Is it more beneficial to use Yext rather than doing the citations manually?
-
Our company wanted to experiment on whether it truly is more beneficial to use Yext for citations rather than to do them ourselves. The thought process here, is that when we manually do the citations, some of our listings would increase in quality. The problem we have been running into, is that Yext has exclusive deals with nearly half of the sources we were previously listed under. Is there a way around this, or is Yext truly worth the cost?
-
I think Yext is really worth the cost and has the most important local directories covered. One main advantage of services like Yext or Moz Local is the ease of making updates to the listings. With manual citations, if you need to make a small change to the hours or description of the business, you need to repeat the task for all the sites one by one. But with Yext or Moz Local, it can happen quickly by just updating the business under your Yext or Moz Local account while automation will take care of updating the rest of the listings in the background for you.
There is also this business listing scan tool out there that I thought might be relevant to this question, it covers the most sites and also tells you what's your completeness score and your accuracy score with a short link that you can use to share the web-based report with others. I hope you find my answer useful. -
Yext is a HUGE time save. Well worth it.
-
Good Morning, Bek!
I hope you will receive a variety of responses from our community on this, as citation management is often a case of horses for courses. What you choose should be based on factors including the scale of your business model, your funding, your expectations of control/management, etc. Basically, you have 3 options when it comes to citation management:
-
Do it all manually. The plus side of this is that you have as much direct control as possible. The minus side is that it is time-consuming and can't be scaled easily for companies with multiple locations. It's all but impossible to efficiently, manually manage local business listings for dozens, hundreds or thousands of locations. And, manual on-going monitoring of citation quality is a huge chore even if you only have a single location business.
-
Hire a company to do it for you manually. Whitespark is one of the more popular companies that builds a la carte citations manually. The plus side of this is that you pay once and the citations are built well with good data that you've approved, without you having to invest a lot of time. The minus side is that citations typically need to be managed on an ongoing basis, which companies like Whitespark don't do. They are an excellent service for a one-time manual build, but because of the way data can degrade over time, may not be the right match for a business that wants to monitor and manage their listings on an on-going basis.
-
Automate it. This is what companies like Moz Local, Uberall and Yext do. Moz Local, for example, distributes your data to the major citation platforms (including the major aggregators) and then offers you a dashboard for ongoing monitoring. The plus side of this is that the work on your end is nominal and, at least with Moz Local, you'll be alerted to ongoing issues with your data, including inconsistent and duplicate listings, as they arise. A solution like this scales to dozens, hundreds or thousands of locations. The main minus side is a lack of direct control, plus cost can be a factor, and one of the key complaints about Yext is that (unlike Moz Local) they charge for your distribution to low-quality directories that few people actually use.
So, those are your 3 options, and what might work best for a single location boutique may not be the right match for a multi-location restaurant chain. Some businesses do like Yext, but if you do a bit of searching, you will also find genuine complaints, as you will about most providers. Other people are big fans of Moz Local, BrightLocal, Uberall and other providers. So, as I said, I'm hoping you'll get multiple points of view on this thread, do some investigative work, and discover the right match for your brand's scenario. In the end, that's what matters most!
I'll just finish up by letting you know that if you have any questions about how Moz Local could help you business, please email our customer service support at [email protected]. You'll receive a friendly and helpful reply.
-
-
This is a really good question and something with which, I am at least personally experienced with - in terms of having done recent research on the subject
Recently we (at Effect Digital, UK) moved office. I say recently, it was probably nearly a year ago now. Previously we had been using Moz Local, but were shocked to find that simple features like 'changing' or 'updating' our business address were not supported. The problem comes down to directory aggregators (the main offender being Central Index) and how they interact with various listing suppliers
When Moz Local failed to update our business address, we tried to contact a lot of directory-owners (and directory aggregators like Central Index) manually. Trust me when I say, the largest ones (like Central Index, which handle the majority of your directory listings across local newspaper sites - at least here in the UK) do not want to hear from you at all
We submitted contact forms, spent hours browsing to hidden contact URLs, even found a phone number for them - which rang for a minute, then forwarded to a separate disconnected number. These guys don't care about receiving updates from Moz and they don't care about your update requests. They don't even want to listen to you, for 2 minutes
The problem with Moz local, as a Moz rep told us - is that when they push data (from Moz's Local database, to the databases of aggregate listing handlers like Central Index), there is no legal agreement requiring the aggregator(s) to accept Moz's update(s). They will accept Moz Local's first set of data, but if you ever want to change anything substantial - that rapidly becomes a massive problem. Moz Local is a great way to take your first steps into local listings handling, but the solution isn't end-to-end, or rigorous enough for on-going usage
Yext is much better, from the sounds of it. Myself and another experienced colleague spent some hours on the phone to their support people who seemed qualified and able to handle our complex queries. They stated to us that, they have a more 'direct' agreement with listing aggregators which directly pushes their data over the top of everyone else's. That tells me that, either their solution works well or - if it didn't work, you'd have recourse to push them to get things sorted out. They take more responsibility and really try to make sure that their updates 'actually' end up live in aggregator databases (which is great)
We didn't end up using Yext because, as an SMB the pricing was pretty severe. We were told that Yell basically re-sell Yext's technology to smaller businesses and that we'd have better luck with Yell. Whilst Yell may be based on the same technology, the support is woefully inferior and I'd never recommend working with Yell. We had one rep visit us to answer technical questions. He knew none of the answers to our questions, knew nothing about SEO and actually had the tenacity to try and 'steer' us toward purchasing some crappy directory listing on Yell which wasn't at all what we wanted (or were interested in)
Moz is great when you're starting out, but because the 'deals' they have with data aggregators aren't 'forceful' enough, it's not a good on-going solution (Moz know this and said as much to us over the phone). It's still the best place for you to 'start' as the prices are great and it does function well, until more crucial data changes are required (at which point it falls flat on its face)
At that point you really should be going with Yext if you can afford Yext. The product is superior, the support is very strong (Moz's support is actually great too, but hindered by the product which is defective under some specific circumstances). In-between the cheap and cheerful Moz and the very expensive Yext, there's nothing good enough to fill the void (which sucks!)
You may have some luck manually adjusting some listings. But for the ones controlled by central databases which fire their data out to many directories, your only real option to have a reasonable shot at getting them changed - is assuredly Yext
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Concern about Citations when business Addresses change!
This may be a beginner level question, but I am concerned about spending money on citations in case I have to move offices at any point in the next 6 to 12 months. Would I have to update my address on all the citations? If so, is there an easy way to do this cost effectively? Or do I leave the old address as it is and create new citations with the new address? What is better or cheaper to do? What is better for SEO? Thank you.
Local Listings | | RyanUK0 -
Has anyone tried using AMP links in Google Business Listings?
We have a client with multiple locations, and Google Business listings for each location. We've also created AMP pages for each of those location landing pages, and they're ranking on page one of their main queries, just below the local pack. We're wondering if anyone has tried pointing a GMB website listing at an AMP page, or if there are considerations to keep in mind before testing it out. So far, we've discussed whether to use the AMP url (amp.domain.com) or the Google viewer url (google.com/amp/s/amp.domain.com), and potential concerns for desktop users.
Local Listings | | WompM0 -
How Should We Handle Citations for a New Building?
One of the companies I work with has purchased a business complex they plan to move their offices into. The current tenant is fairly reputable in the community, but ran into some financial issues, hence the sale. For easy, I'll refer to this place as the Simmons Center. So, currently, the Simmons Center has a Yelp!, GMB and other pages devoted to what it offers (mostly restaurants and small shops) but the new company will be turning the location into a large corporate campus. We'd like to bring naming conventions in line with the new center title and remove (where applicable) citations for the Simmons Center. What would be our best way to go about doing this? I'm thinking our best option is to: 1) claim current listings, where applicable, 2) mark the Simmons Center as closed, 3) Create new listings for the new name at the same address, 4) Use Moz Local and Whitespark to help clean up citations where needed. Is this the best approach for this type of situation?
Local Listings | | AtlasGlobal0 -
Can I use the same interior photos for multiple stores in Google My Business?
Hi, The company I work for has many store locations across the country. Getting good/quality interior pictures has become very difficult for us. We recently good a Virtual Tour from Google for one of the locations, and they took some really pictures. According to Google, the "Photos should represent the actual business" and "Represent the real-world business location". My question is: since our stores are VERY similar in the interior, can we use the same pictures for them while we get more pictures? Would Google penalize this? Thanks!
Local Listings | | StantonOptical0 -
Ranking opportunity if we omit county in citations
I am looking to rank highly in local search for Birkenhead but have not currently filled in the county on Google + so Moz local is not picking the county up. I am wondering whether I should continue and keep the county off there as there is a potential problem: on our website we are listed as being based in the Wirral and we are also based in a county called Merseyside so have two different possible citations. We are ranking well for the term Wirral and do not want to effect this. I am thinking of building citations without Wirral or Merseyside and was wondering if anyone can advise? The address that I have in the citation would be - business name, building number, Birkenhead then Wirral or Merseyside and post code. I am currently using business name, building number, Birkenhead and post code and we want to rank highly for Birkenhead. Could anyone advise me here? The Wirral is a peninsular as can be seen on Wilipedia - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metropolitan_Borough_of_Wirral
Local Listings | | SEM_at_Lees0 -
Local Directories: What are the best practices for manually updating over 500 listings?
We are currently using an aggregator for a client, but we will be manually updating 5 different local directories that are not included in the distribution for over 500 locations. I am wondering if there are any local experts that have a set of best practices/processes for this type of scenario?
Local Listings | | PureVisibility0 -
Is Yext worth it?
Any opinions on Yext? Worth the money? And does it help with organic SERP's and SEO generally? Thanks
Local Listings | | sdwellers0 -
Duplicate Content From Citations?
Hi everyone, A number of citations ask for a business description, so I want to use one from our website. However, would this get flagged as duplicate content or some other problem? Do I need to write unique descriptions for every listing site? Thanks, Ruben
Local Listings | | KempRugeLawGroup0