SEO's Structuring Your Work Week
-
Hi
I wanted some feedback on how other SEO's structure their time. I feel as though I'm falling into the trap of fire fighting with tasks rather than working on substantial projects... I don't feel as though I'm being as effective as I could be.
Here's our set up - Ecommerce site selling thousands of products - more of a generalist with 5 focus areas.
2 x product/merchandising teams - bring in new products, write content/merchandise products
Web team - me (SEO), Webmaster, Ecommcerce manager
Studio - Print/Email marketing/creative/photography.
A lot of my time is split between working for the product teams doing KWD research, briefing them on keywords to use, checking meta.
SEO Tasks - Site audits/craws, reporting
Blogs - I try and do a bit as I need it so much for SEO, so I've put a content/social plan together but getting a lot of things actioned is hard... I'm trying to coordinate this across teams
Inbetween all that, I don't have much time to work on things I know are crucial like a backlink/outreach plan, blog/user guide/content building etc.
How do you plan your time as an SEO? Big projects?
Soon I'm going to pull back from the product optimisation & try focussing on category pages, but for an Ecommerce site they are extremely difficulty to promote.
Just asking for opinions and advice
-
I also want to know about the SEO structure in terms of content especially when you are working for an E-commerce site. I'm working for an Arabic gum product and I want to increase its organic search.
-
We have lots of content on our retail sites.
Some is content that helps visitors use/select/maintain/repair/enjoy the products that we sell. These pages link to where the product can be purchased, where to purchase parts, where to purchase accessories, etc. These pages bring in more traffic than our sales pages and people who arrive at the site through these pages account for a significant number of conversions.
Some is content that is related to the niche that we sell but unrelated to the products that we sell. These pages also bring in more traffic than our sales pages and account for a significant amount of conversions.
On all pages of our site, articles, sales, category, home, etc.... we run adsense, but block the ads of our direct competitors. These ads bring in nice money. Do we lose a few potential buyers through these ads? Yes, but we don't have to do any work for the income.
-
Hi
so the linkable refers to things people link back to? What if those linkable pieces of content aren't directly profitable?
So you produce a great piece of content, but it doesn't initially drive conversions right away?
-
Get a big white board on the wall of your office. Along the left side draw a vertical line and label it "PROFITABLE"... along the bottom draw a horizontal line and label it "LINKABLE". These are the Axes of Success.
Now plot your projects on this graph at positions along these axes. Then organize your work to do as many jobs in the upper right quadrant as possible.
-
HI Becky, so our priorities matrix involves both our business needs with our company values. As such we score each Project (not task) out of 5 for the following :-
- Profitability
- Positive culture
- Customer experience
- Distribution and growth
The total score then dictates the order of priority for our business. We are service lead to our scoring may differ from yours, but hopefully this gives you an idea of what we do. Our projects list is also used at board level to show what we are working.
-
Thanks for your feedback, I have used Asana and I keep lists but I probably need to get better at consolidating the lists & organising them into sections like you said.
Things here can often be disorganised and something will drop in which is completely unplanned for.
How did you put together the projects/priorities matrix? We've started organising our teams tasks into whether they directly impact our KPI's & if not the tasks drop to the bottom.
We're just being pulled on by 2 different teams, their priorities and then ours & your feel like your priorities just slip way down.
I'll see what courses they have online that sounds helpful
-
I know how you feel, in the beginning this was a real problem for me, especially being in the industry we are in, as this makes it so much more difficult. The pace of change is staggering and there is often very little lead time for a huge change that can impact your whole task list.
I find a flexible approach works best for me, I personally, use Asana to order my Task Dashboard into manageable and categorised sections, projects, recurring tasks and where possible tasks that are in progress or have been handed off/waiting on others.
I also have a second projects and priorities matrix which grades my projects (not smaller tasks) based on business needs and the largest potential wins, this helps me to focus my time on what really matters.
Sometimes external influences do cause your projects to creep or slip, just make sure all parties involved are kept up to date to manage delivery expectations. After all Google does like to throw an algorithm spanner in the works every now and then.
It also would not harm doing a course or two in time management. Hope that helps a touch. Feel free to reach out if you want to know more.
-
I would recommend listing out everything you're doing on a daily/weekly/monthly basis (whichever encapsulates what you do)...you already have a great start to this. Then, for 2018, decide the things that you need to either stop doing to delegate to other people (don't worry about who that would be just yet). List out the things that you need to get to but aren't, as well.
So, that leaves you with three lists, essentially: the things you shouldn't be doing (and can pass off to someone else), the things that you should be doing but aren't, and the things that you have been doing (and will continue to do).
Present that to your boss with your recommendation for how to get the other items done (pass them off to a colleague, hire an intern, hire a part-time person). Also, include some ROI of what will most likely happen if you start focusing on those new, key areas.
And then message me and tell me how it goes.
From the sounds of it, you need to put some production management techniques in place. We all face that...
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Why isn't the rel=canonical tag working?
My client and I have a problem: An ecommerce store with around 20 000 products has nearly 1 000 000 pages indexed (according to Search Console). I frequently get notified by messages saying “High number of URLs found” in search console. It lists a lot of sample urls with filter and parameters that are indexed by google, for example: https://www.gsport.no/barn-junior/tilbehor/hansker-votter/junior?stoerrelse-324=10-11-aar+10-aar+6-aar+12-aar+4-5-aar+8-9-aar&egenskaper-368=vindtett+vanntett&type-365=hansker&bruksomraade-367=fritid+alpint&dir=asc&order=name If you check the source code, there’s a canonical tag telling the crawler to ignore (..or technically commanding it to regard this exact page as another version of the page without all the parameters) everything after the “?” Does this url showing up in the Search Console message mean that this canonical isn’t working properly? If so: what’s wrong with it? Regards,
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Inevo
Sigurd0 -
Some site's links look different on google search. For example Games.com › Flash games › Decoration games How can we do our url's like this?
For example Games.com › Flash games › Decoration games How can we do our url's like this?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | lutfigunduz0 -
Is Content Location Determined by Source Code or Visual Location in Search Engine's Mind?
I have a page with 2 scroll features. First 1/3 of the page (from left) has thumb pictures (not original content) and a vertical scroll next to. Remaining 2/3 of the page has a lot of unique content and a vertical scroll next to it. Question: Visually on a computer, the unique content is right next to the thumbs, but in the source code the original content shows after these thumbs. Does that mean search engines will see this content as "below the fold" and actually, placing this content below the thumbs (requiring a lot of scrolling to get to the original content) would in a search engine's mind be the exact same location of the content, as the source code shows the same location? I am trying to understand if search engines base their analysis on source code or also visual location of content? thx
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | khi50 -
Will Canonical tag on parameter URLs remove those URL's from Index, and preserve link juice?
My website has 43,000 pages indexed by Google. Almost all of these pages are URLs that have parameters in them, creating duplicate content. I have external links pointing to those URLs that have parameters in them. If I add the canonical tag to these parameter URLs, will that remove those pages from the Google index, or do I need to do something more to remove those pages from the index? Ex: www.website.com/boats/show/tuna-fishing/?TID=shkfsvdi_dc%ficol (has link pointing here)
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | partnerf
www.website.com/boats/show/tuna-fishing/ (canonical URL) Thanks for your help. Rob0 -
Multiple URL's exist for the same page, canonicaliazation issue?
All of the following URL's take me to the same page on my site: 1. www.mysite.com/category1/subcategory.aspx 2. www.mysite.com/subcategory.aspx 3. www.mysite.com/category1/category1/category1/subcategory.aspx All of those pages are canonicalized to #1, so is that okay? I was told the following my a company trying to make our sitemap: "the site's platform dynamically creates URLs that resolve as 200 and should be 404. This is a huge spider trap for any search engine and will make them wary of crawling the site." What would I need to do to fix this? Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | pbhatt0 -
Canonical URL's - Do they need to be on the "pointed at" page?
My understanding is that they are only required on the "pointing pages" however I've recently heard otherwise.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | DPSSeomonkey0 -
Posing QU's on Google Variables "aclk", "gclid" "cd", "/aclk" "/search", "/url" etc
I've been doing a bit of stats research prompted by read the recent ranking blog http://www.seomoz.org/blog/gettings-rankings-into-ga-using-custom-variables There are a few things that have come up in my research that I'd like to clear up. The below analysis has been done on my "conversions". 1/. What does "/aclk" mean in the Referrer URL? I have noticed a strong correlation between this and "gclid" in the landing page variable. Does it mean "ad click" ?? Although they seem to "closely" correlate they don't exactly, so when I have /aclk in the referrer Url MOSTLY I have gclid in the landing page URL. BUT not always, and the same applies vice versa. It's pretty vital that I know what is the best way to monitor adwords PPC, so what is the best variable to go on? - Currently I am using "gclid", but I have about 25% extra referral URL's with /aclk in that dont have "gclid" in - so am I underestimating my number of PPC conversions? 2/. The use of the variable "cd" is great, but it is not always present. I have noticed that 99% of my google "Referrer URL's" either start with:
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | James77
/aclk - No cd value
/search - No cd value
/url - Always contains the cd variable. What do I make of this?? Thanks for the help in advance!0 -
I'm facinated by SEO but the truth is, I don't have the time to do it. Who can I hire?
I'm facinated by SEO but the truth is, I don't have the time to do it. I trust the moz community more than some of those other SEO forums out there so I'm asking you all, where can I go to find a good SEO firm who's affordable enough for a small startup? The next part of the question is, what should I expect to pay for services that will really make a difference? Please don't spam this thread....I seriously just want an honest opinion as to where I can find some credible help.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Chaz880