Why has my site dropped to page 2?
-
I haven't been paying attention to my sites SERP for the past year, and only realized I've dropped to page 2 on a keyword search.
Specifically, on Google.ca, searching the keywords "wedding invitations"
My site, www.stephita.com, used to consistently rank in the top 3 links. While my competitors have leapfrogged me.
I realized that my site wasn't "mobile-friendly", and had a few other issues like keyword stuffing, long meta descriptions and titles. I've fixed these issues "now", but wanted to know does this mean my site was severely penalized by the Panda/Penguin updates for the last few years?
Does having a PR3 site mean anything? My competitors who our rank me on SERP, are all PR1 sites.
Greatly appreciate any feedback you can give me!
-
Yes, I've removed all the "shortcuts" of bad thin content now.
But I'm a little confused by your comment:
But anyone who looks closely at these cookie cutter pages will see that the wording is awkward, the photos don't match the names or the colors listed, and problems like Oren & Bar Mitzvah sneak in.
Do you see something in particular that is bringing this to your attention?
-
When a site is hit by Panda, most pages of the site suffer a rankings decline. There are different levels of Panda severity. Sometimes the losses might be just a couple of positions, other times the losses might drop many positions.
You seem to have a nice business and you've gotten away with using shortcuts to create your content for a while. But anyone who looks closely at these cookie cutter pages will see that the wording is awkward, the photos don't match the names or the colors listed, and problems like Oren & Bar Mitzvah sneak in.
It's time to invest the time needed to do a proper job. That's what most people who have Panda problems and want to get out of them are doing.
-
As always, I appreciate your knowledgeable feedback on these issues.
I'm cleaning up my site, and removing some of the 'black-hat' SEO techniques that I had thought worked 5 years ago... I had created a script to generate "doorway" pages on my site.
i.e., if you searched "wedding invitations" + random city, like "wedding invitations thornhill, wedding invitations richmond hill, wedding invitations brampton, etc...
http://www.stephita.com/wedding/invitations/thornhill
http://www.stephita.com/wedding/invitations/richmond+hill
http://www.stephita.com/wedding/invitations/brampton
My site is listed on the first page for most of these "wedding invitation city" type searches.
Assuming my site has already been "Panda Demoted", does it make sense that these links are still on the first page for those "long tail searches"? Is it because of these specific pages that my site's index page (www.stephita.com) has been demoted in SERP when searching for the broader "wedding invitations" locally? ** I hope I am making sense here **
I used to have links in the footer and sitemap that would lead crawlers to these "doorway pages", but I have removed all traces of it from the site now. How long will the pre-existing indexed pages live in their results? Should I take steps to pro-actively remove them?
-
Is it re-calculated daily, or only when there are Panda updates (how often?)?
Nobody knows how often google injects new Panda evaluations into the ranking results. It's really irrelevant because the sooner you improve the content of your website the sooner your visitors will have a quality experience. Thin pages can produce a negative impression of your business on the visitor, especially when your competitors have done an excellent job.
**I'm just thinking in the case where I create 1000 product display pages, does that mean I would really need to write 1000 content HEAVY pages? **
Generous content is the cost of becoming competitive. The fact that you realize that and make it happen gives you a huge advantage over your competitors.
**If my site is built 80% product pages, and I suddenly add the NOINDEX meta tag, will that negatively impact the result? **
Nobody really knows the answer to this. If I had a site that was 80% thin product pages, I would delete them instead of noindexing such a large part of the site. Each time you improve one into a good substantive page and publish it, that page will become and asset that pulls traffic and converts visitors.
Is there a "magic number" of number of words to make it a suitable content page?
Since you have a walk-in store, you probably have a lot of experience with customers. Take that experience and produce a page that explains the product, answers common questions, counters objections, explains the questions that they should have asked but didn't.
My main focus for any searchers is to reach my main index page.
I don't agree with that goal. Most of the people who purchase from my sites never see the homepage. They land on a product page from search and add an item to the cart. They might land on an article that I have written and use a house ad or a link to my store and then buy the product. I am quite confident that if many of these customers landed on naked pages I would have never gotten their business.
-
If you remove all your thin content you are sure to bypass panda and you wouldn't be penalized.
And there aren't really a magic number of number of words to make a suitable content page but make sure that the html and content ratio is 70% to 30%.
-
I'll make an effort to improve the THIN content pages. Assuming I've "fixed" all issues that the Panda Algo doesn't like - how "soon/long" would it take to be "out of demotion". Is it re-calculated daily, or only when there are Panda updates (how often?)?
Is there anyway to flag a "product page" so that Panda wouldn't look at it? I'm just thinking in the case where I create 1000 product display pages, does that mean I would really need to write 1000 content HEAVY pages? -- Sorry, I just realized there is the META NOINDEX method...
If my site is built 80% product pages, and I suddenly add the NOINDEX meta tag, will that negatively impact the result? Or would that benefit me in this situation? It was never my intention for any searchers to land on any direct product page. My main focus for any searchers is to reach my main index page.
Is there a "magic number" of number of words to make it a suitable content page? (i.e. NOT-THIN)
I really appreciate you helping me out with this!
-
Would Google penalize me for having THIN content then?
I would be very surprised if your site does not currently have a Panda demotion. Most of the links in your persistent navigation lead to thin content. If you decide to improve these pages it is really important that the content be unique, very different from page to page and substantive.
Another method of escaping Panda is to remove thin content from the site. Here is an article by Marie Haynes that explains how a couple sites improved after thin content removal.
Lastly, does PageRank matter anymore? My site was a PR3 - does that matter when the other local competitors that have leapfrogged me are all PR1s?
PageRank can be important. However, your search results are heavily influenced by the geographic location of the searcher and their distance from your location.
If I owned your site, my priorities would be to improve it by a combination of content writing and thin content removal, then put my main effort into optimizing and promoting my site for local search.
-
Thanks for giving me a better understanding of how Panda works.
I agree, I'm targeting my local market, but I noticed when using "google.ca" (vs. .com) Searching for the keywords "wedding invitations" (without Toronto), does yield a few of my local competitors (along with the big boys like vistaprint) that have leapfrogged me this past year....
So if my site had, hypothetically speaking, 1000s of product pages, but with a simple one line description, along with photo and price to be simple. Would Google penalize me for having THIN content then?
Lastly, does PageRank matter anymore? My site was a PR3 - does that matter when the other local competitors that have leapfrogged me are all PR1s?
-
Panada is a part of the Google algorithm that looks at the quality of a website. If a website has lots of duplicate pages or thin content pages then Google will demote the rankings of the entire website.
Google's recommended way of fixing the problem is to improve the content of those pages by adding substantive, relevant, unique content that is useful for the visitors. You could easily do this for your site. It will simply take a dedicated effort to improve those pages.
Will that enable you to compete effectively with vistaprint, etsy, partycity and others? I am not optimistic it will.
However, you might be able to optimize and promote your site so that it appears in local searches such as "toronto wedding invitations". I see you on the first page, but with some work and investment you might be able to get a better position on both the page and the map results.
-
Thanks for your feedback!
Yes, I agree, I feel that my page 1 placement was more due to my searches based on my geographic location. That is my biggest concern at the moment, that other customers in my area are not finding my site anymore.
I'll definitely remove those footer links that serve very little purpose other than to direct users to content that they can get from the main navigation.
To get a better idea of how Panda works, or Google Search Algo in general... does it look at my site as a "whole" when it scores the value of sending users to my index page?
For pages on my site that obviously are only meant as a "product" with simple photo, sku and price. Does that mean it would see it as very thin content, and penalize my site as a whole?
-
The query "wedding invitations" is quite competitive.
If I look at the .ca SERPs I see well-known, highly deserving, world class brands at the top such as vistaprint, etsy, zazzle, partycity.
Your site is on page three for me.
Perhaps when you searched in the past, Google delivered some personalized SERPs on the basis of your past browsing history or on the basis of your geographic location.
Is your site penalized? It would not surprise me if you have a Panda problem. There are a lot of thin content pages on your site. Clicking on the keyword links in the footer of the site yields pages with an image, a name, and really nothing more. Many of the links in the top navigation produce pages that are about the same. If you don't have a Panda problem yet, you will probably have one soon.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Should Multi Location Businesses "Local Content Silo" Their Services Pages?
I manage a site for a medical practice that has two locations. We already have a location page for each office location and we have the NAP for both locations in the footer of every page. I'm considering making a change to the structure of the site to help it rank better for individual services at each of the two locations, which I think will help pages rank in their specific locales by having the city name in the URL. However, I'm concerned about diluting the domain authority that gets passed to the pages by moving them deeper in the site's structure. For instance, the services URLs are currently structured like this: www.domain.com/services/teeth-whitening (where the service is offered in each of the two locations) Would it make sense to move to a structure more like www.domain.com/city1name/teeth-whitening www.domain.com/city2name/teeth-whitening Does anyone have insight from dealing with multi-location brands on the best way to go about this?
Local Website Optimization | | formandfunctionagency1 -
One locations page, or multiple pages?
Hi, I represent a franchisor who does all marketing- including local seo- for our franchisees. I've read a lot about local SEO and understand the basics, but have some remaining questions. 1- If our typical territories are quite large and encompass more than one major city, should we create multiple location pages for the same franchise owner? I believe the answer should be yes from an SEO stand point, but the problem is that most of our franchisees naturally just have one business address (their home). Since PO boxes and virtual offices aren't the way to go, what's the best course of action? And when I say major cities, I'm really talking about major cities (and not just small towns/boroughs). Can they just use a friend's/relative's address? 2- There's a lot of info out there about "locations pages," but it's not really clear whether or not you should really just have ONE page for each location, or several pages with different content? For instance, it looks like a lot of businesses are creating just one, "home-page" looking landing page for their individual locations, with everything from services to testimonials on just that one page. Is this preferred over creating several different local pages for that one location? The latter is what we currently do. From the user stand-point, it looks like each franchise location has it's own "mini website" on our main website. For instance, a landing page optimized for the local business name, a local services page, a project/photo gallery page, local review page, etc. It seems like a lot less work just building one landing page for each location, but is the payoff the same? I'm torn between the two strategies- is it really worth the extra work (in terms of traffic + local ranking) to build out the individual pages for the one location? Thanks Moz Community!
Local Website Optimization | | kimberleymeloserpa0 -
Should I use Rel-Canonicals links for a News site with similar articles each year
Our small town news site provides coverage in a lot of seasonal areas, and we're struggling with the current year's content ranking above previous years. For instance, every year we cover the local high school football team, and create 2-3 articles per game. We'll also have some articles preseason with upcoming schedule and general team "talk". We've seen where articles from past seasons will rank higher than the current season, presumably because the older articles have more links to them from other sources (among other factors). We don't want to delete these old articles and 301 them to the newer article, since most articles include information/stories about specific players...and their families don't want the article to ever come down. Should we rel-canonical the older articles to the newer one, or perhaps to the "high school football" category page? If to the category page, should we rel-canonical even the new articles to that main category page? Thanks for the help.
Local Website Optimization | | YourMark.com0 -
Landing page, or redirect? Looking for feedback.
If we have a section of our site that we have branded separately from the rest of the site, does it make sense to provide a landing page on our current, high authority site that has content and links off to the separate site, or would just a domain.com/keyword redirect to the page be a better route? Does it matter? I have an idea, but I'd like to get feedback on this. We are a newspaper, http://billingsgazette.com and we have an auto branded site called http://montanawheelsforyou.com. The URL and branding is fubar. We're wondering if we can increase the ranking if we swapped out the http://billingsgazette.com/autos from a redirect to http://montanawheelsforyou.com to a landing page with content and a link to http://montanawheelsforyou.com.
Local Website Optimization | | rachaelpracht0 -
How do I set up 2 businesses that work together but are ran seperately with two separate websites but similar content?
How do I set up these sites so that they will not be negatively affecting their SEO efforts? I have 2 businesses with the same owner. Business A manufactures nurse call systems and Business B installs them. They are run separately with two websites. The content is very similar because the business that installs them describes the different products on their website. These are the two sites: intercallsystems.com and nursecallny.com , My thought was on nursecallny.com when you click on the nav link "Nurse Call Systems" you would be directed to the intercell website. Would this be the best method? Thank you for your help!
Local Website Optimization | | renalynd270 -
What is the optimal approach for a new site that has geo-targeted content available via 2 domains?
OK, so I am helping a client with a new site build. It is a lifestyle/news publication that traditionally has focused on delivering content for one region. For ease of explanation, let's pretend the brand/domain is 'people-on-the-coast.com'. Now they are now looking to expand their reach to another region using the domain 'people-in-the-city.com'. Whilst on-the-coast is their current core business and already has some search clout, they are very keen on the city market and the in-the-city domain. They would like to be able to manage the content through one CMS (joomla) and the site will deliver articles and the logo based on the location of the user (city or coast). There will also be cases where the content is duplicated for both regions. The design/layout etc. will all remain identical. So what I am really wanting to know is the pros, cons and ultimately the best approach to handle the setup and ongoing management from an SEO (and UX) perspective. All I see is problems! Any help would be greatly appreciated! Thanks,
Local Website Optimization | | bennyt
Confused O.o0 -
Local Business Schema Markup on every page?
Hello, I have two questions..if someone could shed some light on the topic, I would be so very grateful! 1. I am still making my way through how schema is employed, and as I can tell, it is much more specific (and therefore relevant) in its details than using the data highlighter tool. Is this true? 2. Most of my clients' sites have a footer with the local business info included on every page of their site (address and phone). This said, I have been using the structured data markup helper to add local business schema to home page, and then including the footer markup in the footer file so that every page benefits from the local business markup. Is this incorrect to use it for every page? Also, I noticed that by just using the footer markup for the rest of the pages in the site, I am missing data that was included when I manually went through the index page (i.e. image, url, name of business). Could someone tell me if it is advisable and worth it to manually markup every page for the local business schema or if that should just be used for certain pages such as location, contact us, and/or index? Any tips or help would be greatly appreciated!!! Thanks
Local Website Optimization | | lfrazer0 -
Single Site For Multiple Locations Or Multiple Sites?
Hi, Sorry if this rambles on. There's a few details that kind of convolute this issue so I'll try and be as clear as possible. The site in question has been online for roughly 5 years. It's established with many local citations, does well in local SERPs (working on organic results currently), and represents a business with 2 locations in the same county. The domain is structured as location1brandname.com. The site was recently upgraded from a 6-10 page static HTML site with loads of duplicate content and poor structure to a nice, clean WordPress layout. Again, Google is cool with it, everything was 301'd properly, and our rankings haven't dropped (some have improved). Here's the tricky part: To properly optimize this site for our second location, I am basically building a second website within the original, but customized for our second location. It will be location1brandname.com/secondcity and the menu will be unique to second-city service pages, unique NAP on footer, etc. I will then update our local citations with this new URL and hopefully we'll start appearing higher in local SERPs for the second-city keywords that our main URL isn't currently optimized for. The issue I have is that our root domain has our first city location in the domain and that this might have some negative effect on ranking for the second URL. Conversely, starting on a brand new domain (secondcitybrandname.com) requires building an entire new site and being brand new. My hunch is that we'll be fine making root.com/secondcity that locations homepage and starting a new domain, while cleaner and compeltely separate from our other location, is too much work for not enough benefit. It seems like if they're the same company/brand, they should be on the same sitee. and we can use the root juice to help. Thoughts?
Local Website Optimization | | kirmeliux0