Organization name as text vs. as a picture with alt text + Schema.org markup
-
I'm looking for some feedback to implement best practice for the markup of our header/navigation at the top of our site.
Our organization name and a tag line is at the top of every page on the left, then our logo, then our navigation to items like "Topics" "FAQs" "About us" etc is to the right along the top.
Our organization name includes the most frequently searched keyword for what we want to rank on, and our organization name is our domain name.
A couple other background items: we're a non-profit startup and no code is public yet -- hence, I'll be explaining what we're going for. We're coding in straight html/css, not using Wordpress or anything like that.
When we originally DIY coded our draft homepage and a few landing pages, we put the organization name and tag line into the markup as text, to look like this:
Organization name | Pretty | Navigation items over here
Explanatory fun tag line | Cool |
--------------------------------------- | Logo | ---------------------------------------------------------Then we outsourced the markup of two more landing pages to a company that does on-demand orders for responsive markup, based on png's we sent of the designs. The company's code renders a fabulous looking version of our design, and important for usability, it is responsive. The company also did something else I'm not so sure of. They made one big image out of our organization name, tag line and logo ... because? The indenting and different font sizes of the Organization name and tag line was too hard to code in? Or is it just best practice for html standards, SEO, etc. to make it one big logo??
Now, as part of an overall effort I'm working on to reconcile our different code ... I'm mulling right now specifically on reconciling the different approaches we each took and incorporating new best practices for the header ... based on what I'm reading online about headers, including debates about whether to use h1 for your company name, whether using an image for the name is fine, advice about including Schema.org markup for logos, etc.
Given all this, which of these two options look better to you? Do they seem equally good to you? What would you change about the one that looks better to you? What do I have wrong in them? Or would you code this entirely differently to hit all best practices? What do you think about using h1 for organization name vs. is there a better tag to use for the organization name to code it in as text? (Note: we have other h1's on our pages for the actual article/content titles of each page, which maybe we should, maybe we shouldn't be having those as h1's?)
Option 1 -- using text for our name and tag line:
<header id="top" class="brandfont brandcolor">
[# Organization nameExplanatory fun tag line](/)
{navigation code here}
</header>Option 2 -- name, tag line and logo all as one big png image:
<header id="header" class="container">
{navigation code here}
</header> -
Well, thank you so much, I appreciate it. No need to apologize about WordPress man everybody has their own thing. Be pretty boring if everyone had the same tastes.
I think I added this reference twice but not intentionally, however, it's fantastic for schema. I also threw in a copy of one of my favorites the perfect website launch
- https://builtvisible.com/the-future-of-seo-structured-markup/
- https://pantheon.io/sites/default/files/perfect-website-launch-pantheon-ebook_0.pdf
I do believe there are huge positives to sites without databases or decouple WordPress installs are getting exciting.
I thought you might want to check it out as it is a best of both worlds use any code including and HTML and the CMS is utilized as the backend only. Decoupling the perfect blend of CMS and pretty much your choice of languages.
- https://pantheon.io/blog/decoupled-architecture-wordpress-and-drupal
- https://pantheon.io/wordpress/wordpress-enterprise-six-reasons-why
All the best,
Tom
-
Wow, you've put together a wealth of information! Thank you so much. For the community as well, this is a great collection of info about schema.org markup. It is great to get all the links, and it is great to know that you think option 2 is the better option, and it is great to get the additional examples of other schema.org markup. Apologies if I'm a little prickly about Wordpress -- I do use it for some things, but not using it here, so it is fabulous to be able to talk markup in detail with you
-
Okay, I was not trying to imply anything negative when I asked about a CMS.
You can do quite a bit with cookie-cutter WordPress you have tens of thousands of developers working on your side.
because everyone has their opinion so I wish you the very best with your site and I have added something that is great for SEO's of all levels I think it will be helpful.
- https://mza.bundledseo.com/beginners-guide-to-seo
- http://www.seobythesea.com/category/semantic-search/ ( Probably the foremost expert in structured data)
- http://blog.teamtreehouse.com/using-microdata-to-markup-structured-data
- https://clarknikdelpowell.com/blog/google-schema-support-for-logos-and-what-that-means-for-css/
- http://blog.teamtreehouse.com/writing-semantic-microformats-amp-microdata-in-html-markup
- https://builtvisible.com/the-future-of-seo-structured-markup/
- https://builtvisible.com/the-future-of-seo-structured-markup/
- http://tools.ranksider.com/rich-snippets
Knowledge graph important if you want that real estate to the right-hand side of your URL whenever it's queried.
[organization name]
![]([logo image url])
[Website]([website url])
Follow us on [Twitter]([profile url]), [Facebook,]([profile url]) [Google+ and]([profile url]) [LinkedIn]([profile url])."In a site design where your company/org name and logo is at the top of every page on your site, is it better to have your organization name (which contains your most important keyword) and tag line in an h1 within the header than it is to have it in an image file which gives the organization name and tag line as alt text? Or does that not matter to SEO?"
It does not matter except for being aesthetically pleasing. The H1 tag and the logo have two different roles and if there on the site H1 preferably used once with proper keywords. The logos an image, so the alt text is all Google gets in addition to indexing the image naturally. Brand awareness is important, but the logo in the left-hand corner and the logo is attractive to the end-user
"Is there some other tag that's better to use on your organization name in your header other than h1? Better for SEO and/or better for html standards and semantics?"
Use the title tag to reference your organization's name as end-users will see it before they click on your site. This is vital, and I have seen great results combining the title tag with the H1 you can use structured data as well.
"-Is putting your organization name, tag line and logo all together into one big image a best practice? I did not send the developer that as one big png. Only the logo itself was in the png I sent, and I was expecting our organization name and tag line to be coded using css styling to have the tag line indent, not for them to make a new png."
Normally yes that is the best way to do it. I cannot speak for your designer however it sounds like you are asking a designer to create CSS when you are a developer that prefers to hand build. You are going to have to work that one out with them. site speed is always affected when you add numerous CSS files. Combine them and minify them.
To answer your question between the two examples for search engine purposes there is realistically almost no difference. They are both going to function very similarly I would personally check out some generators or some sites from developers you admire. The way that your code looks is not as important is the way it functions. I think these examples have if I had to make a choice I would go with number two however you definitely want to check out schema.org
"Option 1 -- using text for our name and tag line:
<header id="top" class="brandfont brandcolor">
# Organization name
### Explanatory fun tag line{navigation code here}
</header>"
or
"Option 2 -- name, tag line and logo all as one big png image:
<header id="header" class="container">
{navigation code here}
</header>"
It’s as easy as including the following code in your website (with the correct file names and locations, of course):
[Home](http://www.yourcompany.com/) ![](http://www.yourcompany.com/logo.png) " data-snippet-id="ext.8ba7444c005a97ebcfda9fb38f150bdc" data-snippet-saved="false" data-codota-status="done"> `[Home](http://www.yourcompany.com/) ![](http://www.yourcompany.com/logo.png)`
- Best practices suggest that your logo should be a stand-alone file (not part of a banner image), visible on your home page, and should not be animated.
- If your site doesn’t use image tags to display your logo, but rather uses CSS to place your logo, you can use meta tags in your code, like this:
# [Your Company](http://www.yourcompany.com/") meta itemprop="logo" content="/images/logo.png" /> " data-snippet-id="ext.2b48ae5fa74df60ff44da6954bb1f3c2" data-snippet-saved="false" data-codota-status="done"> `# [Your Company](http://www.yourcompany.com/") meta itemprop="logo" content="/images/logo.png" />`
- Or, if your site uses JSON-LD or another supported programming syntax, you can use this code, which was added by Google last month:
{ "@context": "http://schema.org/", "@type": "Organization", "url": "http://www.yourcompany.com/", "logo": "http://www.yourcompany.com/logo.png" } " data-snippet-id="ext.c765c0f8ab5d485846e742be74338714" data-snippet-saved="false" data-codota-status="done">
Whichever code you use on your site, be sure to test it with Google’s Rich Snippets Testing Tool before going live.
What does the Schema.org markup do?
It simply tells the search engines that the image located at “http://www.yourcompany.com/logo.png” is the logo file they should use when they display it in search results.
so I would pick something a little bit more like this.
<title itemprop="name">Article's Web Page Title</title> <header> # The Article's Headline <time itemprop="datePublished" datetime="1990-11-12">November 12, 1990</time> By [Author Name](#author-profile.html) </header> Summary of the article. This could be the lead, excerpt, abstract, or introductory paragraph. The main body of the article goes here. <footer> This article was updated on <time itemprop="dateModified" datetime="2015-03-01">March 30, 2015</time> ## Related Articles [A Related Article](#related-article.html) [Another Related Article](#related-article-02.html) </footer> "> `<title itemprop="name">Article's Web Page Title</title> <header> # The Article's Headline <time itemprop="datePublished" datetime="1990-11-12">November 12, 1990</time> By [Author Name](#author-profile.html) </header> Summary of the article. This could be the lead, excerpt, abstract, or introductory paragraph. The main body of the article goes here. <footer> This article was updated on <time itemprop="dateModified" datetime="2015-03-01">March 30, 2015</time> ## Related Articles [A Related Article](#related-article.html) [Another Related Article](#related-article-02.html) </footer>`
http://codepen.io/blueprintmrk/pen/XKqwgk
I hope this helps,
Tom
-
No, we are not using a CMS. And there are no plans to start using a CMS.
If we do start using something, it would be something to manage the code, not the content. We will not be using Wordpress. We loathe Wordpress, and it is not a fit for our content to have a cookie cutter looking Wordpress site. We enjoy writing html and css, and the company I outsourced some of the html and css coding to -- the LOOK of what they delivered and its responsiveness is excellent.So we will have complete control over all the code/markup, and Wordpress won't be coming in to make our code choices redundant.
I guess the basics of my questions are -- in terms of SEO and overall best practice in your site's html:
-In a site design where your company/org name and logo is at the top of every page on your site, is it better to have your organization name (which contains your most important keyword) and tag line in an h1 within the header than it is to have it in an image file which gives the organization name and tag line as alt text? Or does that not matter to SEO?
-Is there some other tag that's better to use on your organization name in your header other than h1? Better for SEO and/or better for html standards and semantics?
-Is putting your organization name, tag line and logo all together into one big image a best practice? I did not send the developer that as one big png. Only the logo itself was in the png I sent, and I was expecting our organization name and tag line to be coded using css styling to have the tag line indent, not for them to make a new png.
-Are these two code options doing the schema.org markup correctly?
-
I will respond to this in full do you mind if I ask a quick question? Are you using a CMS
Because there is going to be a lot that you cannot necessarily control. You're asking about structure when you're talking about navigation and coding so you are going to need to develop the site with a good developer and they will most likely suggest a CMS something like WordPress I assume. This will many times make the format either redundant or not worth it. If you could break your question down into parts I would really appreciate it.
I don't see anything wrong with either one of them just remember the micro data is for end-users and Google open graph is normally what you see around the header of the website JSON-LD is completely invisible to the end-user but used by Google extensively.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Text hidden in tabs on desktop
Hello, Is it still devaluated by google ? It seems that on mobile it isn't anymore but what about desktops ? Thank you,
Web Design | | seoanalytics0 -
Duplicate Content Issue: Mobile vs. Desktop View
Setting aside my personal issue with Google's favoritism for Responsive websites, which I believe doesn't always provide the best user experience, I have a question regarding duplicate content... I created a section of a Wordpress web page (using Visual Composer) that shows differently on mobile than it does on desktop view. This section has the same content for both views, but is formatted differently to give a better user experience on mobile devices. I did this by creating two different text elements, formatted differently, but containing the same content. The problem is that both sections appear in the source code of the page. According to Google, does that mean I have duplicate content on this page?
Web Design | | Dino640 -
Link juice passing from a .org.uk link to a .org/uk websites
Hi all, A client I am working on had a CMS built in recently which has resulted in all their canonicals tags being taken off the website, and as such the same page with both a .org/uk and .org.uk/uk domain have appeared in the search results and I am wondering what your guys take is on the best cause of action. For further background: Historically they have always used .org.uk/uk (not sure why) for their UK website and used .org/xxx for other countries (they also have a .org splashpage FYI). Having seen the .org/uk pages, and knowing they have to choose one to avoid duplication, they would like to move their uk website to the .org/uk domain to fit in with the rest of the divisions. However due to the historical use of .org.uk/uk their backlink profile contains links to both the .org.uk and .org domains. My question then: would a canonical tag on all the .org.uk/uk pages pointing to the .org/uk pages be strong enough to pass on link juice to the .org/uk pages (from all links pointing to .org.uk) or would a 301 redirect be required in this instance, or indeed would it be best to stay with the .org.uk/uk domain? Thanks, Diana
Web Design | | Diana.varbanescu0 -
Increasing content, adding rich snippets... and losing tremendous amounts of organic traffic. Help!
I know dramatic losses in organic traffic is a common occurrence, but having looked through the archives I'm not sure that there's a recent case that replicates my situation. I've been working to increase the content on my company's website and to advise it on online marketing practices. To that end, in the past four months, I've created about 20% more pages — most of which are very high quality blog posts; adopted some rich snippets (though not all that I would like to see at this point); improved and increased internal links within the site; removed some "suspicious" pages as id'd by Moz that had a lot of links on it (although the content was actually genuine navigation); and I've also begun to guest blog. All of the blog content I've written has been connected to my G+ account, including most of the guest blogging. And... our organic traffic is preciptiously declining. Across the board. I'm befuddled. I can see no warnings (redirects &c) that would explain this. We haven't changed the site structure much — I think the most invasive thing we did was optimize our title tags! So no URL changes, nothing. Obviously, we're all questioning all the work I've done. It just seems like we've sunk SO much energy into "doing the right thing" to no effect (this site was slammed before for its shady backlink buying — though not from any direct penalty, just as a result of the Penguin update). We noticed traffic taking a particular plunge at the beginning of June. Can anyone offer insights? Very much appreciated.
Web Design | | Novos_Jay0 -
Infinite Scrolling vs. Pagination on an eCommerce Site
My company is looking at replacing our ecommerce site's paginated browsing with a Javascript infinite scroll function for when customers view internal search results--and possibly when they browse product categories also. Because our internal linking structure isn't very robust, I'm concerned that removing the pagination will make it harder to get the individual product pages to rank in the SERPs. We have over 5,000 products, and most of them are internally linked to from the browsing results pages in the category structure: e.g. Blue Widgets, Widgets Under $250, etc. I'm not too worried about removing pagination from the internal search results pages, but I'm concerned that doing the same for these category pages will result in de-linking the thousands of product pages that show up later in the browsing results and therefore won't be crawlable as internal links by the Googlebot. Does anyone have any ideas on what to do here? I'm already arguing against the infinite scroll, but we're a fairly design-driven company and any ammunition or alternatives would really help. For example, would serving a different page to the Googlebot in this case be a dangerous form of cloaking? (If the only difference is the presence of the pagination links.) Or is there any way to make rel=next and rel=prev tags work with infinite scrolling?
Web Design | | DownPour0 -
3rd party commenting systems vs native?
I'm curious what you all think about using a 3rd party commenting system (like Disqus) vs the native wordpress commenting system? I've read so many reviews online it makes my head spin, so I wanted to see if any of you have any experience, or perhaps some trusted case studies. I was using the native comment system for a while, and then tried out Disqus; which seems to be good, but I'm not sure if people know how to easily get notified of new comments. With the native system there was a check box that said "subscribe," plus I used a plugin to redirect a first time commenter to a welcome page, as well as sent an email to them. I feel like Disqus makes it harder for people to get notified on new comments. However, I like giving people the ability to log in via different 3rd party channels (facebook/twitter/disqus, etc.) I know there are some 3rd party tools that allow you to do this on the native comment system as well. Any way, I'm just curious if anyone had any experience. Also I'm assuming the audience makes a big difference. My target readership is mommy's and parents, and not necessarily a 'tech" one; so I want to make the ability to comment very simple and easy for them. That's key. I'm sort of leaning on moving back over to the Wordpress comment system.
Web Design | | NoahsDad0 -
Live Text in Navigation Vs. Image - Does this affect SEO
I recently was asked the question if having live text in the navigation vs and image affect seo. For example, refer to this link http://markup.io/v/avsaenq856kw the navigation highlighted is seperate images. The html elements read : ![](</span><strong style=)/images/procedures.png"> Live text html reads like this: Breast » What is better for seo value, or does it now matter having live text or an image?
Web Design | | Red_Spot_Interactive0 -
Alt attribute in .ashx file.
Hi, I'm currently in charge of the SEO for a website. When I look at the source of the webpages on my internet browser, most of the images are in .ashx and no alt attribute is related to the image itself. However, when I go in my CMS, the alt attribute is clearly written for all my images. Does it mean that search engines won't take in consideration the alt attribute of my .ashx files. Is there a way to have alt attribute showing for .ashx files ? Thank you in advance JL
Web Design | | Jeremielev0