My website is struggling to receive traffic I think I have a serious error
-
Hi,
My website would receive a lot of traffic and then I asked a SEO company who contacted me to do some work on the site. Since then, the site has dropped in the rankings and our traffic has dropped by like a lead balloon. Instead of receiving thousands of visitors, today we have received 10.
I am finding that I have articles no longer in Google but they are in Yahoo.
Here is an example of an article that was once popular
https://www.in2town.co.uk/travel-advice/how-to-save-money-booking-a-holiday-through-a-travel-agent/
I have tried everything and now I do not know where to turn. I am not sure what they have done but everything has now failed. We have not been penalized and our hosting company have said they cannot find anything wrong.
Due to this problem we have stopped writing articles and have spent all our time trying to work out what has gone wrong.
If anyone can give me advice and point me in the right direction then I would be in your debt.
-
Thank you so much for this. One of the SEO companies who did this is part of a well known SEO franchise, so all what I would say is, don't use that franchise. I found out today, that the franchise in question that a lot of the people who are part of the franchise don't know much about SEO. They seem to take on the work and then they send it to someone else to do for a lot less, making what I have been told a 500% mark up on profit.
Hopefully I can now start getting my traffic back to normal and start building up my site and getting the articles out there.
-
As it turns out, Robin's insights here (that HTTP redirects to HTTPS via 302 redirects, instead of 301s) turns out to be pretty much hitting the nail on the head
Here's the data for anyone who is interested (and can help OP more):
- https://d.pr/f/TskHsn.xlsx (spreadsheet download)
I spent a lot of time on this data. I compiled all of OP's backlinks from many sources (Ahrefs, Majestic etc) and then re-crawled using Screaming Frog. This shows all of OPs backlinks, their current status and critically how they 'land' on OP's pages / URLs (at the destination end)
Surprise surprise, almost all links point to HTTP (not to HTTPS) and are then 302 redirected instead of 301'd, thus cutting off almost all link equity post HTTPS migration
Whoever fked up here, did an epic job of messing up OP's internal SEO authority flow**. This is probably now, the leading on-site factor in terms of OP's site struggles on Google (so thanks for that Robin Lord!)
I still think there's an off-site element, but this needs fixing ASAP. All HTTP->HTTPS oriented 302 redirects must be converted to 301s with immediate effect
-
Hmm, I don't think that addresses what we are trying to change. I think you will need to discuss with them the status code they are using as part of the redirect - unless I've missed something none of the above seems to include anything specifying status code.
-
my hosting company have responded with the following regarding the redirects. they have said if this needs changing to contact them
The following https redirect is set for your website:
RewriteEngine On
RewriteCond %{HTTPS} off
RewriteRule (.*) https://%{HTTP_HOST}%{REQUEST_URI} [R,L] -
I don't know how they crashed it. I was away for the day and then got a number of phone calls to say the site was down. And when I checked it was down and was down for around eight hours. The company said they did a mistake on the site as they were speeding the site up and they were changing the header of the site.
-
If you type in the url examples you gave above but replace https with http you should hit a 302 (the ayima Google Chrome redirect plugin should show you).
Out of interest - how did the SEO agency make your site crash?
-
Yes, my hosting company offer a service and they did the http to https for me. I have just contacted them now asking how they did the migration so it can be changed.
Could you give me a couple of examples of the 302 redirect please.
The change was about 16 months ago now. The site was doing very well in traffic and then we decided to get a seo company in. They did some work but then I noticed they were doing silly mistakes, so then I got a company from the uk and then noticed some daft cheap links and some errors that occurred. at one point my site crashed so I got rid of them. the traffic dropped like a led balloon and ever since I have been trying to fix things.
So, instead of concentrating on content, I have been trying to fix all the errors which is hard when you are a novice
-
What Robin says about 301s and 302s is pure truth and that could also be a significant contributing factor, especially if it's quite widespread. Chantelle remind me at some point via email to look into this and nail down the 'exact' URLs that are 302-ing. If there is a problem there, we can find it and address it
-
Wow, this is pretty thorough, good effort!
Chantelle, you mentioned that you did a http -> https migration, looking at some of the pages in http they seem to redirect to https using a 302 redirect. I would use a 301 redirect instead - 302 means "this move is temporary" so Google treats it as less strong. Essentially it doesn't give a clear enough signal to Google that the new pages are replacing the old ones, Google seems to have some http pages still indexed but I don't know whether it's just not picked up all the redirects. Once you have all the 301s sorted, I would submit a http sitemap to Google to prompt it to crawl the old http pages and realise they are redirected.
Chantelle, when did the drop happen? And how defined was it? It sounds like, from your initial message, you went from a lot of traffic to not much at all in the space of days but was it more gradual than that? Was it before the https migration/ When did the agency make the changes?
The rogue canonicals effectdigital have found sound like they might be confusing things, that could line up with the coverage issues you saw Chantelle.
effectdigital - those links you found. Does it look like they have been around and like that for a while? Or were they recently added?
-
I believe that the content needs significant improvement to be competitive.
I don't mean this as an insult, but just that competitive content clearly and completely addresses the queries that might bring people into the site.
This is obviously a matter where opinions are many. Here is one.
-
So far we have identified some potential issues:
1.) Backlinks don't seem great. I took backlink data from a load of tools (including Ahrefs, Majestic, SEOSpyGlass etc) and funneled them all into SEMRush for it to evaluate those (in addition to the ones it found by itself) and give a toxicity rating. This is what we're looking at - screenshot
2.) Because links are a state, a forensic - intelligent disavow (which doesn't disavow the decent links) is sorely needed as at this point algorithmic devaluations are in play and a penalty may be looming (not too far off)
3.) Once that's complete - the disavow will likely result in a very minor dip (as no one's view of what Google thinks are good / bad links, is perfect). Due to this some really good link building (Digital PR level link building) will be needed afterwards, to clog the wound (only a small wound, but will still need clogging)
4.) Someone has been over-zealous with the indexation sculpting. Canonical tags (which also act like no-index tags, because they tell Google that the 'active' URL is non-canonical, and point it elsewhere) could be removed from the AMP pages on this site and also from a string of parameter URLs. When you use hreflangs, you don't canonical the foreign URLs to the original language. You just use the hreflangs, on their own! Same should be true for AMP links (they're both part of the rel=/link family). Yes, it's sometimes common on a site with sprawling architecture, to reign in parameter URL indexation. Our pal here (OP), isn't in that predicament - so it's been misapplied
5.) The site wasn't registering as mobile friendly earlier. Now that seems to have been fixed but implementation may need examining in more detail (e.g: check a page of every template type in Google's mobile friendly tool, not just the homepage. Check implementation didn't hurt page-loading speeds too much)
6.) Mobile-oriented page-loading speeds, last I checked, didn't even achieve a rating of 20 on Google PSI (it was in the teens). That's real bad news and probably still needs looking into
^ This is all the stuff I've found so far. Any further help, from anyone else would be amaze-balls
-
not got the answer as yet, still researching and still trying to find the problem
-
Thank you, you have been amazing
-
Hi Chantelle, this sounds like it's been quite a concerning situation. There's a lot of information here and it looks like Effect Digital may have given some responses and have followed up on email.
This question is currently marked as "unanswered" and I don't want to mark it as answered unless you have got an answer. Would you be able to share any anonymised solution here to benefit other Moz users? If you haven't got a solution then post the latest development and we'll see what else we can do
-
Thanks for all the info. I got your email and replied in full
-
I have just gone into google console and really do not understand google console.
It says I have 367 valid and 1.42K excluded under coverage. When I go into excluded it brings up different options, one option is Alternate page with proper canonical tag and one of those urls is https://www.in2town.co.uk/holiday-ideas/top-american-ski-resorts-50s/amp/
I have amp installed for mobile devices.
then I have the option of crawled but not indexed. here is an example and some of the articles listed in this section are old articles https://www.in2town.co.uk/feature-news/london-river-thames-must-see/
then I have crawl anomaly
https://www.in2town.co.uk/flash-hotel-benidorm-receives-bad-review-from-benidorm-regular/
then I have Duplicate, submitted URL not selected as canonical
https://www.in2town.co.uk/pet-health/what-you-need-to-know-about-dog-kennel-cough/
Any help and advice would be great
-
We had two SEO companies work on the site, one from the USA and then one from the UK. The one from the UK decided all keywords should be changed and a new design of the site. The site was doing really well until we got these two companies involved. For the past 15 months the site has now struggled with most of the traffic coming from social media.
We recently changed from http to https as well after receiving a recommendation. We are hoping to get back to the way the site was two years and improve from there. I have noticed some pages that were ranking were no longer in the search results when I went to google console. The page above was not even indexed which was really strange. The seo company came in a did a lot of redirects as well which is a bit worrying
-
So in the SEO industry, we have tools which measure a site's estimated worth and traffic intake (just from search, it doesn't tend to reflect anything else)
One is SEMRush:
- https://d.pr/i/zvr8cY.png (screenshot)
The other main one, is Ahrefs:
- https://d.pr/i/0EbHaI.png (screenshot)
Neither of these tools picked up extremely significant movements within the past year. Neither of them seem to think that (in terms of SEO) the site was ever doing that well to begin with.
Basically these tools contain colossal indexes of Google keywords. They monitor these high to mid-value terms frequently, and see who is ranking. They leverage CTR (click-through-rate) data against ranking positions to estimate 'search visibility' (which is like a, ultra-rough traffic estimate - never to be taken as an absolute)
If these tools aren't showing that anything bad happened (or if they're not showing that performance was ever very good), then there are some possible reasons:
-
The tools happen not to contain most of your main keywords in their keyword indexes
-
Your visits were never coming from SEO in the first place, or you had broken tracking which was inflating those numbers
-
You had good tracking and your SEO company broke it (thus making it look falsely like there's been some massive drop)
-
Your visits were coming from SEO, but mostly not from Google. Other search engines exist
It's hard to know which of these is the main offender, or whether there's another reason (some 'unknown-unknown'). I'll take a brief look into your Analytics profile if you want. It could possibly shed some light in terms of what the heck is going on!
If you want to connect further, my email is on my profile page. I can't promise I'll find a solution, but these kinds of problems intrigue me
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Will SEO Blogs Divert Traffic from Main Web pages using same keywords?
Our company has drafted several SEO blogs using certain keywords. If we post these SEO blogs to our website and social media channels , and the blog keywords are also used on our main website pages, will the blogs divert or dilute traffic to our main web pages? Thank you for your expertise and insights in advance.
Content Development | | Johnenchroma0 -
Website Progression
Hi, im a newbie and im getting a bit overwhelmed by the information regarding setting up the blog. im sure that
Content Development | | Jal__Jaun
when people start off they tend to have very few articles , and their designs would be much different from
what they have started? do people start off with hefty number of articles at the start? or can they progress
with few articles for SEO purpose? and the most important thing is that what would the layout be
at the start of the website design, im sure they wont be any homepage displaying articles from different
categories as there are only few articles so do we keep the blog page as the front page? please explain guys! thanks1 -
Website update frequency as ranking factor
Hellooo, Anyone have more info about this issue? I own 1 e commerce site, and one blog about soccer. Both are brand new, e commerce is older few months, with more backlinks and soccer blog with very few profile links from soccer forums. The soccer blog, was updated regularly 2 times per day, and I saw a tremendous rise on visits. Later on , I stop to update it, and then traffic drop immediately . Notice that I stop to build links at least 1 week before I stop to post content. But the site still enjoyed an increase in traffic even after I stop to add fresh links , and traffic dropped once I stop to create fresh content. The other e commerce site, wasn't updated at all, but I was building links and I saw similar increase in traffic. Niche of the e commerce is very boring (industrial) and none of competitors own a blog. Site is quite big, with not even half of links from competitors but I almost outrank them all with internal linking on competitive keywords. (note that site have over 200 pages with at least 300 words each in contrast with competitor sites of 20 pages). Then I added a blog and I saw similar increase in traffic with the soccer blog. Once I stop to update again the blog, traffic dropped again.. anyone with similar experiences?
Content Development | | nyanainc0 -
Embedded Traffic Stats?
Hi all Wondering if someone could give me a pointer here please..... my client is an information resource on internet safety, it is a non profit website just blogging about internet safety and threats. To cut a long story short, the client has relationships with all the police forces and universities in the UK, they regularly republish content on their sites - with approval (and doesn't have relations with many dozens of sites which do not have approval to republish...) Although the goal of the website is information distribution and not to raise money, the site does have a number of KPIs which it needs to meet to justify its sponsorship by the likes of facebook, google, microsoft etc. We are looking to make the content the site publishes embeddable so rather than just republishing 'our' content and it looking like the third party sites' own work, we at least get the credit. The issue we are trying to work out is down to stats. If site B embeds our article and it gets 1,000 views on their site, do these 1,000 people appear in our stats too? I would guess that it does as the content is being loaded from our site each time the 1,000 people visits. In which case, would these 1,000 hits appear as direct traffic or referral traffic in the stats when they read the content on site B? We have run some tests and not seeing the test site appearing as a referrer in the stats so a little puzzled. Many thanks for any advice
Content Development | | daedriccarl0 -
Will having duplicate content on four websites cause a problem?
A client of ours has four websites for different shops they run in the surrounding area. Each website has original content as well as duplicate content. This is for things like product advice which needs to be the same Will having duplicate content on these four websites cause a problem? How can it be mitigated? We can't refer the visitor to another website to get the product information as this will break the user experience, and of course shopping cart sessions will not pass on.
Content Development | | Rebecca.Holloway0 -
Prevent average users from copying content and pasting into their websites
Please do not respond with a "you can't stop them" comment, I understand this. Most of our pages have content that is duplicated across multiple domains. The recent Google algorithm update focused on penalizing pages that have duplicate content, and it could be one of the reasons that we have been seeing traffic loss. I'm looking for some type of javascsript/php code that will help minimize this issue.If could be code that does not allow you to copy and paste the code without turning of javascript or a dialog box pops up and says "this content is copyright protected, anyone copying this content is subject to legal action" I've found one script that might work http://www.ioncube.com/html_encoder.php My questions are still the same: 1 What is the best method to achieve my objective? 2 Will this additional code affect how the webbots see our site and or affect rankings? I know that anyone can figure out how to get the code, I am trying to mitigate by providing a warning about copyright infringement and making it more challenging to copy our content. Please do not respond with a "you can't stop them" comment, etc, I understand this. Thank you for your comments!
Content Development | | 4RealLocal0 -
Website Building: Best practices for SEO and user interaction
I'm a noobie when it comes to SEO, with my knowledge coming from a few books and blogs. What are some of the best practices that you use when building a website for SEO and for user interaction? I've read about the following, but am not sure if they are still relevant. Also if you have any other suggestions, they would be appreciated. -Phone # above fold line. -A call to action above fold line on each page -An HTML sitemap -Terms & Conditions (supposed to create credibility in Googles eyes) -NAP in the footer of each page -Optimize each page for 1 unique keyword Are these correct and is there anything else that I'm missing?
Content Development | | pharcydeabc0 -
How to recover my traffic? How to make a boring subject interesting?
Hi all, your feedback would be hugely appreciated. I've had a mortgage website for about a year and half now that I've painstakingly filled with relevant, informative content. I've seen my traffic ranking in Alexa go from > 14,000,000 a year ago to right around 1,000,000 today, but I got hit really hard in the recent Google updates. I lost about 60% of my traffic at the end of April and have been at a loss as to what to do about it. I wasn't doing anything shady to generate traffic, so my guess is that some of my backlinks were discounted in the update, so my site got hit in the rankings. Now I'm really trying to rework my site to get my traffic back. What would you suggest? I feel almost like I'm starting at square one again because all my efforts thus far got hammered in the updates. Currently I'm updating and reworking some of my content to format it better, make the site more navigable, and better optimize the content for the search engines. I've also hired a virtual assistant to manage my Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn accounts to help build traffic that way. I'm keeping up with blogging on a regular basis as well, but it's such a big time suck when I'm trying to get loans funded full time as well. Also, mortgages is kind of a boring subject. Who the heck would want to come back to my site every day and read about mortgages? How can I make the subject interesting and fun so that people want to come back on regular basis? I'm new here and your thoughts are most welcome! Feel free to unleash the tough criticisms too! My site is mortgagesbymark.com if you'd like to take a look at it. Thanks!
Content Development | | MortgagesByMark1