Absolute urls
-
I am redesigning my website with an updated theme.
One of the theme plugins takes my url: https://example-site.com/1st-level-page/2nd-level-page/page-contentand changes it to https%3A%2F%2Fexample-site.com%21st-level-page%22nd-level-page/page-content%2F
Does this effect how a web crawler see's my internal links?
Can this have a negative effect on my SEO?
Should I edit the plugin to force it to render the url exactly as written? -
HI Joe. Yes. Links still work flawlessly. And if you view page source, they look perfect.
Here's a button I just made in the theme.
http://starttheme2.wpengine.com/url-encoding/
If you hover over it you can see the url is perfect. But the url it's coded in the page like this:
https%3A%2F%2Fmoz.com%2Fabout%2Fteam%2Fbritney-muller
I'm not sure what plugin is causing this. If you want to have a look you most certainly are welcome to.
https://starttheme2.wpengine.com/wp-admin/UN: demo
PW: St#rtTh#m#2018 -
Hello Patrick
- Do the links still work?
- What Plugin are you using & why does it encode the URLs?
-
So after researching this, I'm being told that this is called url encoding. So the question really is, does URL encoding negatively effect internal linking and crawlers and can it negatively effect SEO?
-
No. It only displays the extra code in the word press text editor. The browser displays it properly.
Something is converting the "/" to %. There are no spaces in the url.
As I mentioned in my previous response, if I "view source" in the browser window the internal urls are all correct so I am at a loss.
Appreciate your help.
-
Yikes! Does it display that way in the browser? Is it possible to show how it looks in a browser?
The % shows when there are spaces in the domain name. You definitely don't want that URL structure - it's bad news.
-
Hi John!
Thanks for the feedback. Greatly appreciated.
Screenshot attached.
When I "view source" on a webpage in browser, the url is displayed exactly as needed. Does that matter? Or is that entirely different from the crawlers?
-
Hey Pat,
Any chance you can put the URL's in a word doc and pop a screen shot into the thread? I'm seeing % in the URL and I'm not sure if it's actually putting that in there.
If it's changing your URL structure, you'll need to do 301 redirects (one to one) in order to preserve the SEO equity. If you can edit the plugin to keep the old URL structure, that would be preferred.
Thanks!
John
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Reversing Canonical URLs?
A few months back, we set up canonical URLs on some pages with duplicate content to give some newer pages more link juice. Now, we need to do the opposite and give that same juice to some of the original pages. If we set up canonical URLs on the newer pages to point back to the original pages, are we losing the juice we've been building all along? Sorry for all this convoluted juice talk. Hopefully, my point is getting across here.
Link Building | | frankmassanova0 -
Does having '?search' in a URL affect the page quality?
In our Costume Themes category on our website, http://www.costumedirect.com.au/themes/, the links direct to search pages with URLs containing the term '?search'. For example, the 'Edward Scissorhands' link directs to http://www.costumedirect.com.au/search.php?search_query=edward. Will the question mark and 'search' in our URL affect the page quality and rankings? Thank you.
Link Building | | CostumeD0 -
URL parameters affecting link juice
I have a couple of quirks in my online shop that I'm ironing out. One of them is adding some URL parameters to product links.ie: website.com/product.html?&cat=0&featured=Y If someone links to this URL, will I get the link juice as if it was website.com/product.html ? I have URL parameters in Webmaster Tools and robots.txt set up to ignore them so they're not in the Google index, but I have found a few websites that have linked to us using these longer URL's and I'm wondering whether to write to them and ask them if they mind changing them or not.
Link Building | | sparrowdog0 -
Gifly.com: url structure for new site with only one kind of page
Hi, we are launching a new site called Gifly.com, it's all about Gifs. At the moment, our robots.txt is blocking everything because we want to have a solid url structure before going public. There is only one kind of page, the permalink which has this form: http://gifly.com/QPmf/ (the four characters 'QPmf' are completely random) What we made different from the multitude of other Gifs site is that we are
Link Building | | mylittlepwny
trying to categorize gifs with hashtags, so we introduced these kind of urls: http://gifly.com/FoYi/
http://gifly.com/FoYi/#fail
http://gifly.com/FoYi/#blonde
http://gifly.com/FoYi/#dumb This was done for several reason, the first is that each gif can have up to 10
hashtags. Another approach to this could have been: http://gifly.com/fail/FoYi/
http://gifly.com/blonde/FoYi/
http://gifly.com/dumb/FoYi/ ...but we will face tons of duplicated contents for search engines because the same gif
would have 10x permalinks this way. The way we use to navigate between hashtags is via buttons/ajax (see the list of hashtags on the left)
We know that google may have a hard time understanding the site's structure, We'd like to know if the current set of urls, as: http://gifly.com/FoYi/
http://gifly.com/FoYi/#fail
http://gifly.com/FoYi/#blonde
http://gifly.com/FoYi/#dumb could be okay if we provide google a solid sitemap. We are thinking about a first sitemap with the list of hashtags,
each hashtag points to a second sitemap containing the list of new gifs uploaded for said hashtag. Thanks! gifly_logo_r_a.gif0 -
Site URL called out but not clickable.
Hi - I'm after a bit of clarity; if my site URL is referenced in an article, but doesn't actually link through, does this still 'add value' to my seo efforts? Thanks, David
Link Building | | newstd1000 -
Adding keyword to your url
Couldn't find the answer to my question anywhere so I'll give it a try here. If you have a site called www.example.com, and then want to add a keyword to this site, like this: www.example.com/keyword How do you add a keyword to your url like this? Without making the URL with the keyword your "main" URL, meaning you don't have to enter the keyworded URL to get to the homepage (www.example.com), and still rank better on the keyword put in the url. I'm a bit confused on the subject, would love for someone to help me understand! Thanks.
Link Building | | danielpett0 -
Buying Branded URL's
Hello A competitor of mine has a bunch of branded terms that they purchased, with backlinks point to their main site, is there a specific reason they do this? If I analyze the links on the "branded url" theres it has very little juice/authority? Is it worth it to do this? ex www.siteCOUPON.com. or www.mainsite.biz I have a .ca and something similar to our site re-directing through register.com in Iframe. But would they just be using those terms because it has high search volume? Would this help me in anyway? Thank you!
Link Building | | TP_Marketing0 -
Marketing URLs - best practices
Hi, We do have a consistent url structure like http://www.company.com/productname-london
Link Building | | ecnic
http://www.company.com/productname-auckland
etc. Now marketing wants to include each URL in our yearly printed catalogue.
Out of marketing reasons (I agree with that), they think the URLs are too long and should be for example: http://www.company/london
http://www.company/auckland
etc. Our brochure is very important for direct customers and we have a target group that actively uses the internet and social media and therefore will pick up these links. Even if we do correct redirects in the background - couldn't we have the problem
that we have a double set of urls? What do you think about that?0