Should apartment management companies have a separate website for each of their properties?
-
I work for a company that owns and manages apartments. I would like to know which of the two website design decisions are better from an SEO perspective:
- One single website that contains pages for all of our apartments. (Example: http://www.equityapartments.com)
- Separate websites for each apartment and one main corporate website allows users to search through our apartments. (Example: https://www.greystar.com)
I have spoken to three marketing companies have all recommended option 2. The best reason I have heard is because then the separate apartments are all more likely to rank. They say Google doesn't want to rank multiple pages of the same website.But Google would still know that I have an administrative relationship between the sites. (Source: https://mza.seotoolninja.com/blog/how-google-knows-what-sites-you-control-and-why-it-matters-whiteboard-friday) So I don't know why they would treat multiple sites differently than one site?For what it's worth, it seems the majority of apartment management companies use a different website for each property.So should have a separate website for each of their properties?
-
Those are all the same brand. Something like the following on the same site makes more sense to me from both a branding and SEO perspective.
- modernapts.com
- modernapts.com/locations/ - overview page
- modernapts.com/locations/seattle/ - city/location page
- modernapts.com/locations/los-angeles/ - city/location page
- modernapts.com/locations/seattle/capitol-hill-penthouses/ - building page
This is more or less the same as any retail/physical chain that has location pages.
Here is an example of an actual brand that has locations on the same domain, city level pages, and building level pages:
- http://www.equityapartments.com/san-francisco-bay-apartments - city/location page
- http://www.equityapartments.com/san-francisco-bay/mission-bay/azure-apartments - building page
I have not reviewed their overall SEO setup, but this is a great example from a URL point of view, and they have lots of useful information on their actual building level pages. The city level pages are great for SEO and targeting city-level keywords as well.
-
Hello All,
Late to this thread, but I was wondering what the best approach would be if you have a corporate site that is the brand term for example let's break it down like this:
Modern Apartments - Corporate site.
Modern Seattle - One of the entities in seattle, but with brand name.
Modern LA - another one of the community, but in different city.
Would it be best to house all of these in the corporate site under modernapartments or would it be better to have them on individual sites?
All the properties will have different phone number, address, and potentially website.
Thanks!
-
I thought you raised some really thoughtful points, Kane. This particular situation isn't one of those black-and-white ones with a super obvious call - it's nuanced. So, I thought the points you brought up were very valid in an "it depends" kind of scenario. Thanks for the very kind words.
-
I'll just jump in and add that Miriam thinks about local SEO much more than I do, so I'll second all of her opinions.
-
Thanks for the clarification (and so sorry I addressed you as "Mike" - I read your screenname incorrectly).
My thoughts on this would be based on a few factors:
-
If the brand were the same across all properties (Blue Apartments), then, no question, I would consolidate. This would be like having a single website for Taco Bell or any other brand, vs. having thousands of Taco Bell microsites representing their many locations. A single site would not only be easier to manage, but would consolidate all SEO benefits into a single site, building its authority. I'd have a single site at BlueApartments.com with a landing page for each complex (Blue Apartments on The Beach, Blue Apartments Theater District, Blue Apartments Downtown, Blue Apartments Westside, etc.) And, I'd build a GMB listing for each of these complexes IF (and only if) it had an on-site office, and link these listings to their respective, very well-built landing pages.
-
If each apartment complex has entirely distinct branding (Blue Apartments, Green Apartments, Red Apartments) then the conversation changes. I want to state that I've never done Local SEO for a multi-apartment-complex enterprise, but I see these business models doing both the single and multi-site approach in the city nearest me, and both approaches are managing to rank. I'm just looking at this at a glance, of course, but that's what I see. At the end of the day, I think that the unique branding scenario would incline me to go with a multi-site approach, for better ease-of-use for consumers, whether it impacts SEO or not. These are distinct physical places, and unlike Taco Bell, they each provide a different living experience. If I had the resources, I think I'd create a good, strong site for each property (and, if it has an on-site office, build listings for each). But, if I was shaky on resources, I would not attempt to manage multiple websites for fear I couldn't do them justice. What I would not want to end up with would be a handful of weak, duplicate websites that aren't earning any links. Lack of resources would turn me away from this approach. But sufficient resources would make it appeal to me.
My answer is a bit general here, not knowing the precise details of the business and its available resources. I'd recommend looking at the competition in your target city, and look at how direct competitors who are ranking best are operating. This would contribute to my final decision on this.
-
-
Kane,
We have ranked two apartment complexes in local search using the same domain. So I do agree, separate websites may not help local search unless Google limits the same domain from ranking more than 2-3 times.
Ranking organically is very hard to do beyond the 9th or 10th position for key words like "apartments in Forest Lake". Big players like Apartments.com and Zillow have really concurred that space. There are some long tail keywords like "luxury apartments in Forest Lake" that we could link for.
Having all the apartments on one site would help the domain authority of that site because the backlinks are not spread out. This may help us reach position 8 instead of 10. Splitting the site up would allow us to capture spots 10-20.
As I write this, it seems that capturing spot 8 is better than capturing spots 10-20. What are your thoughts? Are my assumptions even accurate?
-
Miriam,
Thank you! Yes, I do mean apartment complexes (e.g. Blue Apartment Community). I am not proposing creating different sites for each unit (e.g. APT #203).
What's your opinion on this topic?
-
Hey Mike,
Great discussion going on here. I want to clarify - when you say "apartments" you are talking about apartment complexes, right, not individual apartment units within a development? In other words, Tan Apartment Community, Green Apartment Community, Blue Apartment Community; not Apartment 3, 20, and 35 within communities?
-
Knowing that all of your properties are in the same area, this seems like the biggest argument in favor of separate sites. Google may be more likely to rank other sites instead of subpages of the same site to avoid what is called domain crowding. However, it still happens in local. Just search for "office supply stores" and you're likely to see multiple listings for Staples or OfficeDepot, for example.
Honestly you could do both. Have a corporate site with pages for every property on it, and set up microsites with single properties on them. If the site is setup well with something like Wordpress Multisite then at least the same software can be running and updated simultaneously. In that case I'd probably use the microsites as the landing pages for Google local listings.
If you do go the route of multiple sites, I'd recommend having a clear button or call to action to "View Our Other Properties in the XYZ Area".
-
That's a good point. If we did the multisite option we would still have a way to see all the properties from the corporate site.
We are running into one key issue with one site instead of many. That problem is that our site only shows up once in the search results for searches like "apartments in Forest Lake". But we have about a dozen properties in that city. It's my understanding that if we had separate sites then we could show up multiple times, once for each property.
Is that true, and is it worth the hassle to do that?
-
Hello,
I think the best thing is to have single website as Buyers will get choices which one to buy in a single place. As a internet user I will prefer to get things at a place in different prices. Its easy to get hingh ranking in one website rather then multiple websites. single site can be low cost.
-
Kane,
Thank you for your response! Here are the answers to your clarifying questions:
Are any of the communities near each other, or are they in many cities across the country?
The communities are near each other. Most of the communities are in the city called Forest Lake and one is in a city of Blaine.Are you seeing subpages of corporate sites ranking in the local search results for any of your communities?
Yes, our subpages are ranking. The one community in the city of Blaine is ranking consistently at the top in local search. The rest of the communities in Forest Lake are having mixed results. But there are times we will see two communities take a spot in the top three local search engine results.Is there any administrative value to separating the websites? Outside of SEO considerations.
No, it would be easier to have one website instead of multiple. -
Hey Mike,
Outside of Local SEO, one single site would be the clear winner because it’s easier to build the authority of that one domain.
Within Local SEO, having dedicated domains could make more sense. One could make the argument that it’s simpler for Google To understand a single location, but there are plenty of retail sites with single domains that refute that argument.
One could also make the argument that it might be easier to build homepage links to separate domains, but I don’t think it’s enough of a factor to change your web structure.
Option 2 is the standard in your industry, for certain. But it typically means higher web design costs to build and maintain them all, even if they’re somewhat cookie cutter. Frankly I think that’s as big of a factor in your decision.
I wouldn’t worry about the administrative relationship you described. It’s not going to be a major factor - you’re not deceiving Google by separating the sites, you’re changing how users experience the sites.
A couple of clarifying questions:
- Are any of the communities near each other, or are they in many cities across the country?
- Are you seeing subpages of corporate sites ranking in the local search results for any of your communities?
- Is there any administrative value to separating the websites? Outside of SEO considerations.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
We Are An SEO Company - Why Won't Google Believe Us?!?!
Hi All, We are an SEO company based in Brisbane Australia. We help lots of clients, most of which are now on page #1 for the majority of their keywords. Except for 1: US! Organically we float between page #2-3 for the term "seo brisbane" and page #1-2 for the term "search engine optimisation brisbane" However, when it comes to the local pack we are nowhere to be found. Not only are we not in the top 3, but when you click "more places" to see how far out of the local pack we are, we are not there at all!! For whatever reason, we can't get google to believe that we really are a SEO supplier. I'm embarrassed to have to ask, but we just can't seem to work out why. Would anyone have any ideas? We know that our current website is letting us down and are 90% of the way through the build of a new one and we are confident that will help with our organic rankings but when it comes to why we are not showing at all in local results, I am at a loss. Has anyone got any advice or troubleshooting they could help with ?
Local Listings | | timcbambrick0 -
Bad Google Reviews - Should I Remove the Map From My Website?
I have a Google map on a website. Currently, there are only two 1-star reviews — which show next to the company name on the map. We added the map for local SEO reasons, but I’m thinking I should take it down because customer experience supersedes local SEO. Why boost search rankings if the content will drive people away from converting? So basically, customer experience > local SEO. Question: Do you all agree, or do any of you have any evidence that I should leave it? For example, it’s below the fold, so it isn’t the first thing they see, and we really need to boost their local SEO.
Local Listings | | BlueCorona1 -
1 company, 2 shop locations, 3 Google+ pages - help!
Hello, I work for a furniture retailer and I'm doing an audit of our digital presence and need a hand with our G+ pages. Thanks for reading! We are one company but with two shops, located about 10 miles apart. One shop has been established over 10 years, the other is roughly a year old. The shops are called: 'Our Company' and 'Our Company, Second Location' Each shop has its own website (which is confusing and we'll hopefully shortly revert back to just one) We currently have three Google+ profiles: the first G+ was set up a number of years ago and was set up as a personal page, not a business and it links to both shop's websites. The other two G+ pages appear to have been created when we created a Google Local listing for each shop. My questions are: What is the best tool to handle all this info across the web? Bright Local looks good. Should I junk the original G+ profile? If I do, how will I know I won't remove any important stuff from Google? Should I keep 2 G+ profiles, one for each store or have 1 G+ profile and put both store's details in there. Or should I have 3 G+ profiles: 1 for our company name, and 1 for each of our 2 locations? When I search for 'Our Company', I only ever get our original company to show in the Google Local listing on the right hand side of search results. Our second shop is shown in 'People also search for'. Is this the best I can hope for? Is there any way to control this? Both of the G+ profiles that are linked to our Google Local listings have the original G+ URL. Should I customise this and if so, are there any naming conventions I should follow? What should we do with the (2?) G+ profiles for each shop? Both have currently got no content on them. Thanks in advance for any tips and advice.
Local Listings | | Bee1590 -
Does submitting Citations for National website help much at all?
Curious if submitting a national website info to the top citations is helpful at all when ranking a national website?
Local Listings | | surfsup0 -
Google Places: Can't link to website
Hi, how are you? I'm Having some problems with my clients Google Places/Plus listings. Everything is OK, but I can't get my website linked. I'm talking about what I point out in the image. I tried following this instructions: https://support.google.com/plus/answer/1713826?hl=en&ref_topic=3052532, but I can't find the Link website button next to my website URL. Do you know why is this happening? Thanks! 6v1eDG4
Local Listings | | arielbortz0 -
Google Authorship issues with a 200+ person company
So, I wanted to say thank you ahead of time for any help the amazing Moz community may be able to provide me with. I am going to start with giving a little background to the company I work for and then I will ask the question. We are a 200 person CFO Services firm (www.b2bcfo.com). We have partners almost all over the country and our research with potential partners and clients has shown that they like having a national presence, but they also need a regional/local presence too. To that end, we set up Google Places accounts for each of our partners as they are technically separate businesses under our umbrella. We also have the main national site (www.b2bcfo.com) and we have regional websites (e.g. www.houstonb2bcfo.com). We want to set up Google Authorship on each of our partners sections of the regional website, in the process of setting this up, we realized that the Google Plus pages we were using were Local + pages and it didn't seem to give us the option to add the "Contributor on" links to get Google Authorship working. It seems to me as if the only way we can get Google Authorship working is to set up additional Google Plus accounts (users) and then manage 2 accounts for each professional. I was wondering if anyone in the community knows a way of getting the Google plus local pages to work with authorship? Or do you have any other suggestions on how this may work? Please let me know if you need more information, Thank you.
Local Listings | | B2B.CFO0 -
Best Practices For Local SEO For A Nation Wide Property Company?
Hi There, I've recently acquired a client that sells property all over the country (South Africa). It's in their best interests to rank well for localised keywords relating to the areas they have listed properties in. eg. Property for sale in example suburb/town/province. The project has a number of challenges which I'd appreciate any suggestions for The site acts as an aggregator for numerous partner property agents and, as s such, has a lot of duplicate content on it The company only has offices in one city. It handles online bookings which it then passes to its partner agencies - this presents me with a problem of creating listings in the areas I need to rank for I cannot list the actual addresses of properties Your thoughts and advice would be seriously appreciated.
Local Listings | | KJDMedia1 -
Google+ Local and a Google+ Company Page
I have an established G+ company page but also want a G+ Local listing in order to appear on Google maps. The company does have a physical address, phone number etc. to qualify for a G+ Local listing. No current local listing exists to claim. Should I: a) Switch the currrent G+ company page to be a G+ Local page; or b) Create a new G+ Local page and keep the G+ company page; or c) Ignore G+ Local and create the listing through Google Places Thanks
Local Listings | | bjalc20110