Nobody is talking about it. Everyone who lands on it leaves.
I'll probably get their attention when I give them the news. I'll either get the job or I will be on my butt, on the concrete, in front of their San Francisco life insurance office.
You don't earn great rankings or traffic from Google by publishing a ton or rubbish. You get great rankings by publishing a few ounces of gold. If I get the job the strategy will change from rubbish to gold and we will publish a dozen posts per year. We will also restructure the website away from subdomains and into folders.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Keyword Over-usage?
I have a photography page, where there are a number of galleries. In the galleries and thumbnails of each photo I'm selling. These also include the title. It's built dynamically. However, I've noticed when I do an on-page grade check, that one of the places I'm failing is over-using the keyword on the page. This is mainly due to the titles of each photo containing that keyword. For example, there might be a photo gallery for images of the Golden Gate Bridge in San Francisco, and 30 of the 40 images on the page have a title with "Golden Gate Bridge" in them. So naturally, the title is displaying this on the page and showing up 30+ times (after the term is used in the page text as well). Is this a really big problem, or is the benefit on each individual photo page outweighing any hit on the gallery page? Any thoughts? Thanks!
Keyword Research | | shannmg10 -
How to choose a Keyword
I searched around for this answer first but got information overload. I write a photography blog and tonight I will put up a post of photography from around Jiyugaoka Train Station. I will probably call the post Around Jiyugaoka Station or Around Jiyugaoka or something like that. I like in Jiyugaoka (a part of Tokyo) so I have other posts that I have keyworded for Jiyugaoka. What is the best way to determine what is the best derivative of 'Jiyugaoka Station' to choose for the best traffic? I assume I could enter them in to manually into the Keyword Analysis but is there is easier way that would give recommendations?
Keyword Research | | ShootTokyo0 -
Question about ranking for long tail keywords
So I am looking at some long tail keywords for my web design company, for example: "website development and design company" The top results are websites that are not optimized for that specific keyword but about "web design & development" in general. The top ranking sites also have quite high PA with lots of links. If I were to create a page specifically about that term would it be fairly easy to rank for since the top ranking pages are not optimized for that keyword?
Keyword Research | | WebAdvancedUK0 -
How can I do to improve ranking for head keywords?
Hi guys, I'm currently working for an italian restautant finder web site http://www.cibando.com The site currently do not rank for any of the cityName pages eventhough all this pages received a B grade in the on-page report card by Seo Moz and have a great amount of internal links. This is an example of the pages I'm speaking about: http://www.cibando.com/ita/ristoranti/milano/milano As I can changeso little on this page, I'm thinking about creatinng a new cityName page having this URL http://www.cibando.com/ita/ristoranti-milano in which I add some text about the city and the restaurants people can have dinner at and add some link to the currently cityName page and categoryCuisine page. Is it a good idea? Do oyu have any suggestions? Any expert out there give an insight? Thanks in advance. Francesca
Keyword Research | | Francy0 -
Help finding some decent keywords
Anyone care to help a SEO Newbie find a couple of key words that would be easier to rank for for my website that provides kayak fishing information? mysite: yakangler.com The key words that I've identified are as follows: best kayak
Keyword Research | | mr_w
fishing from a kayak
fishing kayak review
fishing kayaks
kayak and fishing
kayak fishing
kayak for fishing
kayak reviews
kayak rigging
kayak weight limit
kayaks fishing
kayaks for fishing But I'm worried I'm missing the point, I don't see hardly any traffic from most of these. I've really tried to rank for "kayak fishing" but seem to be totally lost in the Google Panda abyss. Any advice on a different word or strategy would be greatly appreciated!0 -
How do I make sure my homepage ranks better than my 2nd page when I need the same keywords for both? I don't want them competing against each other for keywords.
I seen here on SeoMoz something about more than one page having the same keywords so they don't compete against each other for the same keywords that makes sense to me. But I would like my main page (homepage) to be ranked better over time rather than the 2nd page or do I just not care about the second page ranking at all and don't SEO the page very well? ,Both pages have similar content so I need the keywords for both. So im very confused on what to do with the second page. Thanks in advance to any helpful answers, i am a newbie when it comes to SEO.
Keyword Research | | DreamKandy0 -
Google Keyword Estimator
Hello Does the Google traffic estimator include the impact of instant? For example, if I type the phrase "London restaurant", instant may provide a list of search results for the phrase "London restaurant guide" prior to me confirming whether or not I just want to search using the phrase "London restaurant". Is this registered in any way as a search for the phrase "London restaurant guide" (i.e. does Instant impact upon the search volumes presented in the Google traffic estimator)? In addition, is there any up to date assessment on how reliable the revised traffic estimator is? The tool currently suggests that for a well known brand we are working for does not have any search volume (over a whole year) for the brand keyphrase when used in isolation (there is traffic for various combinations of the brand and a generic term). However, as one would expect, our analytics data is showing that there are in excess of 1 million annual visitors that use the brand keyphrase in isolation to access the website via natural search and nearly 1.5 million via PPC. Is anyone else getting these problems? Thanks in advance for any assistance. Rgds Neil
Keyword Research | | mccormackmorrison1