Google can't discern the identity of my site
-
I have a website, http://NewYorkJazzEvents.com, that promotes jazz bands that are available for brides looking to hire a jazz band to perform at their wedding, or event planners looking to hire a jazz band to perform for a corporate event, etc. This identity, that my site is an Entertainment Agency, is made clear by all of the content on my site, as well as all of the content on its associated sites (such as its linked Facebook, YouTube, and Google Business pages, and many local citations). Yet, contrary to all of this data, the mere presence of the word "events" in my URL and business name has led Google to believe that my site is a Live Jazz Guide, i.e., a site that lists public performances of jazz groups in New York City.
The problem, then, is that Google displays the site when people search for local events listings, and not when they search for jazz bands to contract for private events.
For example, do a search for "jazz bands new york" and up pops the listings for sites catering to searchers looking to hire bands for private events, like Gigmasters, Gigsalad, right at the top of the list, followed by lots of individual bands. My site is buried (in my results, anyway), on the middle of page 2. (My paid Adwords ad, on the other hand, shows up at the top of paid ads.): https://www.dropbox.com/s/sv4we4gvnb6wkyb/Screenshot%202016-04-11%2019.22.40.png?dl=0
Now do a search for "new york jazz events." Boom! I'm #1 in the natural results, and, unlike in the search for "new york jazz band," my Google plus page and map (or is it the "knowledge graph"?) display right at the top of the right column: https://www.dropbox.com/s/nob24x1b8u1g4or/Screenshot%202016-04-11%2019.18.49.png?dl=0. (Pretty useless to people searching for live jazz listings in New York, though.)
(This, by the way, is an additional related frustration: why does Google display all of its local information (its map, links to my Google reviews, etc.) next to my site listing when people are searching for events, but but hides this valuable information next to my site listing when people are search for jazz bands (when my site comes up on page 2)?)
For a further confirmation of Google's confusion, see this data from Google that indicates the top search queries that it is using to display my site are centered around searches for local live jazz listings: Google Search Console > Search Traffic > Search Analytics > Queries: https://www.dropbox.com/s/t8blxv6a077iuw6/Screenshot%202016-03-07%2012.28.38.png?dl=0
See also see this data from Google that indicates that it see "events" (which it understands as local live jazz listings) rather than "new york jazz bands" as the essential keyword describing the identity of the site: Google Search Console > Google Index > Content Keywords: https://www.dropbox.com/s/6nk6skfgx9zjzgc/Screenshot%202016-03-07%2012.46.04.png?dl=0
It's been this way for several years. I thought Google was supposed to be smart, but it's pretty dumb in this case (all the other search engines, including Bing, are quite a bit more intelligent). All this trouble, essentially from a word within a URL?
Does anyone have an idea of the cause of this issue, and any potential cures? What can I do to clear up Google's confusion?
-
That's great, Chuck. So glad you found someone you might work with. Hope it works out really well!
-
Thanks again Ruth and Miriam, for all of your advice.
I've gone through the list of Moz recommended SEO consultants that Miriam linked to and found someone that I'd like to work with. Hopefully (assuming he's available) he'll be able to set me on the most efficient and cost-effective path to move forward.
-
I understand how hard attracting links can be, especially in a niche market. Building a solid inbound link profile often takes (even) more than being the best - it requires a lot of outreach and promotion. This is another area where an SEO professional might be able to help, because link outreach can be really time-consuming. I would recommend that you vet someone VERY carefully before engaging them to build links. Some things to watch out for:
Red flags:
- Guarantees (X links per month, etc)
- Buying links
- Placing links on networks of sites
- Mass directory submissions (although submitting to useful, relevant, human-curated directories can be worthwhile, it's an area to tread cautiously on)
Basically you want someone who is going to promote your business online with an eye toward attracting great links. It can be a very outreach- and relationship-based approach similar to PR in a lot of ways. Moz' Recommended list is a good place to start, and I personally recommend Jon Cooper from Point Blank SEO as person I know who is the best at this.
-
Hi Ruth,
Thanks very much for your advice. I've actually done your first suggestion (removing every possible instance of the word "events" within the text of the site). The 2nd is something I'll try as a last effort before rebranding. Thanks very much for the link to the Moz resource. So far as the third idea, attracting links, I'm in such a niche submarket that I've found that even though the site is the best (and more or less the only) of its kind, and already fairly loaded with relevant and useful content already, it doesn't attract any links, even though many related people (venues, party planners, photographers, caterers, etc.) have become familiar with it over the years.
-
I think Miriam has some great suggestions. Some other things to try, if you're not quite ready to move your site (or in addition to moving your site):
- Remove as many instances of the word "Events" from your site as you can. Replace them, where it makes sense to do so, with a more relevant keyword. This will be somewhat damaging to your brand if you are committed to the business name "New York Jazz Events," but may help reduce the "Events" signal you're sending.
- Look into markup with schema.org. Here's an intro to it on the Moz Learn section: https://mza.seotoolninja.com/learn/seo/schema-structured-data. Marking up your data will help Google further understand what you do and don't do. This is another area where you may want to bring in a professional SEO consultant, since it can be a bit fiddly to implement.
- Create additional content around finding a jazz band, and try to build some more topical authority in that area by attracting links from other sites about jazz bands/finding a band for your event.
Good luck!
-
Hey Chuck,
Want to be sure to highlight here that I'm not saying the domain is the only reason for what you're experiencing. There could be more to this that a full audit of your website would discover. But it does seem like an obvious signal. Also not suggesting you have to use an EMD if you rebrand, but my gut feeling on this is that Google is correlating the word 'events' with their concept of what an event is (Google has even used Events as part of their Plus offerings to let people publish upcoming events).
So ... before you jump into a re-brand solely based on one idea from my first-glance look at your website, I'd really urge you to consider hiring a good SEO company to conduct a full audit of the website and the issue. Rebranding is a major undertaking! You might consider looking through our Recommend List here at Moz for companies with good reputations:
https://mza.seotoolninja.com/rand/recommended-list-seo-consultants/
And I'm hoping you'll receive further feedback from the community
-
Hi Miriam,
Thanks for your response. I agree that that's what's probably happening. What I don't understand is the complete failure of Google's supposed sophistication, as described in the WhiteBoard Friday. The word "Events" on its own, is ambiguous; in one context, it could mean a wedding or corporate event, in another it could mean a concert, etc. The context of the content on my site and all the related sites that link to it makes the meaning unambiguously clear. Any visitor who even glances at the home page, much less everything else, gets it within seconds. The other search engines get it too. But Google doesn't.
You're right, I'm at a desperate enough at this stage right now to rebrand as an unambiguous string of keywords, NewYorkJazzBands. But that's not a brand (as is/was NewYorkJazzEvents), its a string of keywords, and will be perceived so by searchers. I also thought this is the sort of thing Google tries to discourage you from doing. But clearly, Google interprets the keywords in my current URL as superseding all the hundreds of other signals put together, so if that's what I need to do, I'll do it. At least I'll be in the running in the correct results for the correct search terms…
-
Hey Chuck,
At first glance, I'd say your domain name (http://NewYorkJazzEvents.com) would be sending a very strong signal to Google that your website is promoting jazz events in NY ... not that you are promoting wedding bands. Your case might well be one of the rare ones that calls for re-branding, but I'd also recommend spending a few minutes watching this recent WhiteBoard Friday which relates highly to the topic of how Google evaluates the quality of content:
https://mza.seotoolninja.com/blog/google-may-analyze-evaluate-quality-content-whiteboard-friday
Hope this helps and that you'll get lots of good feedback from others in the community.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
How does Google read multiple Geo Shape Schema Mark Up?
Hi Guys, I posted a question recently about "Can I have multiple areaServed mark up on one domain?" and the responses I got was no. My client work predominantly in the South East of England in specific towns, so I wanted to be able to list all the areas they service. However, after being told no, I went ahead anyway and put in multiple areaServed markup on the page to see if this generates any errors and it isn't when I run it through the Structured Data Testing Tool. I don't get any errors by doing this, so hurray! But... What I want to understand (which I can't find the answer anywhere), is if this is okay, and how will Google read my markup? Will Google see that we are in multiple areas across the SE of England and push my content up before other sites, or is this just going to confused Google? By putting in all these areas into the website as multiple locations, will Google identify that person X in area Y fits the areaServed mark up I've added and push my content to them? Overall... has anyone else used multiple areaServed markup and can validate that this works? hHpEyQf
Local Website Optimization | | Virginia-Girtz1 -
Different variations of my site (www ; non www ; https ; http) have different authority status
In Open Site Explorer I can see that the www and non www versions of my site gets treated differently with one group of links pointing to each version of the same page. This gives a different PA score. eg. http://mydomain.com DA 38 PA 37 http://www.mydomain.com DA 28 PA 27. Currently our preferred variation is https://www.mydomain.com but it used o be http://mydomain.com for 3+ years and I can see that the non www version of my domain have more authority. Would you advise us to "change back" to setting our preferred url as the non www version as before or would it have a negative impact on our SERP ranking etc if we change it again now?
Local Website Optimization | | shaunn140 -
Moving from html to wordpress site - 301's
Hello, I recently took control of my website from a web designer. I have been reading as much as I can regards SEO etc to make long term improvements to my site. The site was a basic 4 page website for a local cleaning company. Consisting of a homepage, services page, testimonial and contact page. The site performed reasonably given it's lack of detail or SEO but probably only because the level of competition isn't great. I am in the process of rebuilding the site in wordpress and with SEO in mind I intend to have more than 1 page regards services. I have 301'd my services.html page to my number 1 keyword term to gain any little link juice that is available. Now to my questions... Should I be doing this with the other pages? Is it worth 301'ing my contact us page? Is there anything to be gained by doing so? Again should I 301 the index.html to the new homepage? Been reading about this and the issues relating to loops etc but cannot find a definite answer regards the need? Last scenario - lets say my testimonials.html page has some link juice would it be beneficial to 301 that to 1 of my new service pages to give that a kick start as opposed to making a less important page like another testimonials page more powerful? Hope this makes sense, I am a beginner just thinking out loud. Thanks
Local Website Optimization | | sfrediktru80 -
Why has my site dropped to page 2?
I haven't been paying attention to my sites SERP for the past year, and only realized I've dropped to page 2 on a keyword search. Specifically, on Google.ca, searching the keywords "wedding invitations" My site, www.stephita.com, used to consistently rank in the top 3 links. While my competitors have leapfrogged me. 😞 I realized that my site wasn't "mobile-friendly", and had a few other issues like keyword stuffing, long meta descriptions and titles. I've fixed these issues "now", but wanted to know does this mean my site was severely penalized by the Panda/Penguin updates for the last few years? Does having a PR3 site mean anything? My competitors who our rank me on SERP, are all PR1 sites. Greatly appreciate any feedback you can give me! 🙂
Local Website Optimization | | TysonWong0 -
How Google's Doorway Pages Update Affects Local SEO
Hey Awesome Local Folks! I thought I'd take a proactive stance and start a thread on the new doorway pages update from Google, as I feel there will be questions coming up about this here in the forum: Here's the update announcement: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2015/03/an-update-on-doorway-pages.html And here's the part that will make local business owners and Local SEOs take a second glance at this: Here are questions to ask of pages that could be seen as doorway pages: Do the pages duplicate useful aggregations of items (locations, products, etc.) that already exist on the site for the purpose of capturing more search traffic? I think this will naturally lead to questions about the practice of creating local/city landing pages. At this point, my prediction is that this will come down to high quality vs. crummy quality pages of this type. In fact, after chatting briefly with Andrew Shotland, I'm leaning a bit toward seeing the above language as being strongly geared toward directory type sites and large franchises. I recommend reading Andrew's post about his take on this, as I think he's on the right track: http://www.localseoguide.com/googles-about-to-close-your-local-doorway-pages/ So, I'm feeling at this point that if you've made the right efforts to develop unique, high quality local landing pages, you should be good unless you are an accidental casualty of an over-zealous update. We'll see! If anyone has thoughts to contribute on this thread, I hope they will, and if lots of questions start coming up about this here in the community, feel free to link back to this thread in helping your fellow community members 🙂 Thanks, all!
Local Website Optimization | | MiriamEllis9 -
Search Result Discrepancy: Keyword "Dresses" shows international sites in the search results of Google.co.in.
Hi All, What would be the reason that Google shows international websites in the first page results while there are huge local players available. Eg: Dresses - Keyword that shows results with almost all the results from International websites whereas the local big players in the same category are not shown. This is not the case for other keywords like Women dresses, Clothing, Shoes etc., Is it a bug or any particular reasons? Thanks,
Local Website Optimization | | Myntra0 -
Duplicate content question for multiple sites under one brand
I would like to get some opinions on the best way to handle duplicate / similar content that is on our company website and local facility level sites. Our company website is our flagship website that contains all of our service offerings, and we use this site to complete nationally for our SEO efforts. We then have around 100 localized facility level sites for the different locations we operate that we use to rank for local SEO. There is enough of a difference between these locations that it was decided (long ago before me) that there would be a separate website for each. There is however, much duplicate content across all these sites due to the service offerings being roughly the same. Every website has it's own unique domain name, but I believe they are all on the same C-block. I'm thinking of going with 1 of 2 options and wanted to get some opinions on which would be best. 1 - Keep the services content identical across the company website and all facility sites, and use the rel=canonical tag on all the facility sites to reference the company website. My only concern here is if this would drastically hurt local SEO for the facility sites. 2 - Create two unique sets of services content. Use one set on the company website. And use the second set on the facility sites, and either live with the duplicate content or try and sprinkle in enough local geographic content to create some differential between the facility sites. Or if there are other suggestions on a better way to handle this, I would love to hear any other thoughts as well. Thanks!
Local Website Optimization | | KHCreative0 -
Do more page links work against a Google SEO ranking when there is only 1 url that other sites will link to?
Say I have a coupon site in a major city and assume there are 20 main locations regions (suburb cities) in that city. Assume that all external links to my site will be to only the home page. www.site.com Assume also that my website business has no physical location. Which scenario is better? 1. One home page that serves up dynamic results based on the user cookie location, but mentions all 20 locations in the content. Google indexes 1 page only, and all external links are to it. 2. One home page that redirects to the user region (one of 20 pages), and therefore will have 20 pages--one for each region that is optimized for that region. Google indexes 20 pages and there will be internal links to the other 19 pages, BUT all external links are still only to the main home page. Thanks.
Local Website Optimization | | couponguy0