Keyword Cannibalization vs. Optimizing Site
-
I am in the process of optimizing our website and I am having a hard time reconciling two best practices I have found on Moz.
1. You should avoid having multiple pages focus on the same keyword because you will lose some control of which result will show.
2. You should identify your core keywords and weave these keywords multiple times (naturally) throughout your site.
I have spent months identifying our top 7 keywords and am working through the site now. The first piece of advice keeps giving me pause. Can anyone weigh in with other considerations or advice on how I can reconcile these two strategies.
Thank you
-
.... each of your pages/articles would still be focussing on a single keyword (or keyword cluster) while bearing in mind the overall goals.
You are 100% correct. They are all about the same long tail keyword with even longer long tail keywords as variants.
You wouldn't have two pages competing for "Stihl Chainsaw MS170 Maintenance" for example, but you might have multiple pages that are talking about "Stihl Chainsaw MS170" in various ways, all probably linking to the page where the customer could buy the actual product or parts, etc.
You are right. And, those pages linking to one another will support the attack on "Stihl Chainsaw MS170"... and all of them plus all of the pages for other models will support the attack on "Stihl Chainsaws".
-
A brilliant response EGOL, however, I would like to put to you, that each of your pages/articles would still be focussing on a single keyword (or keyword cluster) while bearing in mind the overall goals.
You wouldn't have two pages competing for "Stihl Chainsaw MS170 Maintenance" for example, but you might have multiple pages that are talking about "Stihl Chainsaw MS170" in various ways, all probably linking to the page where the customer could buy the actual product or parts, etc.
Of course, if a customer were to search "Stihl Chainsaw MS170" and not be showing any clear intent, then Google may well show multiple results from your site, which, I agree, would be great. (And you'd also likely show up in the SERP generated by clicking on the various, "People also search for", etc)
-
1. You should avoid having multiple pages focus on the same keyword because you will lose some control of which result will show.
First, disclosure. Most people will consider me to be a heretic when it comes to keyword cannibalization. I embrace it, I advocate it, I practice it, I attack it.... and it makes me a lot of money.
Let's say that I want to sell Stihl chainsaws. I would write multiple articles about each one. I would write an article about the features of each model, an article about maintenance for each model, article about the replacement parts for each model (and how to replace them), an article that show the advantages of each model. There would also be a lot of articles that compare the various models. We are talking about dozens total, a few articles for each model, and many articles about how to select, ideas for use, accessories, chains, sharpening etc. When I was done with these articles my site would be the go-to place for these products and would be 10x better than what the manufacturer has prepared. When you search for one of these saws, you would find two, three or four of my pages at the top of the SERPs.
Lose control over what content will show??? HELL YEAH!!! Because all of my content is gonna show up in the SERPs. People will see that dominance and know that I am The Man for these products and that my site is the go-to-place for the. All of those pages at the top of the SERPs will push the competitors down and people will come to my site instead of my competitors site.
This is not cannibalization. This is deep expertise, deep helpfulness, and deep moneymaking. It's a deep investment of money and time too. And you really gotta be The Man to be able to produce this kind of site.
2. You should identify your core keywords and weave these keywords multiple times (naturally) throughout your site.
Stop thinking about this. Just stop it. Instead, write naturally, paying no regard to how keywords are woven into your website. You will waste less time chasing the myths of SEO and more time writing great content.
While I am dissing "best practices"....
If you build the chainsaw website described above.... you will not have to go begging for links. The links will come to you.
The problem with that, is very few people have the knowledge and the willingness to actually buy all of those saws and use them for enough hours to know them. This experience is what separates the people who really have the content knowledge from those who are faking it.
-
Hi,
For your more generic keywords, perhaps general industry or overall business, I would keep those throughout the site. For more focussed keywords, maybe individual products, services, content pieces; I would keep those to individual pages.
A very brief example, if you were a car servicing centre, I would be using terms like "car maintenance" and "car repair" across the site, but focussing specific pages on "Tyres", "Brakes", "MoTs", "Car Air Conditioning", etc.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Optimize CSS Delivery
Hi, I am loading 3 CSS files here: http://www.viatrading.com/wholesale/9/Domestics.html PageSpeed is telling me I "should fix" the delivery of these CSS Files (see image). I read https://developers.google.com/speed/docs/insights/OptimizeCSSDelivery , but can't figure out which is my case. The CSS are big, but even if I split them in several, all CSS files are still showing up as render-blocking. I moved them to the header/footer, but the message is still appearing. Do you know what might be the problem and how to solve it? Thank you, Screen_Shot_2015_09_10_at_4_44_23_PM.png
On-Page Optimization | | viatrading10 -
Problem with getting a site to rank at all
We pushed this Word Press site live about a month ago www.primedraftarchitecture.com. Since then we've been adding regular content, blog posts 3 times a week with social posts on facebook, twitter, G+ and LinkedIn. We also submitted via Moz Local about 3 weeks ago. Yext about two weeks ago and have been adding about 5 listings to small local directories a week. Webmaster tools shows that the site map is valid and the pages of the site are getting indexed and it shows links from 7 sites, mostly directories. I'm just not seeing the site ranking for anything. We're getting zero organic traffic. I though we did a good job not over optimizing the pages. I'm just stymied trying to figure out what's wrong. Usually we push a site live and see at least some low rankings after just a couple of weeks. Can anyone see anything that looks bad or where we've gone wrong?
On-Page Optimization | | DonaldS0 -
Site Not Ranking for Key Term
Question for my fellow Mozers I have a ranking question that I cannot put my finger on. I have a site (visitplano.com) where the client wants to rank for the keyword "Plano". I can't say if the site was previously ranking for this keyword, but I looked into the basic SEO practices and found that the keyword is incorporated in: Domain Title Content There is a lack of internal linking and anchor text within the content External links - 1,558 DA - 46 PA - 55 Currently, the website does not rank for the keyword "Plano". Could someone shed some light on why they aren't ranking or what I may be missing? I would greatly appreciate your help.
On-Page Optimization | | flcity150 -
Keyword self cannibalization
Hello, I'm confused about the recommendations for avoiding keyword self cannibalization. I have a niche blog and some of my sticky posts on the homepage contain my site's main keyword in their title. For example, say if my homepage has "dog training" as it's main keyword, then there are going to be links to more longtail pages with titles such as "dog training London", "dog training Liverpool" etc. When I do this SeoMoz's on-page optimization tool tells me that this is keyword self cannibalization. I am building links to the inner pages using the longtail keywords only. 1. Do I need to rename pages with just "london" and "liverpool" etc and remove "dog training" from those links? 2. What is the best thing to do in this situation? Thanks, Kevin
On-Page Optimization | | KMack0 -
Does anyone have any experience with using Altruik for optimizing a retail site?
Greetings - can anyone offer an opinion on the services of http://www.Altruik.com/? They claim to be able to effectively optimize the deep pages of online retailers. I welcome any and all feedback! Eric
On-Page Optimization | | Ericc220 -
How to find competition for a particular keyword
Is there any operator to find the level of competition for a particular keyword in Google ? Is intitle:keyword a fair indicator ?
On-Page Optimization | | seoug_20050 -
Strategy for dealing with keyword variants
I'd like your opinion on the strategy of dealing with key phrase variants: I've got a page that is ranking in the top 10 and top 3 for about 10 different variations of the same phrase. Seomoz gives it terrible grades for all but one of the keyphrases. Which course of action do you recommend : ----------- create new pages ------------ Create new pages for each variant and get them to grade A. If I go this route what sort of cross linking scheme should I use between this pages? ---------- improve existing page ----------- Try to make my single page rank better for all the phrases by doing extra on-page work so the page has a better grade for all of the variants? Many thanks for your ideas and opinions.
On-Page Optimization | | PillarMarketing0 -
Site-wide keyword density
A colleague of mine was saying that he has been able to get top ranking for a high traffic term by using variations of that head term on multiple pages that are associated with the main page. For example,he would optimize a landing page for the high traffic word "Construction." He would then build pages under this landing page that are optimized for variations of this word: "Construction facts," "Industrial Construction Companies," "Construction Resource Allocator" etc. His theory is that the subpages add credibility with spiders that the root page is the best for that root page. This doesn't seem like it would work, but I'm curious as to what other people think.
On-Page Optimization | | EricVallee340